30 posts categorized "Counter Jihad Brussels 2007"

Sunday, January 11, 2009

ORWELLIAN FRENEMIES

Any friend of Israel is a friend of mine. Period.

If anything has become increasingly clear in the march to the second holocaust, it is that the left is as great an enemy of the Jewish people as Islam. Both are decrying Israel's self defense, both are marching calling for the death of Israel and the death of Jews. It is no secret. The left wing parties march under the flag of Hezballah in Sweden and the leftists call on Euro governments demanding Israel stop defending herself. It is these same parties that feed their willing US dupes inaccurate propaganda to smear and destroy Filip Dewinter.

There is something sinister in the demonization of the rare political party that stands for Israel, staunchly defends her and demands actions to protect the Jewish people. This should be encouraged among the friends of Israel. While impostors and their half wit lemmings  turn themselves inside to explain the unexplainable - the fact is - it is enormously unpopular with the electorate in Europe to back Israel and so it is a principled stand, a rare thing indeed.

I stand with Vlaams Belang because by their fruits ye shall know them, and so I know them.

Robert Spencer over at Jihadwatch goes on to write:

Belgium: "Neo-Nazis" the only ones standing against the jihad and for Israel

The much-maligned Flemish political party Vlaams Belang, which has been the focus of the stupid blog war that has now entered its fourteenth month, turns out to be the only party in Belgium that is opposing the anti-Israel initiatives that all the other parties in Belgium support -- and the only one calling upon authorities to do something about the genocidal Jew-hatred expressed at pro-jihad rallies recently.

[...]

Further - Spencer opines on my post: SWEDEN SOCIAL DEMOCRATS' JEW HATING RALLY UNDER HEZBALLAH FLAG: VLAAMS BELANG TAKES ACTION TO HALT JEW HATING DEATH MARCHES

Vlaams Belang demands an explanation from the Mayor and the Chief of Police on the serious incidents that occurred. They also want to know why there was nothing done about banners saying "Joden Buiten" ["Jews Out"], "Osama we need you" and "Jihad, yes we can".

Vlaams Belang accuses Mayor Patrick Janssens of not having done anything to prevent this. "Only zero tolerance towards violence and vandalism is suitable here. The present policy with which all is done not to 'provocate' nobody, is a weak stand in which the Government beds backwards for the AEL and connected organizations.

This is noteworthy since Vlaams Belang has been repeatedly tarred with accusations of neo-Nazism, neofascism, white supremacism, etc. And there is some evidence that there is some of that in the party's history, but if a party cannot change over time, Barack Obama should be asking himself why he is a member of the party of the KKK, Jim Crow, and segregation. Of course, any group that is actually neo-Nazi, neofascist, or white supremacist is morally abhorrent and should be rejected: but the ongoing spectacle of an allegedly neo-Nazi or crypto-Nazi party taking a consistent and (in today's dhimmi Belgium) unpopular and politically damaging pro-Israel stance ought to move the party's accusers to some self-reflection.

Unfortunately, as the last year has shown many times, these accusers have no compunction about working to destroy the reputations of decent people with outrageous and unsubstantiated accusations. Defamation and lies come easy to them -- in their reptilian minds, if you aren't convinced the people they say are Nazis are actually Nazis, then you must be a Nazi yourself. But admit they were wrong? That would be above their pay grade.

The bottom line is if one only has limited energies to devote to a wide range of enormous problems,  why would anyone chase this? With all of the leftist Jew hatred run amok, why set out on a campaign to destroy those helping the Jews, helping Israel and further ......... set out to destroy those that champion such behavior? It speaks to a dark motive. How long before these "deciders" (like Ellsworth Toohey) throw Israel to the wolves for "racism" or "ethnic nationalism"?

Just for knowing, any friend of Israel is a friend of mine. Period.

OT but related - vote for me.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

SWEDEN SOCIAL DEMOCRATS' JEW HATING RALLY UNDER HEZBALLAH FLAG
VLAAMS BELANG TAKES ACTION TO HALT JEW HATING DEATH MARCHES

And to think the transatlantic counter jihad movement lost a year because the lizard asshat was on a mission to destroy and smear Europe's only political party that has stood staunchly with Israel - Vlaams Belang (and, just for knowing, the VB have made statements condemning the anti-Jewish attacks in Belgium). Chuck should be publicly flogged.

Swedish leading Social democrats in rally with Hizbollah flags hat tip KGS, Tundra

Mona Sahlin, leader of the Social Democratic Party in Sweden, participated today in a rally where Hizbollah flags waved in the air and an Israeli flag was set to flames. Other participants in the demonstration were Jan Eliasson, former social democratic Minister of Foreign Affairs and former President of the United Nations General Assembly, and Wanja Lundby Wedin, chair of the Swedish Trade Union Confederation.

The rally was organised by the Network Gaza Solidarity, in which members of the extreme left work together with immigrant organisations. The demo started at Sergels Torg, in downtown Stockholm, and then paraded to the Israeli embassy where the flagburning took place.

OT but related: The Flemish Parliament voted a resolution condemning the "disproportionate" violence of Israel in Gaza.

The resolution was approved by all the parties, those of the government coalition as well as of the opposition, except for two members of the Liberal Party who abstained, and the Vlaams Belang which voted against the resolution.

UPDATE: Vlaams Belang calls for a special meeting of the [Antwerp] city council to discuss the riots and AEL demonstration. (hat tip Baron)

    Vlaams Belang demands an explanation from the Mayor and the Chief of Police on the serious incidents that occurred. They also want to know why there was nothing done about banners saying "Joden Buiten" ["Jews Out"], "Osama we need you" and "Jihad, yes we can".

Vlaams Belang accuses Mayor Patrick Janssens of not having done anything to prevent this. "Only zero tolerance towards violence and vandalism is suitable here. The present policy with which all is done not to 'provocate' nobody, is a weak stand in which the Government beds backwards for the AEL and connected organizations.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

FACING JIHAD: Gathering in JERUSAELM

We hit the ground running in Jerusalem will be liveblogging
022_3

We landed in Jerusalem late yesterday and found our better halfs working on tomorrows conference.

Facing_jihad_4

What better place to counter the jihad than in its number one target (DC a close second).  You can follow the happenings on twitter (I am not a big twitterhead, but so what?). And Atlas will be covering it live - kicking off coverage this weekend.It was just a little over a year ago when I covered the first counter jihad conference in Brussels.

Among the speakers are Arieh Eldad MK - Knesset,  Robert Spencer, Dr.  Itamar Marcus - Director of Palestinian Media Watch, Robert Spencer, Daniel Pipes...... and the first Middle East screening of Fitna   presented by  Geert Wilders, MP, The Netherlands.

MK Arye Eldad to Push for Anti-Islamization Laws in Knesset.......TundraTabloids

J'lem Post: MK Arye Eldad, who is currently with the National Union-National Religious Party but has founded the new Hatikva Party, says he is planning to introduce a package of emergency "anti-Islamization legislation" in the next Knesset to "confront the enemy within and without."

023_2

025

 

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

VLAAMS BELANG: THE JEWISH PARTY!

I have spent the better part of the afternoon talking with various Jewish members of the clergy, academia and the Jewish community in Antwerp. Respected voices.

First off, no one person speaks for the Jews of Belgium. Period. Two Jews, three opinions.

One thing is clear, Vlaams Belang is the only party that has gone out of its way to support Israel. No political party in Belgium has supported Israel. Vlaams Belang has been the only party staunchly behind Israel  for the past 10 years.

“In the last few years, the Liberal Party has taken into its midst some extremist elements who support Hezbollah and Hamas, while Dewinter is very charming and has been interviewed in Jewish newspapers and he meets with rabbis,” he said. “A lot of Jews are not following the establishment and will vote for him.” said Henri Rosenberg, a chasid and law professor at Catholic University in Holland.

Rosenberg cited instances in which members of parliament from the Liberal Party flew to Syria and “shook hands with [Hezbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah and then traveled to Palestine. And when Mr. Arafat came to Belgium, he received the red carpet treatment in parliament, while a few weeks later [Israeli Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon came and they did not want him in parliament. So as a face-saving gesture, the president of the parliament invited him to his office. And the only party to object [to Sharon’s treatment] was Dewinter’s.’

Rosenberg added that Dewinter is “a friend of the Jews, and he says Israel is the only democracy in the region and should be supported by the European Union.”(more here)

The latest  fallacious argument against Vlaams Belang comes from a Judas. A leftist dhimmi Jewish editor (vanity press) in Antwerp. I have spoken to a number of Jewish rabbis and members of the Jewish communities in Antwerp and they all basically said the same thing. Freilich does not speak for the Jewish community in Antwerp. "Freilich in no way represents the Jewish community in Antwerp". "The Jewish community does not  read his magazine ("and the Orthodox for sure not"). "He has no status in the Jewish community" "He is an extreme fanatic leftist guy". He speaks for himself. "It's a one man newspaper".

Apparently, Freilich ran for office on the Socialist party ticket and lost abysmally.

So I ask you, why should I care what this one dhimmi thinks of Vlaams Belang? I watched 78% of American Jews vote for the jihad candidate - no one can speak for the Jews as a whole.

Further, many of the Jews I spoke to Antwerp did not consider VB anti-semitic.

Filip DeWinter does not need the Jewish vote. There are 25,000 Jews in Antwerp (many of which cannot vote because they are imported) out of a population of one million  in broader Antwerp  and DeWinter loses many more votes among the electorate because of his "charming support of the Jews".   "The Jews have no relevance in the vote." And yet he continues to staunchly defend them and Israel. This is, IMAO, a man of character.

He is always asked on Belgium television why he is against the Muslims and yet supports "Hasidim Jews".

“A lot of individuals ... cannot follow anymore those in the Jewish establishment who say they should vote for the Liberal Party,” said Henri Rosenberg, a chasid and law professor at Catholic University in Holland.

Rosenberg is right. The Liberal party is teeming with real first class Jew haters, "genuine anti-Semites". More sophisticated anti-semitism.....and that's OK?

Fjordman wrote in one exchange wrote,

The Foreign Ministry in my country publicly sponsored a meeting in Oslo recently with Islamic groups that are even banned in the Middle East, among them the Egyptian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Foreign Minister compared Israeli settlements to the Nazis. Every Tom, Dick, and Jerry from the EU meets with radical Islamic groups on a regular basis, and we're supposed to believe that a peaceful party working within the democratic system constitutes the greatest threat to freedom? The VB are harassed because they constitute a threat to the power and privileges of the corrupt Eurabians in Brussels. They do, which is exactly why I like them.

Enough already.

Look, it's all very tedious. More to the direct point, what do the doppelgangers say about the counter jihad movement? What does these small men that deride the movement actually do? And what do they contribute to the transatlantic counter jihad movement? I ask you. What is their contribution to an overall counter jihad movement in general? What?

VB is their canard, a club (which diminishes in size) they use to beat the movement down.

There is a lot to be done. I resent having to spend my limited time and energies proving a narcissist's negative.

What follows is a post the Baron did over at Gates of Vienna which grew out of an email exchange with several counter jihad fighters (myself included)

Vlaams Belang is being held to a ridiculously high standard of evidence that no other mainstream European political party has to meet. No other party — not the Socialists, the Christian Democrats, the Communists — has to publicly refute and disprove every bizarre lunatic accusation made by dishonest shills with a partisan axe to grind.

Frank Vanhecke in a crotch-holdOther parties can ignore wild-eyed accusations from the fringe. But let someone allege a VB Nazi salute or a VB neo-Nazi book fair, and Vlaams Belang is presumed guilty until it proves itself innocent — which it never really can.

Then the next day there is another bogus accusation, and the whole farce begins all over again.

So when one of these Yelloman or EXPO types issues yet another VB smear, we are “troubled” and “concerned” and hope that Vlaams Belang will “refute these accusations”.

WHY???
- - - - - - - - -
Why waste our time with these endless refutations? They suck up thousands of man-hours, achieving nothing. So far all we have seen is the same spurious junk recycled and repackaged for next round of “revelations”.

Once again, no other European party is forced to dance the “We’re-not-Nazis” two-step every day of the week. Only Vlaams Belang.

Vlaams Belang on the groundThe hard Left has orchestrated this little game, and we are suckers for falling into their trap. They have us right where they want us — chasing all these Nazi spectres down dark alleys to try to make them disappear. Every day the leftists release another one from their patented Nazi Spectre Generator™, and off we go a-haring after it.

For the sake of people I care about, I will do what I can to aid the process of refutation. But I think it’s a mug’s game.

Diana West today:

Baron Bodissey of the Gates of Vienna has posted tonight about the evil and ongoing campaign of character assassination against Filip Dewinter and his Flemish secessionist, anti-Islamization party Vlaams Belang in Belgium. Having interviewed Dewinter on several separate occasions--a couple of times in Antwerp last summer, once in Washington last year--I only wish the US had candidates of his strength, purpose and calibre. I know of no American politician who understands the historic sweep of the jihad as Dewinter does, and who is so forthright, outspoken and active in his stand against it. As far as the completely spurious and thoroughly deranged charges against him of anti-Semitism and crypto-Nazism go, they are, well, spurious and thoroughly deranged. Last summer I asked him to explain his stand against Islamization. He replied:

"It’s a global struggle for our values, for our European way of life life, for our civilization. That’s why I think it is also a European struggle; that is, It’s not only about a mosque two blocks away—no! It’s about our survival as a European nation and as a civilization. And I recognize those values, that civilization, also over there in Israel. It’s the only country in occupied territory, the vanguard of Europe in occupied territory, that is sharing those same values. And that’s why it’s so important to support Israel."

I asked him to expland on the term "occupied territory." What he meant, he told me, was not at all the conventionally Leftist and loaded meaning--territory occupied by Israel since Israel's 1967 war of survival against her Arab jihadist neighbors. No, what he meant was territory occupied by Islam since the Muslim wars of conquest and expansion began more than 1,000 years ago. Such lands include Northern Africa, Asia Minor, and the Middle East--all of which used to be mainly Christian and other faiths, including, where Israel is concerned, of course, Jewish.

Pretty darn terrific, if you ask me.

And Even lefty Haaretz must be Fascist now! ...Despite the title of the piece, it is a very sympathetic article!

Belgian far right leader: I am one of Israel's staunchest defenders

By Cnaan Liphshiz, Haaretz Correspondent

At Belgium's request, the European Parliament is expected next month to lift the immunity of one of its members, a former leader of the rightist Vlaams Belang party, exposing him to racism charges. Describing himself as a victim of blatant persecution, Frank Vanhecke told Haaretz the decision could spell his "political death."

In the interview, Vanhecke countered claims that Vlaams Belang is anti-Semitic, calling them "unjust and untrue," pointing to his record of cooperation with Antwerp's Jewish community and standing up for Israel in the European Parliament.

Read it and learn. Form your own opinion. Beware of snake oil. The stakes are too high

UPDATE Nov 13: Tundra Tabloids comes out swinging

Monday, November 03, 2008

Ah the irony ....CHARLES LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM CAIR

Jihad_of_one_2

It is not lost on me that in Johnson's final suicidal death blows - we  have come full circle. Poetic justice (or redemption perhaps) that the Atlas post  - the proverbial shot across the bow  considered by all as "too extreme" (LGF and CAIR 10/22/07)- would be echoed by Spencer (unknowingly I am sure) as the curtain closes on this chapter of the johnson's mental illness.

Redmption aside, the johnson's unceasing attempts to destroy one of our greatest Islamic scholars is criminal. Deadly. Spencer is a national treasure.

What I find morbidly amusing is that at the end of the day, the post that called him out and started it all, was no exaggeration.

I feel sorry for Charles. While my taking a stand at the time not to paint all European parties with one brush did hurt Atlas initially - my readership was cut and none of the big boys would ever link to me again (not Instapundit,  Malkin, Hot Air - or little boys like Pajama Media) - it didn't matter. Atlas did it on her own. My readership has skyrocketed on its merit ..... and LGF has gone nowhere (and rightly so.)

The meltdown is painful to watch ... like the train wreck in slo-mo. Fo-sho.

This is the update to my earlier post: The New Fascism ....on the right.

Robert has it here, click below for more at Jihadwatch.

Continue reading "Ah the irony ....CHARLES LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM CAIR" »

Saturday, November 01, 2008

CHARLES LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS: The New Fascism ....on the right

There is a sickness on the right (although that's to be disputed if it is really the right ............... do not blogroll fighters of the counter  jihad movement.

Just for knowing Atlas readers, I stand with Robert Spencer, Paul Belien, and the courageous souls fighting for  free men. Viva the queen, the queen is the dead ( the dinosuars of the blogosphere) peddle your irrelevant bullying in your creepy sandbox.

EXCOMUNNICATED Robert Spencer, Jihadwatch

I'm sorry to say that my old friend Charles Johnson of Little Green Footballs has written this:

I'm done with Robert Spencer. And very, very disappointed in him.

And:

Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch are out of our RSS feeds. I'm not going to support people who link to vile sites like Gates of Vienna and Brussels Journal.

He also wrote me, asking me to take down the "Designed by Little Green Footballs" logo that had been up on this site.

What heinous crime have I committed? Last month I restored the links here to Gates of Vienna and Brussels Journal, after speaking with Baron Bodissey, Paul Belien, and Geert Wilders in Washington, and wrote that I doubted that Fjordman was a neofascist or race supremacist.

Of course, for many, many months my list of links has carried this disclaimer: "Note: Listing here does not imply endorsement of every view expressed at every linked site." One might have thought that my linking to both LGF and Gates of Vienna was indicative of an openness to perspectives even from people who disagreed with one another and also with whom I might disagree, and not a blanket endorsement of either one or any other site. That, however, was too subtle for some LGF commenters, who dressed me up in jackboots right away, accusing me of an "apparent embrace of the neo-Nazi movement" and claiming that I support genocide.

So apparently my doubting that Fjordman et al are racist neofascists who support genocide makes me a racist neofascist who supports genocide. Linking to groups that are accused of being neofascist, although they deny it, makes me one who embraces neo-Nazis. Unfortunately Charles himself has endorsed this loopy leap of logic in the past. Richard Miniter and Diana West both disagreed with him that several European parties, especially Vlaams Belang, were fascist. In response Charles wrote this:

I've learned recently that neo-fascists are much more prominent in conservative circles than I had previously realized. There are other well-known pundits who are sympathetic to the fascists, too -- I've drastically revised my opinion of more than a few people, e.g. Diane West, Richard Miniter, and several others.

Whatever one thinks of Vlaams Belang, that just makes no sense. West and Miniter don't think Vlaams Belang is fascist, and Charles is representing that as meaning that they are "sympathetic to the fascists."

Charles did this also to Andrew Bostom:

I'm now getting hate mail from Andrew Bostom, who believes we should all be joining forces with European white nationalists, calling me all kinds of names and insults.

It's an eye-opener about Bostom.

Andy is less than diplomatic, but in one of his emails to Charles he was making a point that I think was compelling. In speaking this way about West, Miniter, and Bostom, Charles seems to have been assuming that anyone speaking favorably about European individuals or groups who are accused of being neofascist, or accepting their denials that they are neofascist, must himself be a fascist sympathizer, or one who believes we should ally with white nationalists. Andy accordingly noted that Roger Kimball had commented favorably on a Diana West piece on people in Europe who are accused of being neofascist, and that National Review Online had also linked to the piece. He called upon Charles to be consistent and label NRO and Kimball as neofascists also. There are others also, besides Kimball and NRO. At LGF I put it this way:

The statement that I have "embraced the neo-Nazi movement" is false, and libelous. Charles, you and your friends here are now in the position of saying that everyone who doesn't believe these people (Fjordman, Belien, etc.) are neo-Nazis must themselves be neo-Nazis. Well, Ian Buruma recently published an article in the LA Times saying that the European anti-immigration parties were not neo-Nazis. Diana West has written the same thing in articles that have been picked up at the National Review and quoted favorably by Roger Kimball at Pajamas Media.

Unless you all are prepared to say that Buruma, the LA Times, West, Kimball, and National Review have "embraced the neo-Nazi movement," you can't logically say it about me.

I forgot to mention John Rosenthal, who also wrote a piece doubting that some of the European parties accused of being neo-Nazi are actually neo-Nazi.

