I shall cross this sea to their islands to pursue them until there remains no one on the face of the earth who does not acknowledge Allah. —Saladin, January 1189
I was ordered to fight the people until they say there is no god but Allah, and his prophet Muhammad. —Osama bin-Laden, November 2001
So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote. —Quran 8.17
Faisal Shazad and the Unseen Hand by Vijay Kumar
FAISAL SHAHZAD, THE FAILED TIMES SQUARE BOMBER, exemplifies the legacy of Islam in the world today. It wasn't Faisal Shahzad who planted a fizzled bomb in Times Square; it was the unseen hand of Islamic theology and hegemony, using Shazad as a willing zombie, devoid of conscience or responsibility for his murderous acts. “So you did not slay them, but it was Allah Who slew them, and you did not smite when you smote (the enemy), but it was Allah Who smote." So says the Quran. And the Quran cannot be questioned.
The first sentence of Shahzad’s recently published email explains the totality of his motivation: "If something from what I wrote doesn't correspond with Quran and Sunnah then I renounce it and I ask Allah's forgiveness due to my ignorance." That's what passes for rationality in Islam.
Shahzad is just one of many millions of Muslims who have submitted entirely to "the will of Allah." That is the first requirement of becoming a Muslim. The very word Muslim means “one who submits.” After that there is no need for conscience. There is no responsibility for one's actions, except that they "correspond to the Quran and Sunnah"—Islamic theology. There is no need for empirical observation. There is no room for rationalism. There is only slavish obedience to Islamic theology, and to any whim, however abominable, that can be interpreted as “the will of Allah.”
That's why Fizzled Faisal felt perfectly fine about planting a bomb in New York City and praying to Allah that it would murder or maim as many innocent men, women, and children as possible. It was, after all, the unseen hand of Allah guiding his thoughts and actions. Shahzad’s attempt, and the attendant prayers to succeed in killing and maiming innocent people, all "correspond with the Quran and Sunnah," as he put it.
To a rational mind, that not only is the epitome of ignorance, it's the act of a homicidal maniac. It's curious, though, that so many homicidal maniacs find a welcoming brotherhood in Islam—the ummah, or community of Muslims—and find in Islamic theology "divine" justification for all of their perverse and criminal and murderous impulses.
Almost any conduct that civilized people recognize to be degraded, depraved, criminal, or brutal can be found to "correspond with the Quran and Sunnah": murder, beheading, stoning, hanging, dismemberment, pedophelia, wife beating, slavery, betrayal, lying, stealing, persecution, terrorism, torture—all are recorded as models of righteous conduct in Islamic theology.
These very acts of barbarism are being played out every day in Islamic countries and enclaves around the world. Faisal the Failure is no "radical" Muslim; he is a model Muslim, doing just what the Islamic theology tells him he has every right to do—and not just the right, but the obligation.
Lying is wrong, except in three things: the lie of a man to his wife to make her content with him; a lie to an enemy, for war is deception; or a lie to settle trouble between people. —Muhammad; Sira: Ahmad, 6.459. H
Let us grin in the face of some people while our hearts curse them. —Abu Darda
In order to become a citizen of the United States, Faisal the False swore an oath "to support and defend the Constitution and all laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
He lied, and he knew he was lying, and he didn't care one bit. After all, Islamic theology tells him it's perfectly holy and righteous to lie to kaffirs—non-Muslims—if it serves the purposes of Islam. Such is the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya. Shahzad admitted his willful duplicity in his own email: "Why do you have to follow Democracy (Human made Laws) if you're already given Laws revealed from Allah, Quran and Sunnah."
Those "laws revealed from Allah, Quran and Sunnah" are called Sharia, and, obviously, if you're Muslim and have Sharia law, you don't have to follow human made laws at all. You can spit on the Constitution. Fertilizer Faisal did. And as does Faisal, so does Islam.
FAISAL SHAHZAD, the defendant, unlawfully, willfully and knowingly, did attempt to kill and maim persons within the United States, and did create a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to others by attempting to destroy and damage structures, conveyances and other real and personal property within the United States, in violation of the laws of the United States. —Federal Criminal Complaint 10- MAG-928, United States of America vs. Faisal Shahzad
It should come as no surprise that Shahzad acted "in violation of the laws of the United States." Our laws are meaningless to any real Muslim, like Shahzad, whose life and actions "correspond to the Quran and Sunnah." Of course there are many millions of dilettantes who pay lip service to being Muslims, and go through the superficial rituals, but are almost entirely ignorant of what those source documents of Islam actually say.
In fact, while many leading Islamic clerics insist that the Quran cannot be understood properly at all except in the original Arabic, the vast majority of Muslims the world over cannot read Arabic, and, indeed, a large percentage of those counted as “Muslims” in the world are illiterate even in their native tongues, relying on what they are told about Islam.
But Shahzad and suicide bombers and Universal Jihadists and Islamic terror organizations and Osama bin-Laden and their ilk are the real Muslims, devout Muslims, orthodox Muslims. Those are the true face of Literal Islam. Those are its true ambassadors. Those are the keepers of the faith exactly according to Islamic law.
Another real Muslim is Faisal's "inspiration" and mentor, Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S.-born terrorist hiding out in Yemen, who said: "Fighting in the cause of Allah is an obligation." The endless fighting is a given—for any real Muslim (not a "peace be upon you" pretender) who knows and follows Islamic theology as it is written:
I was ordered to fight all men until they say “there is no god but Allah." —Muhammad's farewell address, 632
I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, “None has the right to be worshipped but Allah." —Hadith: Sahih Bukhari 4:52:196 Narrated Abu Huraira
He who fights so that Allah's Word (Islam) should be superior, then he fights in Allah's cause. —Hadith: Sahih Bukhari 1:3:125 Narrated Abu Musa
I asked the Prophet [Muhammad], “What is the best deed?” He replied, “To believe in Allah and to fight for His Cause." —Hadith: Sahih Bukhari 3:46:694 Narrated Abu Dhar
And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of others along with Allah). —Hadith: Sahih Bukhari 6:60:40 Narrated Nafi'
When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately. —Hadith: Sahih Bukhari 4:52:79:Narrated Ibn 'Abbas
Islamic holy man Anwar al-Awlki (who was arrested several times for soliciting prostitutes) also said, "Establishing Islamic Sharia [law] is an obligation." There's no question that establishing Sharia law is an obligation—if one wants to "correspond to the Quran and Sunnah," as Shahzad did.
And Islam's Sharia law doesn't just spit on the Constitution—it forbids its very existence. Sharia law forbids trial by jury. Sharia law forbids due process. Sharia law forbids our Congress. Sharia law forbids our President. Sharia law forbids our Supreme Court. Sharia law forbids freedom of the press. Sharia law forbids freedom of speech. Sharia law forbids freedom of religion.
Sharia law forbids the United States of America.