Also, when we start playing guilt by association games, how much guilt do you incur for how much association? If one who links to the Brussels Journal has thereby become someone who "apparently embraces the neo-Nazi movement," or at least someone who has done something so "disappointing" as to warrant being removed from RSS feeds, etc., then why does Charles still link to Pajamas Media? For on PJM's blogroll you will find...Brussels Journal. Has Charles, by linking to PJM and appearing on PJTV, become one with whom we should be "very, very disappointed"? Has he become one who is "sympathetic to the fascists"? Why is PJM's link to Brussels Journal not something that makes him "very, very disappointed," but mine is?

Is that not absurd? I have gone on record many, many times explaining why I reject race-based approaches to the jihad threat -- most recently in connection with the Cologne conference. Hugh and I have been clear here in our rejection of LePen, the BNP, and all those who traffic in such approaches. We have been consistent in maintaining that anyone who advocates genocide in comments here will be banned and find his comment deleted. The controversy here is over whether or not some other individuals and groups belong in that category, not over whether one should support race supremacism and genocide or not. Charles has done a grave disservice by acting as if those who reject his judgments about these groups and individuals, or who even -- like me -- are willing to entertain differing points of view on these matters, are ipso facto neo-Nazi or white supremacist sympathizers. He is in this behaving much like the Islamic supremacist bullies of East Tennessee, who are convinced that anyone who says something they don't like must be a liar, a bigot, a racist hater.

I'm done with Charles Johnson. And very, very disappointed in him.

UPDATE: The links to LGF above no longer work; click on them and you'll get a "Forbidden" notice. Well, Charles, old friend, you stay classy -- this only confirms the impression that what we are dealing with here is the bully's fear of actually having to answer for what he said. But his comments are still at LGF; you can go there and see them, or copy the link location from here and paste it into the address bar -- it will become visible that way.

Meanwhile, I note also with sorrow that the mendacious Kejda Gjermani ("medaura") is spreading her libelous attacks on me at LGF yet again, as she has been allowed to do for months. It is telling.

UPDATE: As a Jew I find Johnson's smear of Spencer as an anti-semite the act of a degenerate. Gates of Vienna has the whole thing here: A Counterjihad of one.

Well, the 99th shoe finally dropped from the LGF centipede. In an open thread on LGF, Charles Johnson has officially excommunicated Robert Spencer. He removed Jihad Watch and Dhimmi Watch from his blogroll, and consigned Robert to the Outer Darkness where there will weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Oh, and racists. Lots of racists in that nasty Outer Darkness.

Read through the comment thread for the full flavor of the lizardoids’ reactions. Here’s what Charles had to say:

Paul Belien of Brussels Journal is deeply connected with the Vlaams Belang, and Robert knows this. The fact that he’s put them back in his blogroll speaks volumes about the choice he’s made.

And Gates of Vienna has turned into a reeking sewer of racism. I’m done with Robert Spencer. And very, very disappointed in him.

That’s not just Dymphna and me he’s talklng about, ladies and gentlemen — that’s you, the esteemed readers of this blog! How can you bear to be associated with a reeking sewer of racism?

Another one:

Not that it matters, but when I was still bothering to check Brussels Journal, I saw some extremely hateful antisemitism at the site.

I guess Robert has chosen his side.

I’m sad that it’s come to this.

Please go to GoV and read it all.

Over at Tundra Tabloid - KGS is da money

Jihad_of_one

I laughed at KGS - he left out so many! He updated the photo heh (check out Bat Yeor, David Littman and Oriana Fallaci)

Jihad_of_one_2

I expect to see Geert Wilders under the bus any moment now. The Johnson wrote here:

Wilders would be more effective if he tempered his rhetoric a little.

UPDATE: A Canadian weighs in

Monday, September 29, 2008

My Idea

of a good time :)

Sunday, September 28, 2008

CHARLES JOHNSON, LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS: ATTACKS ATTACKS ATTACKS LOVERS OF ISRAEL AND COUNTER JIHAD FIGHTERS

Andrew Bostom breaks his silence on the the blogosphere's dirty not so little secret - the smear campaign of "fascist" fighters for freedom. The thing is, it is so tedious and essentially small but terribly damaging. And while we have all recovered (nicely, thank you) the real harm has been the setback to the transatlantic counter jihad movement. Perhaps Europe is lost but why throw it away with both hands? There are brave, wonderful warriors desperate for a global network to fight the relentless spread of sharia and Islam (please watch my interview this past Thursday with Geert Wilders).

So much evil, so little time and this is where we are expending our limited energies?

Johnson over at  LGF has effectively destroyed the transatlantic counter jihad movement and smearedthe few and the brave. He's lost it. The latest in his crosshairs is Dr. Andrew Bostom scholar without equal.

He is fighting the last war.  The Nazis are not the problem. And the those of us on the receiving end of his venom gave him a sort of free pass and let the vitriole, personal attacks, ugly insults slide  in a pathetic attempt to sort of handle the crazy aunt in the attic hoping he would eventually come to to his senses. But the pit bull bullies. All that energy, all that blog capital -- we are not the enemy.

Johnson clings to the canard "ethnic nationalism".

The Holocaust while it was a German initiative, was carried out by every nation in Europe, save for the Danes. There were Dutch Nazis, Polish Nazis, Europe as a continent decided it was a good idea to get rid of the Jews. Holland had the highest rate of collaboration with the Nazis, higher than any other country in Western Europe. 95% of Dutch Jews were murdered.

Caroline Glick said in my radio interview with her, the lesson the Europeans took away from the aftermath of WW2 is insidious. "The lesson that Europe had decided to avail itself to in the aftermath of Auschwitz, was not that evil is bad and that they behaved like monsters but rather that everything was caused by nationalism and therefore what we really need to do is have a European Union that will obviate our need for nationalism so that we can become this transnational gobbletygook and we'll all get together and therefore we won't have another Auschwitz.
But really the lesson should have been is that we were evil and we have to be good. And that is the lesson we have to learn and and we have to be able and willing ot make moral distinctions and stand up for the good and fight evil and that is something the Europeans refuse to do."

Nationalism isn't bad. American nationalism wasn't bad, has never been bad. British nationalism hasn't been bad. French nationalism isn't bad. Polish nationalism isn't bed. Czech nationalism wasn't bad.

The thing that was bad was that Germany which decided to embrace madness and evil as its central unifying characteristic under the Nazis. That is what the problem was, it was not nationalism per se. And its still not nationalism.

They took all the wrong lessons from WW2 and applying them while ignoring the only lesson that's really relevant from WW2 which is that you have to choose good and defend good and fight with the intention of defeating evil.

Here is the latest chapter in the continuing inanity:

Confronting a Mendacious Bully Adrew Bostom

Anna Julia Cooper (d. 1964, at age 105), the pioneering black American scholar and educator: “Bullies are always cowards at heart and may be credited with a pretty safe instinct in scenting their prey.”

 

From the wise and courageous, i.e., Geert Wilders, to the (almost) ridiculous, were the stakes not so high:

Charles Johnson doth protest too much. For months I have endured in silence his distressingly stupid and vicious calumnies and threats—private, as well as public—against colleagues and friends—brave, decent souls who, unlike Johnson, are serious scholars, authors, and journalists, investigating the burgeoning threat of violent and non-violent jihadism/ Islamization in Europe.

 

When Johnson put my dear friend—the perspicacious writer and journalist Diana West—in his crosshairs, I was compelled to break my silence. Following Johnson’s e-mail threat to another close friend—the brilliant scholar and author Robert Spencer—after Raymond Ibrahim (editor/translator of The Al Qaeda Reader) simply blogged a favorable discussion (subsequently removed by Spencer, pace Johnson’s threat!) of Diana West’s September 18, 2008 Town Hall.com column at the Jihad Watch/Dhimmi Watch website—I noticed that National Review Online had a featured link (on 9/19/08) to the same West column.

 

As a rather gentle rebuke of Johnson’s bullying (not to mention months of his indiscriminate, irresponsible, and just plain idiotic spraying of charges of “Fascism”), I sent “CJ” an e-mail link to the NRO featured posting of West’s September 18, 2008 essay with the subject line heading, “Lookie!-NRO ‘Fascists’ have featured a link to Diana West’s ‘We are losing Europe to Islam.’” A week later, when Diana’s follow-up column was also a featured link at NRO (9/26/08), I again forwarded the NRO link with a similar subject heading. And the next day (9/27/08) when social critic Roger Kimball (of The New Criterion, and Pajamas Media) had a lengthy, favorable discussion of West’s 9/26/08 column, with the subject line title, “Oh No! ‘Fascist’ Roger Kimball on Cologne and ‘Fascist’ Diana West.”

 

Johnson responded to this latter e-mail accusing me (on the basis of the three rather innocuous e-mails above, sent during a week) of “stalking” him!

 

I wrote back in admittedly (albeit deservedly) caustic language highlighting the hypocrisy of Johnson’s attacks on those he perceived (see the observation of Anna Julia Cooper’s observation, about a bully’s “pretty safe instinct in scenting their prey”) as vulnerable—independent writers and thinkers such as West and Spencer—while lacking the guts to similarly attack well-established conservative icons such as NRO, or Roger Kimball who had endorsed West’s writings (NRO twice, in successive weeks) on the Islamization of Europe.

 

Johnson then proceeded to blog the comments (below) at his website, which included a “threat” to publish my e-mails to him. Johnson’s warped characterization of my correspondence, and idle threats to “expose” those e-mails reveal his mendacity and prototypical bully cowardice. The e-mails are included below, preceded by Johnson’s public comments at his blog.


http://littlegreenfootballs.com/showc/74/5941013 

Charles: 9/27/2008 8:46:07 am PDT I’m now getting hate mail from Andrew Bostom, who believes we should all be joining forces with European white nationalists, calling me all kinds of names and insults. It’s an eye-opener about Bostom.

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/showc/105/5941049

Charles: 9/27/2008 8:52:05 am PDT

I may publish Bostom’s emails, so people can see what he’s like behind the scenes when he isn’t writing lengthy anti-Islam articles.

 

—– Original Message —–

From: Andrew Bostom

To: Charles Johnson

Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 2:36 PM

Subject: Lookie!-NRO “Fascists” have featured a link to Diana West’s “We are losing Europe to Islam.”

 

Lookie!-NRO “Fascists” have featured a link to Diana West’s “We are losing Europe to Islam.”

http://corner.nationalreview.com/#webbriefing

 

NRO Web Briefing   |  9/19/08

1) Obama is stoking racial antagonism. Rush Limbaugh, Wall Street Journal

2) We are losing Europe to Islam. Diana West, townhall.com

Read the complete email exchange -- Bostom posts  all the emails - read them all.

UPDATE: lol

UPDATE:  John Jay isWordy but well said
 

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FJORDMAN ON "FASCIST", CHARLES JOHNSON, LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS

What follows is an essay by Fjordman on what I consider to be the dangerous, almost lethal hypocrisy of bloggers, pundits and their followers on the right who have taken up against brave men and women fighting the spread of Islamic supremacism taking over their respective countries . What began as an assault on the transatlantic Counter Jihad  movement in October of last year, has metastasized. Just this past weekend, a small group of peaceful protesters were set upon and Jews were beaten while being called "Nazis" and "fascists" during what was to be a peaceful protest against the islamification of Europe.This is pure evil at its most base. I believe this polemic had a hand in empowering these thugs.  Who are the Nazis, the fascists? It certainly infected the already poisonous leftist/Islamic narrative.

Then, as now, I am confounded by the irrational position of those in the blogosphere that point fingers at those fighting the scourge of Islamic imperialism in Europe and America (myself included). In covering the spread of the global jihad, I am steeped in the evil of the hegemony of Islam, sharia law and the stealth jihad. One does not not have to go far to find hatred of the West, anti-semitism,and  the careful dismantling of our freedoms everyday. Evil is all around us so it is nonsensical to me to spend unlimited energy trying to find an incriminating "gotcha" moment or smoking gun on  folks like Filip Dewinter who have put themselves and their families at great risk to fight the leftist/Islamic alliance and align themselves with Israel.

Why sit in the middle of a haystack searching for the proverbial needle, while the barn burns?

In free societies, free man can speak, assemble, demonstrate  - but no more. I stood by Europeans desperate to save their countries then and I stand by them now.

Here is Fjordman's essay:

FJORDMAN September23 2008

In late 2007 and early 2008, I was involved in a heated argument with the American blog Little Green Footballs and its owner Charles Johnson. I haven't been thinking much about it since then because it consumed too much energy and I found it to be a waste of time. However, recent events have caused me to look at these issues once more. In the city of Cologne (Köln), Germany, a scheduled anti-Islamization demonstration was disrupted by an unholy alliance of Eurabian Multicultural elites and extreme Leftist "anti-Fascists." As puts it in The Brussels Journal:

"Last weekend's events in Cologne demonstrate what European conservatives are up against. A conference protesting the building of a mega mosque run by Turkish radicals was violently disrupted by thugs who gained the approval of the local German authorities and the German media. The international media, including the so-called 'conservative' media, have either not written about the Cologne incidents or done so by branding the conservatives as 'Neo-Nazis' and the thugs as ordinary citizens bravely fighting back 'Nazism.' An example of the latter can be found in The Times of London."

According to magazine Der Spiegel, "an estimated 40,000 protesters turned up in Cologne's downtown Heumarkt area, many wearing clown suits, to disrupt the rally. They blocked urban trains to keep delegates away and raided a tourist boat shaped like a whale - called the 'Moby Dick' - where the far-right gathering had been hoping to hold a press conference. A Pro Cologne spokesman said, 'Stones, bricks and paint bombs were thrown and the panoramic windows of the Moby Dick were shattered.' Police cancelled the rally after 45 minutes. Pro Cologne organizers had to dismantle microphones and other equipment in Heumarkt while the overwhelmed riot cops tried to hold back the crowd of protesters."

According to Der Spiegel, Police had prepared for about 1,500 far-right activists, organized by the local 'Pro Cologne' movement, to make a public show of discussing what they called the 'Islamization' of Europe."

As the esteemed American writer and columnist Diana West commented: "The suggestion here is that no non-'far-right activist' could possibly be so 'far right' as to imagine Europe is being Islamized….The point of the anti-Islamization rally was rational discussion. But Cologne proved it values neither reason nor discussion. 'The city was ready.' For mob rule."

The supposedly conservative newspaper Die Welt put up an online poll asking their readers whether they thought it was OK to ban the anti-Islamization demonstration. According to the major blog Politically Incorrect, as of midnight 86% disagreed with this policy. Suddenly, in the middle of the night, thousands of votes miraculously came in and the poll ended with exactly 50% in favor of the ban. Die Welt deleted the comment section because many comments criticized the decision to ban the Pro Cologne meeting.

Several eyewitnesses who were present this weekend were shocked by the behavior of the police, who in their eyes seemed to be acting as a surrogate of the left-wing "antifa" groups (supposedly anti-Fascists, although they tend to behave pretty much exactly like Fascists).

Aviel, a Jewish man who was beaten up in Cologne on 20 September, explains:

"My [Jewish] friend, Michael Kucherov was the first casualty here on Friday. He got beaten up for trying to enter the first of our [=Pro Cologne] meetings on Friday. I sorely resent myself for not being there at that time for him. It rips me apart to hear about a Jew being beaten up in the streets of Germany. Well he wouldn't be the only Jew. The next day as I was trying to enter Heumarkt, I was beaten up by Antifa thugs on Eibahnstrasse. In both incidents, as we were being beaten up, they were yelling and screaming 'Nazi' which was quite odd. Michael dressed in a suit but I was wearing my kippa and quite easily identified as a Jew so you can understand how odd it seems to be beaten by Germans in the street and called Nazi when you are Jewish. Anyway, I am going home with a broken rib but my pride still intact. I could have tried to escape or run but no way no how and I going to run or get on my knees for these people. Not this Jew. And one more thing, just let them all know that we (Jews) aren't all soft. Living here in Europe, we battle thugs and islamists all the time and still ask for more. That's why I traveled from France to Germany to make this conference. We are on the frontline of a battle which grows darker by the minute."

A Norwegian man blogging under the name maalmannen experienced something similar and posted many photos from the event:

"On several occasions, I observed people trying to join the demonstration being attacked and chased away by the leftist counter-demonstration. In one case, an old woman carrying a lot of anti-Islamization posters was attacked by a gang of Antifa activists. The rest of the crowd shouted 'Nazis raus' [Nazis out] when these criminals attacked the old frau and took all her posters away from her, and then ordered her to leave or risk more attacks."

Spanish writer AMDG from the blog La Yijad en Eurabia adds his observations:

"It was obviously not possible to enter the Heumarkt. I tried one of the narrow streets of the old city; there was a line of antifas with black clothing and sun glasses. They have even dared to place one of those plastic red-white stripes in front of them. I told one of them that I wanted to cross, they say no way. One of them spoke Spanish, and I ask her whether she was any authority, she confirmed it 'we are the authority'. A line of anti-riot police agents was only two meters behind them. I can not find a better image of the creeping Eurabian fascism: The police not only do not confront them, they cover their backs. Alternatively, we may think that the antifa-lefty militants are just the stormtroopers (Sturmabteilung?) of the formal police."

A number of those demonstrating for "democracy" and against "extremism" were Communists. I guess a hundred million dead victims of Communism in a few generations isn't a sign of extremism. Some also carried anti-Israeli slogans and merchandise using the icon of Marxist mass murderer and torturer Che Guevara. It is well-known that hardline Marxist organizations are still strong and influential in Germany, as in many other countries.

Many of those present noticed the militant-looking black outfits of some of the extreme Leftist demonstrators, which seemed to match closely with their attitudes. Since the term "Fascist" these days appears to be reserved for anti-Islamists and "racist" critics of mass immigration in general and Muslim immigration in particular, it is challenging to find a proper term for the militant antifa crowd. "Red Nazis" could be useful, but perhaps "blackshirts" is most appropriate, alluding to their black clothing and uniforms.

According to AMDG, "I think that we should repeat this rally every year. We need to show the Europeans that the Nazis and the fascists are the lefties. We can only make it by insisting. We need to join also the counterdemo with banners showing verses of the Koran."

The decision to silence the demonstration against Islamization was supported by local authorities as well as national and probably supranational ones. Thomas Steg, spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel, stated that Berlin favored "inter-cultural dialogue." The German Interior Ministry, too, criticized the rally, stating that "Such a gathering of populists and extremists harms the co-existence that the city and Muslim citizens have striven for."

Cologne Mayor Fritz Schramma, from the same "conservative" Christian Democratic Party (CDU) as Chancellor Merkel, said on public radio that "We don't want their conference and along with a great majority of Cologne people we'll be obstructing them."

In my view, Cologne Mayor Fritz Schramma is a dhimmi collaborator. His actions betray his city, his country and his civilization. This was a shameful act of cowardice and appeasement of the Nazis of our time. The true heirs of the Nazis and the Communists, both in totalitarian mentality and in methods, were the blackshirt left-wingers who were present this day, not those who demonstrated against the Islamization of their continent. Schramma should resign immediately. It is nothing less than an international disgrace that after Germany has been freed from the Nazis and the Communists, the authorities in a major city in the largest country in Europe kneel to totalitarian thugs and allow them to rule the streets.

The blackshirts were deliberately allowed by the authorities to harass those who are critical of the official pro-Islamic policies. This confirms my long-held suspicion that the extreme Leftist thugs who assault immigration-critics in certain countries are a prolonged arm of the state. The "anti-Fascists" AFA in Sweden, for instance, openly brag about regular physical attacks against people they don't like. They have been doing this for years. The media and the authorities know about it and do nothing. They like it, plain and simple.

The state-sponsored organization Expo in Sweden co-published a book with AFA on critics of mass immigration. Expo has now provided their material to the largest political party in the country, the Social Democrats, for use against their political rivals.  The "respectable," state-funded organization Antirasistisk Senter, the Antiracist Center in Norway, at their home page link to AFA Stockholm, which they call "militant Swedish anti-Fascists." So they do know they are "militant," but not so much that they won't link to them. They also link to Antifaschistische Aktion (AFA) in Berlin, some of whose members were probably among the brave "anti-Fascists" who assaulted "racist" old ladies and Jewish "Nazis" in Cologne. The other organizations mentioned indicate that these are recommended links, not just "relevant links." This is met with silence from the mass media and the political class.

Norwegian newspaper Dagens Næringsliv has earlier exposed the fact that the largest "anti-racist" organization in the country, SOS Rasisme, was heavily infiltrated by Communists in the late 1980s and early 90s, in other words, during the downfall of Communism in Eastern Europe. They went directly from Communism to Multiculturalism, which indicates that some of them view Multiculturalism as the continuation of Communism by other means.

The state-funded Islamic Council of Norway admit that they receive "guidance" from the Muslim Brotherhood's spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi and his Fatwa Council, who are debating whether or not gays should be killed, among other things. He has also supported suicide bombings and marriage to girls aged nine years old. Meanwhile, a Socialist named Lars Gule, who was once arrested traveling to the Jewish state of Israel with dynamite in his backpack with the intention of blowing up stuff, suggested on a major blog that the security services should have me under surveillance because I am a dangerous "right-wing extremist."

One of the foreign visitors, the Flemish politician Filip Dewinter, criticized Cologne Mayor Schramma and compared him to Freddy Thielemans, the Socialist Mayor of Brussels, Belgium, who in 2007 and 2008 banned demonstrations commemorating the 2001 9/11 terror victims in the USA because he didn't want to upset the local Muslims. "Brussels and Cologne have mayors who kneel and submit to Islamization," Dewinter said.

I checked the front page of the major American "anti-Jihad" website Little Green Footballs (LGF) from Friday 19 to Tuesday September 23 2008 to check what blogger Charles Johnson wrote about the demonstration. As far as I could see, he remained completely silent on the subject, yet there is no doubt that he was aware of the event. On Sep 8 he wrote about "Fascists Hijacking Anti-Jihadism in Cologne" and stated that "Here we go again, as an all-star cast of European fascists hijacks the anti-jihad movement for their own sick political purposes."

One of these "Fascist bastards" (Johnson's words) was Dewinter, with his "Cities against islamisation" project. Mr. Johnson himself noted that the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran, hardly a beacon of tolerance and enlightenment, urged the European Union (not Germany, interestingly enough) to intervene and stop this planned "anti-Islamic" meeting, and Johnson concluded that "The Iranian mullahs couldn't have asked for better propaganda."

The Iranians put pressure on the EU several times and summoned the French ambassador - France held the rotating presidency of the EU - to expressed deep concern over the EU's lenient behavior toward anti-Islamic sentiments in Europe and suggested that European authorities prohibited the conference. Shouldn't the "anti-Jihadist" Johnson and his followers be concerned over the fact that they end up on the same side as a repressive and terrorist-sponsoring Islamic state against Westerners fighting for their freedom? Apparently not.

Just a few days before this, the "Fascist bastard" Filip Dewinter received the "Oriana Fallaci Prize" in Florence for his work with "Cities Against Islamisation," among other things. The prize is named after the courageous Italian Islam-critical journalist and writer Oriana Fallaci. The irony is that Mr. Johnson kept a photo of Fallaci on his frontpage for several years, but at the time of writing, this photo has suddenly and mysteriously disappeared. I guess Fallaci was a Fascist, too, just like Dewinter, myself and everybody else who doesn't believe in the myth of a moderate Islam. Dutch politician Geert Wilders does not appear to believe in the existence of a moderate Islam, either. When will LGF declare him a Fascist?

The LGF-crowd thinks that Europeans must prove that we are 100% "ideologically pure" before we should be granted the right to fight for our continued existence. Imagine if a house is on fire. The fire brigade has just arrived to put out the fire, but the neighbor won't allow them to use the local water because he fears it may be impure. He will only accept that they use holy water - distilled holy water - and only if it has been blessed by a lesbian priest who supports voting rights for illegal immigrants. Since the firefighters don't have this available, the house burns down, but the neighbor takes comforting in knowing that at least the remaining ash is ideologically pure. This is Little Green Football's attitude to the threat faced by the Western world. In fact, their attitude is to say that the water is more dangerous than the fire itself, and to beat the firefighters with their umbrellas while screaming "Fascist bastards!"

The thinking seems to be that if you scratch any random European there is usually a Nazi lurking underneath, just waiting to get out. There are only two possible versions of Europeans: the surrender-monkeys and the Nazis. If we are not the former, then it follows by logic that we have to be the latter. This attitude betrays an all-pervasive hatred that demonizes absolutely anything Europeans do to protect their dignity and heritage. It closely mirrors Multiculturalism, which is an anti-Western, but especially anti-European, hate ideology

One of the reasons why hardcore anti-Semites (David Duke would be a case in point) are unreliable allies is that they hate Jews so much that it shuts down the rational parts of their brain and they end up making common cause with Muslims, based on mutual hatred. The same logic applies to hardcore anti-Europeans, of which there are many even at "conservative" websites such as LGF. They have an irrational hatred, a dark cloud in their minds which prevents them from seeing the world clearly. In a way, some LGF-ers thus have more in common with David Duke than they'd like to admit. If mindless anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism should be considered a problem then so should mindless anti-Europeanism.

This weekend, we witnessed how violent thugs threatened, assaulted and in some cases beat up people they disagreed with, several of them Jews. These "anti-Fascist" blackshirts are closely related to the violent totalitarian movements of past generations, in their dress code, mentality and willingness to silence freedom of speech by brute force. In short, they resemble Fascists and Communists (some of them were Communists). What has Little Green Footballs, which never misses an opportunity to denounce "Fascists," written about this? So far, absolutely nothing. There are indeed people who behave like Fascists in Europe, and they receive tacit support from LGF while their victims are denounced as "Fascists."

I have watched, for the better part of a year, a number of decent human beings including, but not limited to, Pamela Geller, Paul Belien, Diana West, the Baron and Dymphna from the Gates of Vienna blog and many others, being at the receiving end of a vicious smear campaign from Charles Johnson and Little Green Footballs which is unlike anything I have seen in my life. After engaging in an insane witch-hunt on imaginary Fascists, whose ranks seem to grow every month, Mr. Johnson now suddenly chooses to look the other way in silence when very real Fascists use violence to silence their critics in a major Western city. I admit that makes me angry, and I think I have the right to be so.

The time has now come for Mr. Johnson to apologize in public to the numerous people he has smeared since the fall of 2007, starting with the ones I have mentioned above. It's not their credibility that's on the line here. It's his. If he continues to undermine those confronting Islamic infiltration, it will become increasingly difficult for LGF to present itself as an anti-Jihad website at all. At some point, the rapidly shrinking number of people in the northern hemisphere who haven't been banned from the site yet will be forced to ask themselves whether the website and its owner have simply switched teams and joined the Dark Side.

A Jew Beaten in Cologne: A First Person Account

A Jew who attended the banned (at the last minute)  Anti-Islam rally in Cologne, Germany gives us his disturbing, first hand account of events. Meet Aviel, A Jewish man who was beaten and kicked with steel toe boots ........... I have made no corrections. I thought readers should read it raw.

Dsc02718

The Anti-Islam Rally (Photo:  first photo is rather disturbing.  It shows a band of some sort of humans preventing the police from moving about. I find it odd that they were even powerless to deal with that lot. However i find that they were probably just unwilling)

Well this is the first chance I have gotten to write about the events in Cologne on the 19th and 20th of this month as I saw them happen. I am no essayist like Fjordman but then again this is not my intention. I will just let you know how things went down as best as I can remember.

I arrived in Cologne on Thursday the 18th and checked into the Hyatt hotel on the right side of the Rhine just opposite the Cathedral. I had been to Cologne before and so I decided to return to a restaurant I knew called The Lowenbrau. After eating I was walking back to my hotel and passed through Domplatz. There I saw the first signs of what was going to be a long weekend. In the square was a menagerie of leftist protest displays, ranging from anti-Israel to the DKP (German Communist Party) placards. I was wasn’t really surprised to find such nonsense so I continued on As I rounded the corner towards the bridge I saw floods of Antifa begin to arrive and settle in for the night. They were mostly clad in black, boots, and a variety of hair colors with dark glasses and face masks etc…. . Most were wearing, as many other protesters, Palestinian keffiyah, and I saw many of them carrying placards which read things like, “Islam Mosques Welcome, Nazis Out!!” They were setting up camp around Domplatz and other areas, drinking beer, breaking bottles and being loud and quite threatening to passersby. All this seemed to bore the police. 

 

Friday morning the private meeting of delegates for the conference was to take place in a municipal building and from there they were to move to a Rhine pleasure boat for a news conference. On the way to the municipal building, my friend Michael Kucherov was attacked and beaten just outside the building as he attempted to enter. All of this in plain view of the police who could not be bothered to intervene until he had taken more than a few good shots to the head and body. This really set the stage for the Police behavior I would witness in my own assault and throughout the events over the weekend. After a short while the delegates were moved by bus to the boat. Again, the Antifa seemed to know the exact time and location of this event as well. It is really no coincidence that the media and police were also present at both locations. The Antifa began hurling stones at the delegates and the boat; smashing windows and this continued to the point where the boat was considered not seaworthy due to the damage. Once again, the police took their time before acting against this aggression. I will admit that some arrests were made but let’s not start congratulating the police. The damage done to the boat was extremely extensive, the danger to the personal safety of those onboard was without question, and the thugs were in arms reach of the police who allowed a point to be made before deciding that they had better uphold their own image as well. At that point, if anyone were still questioning whether or not the Antifa were acting as a surrogate to the government and the police, then they ought to have had their heads examined.  Generally speaking the mayhem continued through the day. Drinking and destroying private property, while the police watched, carried on through the night. Antifa also disrupted rail traffic from the aeroport early Saturday morning by setting fire to a rail signal and blockading the tracks.

Dsc02720copy

(photo:Very revealing. This photo is the police actually escorting Antifa and other scum into the city before pulling back. I think this photo tells more than many others).

Saturday morning saw the events turn despicable. My friends and other delegates of the conference decided the best way t act was to arrive at Heumarkt early in the morning to begin setting up for the events. Contrary to what the Cologne government would tell you, many media organizations did show up to the event. Reporters from the New York Times, the London Times and others in Heumarkt proceeded to do interviews with delegates like my friend Kucherov in the morning before the conference and rally were to begin. However it was doomed from the start. The police began setting up barricades across every street leading into Heumarkt, thus preventing ANYONE, including those who wanted to attend the conference, to gain access. Here is where it gets interesting…. The Antifa set upo there own barricades, human chains if you will, right in front of each of the police barricades. The police seemed perfectly okay with this. They even seemed okay with the fact that if there were an altercation between citizens and the Antifa barricade, they would not be able to break through in a timely fashion in order to stop it. In general, it appeared that they were quite happy to let the Antifa control the streets and access to the Heumarkt square. This of course would ensure that they (the local government) would be able to gloat and report that nobody showed up to support the “Nazis”.

I myself came upon one of these barricades on Eibahnstrasse that morning on my way to attend the conference on Heumarkt. I approached the Antifa thugs and demanded that they let me pass. I was wearing my Kippah and readily indetifiable as a Jew; however, they screamed at me “Nazis Raus”. One of them showed me backwards and a woman spit on me and called me a fascist pig. At this point I had had enough and put my head down and started to try and break through the barricade. I was pummeled in the head several times and then shoved to the ground were I was beaten and kicked with steel toe boots in plain sight of the police who did nothing. I grabed the boot of one of the attackers and pulled him down to the ground. I, despite the beating I was taking, proceeded to give this bastard as much or more than I myself was getting. Unfortunately, and I say unfortunately because he was just a kid in his early twenties, I really hurt this one. It was then that I heard the police shouting and blowing whistles. They stopped kicking me and I got up and stumbled away. I didn’t realize that I had a broken rib until later.

 

The Antifa barricades continued and I witnessed several more people beaten up by these thugs in view of the police. This included the savage beating of a man with all white hair well into his sixties. I had also heard of an elderly woman who was assaulted but I myself did not see this. In short, due to the police and the Antifa, nobody was able to pass through to attend the conference. I myself never made it though some of my friends did because they arrived at about 7am in preparation. At about 1 or so I was resting up, licking my wounds over a liter of Kolsch in a pub when I heard celebratory shouting and cheering. I assume this is when the people got word that the conference had been officially shut down.

 

The streets from that point on were entirely controlled by the Antifa and other thugs. The police removed air cover later in the day and many of the police had retreated to the right side of the Rhine while more Antifa poured over the rail bridge from the left. It was such a joke. The police never secured the rail bridge. They instead secured the Deutz bridge for what looked to me as just a show of force but with no intended result. The Antifa kept coming over the rail bridge and basically set up a rectangular perimeter on the left side of the Rhine over which they had total control. You could clearly see the police had pulled back and grouped themselves on the Deutz bridge outside of this permiter. The perimeter itself ran basically from the rail bridge to the Deutz bridge, from Hohestrasse to Frankenwerft and the waterfront. Despite my earlier troubles I decided I was not running back to my hotel. I stayed out and documented the absolute anarchy that carried on throughout the day and night. I got into a couple more scuffles that night over being called a “Jew” by so-called anti-fascists but mostly I just watched Germany descend into the worst chaos and darkness since the 1920s and 30s. I finally went home around 11:30pm Saturday night and noticed that I had a major problem with my ribs. That’s when I first sent word to Gates of Vienna

Later that night, I was disgusted by how the television reports boasted and bragged about how the citizens rose up and drove out the “fascists”. They gloated about how the “Nazis” had no support and “nobody showed up to attend the conference”. Now I can’t tell it like Fjordman can tell it, but that was definitely propaganda produced by brute physical force and condoned by the local government.

 

I really left out a lot of detail due to space on your blog but this was a general overview of what happened. I want to say in closing that I do not blame the Muslims for what they do. It is in their nature. If you leave a raw steak around your neck and walk amongst ravenous dogs, you are bound to be attacked. They have their agenda and they are not afraid to admit this is war. If we are weak, the smart enemy will hit us in that spot. So I can’t blame them for smelling victory and going for it at every opportunity. No, the greatest threat to European society and the west in general, are the neo-Bolshevik hordes of the Antifa and the Socialist elite of the EU. These people are committing the greatest atrocity and betrayal of western society in the history of mankind. They want nothing less than to destroy our morality, our culture, our way of life and everything that our ancestors fought and bled for. I hope everyone who reads this realizes that the true enemy is socialism and its surrogates.

 

Aviel

Saturday, September 13, 2008

CHARLES JOHNSON, LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS: TRAITOR! The Neo-Old Right fighting the Last War .....still

I covered the Counter Jihad summit back in October 2007 and it was a core group of courageous freedom fighters. Bat Yeor, Sam Solomon, Patrick Soohkdeo, friends of Oriana Fallaci, Dr. Aryeh Eldad, Steen, Robert Spencer, Dr. Andrew Bostom, Paul Belien of The Brussels Journal, Bart Debie, Filip De Winter, Philip Claeys, Dirk Crols and their colleagues and the blogosphere ambassadors, Baron Bodissey of Gates of Vienna, - warriors in the fight for the west.

On October 18 and 19, over 70 organizations and individuals joined together in the European and Flemish Parliaments to create a European network of activists from 14 nations to resist the increasing Islamisation of their countries. Keynote speakers included Bat Ye’or, author of Eurabia and Dhimmitude and Robert Spencer, author of Religion of Peace, Why Christianity is and Islam Isn’t. Additional speakers included David Littman, Dr. Arieh Eldad, member of the Israeli Knesset, Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, Director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity, Sam Solomon, Director of Fellowship of Faith for Muslims and author of the Charter of Muslim Understanding,  Dr. Marc Cogen, Ghent University, Dr. Andrew Bostom, author of The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism, and Laurent Artur du Plessis, author of a forthcoming book on shariah finance. Many participants worldwide also attended the first day of presentations online through webex

The most fascinating portion of the morning program was a series of country reports on the status of the Islamization and the creeping sharia in their respective countries.Paul Belien of Belgium, Stefan Herre of Germany, Nidra Poller of France, reports from the UK (the worst), Ted Ekeroth and Reinhard Fomi from Sweden, Lars Hedegaard from Denmark (extraordinary presentation), Jens Anfindsen from Norway, KGS from Finland, Johannes Janasen from Holland, Adriana Bolchini Gaigher of Italy (what passion!), Arnaud Dotezac from Switzerland, Traian Ungureanu of Romania (gave excellent advice how to bite back at the jihad), Austria.

But the hysterical opposition would have none of it. Europe be damned!
These silly allegations "THE FASCISTS ARE COMING! THE FASCISTS ARE COMING!" are the last gasping remnants of the last war. It is irrelevant and dangerous.

Filip_dewinter
Photo: Belgian police arresting Filip Dewinter at a 2007 Brussels rally marking the 9/11 attacks on the US and protesting the Islamization of Europe.

YES OR NO TO ISLAMIZATION Diana West (hat tip Andrew Bostom)

On September 20, a European group called Cities Against Islamisation

  is sponsoring a demonstration called "No to Islamisation" in Cologne/Koln, Germany.  Although the demonstration has been planned for some time, just last month the city council there approved controversial plans to construct a mega-mosque and surrounding Islamic complex in this ancient city famed for its skyline dominated for centuries by the largest Gothic cathedral in northern Europe. The speakers at next Saturday's demonstration, according to the Cities Against Islamisation website, will be:

Henry Nitzsche, member of the German Parliament (Deutsche Bundestag)

Filip Dewinter, group leader of Vlaams Belang in the Flemish Parliament

Markus Beisicht, president of the German Movement “Pro NRW”

Jean-Marie Le Pen, president of Front National (France)

Mario Borghezio, member of European Parliament for the Italian Lega Nord

Heinz-Christian Strache, president of FPÖ (Austria)

According to a headline posted on the website Little Green Footballs (LGF), this means: "Fascists Hijacking Anti-Jihadism in Cologne." It went on to say:

That list contains virtually every racist, fascist leader in Europe, and you can bet that the usual suspects will be defending it. The concept of fighting against the global jihad has lost much of its credibility, because some of the most visible spokespeople refuse to unequivocally renounce their associations with this crew of vile Neanderthals.

Every "racist, fascist leader" in Europe? How ridiculous, but how poisonous. The post concludes by calling these men "fascist bastards." Such crude invective is far better suited for spray-painting on a wall than writing even in an Internet blog, but, of course, in an Internet blog it is far more damaging to political reputations and vital causes.

My question is, Why? Why this acid campaign to destroy with slanderous and empty buzzwords some of the only politicians in the world with the guts to stand up in the public square (literally, and, as only partly indicated in the picture above, at great physical risk) and try to turn back the Islamic colonization of Europe--a trend which, as Bernard Lewis has famously predicted, barring change, will likely be complete by the end of this century. I speak here specifically about Filip DeWinter, Mario Borghezio and Heinz-Christian Strache, each of whom I interviewed this past summer in Antwerp, Brussels and Vienna respectively. I am not familiar with the two Germans and I will address Le Pen below.

Dewinter, Borghezio and Strache are not "racist-fascist" leaders. They are, in their very different styles, leaders--very popular (but not in the press!) elected leaders--who are bravely combating the smugly dictatorial, entrenched, leftist establishments of Europe which, as Bat Ye'or has explained in Eurabia and elsewhere, have made common cause with the Islamic world, exchanging their Western heritage for power and oil. Dewinter, Borghezio and Strache  are all Euro-skeptics, meaning they oppose the sovereignty-gobbling European Union. Dewinter and Borghezio are doubly revolutionary in that they also represent the secessionist movements of Flanders and Nothern Italy that want independence from Belgium and Italy respectively. (Here

  is an astute appraisal of Lega Nord, Vlaams Belang and the trend of "localism" in Europe by my good friend Paul Belien.) "Racist"? "Fascist"? Did I say the LGF post was ridiculous and poisonous? It's equally absurd and outrageous.

I find a fascinating revelation contained within. LGF writes: "The concept of fighting against the global jihad has lost much of its credibility because some of the most visible spokespeople refuse to unequivocally renounce their associations with this crew...."

Question: How can "the very concept" of fighting jihad be tarnished by anything? That is, if the cause is just (and the threat is dire), nothing can take away from it--and certainly not  the "associations" of some "spokespeople," whatever that means. But I can just see LGF, circa 1942, dumping verbal sludge on FDR and Churchill for not "renouncing unequivocally" their associations--or, in this historical example, their alliance--with mass butcher Stalin. "The very concept of fighting Nazism has lost much of its credibility because some of its most visible spokespeople refuse to unequivocally renounce their alliance with this crew of Soviet murderers...."

The very concept of fighting Nazism, no less than the very concept of fighting jihad, never loses credibility. But this overarching concern for "credibility"--in the eyes of whom? I wonder--appears to be of greater concern to those of the LGF ilk than fighting jihad.

That said, I don't like Le Pen, who is also appearing at the September 20 event. I can't even tell you what he stands for. (Last I heard, he was effectively pro-Islamization  so long as Muslims speak French, so I can't imagine what his contribution to an anti-Islamization rally might be.) Last summer in Brussels, I also interviewed Carl Lang, a member of European Parliament for Le Pen's Front National, and concluded that this political party is in total disarray, and that the 80-year-old Le Pen himself will probably have to retire before any coherent anti-Islamization movement has a chance of evolving out of the political group Le Pen will eventually leave behind. (Coincidentally, Le Pen announced this week he will effectively retire in 2010.) Last summer, when I asked Filip Dewinter about the upcoming event in Cologne/Koln, Le Pen wasn't even on the list of invitees. I don't pretend to follow the internal machinations of the group Cities Against Islamisation, so I can't explain how or why Le Pen came to be added to the list, but again, in the face of "racist-fascist" hysteria, I keep thinking of the analogy of FDR, Winnie and hideous "Uncle Joe." Who's on which side here?

Speaking of sides, I find it quite telling that in addition tothe hysterical opposition

of LGF, there are a couple of other groups also voicing opposition to the protest in Cologne/Koln--albeit in a more measured (!) tone. The  Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has come out against the protest, and Iran, an OIC member, has separately lodged some kind of official complaint with EU President Sarkozy actually asking him to prevent this free assembly of Europeans from taking place.

LGF, OIC and Iran vs. Filip Dewinter, Mario Borghezio, Heinz-Christian Strache (and I couldn't care less about Le Pen who at least hasn't murdered 20 million people a la Stalin). I know which side I'm on.

And I stand with you Diana. For more on the vicersal, ad hominem attacks post conference go here.

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Does the West Want to be Saved?

Speaking of the Counter Jihad movement, the follow up to Brussels was in Vienna and though I wanted so much to go, there was no way I could leave my kids for 5 days. And a Jewess in Vienna? Oy.

The Baron was there and Dymphna writes;

The event was a working meeting, with a series of workshops aimed at specific objectives. Some of the materials used for the conference can be found at Mission Europa, and the conference results will be posted there as they come in.

The keynote speaker on Sunday evening was Serge Trifkovic, the author of Defeating Jihad: How the War on Terrorism Can Be Won - in Spite of Ourselves and The Sword of the Prophet: Islam; History, Theology, Impact on the World. Mr. Trifkovic kindly sent us an advance copy of his speech, which is posted below.

His speech is an amazing work. Read it all:

CAN THE WEST BE SAVED?

by Serge Trifkovic

Vienna, May 10, 2008

“Europe today is a powder keg,” Otto von Bismarck remarked , “and the leaders are like men smoking in an arsenal.”

I am not going to waste your time tonight with yet another treatise on why Islam is not the Religion of Peace, Tolerance, Compassion, etc, etc. We are beyond that. Had America agonized, in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, whether Shinto was actually OK but only Bushido was bad, the Greater Asian Co-prosperity Sphere would be going strong to this day. Among reasonable people, unblinkered by the dicta of political correctitude, the real score on Muhammad and his followers is well known. It has been known for centuries. That score, however, no matter how calmly stated and comprehensively supported, invariably elicits the howls of “Islamophobia” from the neoliberal elite class.

AN EMINENTLY POSTMODERN LITTLE PHOBIA

In the way of an introduction, let us therefore look at the formal, legally tested definition of that word, the latest addition to the arsenal of postmodern “phobias.” It is provided by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) based here in Vienna. (“Orwellian” is a worn-out adjective, but it simply has to be used in connection with this particular institution.) The EUMC diligently tracks the instances of “Islamophobia” all over the Old Continent, which it defines by eight red flags:

1.   Islam is seen as a monolithic bloc, static and unresponsive to change.
2.   Islam is seen as separate and “Other.”
3.   Islam is seen as inferior to the West, barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.
4.   Islam is seen as violent, aggressive, linked to terrorism, engaged in a clash of civilizations.
5.   Islam is seen as a political ideology.
6.   Criticisms made of the West by Islam are rejected out of hand.
7.   Discriminatory practices and Muslims’ exclusion from mainstream society are advocated.
8.   Anti-Muslim hostility is seen as natural or normal.

This definition is obviously intended to preclude any possibility of meaningful discussion of Islam.

Read the point by point here.

FJORDMAN ATTEMPTS THE IMPOSSIBLE

Fjordman, over at  Brussels Journal, is  attempting, yet again, to  reason with the the unreasoned. It's a waste of his extraordinary talent, IMAO.

As I have repeatedly lamented, this division of the right and, in effect, the clubbing of the transatlantic counter jihad movment plays right into the hands of the ....... jihad. It is like arguing over the place mats on the Titanic dining tables, as the water is washing over the decks. I just don't get it but have stopped trying to understand the motive. It's plain wrong.

Fjordman's account of events in Europe is a bloody mess. The Euro lefties have a death/obliteration wish.

The trouble with Europe trying to defend the political and religious and demographic invasion by Islam is there is nobody left in the house to defend the house, they have all become their enemy.
There is no one else left to defend Europe except the nationalistic groups. Fjordman shows that in associating with those whom he believes to be moderates, Charles is consorting with the devil. I have seen the enemy, it aint us.

It's one thing to pose as the  great conservative fighting the pure & good fight against  "fascist" elements in the Euro-nationalistic movements, but consorting with marxists, leftist and outright feminazis is hardly pure.

To the obvious point, that absent the nationalists, there is no one to defend Europe. Absent a defense & a fight, Europe is swept away in the encroaching tide of Islam.

To the readers of Little Green Footballs Fjordman, Brussels Journal

I've written about the Swedish organization Expo before, but it seems I have to do so again. As most of my readers know, I have been involved, along with several others, in a very public debate with Charles Johnson of the major American "anti-Jihad" blog Little Green Footballs. If it can indeed be called a debate, I'm not so sure. I can personally testify that pretty much everybody on "my side" of this issue has been tired of it for a very long time. Yet recently LGF again publicly attacked Gates of Vienna and The Brussels Journal, and Johnson has continued posting negative remarks about the website Atlas Shrugs.

I was not mentioned by name, but since I publish essays regularly at GoV and TBJ and will probably publish occasionally at AS in the future, it is tempting to treat attacks on these websites as attacks on me personally. If I have been slow in responding, this is because I am so tired of this nonsense that the mere thought of getting involved once again almost makes me feel physically ill. After thinking about it, I have decided I will respond after all. First of all because it annoys me to see good, honorable and decent individuals being unfairly demonized in this way, but also because ignoring such attacks, which was my initial reaction, leaves the impression that you are an easy target for bullying. I'm not an easy target, and I will thus respond once again, against my better judgment, to give my side of the story.

Go. Read it all, it's lenthy it's a must read.

OT ................ Fjordman will be reviewing Andrew Bostom's devastating new book, The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism,  but before this  he "intends to write about the causes of Christian anti-Semitism. I will publish the full essay about this at Atlas Shrugs".

I am honored.

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Dr. Arieh Eldad, Knesset, PM Candidate:
"The Moslem Republic of Kosovo"

Dr. Eldad is my candidate for Prime Minister once Olmerde's term is mercifully up. Eldad gets it. He is unbowed, unafraid and without corruption [Emphasis and bolding mine]

The Kosovo Precedent By Arieh Eldad

The Moslem Republic of Kosovo declared its independence this week.  The United States and several European countries have already recognized it.  News reports that the Israeli Foreign Ministry was urging swift Israeli recognition were denied, and reporters were told that Israel does not want to be the first to jump, but once the list of countries recognizing Kosovo is longer, Israel will be one of them.

If Israel does recognize Kosovo, this will certainly be the result of a decision made by the prime minister and foreign minister. Such a decision will be indubitable proof of the foolishness and malignant shortsightedness from which they suffer. If their willingness to establish an Arab terrorist state in the heart of our own country can be explained by their having internalized the Peace Now ideology concerning what they call the “occupation” and the demographic problem – there can be no such explanation for Israel’s giving support to Islamic imperialism in Europe. 

The fear of the spread of Islam is expressed today in increasing support for conservative parties in Denmark, Holland, Belgium, Switzerland, and Germany.  These are not extreme right or neo-Nazi parties but rather mainstream conservative parties. They view Israel as a frontline fortress of Western culture facing jihad, and they fear that this fortress may fall under Arab pressure and because of the weakness of Israel’s leaders.  Such Europeans fear the separatist trends among millions of Moslem immigrants in Western Europe, the demands to apply Islamic Sharia law in those countries, and the ideological and financial support the immigrants are getting from Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Al Quaida.  They are worriedly counting the thousands of mosques being built in Western Europe, and they are made anxious by their understanding of how Moslems have exploited Europeans’ collective guilt feelings over the destruction of the Jews to win surrender to Moslem demands for collective rights, free immigration, and multi-culturalism – all so that the Europeans will not be accused of racism.  Millions of Moslem immigrants in Europe supported by billions of Saudi dollars are garnering more and more “rights” and influence.

Islamic proliferation in Europe took in a new country this week. The Moslem minority in Serbia in the Kosovo region bordering the Islamic state of Albania declared its independence.  Serbia is a sovereign country, a member of the United Nations, with an ethnic minority.  Based on the standards being used for Kosovian independence, the Basques should now be able to set up an independent state in Spain.  Such states may also be established in Russia, Slovakia, Greece, and Cyprus.  The flag of Kosovo is that of Islamic proliferation and a source of serious anxiety to EuropeThose European countries recognizing Kosovo are doing so under economic pressure from oil-rich Arab countries, the markets of Islamic countries, and internal pressure by millions of Moslem voters in Europe.

Expressing complete political blindness towards the nature of the conflict between Moslems and the rest of the world, Olmert and Tzippi Livni are convinced that establishing an Arab state in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza is in Israel’s political interests.  Only someone who doesn’t understand that the conflict has nothing to do with a parituclar boundary can think that drawing such a boundary line along the 1967 borders will solve anythingOnly someone who doesn’t understand what the Moslems in Europe want can think that the establishment of an independent Kosovo will resolve the conflict in the Balkans.  If Israel joins in recognizing Kosovo, there will be no political, legal, or moral claim it can make to oppose establishing an Arab state in the Galilee and Northern Negev.  For what is the difference?  An ethnic minority with territorial contiguity to neighboring enemy states demands, following a bloody war, to tear pieces from a sovereign country, and proclaim its independence.  This is or will be exactly the demand of the Arabs after the first stage in the “strategy of stages,” the establishment of an independent Palestinian state is, Heaven forbid, attained.  And we cannot forget that Arabs and the haters of Israel in Europe portray Israel in colors no less cruel than those used to portray the Serbs, and accusations of genocide are thrown at us just as they were thrown at them.  When the day comes when the Arabs in the Galilee declare independence, Israel will have no way to oppose it, assuming it today recognizes a country formed on exactly the same basis.

I have heard commentators explaining that neither we nor Europe should fear Kosovo because the Kosovians are “moderate Moslems.”  It was from these moderate Moslems that Haj Amin el-Husseini gathered tens of thousands of volunteers for the 13th SS Division (“Handschar”) and 21st SS Division (“Skanderbeg”).  On them he built his dream of marching with Hitler’s armies into Palestine and destroying the Jews of Eretz Israel.  Today Israel, together with its European partners, must present a solid front to stop the spread of Islam in Europe, for as long as the Moslem strength there increases, the tendency of European countries to prefer the Arabs over Israel will also increase. 

Friday, January 18, 2008

CHARLES JOHNSON, LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS SLANDERS

UPDATED PLEASE SCROLL!

Contrary to popular belief I am not responsible for the actions of others, particularly those across the Atlantic.  Apparently a new coalition has formed to fight the Islamisation of Europe.

SEVERAL European far-right parties announced a new organisation aimed at fighting the “Islamisation” of Europe.

The group dubbed “Cities against Islamisation” was presented to the media in the northern Belgian city of Antwerp by Filip Dewinter, head of the far-right Belgian party Vlaams Belang (Flemish Interest) along with Austrian FPOE leader Heinz-Christian Strace and Robert Spieler of the regionalist Alsace First group.

Parties from Britain (the British National Party), Denmark, Germany and Italy were also represented at the launch of the group which has a road-sign-style crossed-out mosque as its logo.

Thirty members of the new organisation then set off on a walk around areas of Antwerp with a high immigrant population. (more here)

LGF reports on this and adds this;

Nice company that Gates of Vienna, the Center for Vigilant Freedom, Brussels Journal, Fjordman, and Atlas Shrugged are running with. Will they distance themselves from the Vlaams Belang now, or are they OK with the British National Party too?

If I had to predict, I’d bet they’ll be OK with the BNP. It’s easier after the first step.

I have not and never had supported or backed the BNP. To tie me to them  because of a this latest attempt to fight the tsunami of islamisation in Europe of is dishonest and fallacious. Back in October I attended a Counter Jihad conference at the EU with Andrew Bostom, Robert Spencer, Bat Yeor, Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, Dr. Arieh Eldad (running for Prime Minister of Israel on the Hatikvah ticket), Nidra Poller, Paul Belien, David Littman, "Friends of Orianna Fallaci (Armando Manocchio of the Italian organization Una Via per Oriana (”A Way For Oriana”) presented an award to Bat Ye’or in honor of Oriana Fallaci),  and other leading figures in the battle for the West. Filip De Winter of Vlaams Belang and the Swedish Democrats were also among the 80 or so attendees. The conference was important and necessary but that all seems to be lost on this obsession with discrediting everyone and everything at that conference because Vlaams Belang and the Swedish Democrats also attended.

I do not support the BNP . The BNP was not at the Counter Jihad Conference. I think it was incredibly stupid of Vlaams Belang to include  the British Nazi Party. They are not nationalists, they are Nazis.  I don't speak for these people. This is ridiculous. End  of story.

NUTS. All of it

UPDATE: Listen up! I am told the BNP is not apart of this coalition. Brussels Journal has this;

Yesterday politicians from several Europeans countries convened in Antwerp, the stronghold of the Flemish secessionist Vlaams Belang party, to establish the international organisation “Cities against Islamization” (CaI). Apart from the Vlaams Belang, the following three parties have joined the organisation: the FPÖ (Susanne Winter’s party, Austria), Alsace d’Abord (a regionalist party from Alsace, France) and Pro Köln (Germany).

Apparently, There are only four parties involved in the Cities against Islamization network:

1/ Vlaams Belang
2/ The Austrian Freedom Party (which is no longer Joerg Haider's party)
3/ The Alsatian regionalist party "Alsace d'Abord"
4/ The German Pro Cologne party, which is a local city party in Cologne.,

The Belgian papers (and other European MSM which I saw) do not mention the BNP at all. there is 
only one source for the BNP quote: The Australian.  Radio Netherlands does not mention this and reliable sources in Flanders deny it.These people make this up.

I am debating if this post ought to come down. Why should I spread this manure?

UPDATE: It's back up because you asked. I hate to give the malicious lies legs by running it . Proving a negative not good

UPDATE: Fjordman is there ...in Europe, in the thick of it. BNP was not there. he explains at Gates of Vienna here;

Several prominent blogs are at it again with accusations against various European groups. Despite what The Australian newspaper claims, the British National Party did not participate at the meeting to establish “Cities against Islamization.” They also did not participate at the Counter-Jihad Conference in October, because they carry too much baggage with them, including open anti-Semitism.

I understand, however, the deep frustration of native Brits who have to watch as their country disappears right in front of them, and have few real alternatives to turn to. If the BNP gets more support, this is only due to the failure or outright betrayal of the established parties in the UK and throughout the European Union. If the mainstream parties want to restore the public’s faith in them then they have to address their concerns, permanently end Muslim immigration, and take a long break from mass immigration in general.

Since I’m already here, I would like to ask VB’s detractors a question. They have warned against the rise of “Fascists” in Europe, but have never made any attempt to define exactly what “Fascism” is. It’s about time they did that. So what is fascism?

If they answered that, they would notice that people such as Jonah Goldberg argue that Fascism is in many ways a left-wing movement. Daniel Pipes seems to agree, and I have been arguing the same in the past. I have been advocating more free speech in Europe, less government intrusion and more checks and balances on state power, viewpoints as far removed from Fascism as humanly possible.

In contrast, the left-wing comrades of Øyvind Strømmen, the third-rate Norwegian Islam apologist who has for years written disparagingly about Oriana Fallaci, Robert Spencer, Ibn Warraq and other anti-Jihadists and is now enthusiastically linked to by some anti-Jihad blogs, are far closer to the ideals of Fascism and the all-powerful state than I am.

There's a lot more. Go

Saturday, December 08, 2007

A Plea from Italy

The counter jihad summit in Brussels was a critical meeting of those determined to fight the islamization of Europe and the world. Those attempting to paint it in any other light have motives I do not understand. I will not stand down. I intend to fight to the last man.

There is something unholy in these attempts to destroy the counter jihad movement. There are Europeans putting their lives at stake to fight the jihad in Europe. There is something diabolical at work here. We need to build the transatlantic counter jihad movement, not destroy it. I stand with those brave souls.

The latest attack on the Islamic scholar, Bat Yeor, is beneath contempt. Eurabia--the actual vision of Islamization---was in fact promoted by Fascists on the Right and totalitarian Leftists, some of whom were Nazis, including Johannes "Omar Amin" von Leers, who actually converted to Islam. Bat Ye'or has simply reported this phenomenon. So of course to those idiots who deny the problem that makes her the problem for simply reporting it.

It's not about Nazis. It's about Islam. The real Nazis are converting to Islam.

I received an email from the attendee to the summit representing Italy. Do me a favor, go here and check out Adriana Bolchini's country report that she gave at the summit on Islamisation: Italy (there was 18 countries reporting on the dire state of the Islamisation of their respective countries.)

"THE SHADOW OF THEOCRATIC TOTALITARIANISM HOVERS OVER ITALY AND OVER EUROPE AND IS IN DANGER OF WINING THE WAR DECLARED ON US." (HERE)

Here's the email from Adriana. A warrior.

Hello Pamela hat, is Adriana Bolchini of Milan Italy, we are met to Brussels and is a lot that I wanted to write to you, but I did not find the time.

I follow with attention your activity and are of agreement on your disdain for that it has happened to Annapolis, therefore I have translate your article the UNITED STATES SPONSOR the JUDEOFOBIA and I have published it here:

  You they are much neighbor and I make mine you compliments for your force and your courage, I augur you not to abandon the fight and remembers that anchio

I would want to make very for Israel and I make every day that that I can, but do not have power.

I embrace. Adriana Bolchini

excuse my little clear translation.

********

Originale in italiano:

Ciao Pamela, sono Adriana Bolchini di Milano Italy, ci siamo incontrate a Bruxelles ed è tanto che volevo scriverti, ma non trovavo il tempo.
 
Seguo con attenzione la tua attività e sono d'accordo sul tuo sdegno per ciò che è successo ad Annapolis, ho perciò tradotto il tuo articolo GLI STATI UNITI SPONSORIZZANO LA JUDEOFOBIA e l'ho pubblicato qui:
 
Ti sono molto vicino e ti faccio i miei complimenti per la tua forza e il tuo coraggio, ti auguro di non abbandonare la lotta e ricorda che anchio vorrei fare molto per Israele e faccio ogni giorno ciò che posso, ma non ho potere.
 
Un abbraccio.  Adriana Bolchini
Scusa la mia traduzione poco chiara

Adriana, I am with you.

UPDATE: Tonight, 8 December, at 8.00 pm Italian time there will be a transmission on La8 Padova about the Bologna conference.  It can be seen on internet by clicking on the this link.

The Conference was about the mega mosque in Bologna. hat tip Chris

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Eviscerating the Doppelganger

Fjordman responsibly addresses (point by point by sometimes inane point) the rational blogosphere's most embarrassing, distressing and incomprehensible moment. Frankly, it's beneath him and everyone who has been toiling feverishly on these long dead matters, particularly when these energies are needed for far greater use.

The proverbial shooting  fish in a barrel. It's  lengthy, informed and absolute in its argument. Read it all here.

Believing what the Eurabian establishment says is like taking the Chinese Communist Party at face value when they denounce political dissidents in China. In fact, it’s worse. Even the CCP doesn’t import millions of Muslims who attack the native population. The European Union does, in a coordinated attempt to destroy the national cultures from Italy via Belgium to Britain. The EU’s policy of deliberately Islamizing the European continent represents one of the greatest betrayals in the history of Western civilization. There is no other continent on the planet today where the indigenous peoples are being systematically deprived of their heritage, displaced in their own cities and subject to violence and abuse with the active involvement of their own authorities, yet where this is celebrated as a good thing in the media.

UPDATE: It was never about Dewinter. It was all about this. Dewinter was an attendee. That's it. BFD. That has become  all about the attendance of VB and SD is sabotage. The conference and what took place is not what is being discussed is a crime.

UPDATE: Conservative Swede fisks.

UPDATE: Robert Spencer's statement.

What we have in this controversy is the spectacle of people I love and have loved for years having a bitter falling out. I have tried to maintain good relationships with everyone involved, as I continue to believe, despite the bitterness of the controversy, that everyone involved has good intentions, good motives, good hearts. All want to resist the jihad, all want to save Europe if it can be saved. All are trying to defend what is good in Western civilization, even as they might conceive of that good in different ways.

There's much more. Go.

Monday, November 12, 2007

Reckless Feckless Hysterics

On fighting the islamisation of Europe. Please read the whole thing here.

On Racists, 'Racists,' and Harakirists Takuan Deiyo

My mother's journey through darkness would last another three years. She would be one of four people who survived the liquidation of her concentration camp, and would appear as state witness in the trial of her camp commandant –- an Austro-German devil's incarnation, complete with a people-ripping Great Dane. She would marry a Jew and remain throughout her life a philo-Semite and supporter of Israel.

It is therefore not coincidental that when hysterical, historical and cultural ignoramuses started lobbying transoceanic charges of crypto-Nazism at Vlaams Belang and The Brussels Journal, I recalled the evening when I was sitting with my mother by the telly, and the news announcer said, voice unsteady from suppressed fury, that Jörg Haider's Austrian Freedom Party had just won 27% of the vote in the 1999 Austrian elections.

My mother, old and ailing by then, looked at me and said, "Finally, some common sense in Europe."

I am no expert in modern European history, and if I were, you couldn't trust what I say anyway, for bending with the academic zeitgeist, most likely I'd be manipulating data to make whitey look bad. But as one who has the calling of writing, and is a practitioner of Zen, I am a serious student of reality.

I will not pretend, therefore, that I know much about the history of Flanders, except what every educated and still non-zombified person knows: great horses, an unjustifiably lesser slice of the Belgian pie, thwarted self-determination aspirations, and, yes, a few battalions of Waffen SS volunteers – whom, incidentally, my father did his best to kill in the frozen forests of Galicia.

So I don't need an American neocon rushing, panting with the horrific discovery that there were Nazi-sympathizers among VB's founders, or that skinheads and racists vote VB or attend VB rallies. It figures, just as it figures that among Nazi sympathizers were Finnish, Estonian and Irish patriots – the latter including the father of one of the chief fomenters of left-liberal dystopia in the Western world, US Senator Edward Kennedy.

The issue of the sympathies of VB's founders is about as relevant as was the IED the hysterical left tried to put under Arnold Schwarzenegger when he was challenging the left's political franchise in California: the Nazi sympathies of Schwarzenegger père. And the issue of some unsavory elements voting VB or attending VB rallies is the same one the American left uses to libel the Republican Party.

Simply put, the few political parties like the AFP (FPÖ, Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs, Austrian Freedom Party) in Austria, the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, the respective People's Parties in Denmark and Switzerland, the SD (Sverigedemokraterna, Swedish Democrats) in Sweden, and the unincorporated paleocons in the US are the only alternative to an across-the-board dominance of the Western world by the Western-world-hating left. So all who wish to resist the harakiri of their society and their civilization through leftist chimeras like unlimited Third World immigration, Islamization, and socialist equalization support the few parties that stand athwart the road to civilizational perdition.

It is a statistical fact that those who see the truth in these matters include a disproportionate number of the less educated, less affluent or even dispossessed whites. That stratum contains some simple minded people who look at the destruction of their societies, values, themselves, and, failing to comprehend the complex mechanism by which such disaster could have been wrought by their own kinsmen, fall for conspiracy theories, "the Jews-did-it" theories, and other such crackpotisms.

To such as recoil at the ripe odor that sometimes emanates from a congregation of the proletarian "unwashed," one may point out that those doing the destruction, ultimately slitting their own belly in the demented belief that they are improving man and reality, include a disproportionate number of the highly educated, affluent and overwashed. It was their kind too that led the penetration of the West by Communism and Bolshevik savagery

So, no, the racist tint on the fringes of VB is not the real issue. The counterjihad movement's recent collaboration with VB is not the real issue. And dragging The Brussels Journal into it is a non-issue altogether.

Even the far more objectionable, partially Nazi or neo-Nazi pedigree of parties like AFP or SD, or the anti-Israel or borderline anti-Semitic utterances of some American paleocons, are not something that ought to disqualify them from support by true conservatives as long as there are signs that they have genuinely cast off the blinders of the past. And with respect to the relevant parties, such signs are ample.


The more important issue lies elsewhere. In Europe, it lies in the conservative and anti-Eurabian position of the few right-wing parties that thwart the left's full domination of the continent. To divert attention from the magnitude and perils of this domination by hurling "Racist" and "neo-Nazi" stink bombs at the few obstacles to it is a brilliant tactic straight from Sun Tzu's The Art of War.

Mosque Building: SAVAGES VS CIVILIZED

Watch the video here (on Bart's website) of a Vlaams Belang demonstration (last week) against the building of a new mosque in the Antwerp neighborhood.
The video shows a counterdemonstration of local Muslims. The latter, raising their fists, shout: "Fascists! Fascists!" followed by "Allah Akhbar."
The VB people across the street, behind a banner "Stop Islamisering", shout: Geen moskee in onze buurt (No mosque in our neighborhood). The only Nazis I see are the Muslims channeling the Brown Shirts.

Hat tip Paul Belien

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Paul Belien on Nazis and Islamists

Steuben__bataille_de_poitiers

"Had Charles Martel not been victorious," Hitler told his inner crowd in August 1942, "then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world." Hitler told Mr. Speer that Islam is "perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament."

Clear explanation by Paul Belien over at The Washington Times on Nazis and Islamists. I for one am not spooked by the newly resurrected old bogeyman - NAZIS! We are not at war with the Nazis. This is a distraction from addressing the real problem, the real scourge of civilization - Islamic jihad. Paul Belien is editor of the Brussels Journal and an adjunct fellow of the Hudson Institute.

BTW, Paul will be joining me on my radio show next Monday at 3pm. Listen and learn.

Nazis and Islamists Paul Belien, The Washington Times

During the Second World War, the Nazis worked on plans to build the "Amerikabomber," an airplane specially devised to fly suicide missions into Manhattan's skyscrapers.

Albert Speer, the Nazi minister for armaments, recalled in his diary: "It was almost as if [Hitler] was in a delirium when he described to us how New York would go up in flames. He imagined how the skyscrapers would turn into huge blazing torches. How they would crumble while the reflection of the flames would light the skyline against the dark sky." Hitler hated Manhattan. It was, he said, "the center of world Jewry." Less than 60 years later, Hitler's plans were executed by Muslim immigrants living in Germany. At the 2003 trial of the network around Mohamed Atta (the pilot who flew into the World Trade Center), Shahid Nickels, a German convert to Islam and a friend of Atta's, said that the Islamists had targeted Manhattan because it is "the center of world Jewry, and the world of finance and commerce controlled by it."

The parallels between Nazism and Islamism are overwhelming. Yet the subject is a taboo. When last March the German historian Matthias Kuentzel, author of "Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11," was to give a lecture at the University of Leeds (Britain), the university authorities cancelled the lecture after threats from Muslim students.

Read more on this subject here: Nazi/Islam  Nexus: Inspiration or Conspiracy

There is a war going on between the Jihadists and the West. We are losing the battle because, as so often in man's history, our political leaders think that they are still fighting the previous war. Europeans who warn against the danger of Islamism are considered — and sometimes even prosecuted — as xenophobes, racists, even neo-Nazis.

The European left, in league with the Islamists, is constantly reminding the Europeans of Hitler and the Nazis, accusing Europe's identity, the very core of its being, of being intrinsically evil. Hence, attempts to rob Europe of its identity are seen as "good," even when those eager to eradicate this identity leave no doubt that they will eradicate the Jews first.

Unfortunately, some American "conservatives" are also blind. Last year, Ralph Peters wrote in the New York Post that Europe's identity is stained by "ineradicable viciousness." He said that the Europeans are "world-champion haters," who have "perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing." Mr. Peters' message is similar to that of Ayyub Axel Koehler. Last June, Mr. Koehler, a convert to Islam and the chairman of the German Council of Muslims, told German church leaders that Europe should be ashamed of the "trail of blood" that it had left throughout the world down the centuries.

Please read it all.

ARTWORK:Charles Martel de Steuben from 1834 till 1837

He is best remembered for winning the Battle of Tours in 732, which has traditionally been characterized as an event that halted the Islamic expansionism in Europe that had conquered Iberia. "Charles's victory has often been regarded as decisive for world history, since it preserved western Europe from Muslim conquest and Islamization."

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Just the Facts, Please

The Center of Vigilant Freedom has an excellent post on the scurrilous accusations hurled at those fighting for Europe's very survival. Please read the whole thing here. Now that is what I call research. I ask that you read the whole thing.

Dewinter in his latest interview said;

....it is very easy for our opponents who want a multicultural and left wing policies over here to put us in the same bag. They have always tried to do that. It is always us to to make a lot of distant between [these groups]...... Because always the left wing is treating us a neo fascist and so on. But is there a risk? Of course there is. We should be careful about it We should be very vigilant about it. Don't put eveybody in the same bag. But those groups like Vlaams Belang and others  who are courageous. Who are fighting against islamisation . Who are fighting against immigration invasion and those groups who are succeesful like Vlaams Belang......Don't treat us as Neo Nazis or neo fascists just because we are conservatives, just because we are right wing. Just because we stand up for our identity and for our moral values and for our way of life......Don't do that because it would be completely wrong.

I quite agree.

Vlaams Belang is not an anti Semitic party neither a Nazi party. Dewinter's own father was, as a medicine student, deported to Nazi Germany to perform forced labour. His grandfather was a member of the resistance. VB's opinions concerning Israel, revisionism, anti Semitism, etc… are well known and have been published in a range of articles and interviews.  They consider Israel a front post of the free West in Islam occupied territory. Dewinter has said Jews and Israeli are our allies in the battle against Islamisation. They stand in the front lines of the battle.

The diabolising of all who criticize and turn against multiculturalism and all who consider the Islamic immigration as a Trojan horse, is proven technique, that certainly in Europe, is successful.

It has never been easy to stand up for ones opinion. Oriana Falacci, Pim Fortuyn a.o. are examples of journalists and politicians who dared to speak up what many were thinking.

Remember this quote from Barry Goldwater: “Extremism in the defence of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue”.

Filip Dewinter in Haaretz
Filip Dewinter in Jewish Week

and his remarks at the Counter Jihad summit along with  his latest interview here.
·

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Nazis? By Their Fruits We Shall Know them.......And so we know them

We must understand the tremendous challenges facing our civilization and work with those who defend the democratic values and freedoms. We must look forward not backward. I think enormous harm is being done to the counter jihad movement in Europe.

BY THEIR FRUITS WE SHALL KNOW THEM

We chose to  participate in a very worthy and substantive conference held in part  by European political parties being wrongly demonized.

I find it difficult to believe, even for a moment, that Vlaams Belang and the Swedish Democrats  chose to support the Brussels Counter Jihad summit and host Jews like me and Andrew Bostom (to specifically speak on the legacy of Islamic anti-semitism, no less) while really, secretly being neo Nazis. To what end? What Nazi does that? They invited  Dr. Aryeh Eldad - is there a more vocal, uncompromising Zionist? And Robert Spencer (his take here)? Vlaams Belang and the Swedish Democrats take the hugely difficult position of staunchly supporting Israel. What Nazi gives interviews such as the one Dewinter gave to the Jewish Week? What Nazi does that?  Why would  they go to all this trouble? For what?  So that they can start roasting Jews after they seize power? I don't buy that. Nazis are quite vocal in their hatred. They don't hide and if you're a real Nazi - I would think Islam would be more your cuppa tea. Jew hatred is celebrated in Islam - there is no need to hide. Read The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism by Andrew Bostom.

Adolf Hitler, Osama Bin Laden, Ahmadinejad are quite clear in their Jew hatred as are all Nazis. No ruse is  necessary - just join the leftist Islamic alliance.

Nazi collaborators

Nazi collaborators have always been a problem for all of Europe, Austria, France, Italy etc. even America. If all the collaborators would had been jailed or boycotted, there wouldn’t had been one European politician. De Gaulle had in his cabinet former collaborators. He declared an amnesty.

Austria elected as its president Kurt Waldheim, former Secretary General of the U.N., a great friend of Arafat and a former Nazi officer responsible for an enormous massacre in Italy during the war. Legions of former Nazis moved to  Socialist parties and aligned themselves with former allies, the Arabs against Israel, America and a free Europe. The same can be said about the European Communists, first allied with the Nazis and who never apologized (until the fall of the Soviet Union.) By G-d, they supported an inhumane regime that killed 40 million people.  I do not think that the Left and the Communists are entitled to attack Filip Dewinter without looking at their own criminals.

Dewinter is right when he says that the Nazi collaborators were amnestied by other parties, even criminals became ministers (France), and chief of state (Austria). Filip differentiates between collaborators and criminals. That difference has never been made  in France,  in Austria, or by socialist parties.

The Neo Nazi, neo fascist movement  is very small in Europe. It is very easy for the opponents of parties like Vlaam Belang and the Swedish Democrats who want promote a  multicultural and left wing agenda,  to group anyone deviating from the group think to group them together and call them neo nazis and neo fascists. They have always tried to do that.

Leftist parties  have their black sheep and have not yet disavowed their collusion with the biggest terrorist and and the biggest racist: Arafat, nor with terrorist Arab regimes and totalitarian communist politicians.

I think that it is important to explain why these Europeans oppose the Islamisation of Europe. The majority of people ignore that Muslim values are determined by jihad, an enemy ideology who's aim is our destruction.

A requirement for integration should be the rejection by Muslim immigrants of all those Koranic verses hostile to Jews and Christians, and of the culture of hate they promote.

Such precautions do not apply to Hindus or Buddhists or Bahais, because their religion is different. Moreover Islam struggles to establish a universal caliphate, a totalitarian system totally opposed to our democratic system and freedoms based on the equality of human rights, the independence of the judiciary and politics and so on. It also wants to destroy all non-Muslim cultures considered belonging to the Jahillyia and replace them with Islam.

Islam negates our history as the former Palestinian Mufti has proven it, when he declared 2 days ago that there was never a Temple in Jerusalem. This also concerns the Christians who share the Bible with the Jews. It means that Jesus never went to the Temple because in the Koran, the Muslim Jesus is totally different than the Jesus of the Gospel, and there is no mention of the Temple. Further all the people of the Bible are Muslim, hence we have no history nor even our religion. Everything is Muslim.

It is for these reasons that brave Europeans refuse the Islamisation of their continent. Obviously it is not  based on race or xenophobia.

UPDATE: Mu!

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Proving A Negative

Diana West weighs in on the campaign to wrongfully destroy the reputation of Vlaams Belang:

VLAAMS BELANG: FREEDOM FIGHTERS Diana West

   One of the epic successes of the Communist and fellow-travelling Left in this country was its suppression of the Cold War in the popular culture. I refer to to near-total blackout on movies and TV that chronicle the primary struggle of the last century between Freedom and totalitarian Communism.
     In its stead, the Left engraved onto our collective consciousness its demonology of American capitalism, the CIA and suburbia. When that wasn't enough, there was always the Sieg-heiling, boot-clicking Nazi. And not just in World War II dramas, where he belongs. Whenever a hero in a plot needs a villain, there always seems to be a Nazi lurking. Where German Nazis don't work, there are South American Nazis. Where South American Nazis won't do, there are South African Nazis. Where South African Nazis stretch our credulity there are Religious Right Nazis. From Tom Clancy to Indiana Jones, Nazis are forever.
    And now, even as our liberties are no longer threatened by Communism and we face a new threat from Islam, we still seem to have Nazis on the brain.  Our liberties are contracting every day in the face of expansionist Islam, but it is still the specter of Nazism that distracts us--some of us, anyway.
    I refer to the very upsetting and undeserved Internet attacks--mainly being lent credence by the blog Little Green Footballs--on Vlaams Belang, the Flemish secessionist party in Belgium. The attacks allege that Vlaams Belang has ties and allegiance to Nazi-type ideologies and organizations. I find these attacks both sloppy and unconvincing. Vlaams Belang is not only the most stalwart, resolutely anti-jihad party in Europe that I know of, but also--and, not at all incidentally--the most pro-Israel party in Europe that I know of. In other words, it is ridiculous to suggest that they are Nazis--neo-, South American, Religious Right, or Other.
    Indeed, it is crucial to understand that Vlaams Belang's political opponents in Europe are the Islamo-Socialist Left, which is where vicious anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism now finds its ideological home. Vlaams Belang is fighting, virtually alone, the Islamization of Europe. For that they deserve both our gratitude and our support.
    You can catch up with the story here and here.          

There are more thin attacks today. Today's  stale offering, the Celtic  cross on a shelf ( video date unknown.)

It is regrettable that the White power movement adopted the ancient symbol of the Celtic Cross as their symbol, but that does not mean that every occurrence of the Celtic Cross means that someone is involved with the White power movement?

More info on the Celtic Cross. Oh and the Celtic cross is  also identified sometimes as the "Solar Cross" - see here. Or here at Wikipedia (not the controversies section.)

At the Celtic Cross Presbyterian Church, a small parish in California....

Or this dangerous group (Note - the building is white - doesn't that tell you something....) at the Celtic Cross Presbyterian Church in Michigan

Geez. they're everywhere - it's a Vlaams Belang/Presbyterian global conspiracy!! Look here...Hawai!! - and now it's the Anglicans too.....

Check out  this website. The Nazi threat is not just at our door, but in our beds....

The Celtic Cross Quilt Square - the horror, the horror...

I hear Dewinter has a menorah on his shelves. And he has the Israeli flag in his office. BTW, Vlaams Belang is pro Israel. That's a mighty big deal.

As for 20 year old videos?  That's pretty weak, wouldn't you say? It’s almost like faulting Mitterand for what he said when he got his Vichy award in 1942 or 43. Belang has long since.

Most Nazis are frank with their message. Positively vocal. Neo's and oldos. Hitler's Mein Kampf and  Osama's fatwa on America are pretty clear documents. No need to search for itty bitty clues. Hitler would be turning over in his grave if Andrew Bostom was invited to speak out about Islamic Jew hatred under the flag of the Third Reich. I mean really.

Ghosts of Nazi Past

Philosopher Roger Scruton, who also spoke at a VB event:

As the British conservative philosopher and author Roger Scruton said in a speech in Antwerp last year, the charge of racism and xenophobia in the EU countries “has become the equivalent of a charge of heresy in medieval Europe, of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts, or of ‘deviationism” in the Stalinist state.” However, as Mr. Scruton pointed out, “we have a duty to brave the charge of ‘racism and xenophobia’, and to discuss every aspect of immigration.”

Mr. Scruton made his remarks in a speech to the Vlaams Belang party – a party which has been accused of racism and xenophobia by the Belgian authorities. “There are many people in this country,”Mr. Scruton added, “who believe that I should not talk to you at all, and that by doing so I become tainted with the very charge that has been levelled at you: the charge of racism and xenophobia. By talking about this charge, I hope to deflect it. I am neither racist nor xenophobic; I am in the habit of assuming that the same is true of others, until they have shown evidence to the contrary; and I am glad that a Party exists that is willing to brave this charge, in order to discuss the problem that is in the minds of all ordinary Europeans today.”

Paul Belien takes a cool and sober look at the facts in the latest smear campaign here.

BELIEN:ARE WE ALL NAZIS NOW? Brussels Journal 

The Egyptian-born Jewish author Bat Ye’or (a pseudonym meaning “daughter of the Nile”) and her family were expelled from Egypt in the 1950s because they were Jewish. She, too, is worried about the trivialisation of the Holocaust by the left and the far-left for the advancement of its own political aims. When recently she expressed her worries at a public meeting she was insulted and called… a racist. A lawyer who was present says that though Bat Ye’or was treated most disgracefully “few people reacted. People are not ready to fight the new anti-Semitism.” The Europeans did not fight the previous anti-Semitism in the 1930s, and they are not fighting the present one. Europe did not prevent the previous holocaust. It does not seem able to prevent the coming holocaust either. And maybe, paradoxically, feelings of guilt for the horrors of the past are preventing some people from doing so.

As Roger Scruton says it needs courage to brave the charges of racism, xenophobia or neo-Nazism in order to speak out. This courage is what Europe lacks.

[...]

Why do I mention all this today? Last week almost 80 people from 15 European countries, plus sympathizers from the US, Canada and Israel, convened in the European Parliament in Brussels to discuss a common strategy to fight Islamism. This important and historical event, which shows that there still is a fighting spirit among some Europeans, has been criticized by Charles Johnson, the owner of Little Green Footballs, an influential American neo-conservative website, because members of the Vlaams Belang were present. Though the VB did not organize the conference, it provided an important part of the logistics and the security of those attending. Johnson says the VB is a neo-Nazi party. His arguments are:
(1)    that the party abstained in the European Parliament from approving the above mentioned Holocaust resolution;
(2)    that early this month the party organized a “white supremacist” demonstration;
(3)    that Nazi skinheads applaud the party;
(4)    that neo-Nazis link to VB videos.

Instead of being able to write about last week’s meeting I have been busy answering emails from friends who, because Charles Johnson is such “a respected anti-Jihadist,” fear that they have been fooled by the VB. The issue is hotly debated on American blogs (here is a detailed account for those interested).

There is, however, no beef to Charles Johnson’s allegations. More here

Read it all and weigh the facts. Not the ad hominen attacks, not the innuendo, just the evidence.

Moreover if I might add that Andrew Bostom was SPECIFICALLY  requested by the organizers to speak about Antisemitism, AND I included at the end at the of his remarks a specific mention of NAZI Antisemitism in the guise of the annihilationist Johannes von Leers. This concluding section was even entitled, "Islam Uber Alles." Here's Bostom's whole speech at the Counter Jihad Summit in  Brussels - read it.

Friday, October 26, 2007

"ALIGNED" was Wrong

Stepping back. Not backpedaling. I want to clarify my position. I was wrong to say Charles was aligned with CAIR. He is in no way aligned with CAIR. In my initial post, my passion and my initial shock lead me to snark. It is the blogoshere after all. The fact that CAIR and ultra leftwing sites are on the same page as LGF on this is merely a confluence of events.

This kerfuffle (!) cannot, must not stand in the way of all of Europe. I apologize for using that word. I stand by my position. I believe the European parties we have aligned ourselves with are forthright and true and I am deeply sorry if I offended Charles. He is the quintessential anti-jihadist and does yeoman's work. And it is my fervent wish that he examine all the evidence.

Thursday, October 25, 2007

Dewinter and the Jooooooos
Supporting the Resistance

Filip Dewinter speaking in Ghent, Belgium. "You should know, the real enemies of Israel today are not on the right, but rather on the left: the socialists and the Greens."

The rapid Islamisation of Europe must be fought. In order to fight it, political parties must be engaged. If not, how then to effect change?

I will make the case for the Europeans desperate to save their country(s). I did  research (and continue to) and see the ghosts but VB or more particularly the Swedish Democrats have done nothing in recent years that I need to worry about.  The Swedish Democrats have had their purge a few years ago and are now clean. I see a pattern of such transformations in several European countries. If they want to become respectable, pro-Israel, I am thrilled to be part of the process.

I can't be held captive to past associations. That's like the left repeatedly running the pic of Rumsfeld and Saddam back in the 80s.  Every party, every person, everywhere has past associations that are irrelevant to what's happening now.  Hell, I was once a Democrat.

The Counter Jihad summit was significant in that forces must enjoin to fight the scourge of sharia. It's not enough to talk about it, action (and quick action) must be taken. The focus needs to be on what the summit set out to do, what transpired and the next steps that must be taken. Bat Yeor, Robert Spencer, Dr. Andrew Bostom, Patrick Sookhdeo, Dr. Eldad, Paul Belien, Fjordman, et all went to that summit to strategize a plan of action.

I have no qualms about aligning myself with these brave souls to beat  our mortal enemy. These daring freedom fighters live under constant death threat. They can not walk down the street in fear of their lives. They are the people on the ground getting arrested. In this video over at Brussels Journal the first man to be taken  is the deputy speaker of Parliament, the second man the president of the Vlaams Belang (the testicle grip is not on film) and you will recognize Filip Dewinter towards the end, having his arm beaten by the baton against the bus.

It is a deception to depict VB's refusal to vote in favour of a European  Parliament resolution condemning the holocaust as Nazi loving.  This EP resolution amalgamated the  horrors of Auschwitz with the rise of contemporary European parties,  like the VB, which are accused of "stigmatizing (Muslim) foreigners."  According to the resolution, opposition against Muslim immigration  leads to a new Auschwitz. This was the reason why the VB did not vote  in favor of the resolution, not because they deny the holocaust. UPDATE:   Here is the text of PE 354.156 European Parliament Resolution on remembrance of the Holocaust, anti-semitism and racism.(hat tip Jeri) Here is the framework referred to in that bill. Read it, it's unbelievable. VB had no choice except to abstain.

Moreover, the notorious pic making the rounds is  NOT of a VB demonstration and the flags (black lion on yellow field) are not VB flags. Paul Belien explained,they are the official flags of Flanders. This is like saying that Bush is a racist because American racists carried along stars and stripes at one of their demonstrations.

We must not undermine the most successful anti-Jihad  party in Europe by depicting them as vile neo-Nazis.

Diana West in her column: AMERICA'S EYES SHOULD LOOK TO EUROPE hat tip the brilliant Babbazee

Before I met Vlaams Belangâ€'s Frank Vanhecke and Filip Dewinter in Washington, I believed Europe's rush to Islamize itself was a stampede, its transformation all but inevitable. Now, I think these men have at least earned Europe the benefit of the doubt. Studying their various statements and interviews, I found no evidence to support the crude slanders to which they are continually subjected in the media for being a right-wing party opposed to the massive Islamic immigration now transforming traditional European culture. Indeed, their statements on Israel are more supportive than any European party I know of. As Vanhecke put it in a recent speech,  "€œThey call us '€˜intolerant' because we oppose intolerance. They call us '€˜fascists' because we oppose Islamo-fascism."

They call us 'the children of holocaust perpetrators', because we oppose Islamists who are preparing a new holocaust against the Jews. America must start paying attention to Europe.'" And to Vlaams Belang.~ Diana West

The Center for Vigilant Freedom has some excellent research here.

Sweden Democrats on Israel

From the Sweden Democrats webpage, on questions of nazism and racism.

Claim: SD has a dark history, your party was formed by racists/Nazis. How does that feel?

SD was not created by Nazis, it is furthermore not a direct continuation of BSS (Keep Sweden Swedish) that some people claims.  We are sadly aware of that a few members, like in other parties, had said and done things that do not comply to the party politics.  But from the start the party has withheld it's democratic, peaceful and non-racist ways which easily can be checked by reading the older party programs. The risk of getting people with extreme political views is always the greatest in the beginning when the party is small and hasn't had time to build a party structure and get organized. We haven't had such problems for a long time.

SD is an open anti-Nazi party which can be read in the old party program from 1999:

€œThe Sweden Democrats rejects Nazism, who's lead motive is the “Führer”, “racial superiority” and aggressive war […]”

Read it all. And read all the links I've provided and decide for yourself. Make your own determination. There is so much at stake. So much evil, so little time.

Filip Dewinter in The New Republic

Vlaams Belang Interview: Support for Israel and Resistance against Islamisation

Here is an earlier interview from December 2005 with Filip Dewinter that provides some clarity on positions that are often presented askew in leftwing blogs:  Some background first from the Militant Islam Monitor and then the interview with Dewinter:

Filip DeWinter on the Islamization of Europe

Filip Dewinter in Jewish Week

Q: There are those who fear that first you will go after the Moroccans and then the Jews. How do you respond?

A: This is ridiculous. You could say the same about president Bush or Tony Blair: “First they are going after radical Islam, then they will go after the Jews.” As if Judaïsm were an extension of Islam. In our view, Judaïsm and Islam are absolute not two of the same kind. On the contrary, they are foes. One has to choose sides. Which side are you on in the “war on terror”? The side of western democracy and western civilization, with its Judeo-Christian roots, or the side of radical Islam? The side of Great-Britain, America and Israel, or the side of Iran, Sudan and the Taliban?

Q: There are those who say Jews should not be voting for a party that espouses xenophobia. Your reaction?

A: “Xenophobia” is not the word a would use. If it absolutely must be a “phobia” let it be “islamophobia”. Yes, we’re afraid of Islam. The islamisation of Europe is a frightening thing. Even distinguished Jewish scholars as Bat Ye’or and Bernard Lewis warned for this. If this historical process continues, the Jews will be the first victims. Europe will became as dangerous for them as Egypt or Algeria. So, I return your question. Should Jews vote for a party that wants to stop the spread of Islam in Europe?

Q: Last year your former party was banned by the Supreme Court for racism. People say that you have just changed the name of your party, that little else has been changed and that many of the same people are in it. Is that true?

A: Yes, that is true. We have not changed so much since our conviction. Indeed, we were convicted. But the conviction was a sham. It was a political process, aimed at curtailing an opposition party. In the United States, judges are independent. Even the president himself could not influence a judge, let alone the Supreme Court. But in Belgium the judiciary is a tool in the hands of the government. All judges are appointed by the three political parties that govern the country since World War I. Some judges are strong enough to shrug off the political pressure, but that’s exceptional. The separation of powers is just fiction. The laws used in this conviction were specially concocted to eliminate our party. In the United States, we would have been acquitted under the First Amendment protecting free speech. Stephan Pollard, one of Tony Blair’s Jewish advisors wrote a very good column about this juridical sham: “I’ve seen the future, it’s scary and it’s Belgium.” In the Cour the Cassation the judiciary discovered the dossier with the indictment had disappeared. Not just one document, but the whole indictment. Hundreds of pages. They had lost it… In a constitutional state, the conviction should have been reversed for matters of procedure. In Belgium, there was no problem. This conviction proves another thing: the plaintiffs had gone over all our publications with a fine-tooth comb: each article in our party magazine, each political flyer, each book, each essay, looking for forbidden opinions. They accused us of inciting hatred towards Muslims, Arabs, Turks… Of course, these accusations were unfair. But even such biased opponents couldn’t find a single word that could be interpreted as anti-Semitic. A so-called neo nazi-party that in twenty years never utters one bad word against Jews… Is that possible? Yes, we are right-wingers. Just as Ariel Sharon, Winston Churchill and Margaret Thatcher are right-wingers. But this doesn’t mean they – or we - are anti-Semites.

Q: It is said that your party was founded by Nazi collaborators and Holocaust deniers and that it still attracts Holocaust deniers. What is your reaction to them in your party and the fact that it was founded by Nazi collaborators?

A: Do we attract Holocaust deniers or nazi’s? Well, sometimes a decent women attracts evil men, not because of her own deeds, but because her good name has been blackened by slander. This is our problem too: all Belgium governments have depicted us as nazi’s in their propaganda. Of course some people believe this propaganda. And of course some youths with nazi sympathies think we are their allies. But we are not. They are not welcome. Such propaganda can be self fulfilling. There are some very small nazi groups in Belgium, but they hate us. They say we are the accomplices of international jewry and that we betrayed nationalism in return for jewish money, that we kowtow for international Zionism, and so on. You certainly know that kind of slander.

Our party was founded in 1978. It originated from the Volksunie. This was a respectable party: in 1978 it took part in a Belgium government coalition. Would our mainstream parties (social democrats and Christian democrats) make coalitions with a party founded by Nazi collaborators? Many political heavyweights in the liberal party and the Christian democrats began their careers in the Volksunie. Not one of our “founding fathers” has collaborated with nazism. Our founder, Karel Dillen was just seventeen when WWII ended. He had not collaborated. As a political party, we have clean hands.

It’s is true however, that before WWII, all political movements in Belgium – including the Flemish patriotic movement - have made fatal mistakes in dealing with nazism. But before the war, before the truth about the shoah became clearly visible, this was a mistake many people made. Before the war, Flemish nationalism was politically divided. There were two parties, the VNV and the Verdinaso. In hindsight, it’s easy to see that they made many mistakes. Their most fatal mistake was their inability to discern the ugly, totalitarian face of national-socialism. Another shameful weakness was their indulgence towards the omnipresent anti-Semitism of the interbellum. This was not the murderous, hateful anti-Semitisme of Goebbels and Hitler, but is was bad enough. It was not typical for the Flemish movement either. That low-level anti-Semitism was omnipresent. In France it was even worse. All political parties in Belgium were more or less infected. Even the royal family, even the socialists, even many of the resistance movements who fought the German occupation. They were no Eichmans, but they didn’t like the Jews.

We are not glorifying the VNV or the Verdinaso. But we can’t deny history. They were our historical ancestors. Not our fathers, but still our grandfathers. That doesn’t mean we will repeat their mistakes. When the Germans invaded Belgium in May 1940, the Verdinaso leadership asked all party members to volunteer in the Belgiumarmy, and to fight the invaders tooth and nail. Those men are our political ancestors too. Yes, it’s true the VNV leadership collaborated with the Germans. But it’s also true the Verdinaso leadership didn’t. The first truth is often used to discredit us. The second truth is almost forgotten. We can’t change the past. We can’t deny the dark spots in our history. But we are not prisoners of that history. This bitter experience has been a sobering lesson. We will never ever again believe the false promises of totalitarism. One could only wish the left-wingers had learned that lesson too.

In 2002, the Democratic Party celebrated the hundred-year old Strom Thurmond and Trent Lott came under fire for having made some positive remarks about Thurmonds political views. An evil interpretation could be that the Democratic Party hasn’t changed a bit, that it’s still secretly supporting segregation, and the Jim Crow-laws. Every American knows such allegations are nonsense. Every American knows the Democratic Party has tremendously changed since Strom Thurmond’s days. But that’s just the way mr. Marinower, the left-wingers and the Muslims are making stupid allegations about us, using seventy-year-old quotations to “proof” we are racists, anti-Semites or even national-socialists. For this people, everyone who’s not a left-winger is a fascist or a national-socialist. In their perverted view of history, there’s no distinction between Eichman, president Bush, general Schwartzkopf and Ariel Sharon. All damned nazi’s. Haven’t you Americans experienced the same thing? Haven’t the Israeli’s experienced the same thing? The Democratic Party in the South has changed. Well, the Flemish movement has changed too. Even more so. The Democratic Party still exists. The old Flemish political parties that became entangled in collaboration in WWII have ceased to exist. Their Strom Thurmonds are dead. We are not even their political children. We are their grandchildren at most. But for mr. Marinower, that makes no difference. This is as stupid as identifying the Democratic Party with Strom Thurmond.

Q: Mr. Marinower compares your party to the Ku Klux Klan and says your party’s quest for votes based on protecting the Jews is comparable to the KKK defending the Jews in America.

A: In the past the KKK was responsible for the killing of Afro-Americans, and for inciting hatred towards Jews and even roman-catholics. If such people would pretend to be “protecting” their former victims, this would be in stark contradiction with their deeds and words in the past. No one would believe this, and with good reason. Blood is thicker than water, and deeds are stronger than words. If the deeds contradict the words, believe the deeds, don’t believe the words. You can apply this to Arafat, the PLO, the Palestinian Autority or the KKK. Look at their terrible deeds. But we haven’t such a criminal record. We have never written anti-Semitic texts. You may examine all our publications since the day our party was founded. You won’t find any attacks against Jews or Judaism. On the contrary. Very often we were the only political group defending Israel, both in publications and in parliament.

Q: Your party proposed naming a street in Antwerp for one of the worst nazi collaborators. Who was that and why do it?

A: It was not “my party” that took this initiative. It was a personal, individual initiative of one of our local councillors. He withdrew his proposal when he came to the conclusion that it was too provocative.

Q: You are said to have on your desk two pictures in which you are shaking hands with Le Pen and Haider. Why display those two photos? What does it say about you that you have selected those two pictures to highlight on your desk?

A: Such photo’s exist of course. But they are not on display in my office. We have contacts with Haiders en Le Pens parties. On issues as immigration, we even have common ground. But we don’t like Haiders kowtowing for dictators as Saddam Hoessein or Khadaffi. We don’t  like Le Pens typically French views of centralisation, we don’t like his anti-Americanism and we absolutely don’t like his anti-Jewish provocations. Just as almost all French politicians, he has this disastrous illusion that it’sFrance’s destiny to have a special, privileged relation with the Islamic world. This explains the French’s biased political position against Israel. This explains their alliance with Saddam Hoessein, their support of Khomeiny when he was preparing to topple the shah… Le Pen shares this views, and we don’t like that at all. He is not the monster the leftists say he is. But I am not identifying with him. We are certainly no holocaust deniers. In Belgian parliament we supported the law who punishes holocaust denial. Recently we even published an article in our party magazine about Raoul Wallenberg, who saved ten of thousands of Hungarian Jews. In our party magazine, we repeatedly denounced arsons against synagogues and violence and racist insults against Jewish people, even when most of the mainstream press kept silent about this, because the perpetrators were Muslim youths. That’s an indication too: our party is very strong in Antwerp. We have more than 100 000 voters there. There were many attacks against Jews in Antwerp: a car bomb, a grenade attack on a school bus with Jewish children, some murders and attempted murders, and many, many cases of harassing, insult and intimidation. But the perpetrators were invariably Muslim youths or foreign Muslim terrorists. In thirty years, not one of our militants ever committed even one anti-Semitic act. These are not empty words. These are facts. You can check them. Ask the Jews in Antwerp. This is at least a strong indication that we are no anti-Semites. Mr. Marinower says we are evil guys, just pretending to be decent right-wingers. People can play a misleading role for some years. But is it possible that tens of thousands of people play a misleading role for almost thirty years?

Q:You referred during a debate with Claude Marinower to Ariel Sharon and said he was Mr. Marinower’s prime minister. He is not Israeli, why call him Mr. Marinower’s prime minister?

A: I admit I was wrong. This was a slip of the tongue. I said “your prime minister”. I should have said “Israel’s prime minister”. This hasn’t any political relevance. Of course I know the difference between “Jews” and “Israeli’s”. I will defend both of them: the Jews in the Diaspora in Europe, and the Jews in Israel. Both are under siege. Both have the same enemy: militant islam, with it’s anti-Semitic core.

Q: Mr. Marinower says he will follow you wherever you go and tell people who you really are. Your reaction?

A: Well, he has the right to do so. Of course he will not tell who I really am. He will depict me as a anti-Semite and a notorious nazi. Mr. Marinower views are distorted by hate. But he directs his hate towards the wrong people. The Jews have enough real enemies. Mr. Marinower would better fight the real anti-Semites. Now he’s spending all his energy in a war against an imaginary foe. He could use some of that energy to fight Israel’s enemies in his own party. Vincent Van Quickenborne, now secretary of state for mr. Marinower’s VLD, a few years ago had a friendly encounter with sheik Yassin, the Hamas chief. Van Quickenborne wished the sheik “good luck”. Good luck in killing more Israeli children? Mr. Marinower never protested, at least not in public. And a VLD-senator said about the Israeli “occupation” of Samariaand Judea: “If a new holocaust would occur, the Jews have to blame it on themselves.” Could Mr. Marinower clean up his own house first?

Q: What do you think of Europe’s pro-Palestinian tilt?

A: It frightens me. Europe pays lip service to the great principles of human rights, democracy, and rule of law. Israel is the only democracy in that part of the world, the only constitutional state. It’s the only nation that respect the freedom of religion, even for the Arab Muslim within it’s borders. Every decent person, every dedicated democrat should defend Israel tooth and nail. But the Europeans do the opposite. They betray all their principles. The European politicians are kowtowing for the Arab dictators, for leaders of rogue states, for terrorists. The European Union subsidizes the Palestinian Authority with billions of euros and big chunks of that money are directly transferred to terrorist groups. And it’s not the Palestinians alone. If the European Union had had his way, Saddam Hoessein and maybe even the Taliban would still be in power. The European Union repeats the mistakes Chamberlain and Daladier made in dealing with Hitler: they permanently try to appease dictators. They don’t use that damned word “appeasement” but that’s the bottom line of their politics towards radical Islam. Appeasement towards Iran. Appeasement towards Hamas, Hezbollah and the Al Aqsa Brigades. And finally appeasement towards the rise of Islam in Europe itself.

UPDATE: The Gates of Vienna has the whole thing here: Vlaams Belang on the Holocaust by Baron Bodissey  

Below is an article that was posted on the Flemish Parliament website in 2005 by Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang. Rolf Krake, a Dane who lives in Brussels and speaks Flemish, has kindly translated it for us.

Go here for the complete European Parliament Resolution, and here for the Council Framework.

Vlaams Belang approves Holocaust resolution in Flemish parliament

Vlaams Belang disapproves the political abuse of the ‘Green Party’ concerning the holocaust resolution

Filip Dewinter sent an open letter to the Jewish community

Go here. Read it all.

UPDATE: RE: The Vlaams Belang flag. This is the flag.

Bevlblg

here again:Vlaams_2

Vlaams2_3
 

 

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

The Man in the Arena, Filip Dewinter

While Muslims riot and burn Belgium and Amsterdam  and ccontroversy continues to swirl around the Counter Jihad summit that took place at the EU last week, I thought it might be instructive  run a transcription of  the remarks made by the object of  the scurrilous attacks, President of the pro Israel Vlaams Belang, (in the Flemish Parliament) Filip Dewinter. So many are agitated, I thought it time time to move on, the battle against the common enemy continues.

Paul Belien writes extensively on the summit: Bowing to Islamists (originally published in The Washington Times.)

Europe is in serious trouble and massaging the numbers ain't going to make it go away. In order to effect change, political parties must be part of the process.

Counterjihad Brussels 2007
Country Report: Belgium

Filip Dewinter
18-10-2007

The situation in Belgium does not differ significantly from the situation in other Western European countries, except for the fact that it might be worse here than elsewhere because Belgium is an artificial state without a national identity to defend.

Belgium, like the rest of Europe, is confronted with welfare immigration. Most immigrants in Belgium are Muslims from Morocco. There is also a significant number of Turkish immigrants.

The overwhelming majority of the Muslim immigrants did not come to Belgium as so-called “guest workers” in the 1960s and 70s. They arrived since the 1980s purely for the purpose of claiming benefits. They sympathize with the parties of the Left. This is the very reason why the socialist Belgian establishment has given them the right to vote.

In Antwerp, the Socialist Mayor Leona Detiège defended the policy of granting citizenships (and the subsequent right to participate in the elections) to as many immigrants as possible, on the grounds that the indigenous Flemings are – quote – “politically overrepresented as the immigrants are not allowed to vote” – unquote.

Belgium is confronted with the phenomenon of Islamo-socialism – an alliance between Muslims and the Socialist Party leadership. The latter  has seen its traditional blue-collar voters flock to conservative parties, such as ours, and hopes to find a new electoral base.

This strategy has worked. In last year’s local elections in Belgium the immigrant vote tipped the balance in favour of the Left.
In Brussels more than one fifth of the municipal councillors are now immigrants of non-European origin. Most of them are Muslims, and most of them have been elected as Socialists, though many have also been welcomed as Christian-Democrat trade unionists on the lists of the Christian-Democrat Party.

In the Brussels borough of Sint-Joost-ten-Node 11 of the 16 Socialist municipal councillors are non-European immigrants, as are 4 of the 5 Christian-Democrats, 2 of the 3 Liberals.

In Antwerp one third of the Socialist councillors are Muslims, as are one third of the Christian-Democrat councillors. According to the Marxist sociologist Jan Hertogen – quote – “The immigrants saved democracy in Belgium” – unquote. Hertogen calculated that if the franchise had not been extended to immigrants my party, the Vlaams Belang, would have polled over 40 per cent in Antwerp instead of 33.5 per cent.

In other towns the situation is similar. In Ghent, one quarter of the Socialist councillors are Muslims. In Vilvoorde, a Flemish town 20 km north of Brussels, half the Socialist representatives are Muslims.

The authorities turn a blind eye tot the radicals because they want to buy the Muslim vote and the radicals control the Muslim population. The Socialists even help the radicals in their efforts to control the Muslim population.

Last year, immediately after the elections, the Antwerp city council sacked Marij Uijt den Bogaard, an Antwerp civil servant who worked in the immigrant neighbourhoods. Uijt den Bogaard witnessed how Salafist extremists were taking over these neighbourhoods and wrote alarming reports for the city authorities about the growing radicalization. This brought her into conflict, both with the Islamists and her bosses in the city.

The city warned her that her reports were unacceptable and that she had to – quote – “change her attitude” – unquote.
When she persisted, she was sacked and her job was given to a radical Salafist. The latter now works for the city, supervising 25 Antwerp Moroccan mosques.

So far Belgium has never been the scene of Muslim terrorism, although Islamists frequently use the country as a logistic support base for actions elsewhere. The Madrid train bombings of 11 March 2004 were planned in Belgium. The Belgian authorities have always categorically denied it, but there are persistent rumours that Brussels has made a deal with the terrorists, agreeing to turn a blind eye to conspiracies hatched on Belgian soil in exchange for immunity from attack. In a GIA statement, addressing the Belgian King Albert II but posted to the French embassy in Brussels in June 1999, the Algerian terror movement explicitly referred to such a deal.

In May 2002, the Belgian Parliamentary Committee controlling the State Intelligence Services published the report of its “inquiry into the ways in which the intelligence services screen extremist and terrorist Islamic activities”. The report confirms that Belgium is the logistical hub of Islamist terrorists. The report states that the Belgian secret service does not screen Muslim radicals, because (a) it is under-funded and under-staffed; (b) it relies on a mutual understanding that the terrorists won’t attack in Belgium; and (c) it fears being accused of racism or xenophobia towards Muslims and immigrants.

According to the report, the Belgian Muslim community, officially numbering 350,000 members, of whom 200,000 Moroccans and 100,000 Turks, has been heavily infiltrated by fundamentalist extremists since the mid-1980s.

Thirty of Belgium’s 300 mosques, the report says, are run by fundamentalist clerics. Candidates for the Jihad are being recruited amongst Muslims in schools, prisons, hospitals and sports centres. Belgium has officially recognized the Muslim religion and consequently subsidizes Islamic clerics and teachers. The latter have free access to Belgian primary and secondary schools. The authorities fail to control what these people are propagating. The report warns that the fundamentalist Saudi-backed Salafi movement is creating a religious state within the Belgian state. The biggest mosque in Belgium, the Great Mosque of Brussels, is controlled by Saudi sects. It is the headquarters of the Islamic Cultural Centre of Belgium. This institution employs 600 Muslim teachers whose wages are paid by the Belgian state. According to the report, the Centre operates its own “Islamic police”, supervising certain Brussels neighbourhoods with a large concentration of Muslims.

The report says that Brussels has become an ideal logistics centre for international terrorist groups, because of Belgium’s open-door immigration policy, the deliberate “hands-off” policy of the authorities towards the mosques and Islamic centres, the geographical position of Belgium and the fact that French is an official language in Brussels, which makes the city attractive to North Africans.

Godelieve Timmermans, the head of the Belgian state security, resigned after details of the report had been leaked to the press. Unfortunately, the situation has not improved in the past five years. Only last month Jean-Claude Delepière, the head of OCAD, the Belgian government’s terrorism watchdog, said that “there is no substantial evidence” that the risk of a terror attack in Belgium has grown because-quote ¬– “Belgium is careful to avoid any aggressive attitude that may provoke negative reactions from Muslims” –unquote.

Indeed, Belgium takes care not to provoke negative reactions from Islamists. Undoubtedly, this was also the reason why last month a pan-European anti-Islamization demonstration in Brussels was banned by the authorities and why the peaceful demonstrators were beaten up by the police. Appeasement is not new in Belgium. Throughout its history Belgium has always appeased its enemies. Apparently, Belgium has not learned the lessons from its history.

Radical Islam is conquering Belgium and Europe by massive immigration and high birthrates. Libya’s Muammar Gadaffi states it this way: “We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. They are a sign that Allah will give Islam victory over Europe — without swords, without cannons, without conquest. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn Europe Muslim within a few decades. Allah is mobilizing Muslim Turkey to adds that to the European Union. That is an addition of 50 million more Muslims. Then there will be 100 million Muslims in Europe. Albania, which is a Muslim country is already in the EU. Bosnia which is a Muslim country is already in the EU. 50% of the population in those countries are Muslim.” (Al Jazeera television, April 10 2006). Gadaffi might be right.

In my home city, Antwerp, we count up to seventy thousand Muslims, or up to 15% of the population. In the municipal elementary schools of Antwerp, the Islamic children represent over one third of the school population. This number increases year after year. If this evolution persists, Antwerp will be a Islamic city by 2050. In Brussels, our nations capital, the situation is even more critical. Nowadays natives are already a minority in Brussels, over half the Brussels population has foreign roots. One third of the total population in Brussels is Muslim. For newborns in both Antwerp and Brussels, Muhammed is the most often received first name.

Simultaneously, a frightening trend of radicalisation can be observed among Muslim youth throughout Flanders. An inquiry among five hundred Muslim youngsters revealed that half of them is convinced that the Koran should be followed literally. Two thirds indicated that they would force their children to become Muslim as well. Only a quarter of the respondents answered in denial to the question whether Muslims are better people than non-Muslims. This radicalisation is spurred by frequent visits of radical Islam websites. Almost every Muslim has access to satellite television, where they pick up radical Islam channels.

The increasing demographic weight of the Muslim community, and the growing radicalisation among Muslims are putting our society under great pressure. Both Brussels and Antwerp have been the scene of ethnic and religious inspired violence. Young Muslims bring destruction, they harass natives and even policemen. Electoral considerations and the fear of escalation shape the policy of giving in to the demands of the Muslim community. Even basic democratic principles and acquirements of our Western civilisation are endangered, as for example the equality of men and women, or the separation of church and state.

Let me give you some examples from Antwerp:

-         Antwerp was the first of many cities in Flanders to allow for restricted opening hours for men in public swimming pools, in advantage of Muslim women, since their partners don’t grant them the presence of other men.

-         All school meals in Antwerp are prepared “halal” according to Muslim regulation. School forms explicit note that pig or horse meat is completely banned from school menus – even for Christian pupils. This solely to meet Muslim demands.

-         The neutrality of public service in Antwerp was contaminated by a growing number of Muslim clerks at reception desks. Therefore the town council intended to ban all expressions of religion whatsoever. This ban would imply for both the Muslim veil, Jewish kippa and Christian crucifix alike. Muslims protested furiously and demanded a general prohibition of Christmas trees and Easter chocolates on the work floor. The ban on veils was immediately withdrawn, mysteriously the prohibition on crucifixes and kippas was maintained.

It must be clear in meantime that the theory of “appeasement” has failed. The more we give in to Muslim demands, the higher the next demand turns out to be. Flemish leading islamologist in Europe, professor Urbain Vermeulen, leaves no margin for misinterpretation concerning the Muslims motivation. I quote: “They simply don’t want to integrate. If they want an integration, than it is according to their Islamic morals. They intend to live in OUR nations, according to THEIR rules. And if this disbelieving regime allows for it, the better for them. Therefore I dare to say that wearing a veil, the continuing claim for generalisation of certain Islamic rules, the enforcement of Muslim rules in the name of the constitutional separation of church – excuse me – mosque and state, are all in essence rejections of our society as a whole.”. End quote. (HLN 27/10/2004)

Hind Fraihi is a reporter for a Flemish newspaper. Having immigrant roots herself, she went undercover two years ago for two months in Molenbeek, a suburb of Brussels with a very high concentration of Muslim immigrants. The outcome of her investigation was clear as crystal. I quote: “The Muslims of Molenbeek have chosen a different path, separate from integration; a path of a Moroccan Muslim state within Belgium. The Muslims of Molenbeek all seem to be made out of the same stuff. Their lives are determined by Islam, Islam, a thousand fold Islam. The evil of the world is the work of “despicable Zionists”. The Palestinian issue and Islamic martyrs are cherished.” End quote (Nieuwsblad 17/03/2005). Fraihi observed how public life in Molenbeek was completely organised by Muslim regulation: fitness centres apply completely separated opening hours for men and women, bookstores sell radical Islam literature, and pig meat can’t be found in a butcher far or near.

I believe there exists a masterplan to submit, first our cities and later Europa as a whole to Islam. Islamic organisations are creating ghetto’s in certain neighbourhoods of our cities. They strive after segregation of the Muslim communities to keep the Muslims living in these cities under control. These faithful Muslims live together in de Islamised neighbourhoods of our cities, where they go to the mosques and Koran schools, go to Arabic shops that only sell halal food, join the Islamic organisations who took over the original social tissue in a very short term. Non-Muslims are not welcome anymore in these neighbourhoods.  Integration of the Muslims in our society is made impossible that way.

In neighbourhoods with a Muslim majority, the radical Muslims try to impose the extreme Muslim way of life on the other Muslims. Everything not in line with Islam, has to deal with tremendous pressure. Step by step the sharia is imposed on these neighbourhoods. Women reluctant to wearing a veil are insulted, threatened and even under physical attack. In some Muslim neighbourhoods a kind of religious police force is keeping an eye on dressing. Last year in the Antwerp suburb Borgerhout, with now almost half of the population Muslim, radicals disturbed and interrupted a music festival. Visitors were intimidated or stripped of entrance tickets. The entrance was charged by a group of young, fired up radical Muslims. Also in Borgerhout, this year, in some areas the bartenders are threatened not to serve any alcoholic beverages any longer.

By this concentration politics, radical Muslims are deliberately creating Muslim enclaves in our cities, who isolate themselves from our society. This ghetto strategy stimulates the white flight of the indigenous people out of the neighbourhoods and cities. These neighbourhoods are used as a bridgeheads of the radical Islam to conquer the city as a whole. If the evolution persists, cities like Antwerp en Brussels in Belgium, but also Marseille and Lille in France, Birmingham and Bradford in the United Kingdom and Stuttgart en Frankfurt in Germany risk to become Islamic cities in a few decades.

One may wonder how this is going to end up if Belgian policies don’t change? The Flemish islamologist professor Urbain Vermeulen is very clear about this: “In thirty to forty years the region ranging from the North of France Lille – Roubaix – Tourcoing to Amsterdam will be one Islamic enclave. Flanders and Brussels lay in the centre of it. In twenty years Brussels will be the largest Maghreban city outside of the Maghreb. (…) Our society will be destabilised. Muslims will continue to launch problem after problem, increase o their demands and they will determine the public life. This may be the end of the mainly European civilisation”. My party will do its very best to prevent that this dark scenario becomes reality.  (HLN 27/10/2004)

Filip Dewinter
18-10-2007

Monday, October 22, 2007

LGF and CAIR

It is most unfortunate when a group of Islamic thugs get inspiration from LGF. I never thought I would see the day that CAIR and Charles over at Little Green Footballs would be aligned against a counter jihad movement, but perhaps pigs do fly.

CAIR released this statement regarding the Brussels Counter Jihad summit, which soundsPigsfly like it took its talking points from Charles' post here.

I previously wrote that it was utterly wrong to dismiss this incredible effort, an enormous undertaking by so many brave fighters and truth tellers , so casually and so out of hand. I attended that summit. As did many other global bloggers, activists, and freedom fighters, in an attempt to formulate strategy to fight the scourge of the Islamization of Europe. Many came at great personal risk to themselves and their families.

I have enormous respect for Charles and came to blogging because of LGF. His news site gave me and thousands like me hope after 9/11. He is a crusader against radical Islam. An invaluable resource for news on the global jihad.

I assure you there was no neo nothing going on there. Charles painted this herculean effort with one ugly brush and took everyone and everything down with it. The irony is the one thing that we came away with, the thing we must do and do now, in order to affect any change, is EDUCATE. And look at the education we are getting. Political correctness run amok.

This conference deserved international coverage. I am not surprised that the mainstream media wouldn't touch it; they are deathly afraid of anything remotely tinged with Islam. They won't even call terror terror. But the alternative media? WTF?

And as far as the racist label (which anyone who dares to question Islam is called) - I don't consider this racism. The EU elites, maybe, but not me.

Robert Spencer is main speaker for upcoming Islamophobic campus tour    
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) revealed today that the main speaker for an upcoming series of "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" lectures at university campuses nationwide recently offered a keynote address at a European gathering that included representatives of racist or "neo-Nazi" political parties.

    Author Robert Spencer, who is scheduled to appear beginning next week at universities such as Brown, DePaul and Dartmouth, is regarded by American Muslims as one of the nation's worst Islamophobes. His virulently anti-Islam website promotes the idea that life for Muslims in the West should be made so difficult that they will leave.

    Spencer recently spoke at a so-called "Counterjihad Brussels 2007" conference in Belgiumattended by those with links to far-right parties such as Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang (Belgium) and Ted Ekeroth of Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden). Both parties have been accused of either having a racist platform, a neo-Nazi past or having links to neo-Nazis and other racists.

    Vlaams Belang is the successor to the Vlaams Blok party, which was banned in 2004 for being an illegal racist political faction. (Vlaams Belang's founders were Nazi collaborators in World War II.)

Who the hell wasn't a nazi collaborator in Europe? Puhleeeeeze.

UPDATE: Conservative Swede weighs in:

..... we should focus on our mortal enemy, but it's also important to know who are with us and who are not. CAIR's core message is no different from that of Charles of LGF, it's just got the volume turned up.

I'm not surprised at this development at all, these are the mechanisms of political correctness. LGF is no different from Sweden here. As is illustrated by my concept "The Finish of the West", the reason why Western people end up on the same side as CAIR (etc.) like this, is not their wish to destroy the West. On the contrary, it's driven by: i) their wish to perfecting goodness, ii) fear of ghosts. Liberals do not went to destroy the West, their aim is in perfecting goodness. Same with the leftists, only a few avant-gardists actually want to destroy the West, the big majority are just working hard in perfecting goodness. The only difference between the left-wing and the right-wing, is that the right-wing has realized that goodness cannot be just that perfected. For the right-wing the fear-of-ghosts component is therefore more active, but both components are active in both camps.

Sweden, which I know well, is a perfect case study of political correctness. As Edmund Burke said "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." And there are a lot of good people in Sweden, many in Moderaterna, the party of Reinfeldt, who see the problems but are completely paralysed by their fear of ghosts. The PC system is a maze, full of smoke an mirrors, which got most people caught in it. Few people see through the smoke and mirrors, and manage to find their way to the exit. But for these few who find an exit, each exit is guarded by a Nazi troll, fake or real. This is enough for decent people to back off and stay paralysed, while joining in the ostracism of anyone fulfilling his dream, escaping through the exit.

There's no difference between these decent and good people of Sweden, and Charles of LGF. And both cases illustrate how the PC tyranny is ultimately held up by fear. People will say that Charles is a good guy and fight Islamism, but so does George Bush, doesn't he? I'm sure Charles does good things for America, but when it comes to Europe he's effectively opposing resistance to Islamization. He's decided that the PC mazes of European countries, such as Belgium and Sweden, are best kept as perfectly sealed systems, and thereby effectively support the PC tyranny. So as Fjordman put in in the LGF comments section, either we are surrender monkeys or we are neo-Nazis. If we would take our cues from Charles and LGF the only option is to lie down and die.

As the commenter at Atlasshrugs wrote: "i think charles and little green footballs at least owe the rest of us some sort of explanation why they do not feel this conference in brussels worthy of a more extended coverage and comment."

Charles did not only avoid covering our conference, he struck a decivive blow against it. Of course all out of goodness and decency... and fear of ghosts. And these ripples have now reached CAIR. All unintentionally by Charles of course, this is not in his control, he's just a pawn in the all-encompassing PC system.

We who were at the conference know that THIS IS IT. Charles will have to decide if he's going to be with us, or stay on the wrong side.

UPDATE: Paul Belien of the Brussels Journal sent Spencer this information:

It is simply not true that "Vlaams Belang's founders were Nazi collaborators in WW II."

Vlaams Belang founder Filip Dewinter was born in 1962 in a family that cannot be accused of Nazi sympathies. His father and uncle were members of the anti-German Resistance. Vlaams Belang was founded in 2004, sixty years after the end of WW II.

The Vlaams Blok, predecessor to the Vlaams Belang, was founded in 1977 by Karel Dillen (1925-2007). Mr Dillen came from a non-political background. His father, an Antwerp labourer, abandoned his wife and their two sons when when Dillen was still a baby. He was raised by his mother. Neither he, nor his brother nor his mother were involved in any political activities at all during the war, let alone that they belonged to pro-Nazi and collaborationist groups.

UPDATE: Robert Spencer responds to CAIR. Please go and read it all.

CAIR hits a new low of defamation

The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has never cared much for the truth when speaking about me. The organization's spokesman, Ibrahim Hooper, has defamed me on national television, and the organization's website even featured a link, for a time, to a tissue of lies penned by a pathetic convicted felon.

But now CAIR has reached a new low, in a press release entitled, "'Islamo-Fascism' Week Speaker Meets With European 'Neo-Nazis.'"

WASHINGTON, Oct. 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) revealed today that the main speaker for an upcoming series of "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" lectures at university campuses nationwide recently offered a keynote address at a European gathering that included representatives of racist or "neo-Nazi" political parties.

The gathering was organized by American bloggers. It was about the Islamization of Europe. I had no hand in the selection of attendees, and was meeting most of them for the first time. No racist or neo-Nazi themes were discussed. If any of the people there are actually racists or neo-Nazis, I completely disavow them and all racist and neo-Nazi ideas. Now: will CAIR do the same thing regarding Hamas?

What's more, the real neo-Nazis of the Aryan Nations have said: "Islam is our ally, and the 1500 cults all claiming to be 'Christian' are our opposition."

Author Robert Spencer, who is scheduled to appear beginning next week at universities such as Brown, DePaul and Dartmouth, is regarded by American Muslims as one of the nation's worst Islamophobes. His virulently anti-Islam website promotes the idea that life for Muslims in the West should be made so difficult that they will leave.

Here again, there would be no "Islamophobes" if there were no Islamic jihad terrorism. The whole concept of "Islamophobia" is designed to divert attention away from Islamic terrorism and onto those who resist it. And we do not actually promote the idea that life will be made so difficult for Muslims that they will leave. In reality, I have consistently asked that American Muslim advocacy groups like CAIR help implement comprehensive programs in American mosques and Islamic schools to teach against the jihad ideology and Islamic supremacism, and that they renounce now and for the future, in deed as well as word, any intention to impose Sharia here. Why is that too much to ask? Why does that make me an "Islamophobe"?

Spencer recently spoke at a so-called "Counterjihad Brussels 2007" conference in Belgium attended by those with links to far-right parties such as Filip Dewinter of Vlaams Belang (Belgium) and Ted Ekeroth of Sverigedemokraterna (Sweden). Both parties have been accused of either having a racist platform, a neo-Nazi past or having links to neo-Nazis and other racists....

I know very little about Dewinter and virtually nothing about Ekeroth, and I am not going to be held responsible for all the ideas and associations of people with whom I shared a platform, any more than they should be held responsible for mine. It is noteworthy that the New York Times, in a profile of Dewinter, found no grounds to call him a neo-Nazi, which they surely would have if they could have. It is also perhaps worth noting that his father was in the anti-Nazi resistance. But ultimately, I said it all above: if there were any actual neo-Nazis there, I disavow them, and ask CAIR likewise to disavow the terrorists of Hamas.

Later on they quote Hugh Fitzgerald (why the quotation marks around his name?):

Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch Board Vice President "Hugh Fitzgerald" wrote on that hate site: "Only one group, only one belief-system, distinguishes itself by appearing incapable of fitting in. And that is Muslims, and Islam ... if one really knew what Islam contained ... then how could any decent person remain a Muslim?"

"Only one group, only one belief-system, distinguishes itself by appearing incapable of fitting in." Right. That's why there was a "Muslim Accommodations Task Force" (that was an MSA initiative; they're doing their best to erase all traces of it, but it's still mentioned on this Google Cached page).

UPDATE:  It takes on a life of its own.

UPDATE: LGF and Vlaams Belang Conservative Swede. More light on Vlaams Belang.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

SOOKHDEO TRANSCRIBED

The wonderful KGS of the indispensable Scandinavian blog,  Tundra Tabloids, transcribed my interview with the brilliant Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo here. Check it out.

KGS caught the blogger vblogging and sent this along:

Img_0986

Speaking right after his presentation, Dr.Patrick Sookhdeo was interviewed by Pamela Geller. He spoke about the 1979 Arab Euro conference,

Dr.Sookhdeo: "in which it was decided that Muslims should not integrate as individuals in society, but as communities. So they emphasized the development of Muslim communities, in other words they would become majorities in given areas, and then they would go to the next stage, which was to engage the political bodies in that area.

If you had to deduce their strategy, over the past thirty years, it would be first the creation an Islamic consciousness, in other words the women wear hijab, everyone eats halal meat, those very basic things that give visibility to the Muslim community, they know who they are, and their sharia, their law becomes operative.

And secondly, to create organizations within institutions, for example, the Islamic Women's society, an Islamic Leaders society, an Islamic Education society. Now, each of those societies sits down and works out its principles. It says what are our objectives, where do we want to go, how are we going to get there? How does Islam fit within this, and how does our law come in?

Once they have that in place, they move to the third stage, which is to say to their local authority, ' that we have got lots of Muslim children in school, should not the school cater for our children, in terms of dress, in terms of Ramadan, in terms of food, in terms of education'? That say politically that, 'we are here, shouldn't we be a part of everything'?

So what has happened as they have engaged the political structures at the local (unclear) national level so now that Islam has been accepted and brought into the center.

Pamela: Yeah

Dr.Sookhdeo: But that engaging has also had to with the media, social, cultural, religious bodies.

Pamela: All operating in tandem.

Dr.Sookhdeo: Yes, all operating in tandem, so their persons must now that it was felt. And then there is the final stage that is set. 'If you don't give way to what we want, then we aren't to blame if you are attacked. Now in England we have had our 7/7. An extremist Muslim came out and said that, "it's really the British government's policy is to blame because we are in Iraq killing Muslims, you can't blame our young people", in other words they're saying to government, "you've got to follow out foreign policy, we will tell you what to do."

So you've got a fourth stage, which is where violence is (unclear) or utilized.

Pamela: Now in America this is starting to happen, I'm on the "Stop the Madrassa Coalition" there this school in Brooklyn, an Arabic school, we're trying to stop it, but it's certainly not the first, and I can see in the UK they have been very successful, have they not? Are there great many Muslim schools, public schools?

Dr.Sookhdeo: Very much so, and in fact the worrying feature is that our present Labour government has decided to fund at least 1oo Muslim schools. So you had independent Muslim schools that's outside the state sector, self funding, and the government is now saying well, that we need to now fund them into the state sector as Muslim schools, which I think is an unwise decision, eh to take.

Pamela: And what do you think that the next step is in the UK, what happens next?

Dr.Sookhdeo: I think the worrying factor is how far these communities are going to go, in terms of some kind of autonomy. If they form majorities within given geographical areas, and that is already happening, (Pamela: it is happening) and if non-Muslims are being pushed out, if they create their own institutions which they've done, if they're are able to Islamicize police forces which they have done and capture political power. At what point do they say that these areas are now Muslims are now going to be under sharia, and we will determine who comes in, what can take place within.

Let me give you two illustrations. Dogs. Muslims of Coventry saying that Hadith traditions are saying that dogs are unclean, should not be in these areas. so what happens if you have a dog? Another is alcohol. What happens if you have a taxi driver who is a Muslim, and he picks up somebody and asks to go to an alcohol shop, does that mean that those will have to close down? Or advertising. One may not like some advertising, they advertise beer or scantily clad ladies, but should they all be removed?

So it has huge impact on what happens within a community. My concern for the States, is not just that Madrassas are developing, but actually Islamic communities of the type we have seen developing inside the UK.

Pamela: Like Dearbornistan.

Dr.Sookhdeo: Yes that is happening inside the States.

Pamela: If George Bush could have done something different after 9/11, did he do something that you would have done differently? Done better, more effectively, or is this just a runaway train?

Dr.Sookhdeo: I think that Mr.Bush's strategy, and I doubt that any other incumbent would have done it differently, was the right one, because they have to safeguard the American people. That was the priority, and it meant that they had to develop homeland security for the first time to join up all the dots and making sure that all of the security agencies are all working properly. Good immigration laws, and a much greater emphasis on counter terrorism. I personally believe that he did the right thing.

And secondly, I do believe that he had to go after the perpetrators, and so..it was right. The Taliban, Al-Qaida was a (unclear) in their back yard, and I don't see where Mr.Bush could be faulted, and any other incumbent wouldn't have done the same.

Pamela: Uh, do you think that the train has left the station?

Dr.Sokhdeo: I think that in the UK, I think it has. because the Muslim community has been allowed to develop in such a way, that it's going to be very difficult to for outsiders to influence it. But it could be influenced from within, it would mean that the Muslim community leaders standing up and saying , "look we want to come back into the station, we want to be a part of life". That's a decision that they have got to take, but if they continue to preach, separation, the development of a parallel society of the old Indian version of communalism, then I think that it's going to be very very difficult to see a way ahead.

Pamela: Why would they back pedal when they have been so successful, I mean I don't understand what would be the objective, their achieving their objectives this way?

Dr.Sookhdeo: I believe that if you are not happy, there are some young professionals who have embraced western values, particularly religion and state, internal private law rather than public, they appreciate a western liberal society, I think people like that obviously do not want an Islamic state.

I think there are some Muslim leaders, who are now sitting down and thinking and saying look, we have fled rigid societies, do we want to replicate these societies here? Is it possible for Islam to adjust, to a contemporary western society? So I think that we've got those thinkers. The real dilemma is, the communities are concervative, by nature even though they are traditionalists, their leadership actually tends to be more of a hardline. The Jamat, the Muslim Brotherhood.

Their leaders actually say well, 'we got want we wanted, and it's taking us where we want, and more than that, western society and British society is so secular, so corrupt, we don't want that, we want our children and families to grow up in our own communities, with our own religion and with our own law. In other words, we want a Muslim street. And that is where the tension is going to be.

Pamela: And this Muslim street, do you think that it'll welcome Christians, Jews and infidels? It's not in the book... Patrick.

Dr.Sookhdeo: Well thus far, in the UK, they're saying that they don't want them, because we have had evidince of people being pushed out of those areas of conflict and violence, and the Muslim street, being deemed their Muslim street is under sharia, otherwise they are going to create zones in which non-Muslims are not going to be allowed into.

Pamela: Your feelings on Turkey entering into the EU, have you any thoughts on that?

Dr.Sookhdeo: Very much so, I think that Turkey is a member of NATO and a very valued member, I can see a place where Turkey in terms of economics and trade can have a relationship with the European Union, but I think for Turkey to become a full member of the European Union would pose real challenges to Europe. The size of the Turkish population by 2020, it could be up to 100 million, that's a quarter of Europe, would then be an Islamic Muslim position.

The present government is moving away from the secular state, and is moving towards an Islamist state. Europe, if they weakened in terms of its foundations, its Judeo/Christian basis (Pamela: would be so easy to infiltrate), precisely. So I would be uneasy with a fully intergrated Turkey into the European Union because I believe that it could pose real difficulties for Europe, for the future, and if, there are those who have suggested that if Europe (means Turkey) enters into the European Union by 2020, Europe could have as much as 45 percent Muslim and begins to pose real difficulties for a country that would be shaped by Islam.

Pamela: And in regards to the Global jihad, by the way I just purchased your book the Global Jihad, is that available yet, is that on Amazon yet?

Dr.Sookhdeo: It is on Amazon and will be published in the US next month

Pamela: OK, I hope that you'll maybe do a show with us when that book will come out and we'll sell some books.

Dr.Sookhdeo: Thank you.

Pamela: How did Israel fail, most assuredly failed, not always, not through industry, you have to see the current leadership as weak, what would you have done differently, if you were advising?

Dr.Sookhdeo: I think that you mean in the context of Hizbullah, I think that if one is going to go to war, then one needs to decide to pursue it absolutely, or not at all. I think secondly, there's a temptation now to use air power, because no one wants more body bags, and air power by itself is not sufficient.

I think thirdly, the issue of ground troops was very significant and how far they would move, but I think more than that, Israel underestimated the fighting capabilities of Hizbullah. And I think she will need to take seriously an irregular force fighting asymmetrically, and she will have to look at how she can engage in that, particularly if air power takes out buildings from which eh., insurgents can fight bombs. So I think that the whole strategy needs to be relooked.

Pamela: Well thank you very much, and good luck.

Dr.Sookhdeo: Well thank you so much too.

In mp3.

 

BTW, wrong to dismiss this incredible effort by so many brave fighters and truth tellers so casually and so out of hand.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Brussels: COUNTER JIHAD RESISTANCE

 One for the Ages, I tell ya. A press release from Vigilant Freedom Europa has the details and  Gates of Vienna has the background on the summit here.

Counterjihadbrussels

I came to Brussels before the barbaric curtain descends altogether and the last memory of man's greatness vanishes in another Dark Ages. The course of of mankind's progress is not a straight automatic line, but a tortuous struggle, with long detours or relapses into the stagnant of the irrational. (Ayn Rand)

Warriors, bloggers, scholars, politicians, from across the globe converged in Brussels at the EU to strategize against the onslaught of the Islamization of the West.
Counter_jihad_brussels_010_2

I came with my buds Andrew Bostom, author of The Legacy of Jihad and the forthcoming Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism and Robert Spencer, Director of Jihadwatch and author of several books on Islam. Sitting together made the relentless stream of bad news more tolerable as we scribbled little notes to each other and kicked each other under the table (on the off moments, of course :)

Some names must remain unreported here, their security too tenuous.  But it was an extraordinary group! Much thanks to our gracious hosts Paul Belien of The Brussels Journal, Bart Debie, Filip De Winter, Philip Claeys, Dirk Crols and their colleagues and the blogosphere ambassadors, Baron Bodissey of Gates of Vienna, and many European bloggers, activists and experts who contributed ideas and contacts.

The middle of the road is like an unstable, radioactive element that can only last so long - and its time is running out. (paraphrasing Ayn Rand )

On October 18 and 19, over 70 organizations and individuals joined together in the European and Flemish Parliaments to create a European network of activists from 14 nations to resist the increasing Islamisation of their countries. Keynote speakers included Bat Ye’or, author of Eurabia and Dhimmitude and Robert Spencer, author of Religion of Peace, Why Christianity is and Islam Isn’t. Additional speakers included David Littman, Dr. Arieh Eldad, member of the Israeli Knesset, Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, Director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity, Sam Solomon, Director of Fellowship of Faith for Muslims and author of the Charter of Muslim Understanding,  Dr. Marc Cogen, Ghent University, Dr. Andrew Bostom, author of The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism, and Laurent Artur du Plessis, author of a forthcoming book on shariah finance. Many participants worldwide also attended the first day of presentations online through webex

The most fascinating portion of the morning program was a series of country reports on the status of the Islamization and the creeping sharia in their respective countries.Paul Belien of Belgium, Stefan Herre of Germany, Nidra Poller of France, reports from the UK (the worst), Ted Ekeroth and Reinhard Fomi from Sweden, Lars Hedegaard from Denmark (extraordinary presentation), Jens Anfindsen from Norway, KGS from Finland, Johannes Janasen from Holland, Adriana Bolchini Gaigher of Italy (what passion!), Arnaud Dotezac from Switzerland, Traian Ungureanu of Romania (gave excellent advice how to bite back at the jihad), Austria.

GERMANY: STEFAN

Germany Muslim immigration is unknown, "unverified."The only thing known about the number of Muslims in Germany is that they don't know it. Given the federal survey's lack of interest in the number of immigrant Muslims, analysis of the costs of Muslim immigration is very difficult. The Federal government says between 3.1 and 3.4 million. Mideast expert Hans-Peter Raddatz  believe the number north of 6 million. Massive German family reunion programs (from Turkey primarily), frequently directed into the German Welfare system, rapidly established a huge flux

Additional influx of German citizens with Lebanese backgrounds were evacuated from Lebanon. The goverment did not want to be too particular about passport controls (for humanitarian reasons) so how many were tied to affiliated with Hezbollah is impossible to know.


What I found most interesting is European  countries consistently underestimated their Muslim numbers, while in America CAIR , MAS et all consistenly overestimated the number of Muslims in America. I am sure that will continue to until the Muslims reach critical mass in America.

The islamization in Germany is not only a question of ideology but increasingly of an Shariaclockmed intervention of a foreign state -- Turkey in national sovereignity.May of the 2800 mosques built in Germany were built by theDITIB a subsidiary of the Turkish government authority for religion.
 
POLICE:
The police force in Germany's biggest state, Nordrhein-Westfalen is proceeding to reserve jobs for Muslims, whom they recruit in mosques. The establishment of exclusive Muslim units for "better cooperation between the police and Muslim communities."
When we define as an unreasonable demand that Muslims accept infidel police officers, we are starting to seperate society into Islamic and no-Islamic enclaves.


A problem Stefan thought was only Germany's yet it now more widespread is the tactic of  the promoters and and defemders of Islamization to conflate, and deliberately mix up critics of Islam and nazis. Accusations such as racism, fascism or nazism usually are hurled at people who criticize Islam or even question the Islamization of Europe or the Eurabian concept. This is done by politicians, the media. clerics. academia and regular folks as well.

There are somee 100,000 Jews living in Germany, most of them immigrants from the Soviet Union, and they are increasingly harassed, especially in the public schools. It's horrific, appalling and sad. The harassments orginate mainly from Islamic immigrants but not only from them. Unfortunatrly there is still some original anti-semitism  and Anti0Americanism dound within the native German population, though most of it is not open aggressive but rather, latent.
 
Most Germans support the European Union as a garantor of peace in Europe. and perhaps as a way to give up an embarassing nationality trading German for European.There is hardly any knowledge among Germans about its antidemocratic and Eurabian aspects so they tend to consider inofrmation about it as some odd conspiracy theory. To sum it up, there is only very little resistance agaisnt the Islamization in Germany.

Counter_jihad_brussels_004_3

 Italy:

"The shadow of the throcratic totalitarianism hovers over Italy and Europe and is in danger of winning the war declared on us."

For western democracies this is the mani problem: If in Islam society, politics culture and religion are all one, how can we live in harmony with a Muslim system that wishes to islamize all aspects of life.
 
The political plan as already produced in Italy a series of small manifestations of intolerance towards Christians and their symbols (who have not relited by burning mosques ir killing Muslims.)
 
Muslims are demanding seperate beaches and restricted use of swimming pools and calls to consider Friday the festive day for Muslims  (where it is not even in practice in Islamic countries.)
Further demands are being made for 5  pauses for prayer during study and work times which interrupts the rhythms of all other workers and damages the freedom of study and work for the Italian population at large.
 
Reports of maltreatment of women dominate the newspaper crime reprots. These are the ones  that come to the attention of the public, but we know the tragedy of Muslim women segreagted at home and subjected to ill treatment is so very widepsread. Their Calavry begins when they arrive in Italy. They are isolated from the indigenous population are not sent to school, do not learn the language and therefore they cannot communicate with us and cannot ask for assisitance .
Not that they would. Terrified to I am sure.
New and hurried consturction of mosques has become an emergency, they excpect them as an urgetn need and there is not one Italian city that is not affected by thenis problem.They are not simply mosques but Islamic citadels, catering to their needs from birth to death seperating them form the Italinas. The main problem is that these Centers are under the influence of UCLII (unione delle Communita' e Organization Islamiche in Italia) whose Presiddnt and former secretary Robberto Piccado was investiaged for "incitement to to ethni and religious hatred" and "aplogists for terrorism. Charges levelled by two paliamentarians.
 
She went on to cite crime after crime against the church, women  and hate speech.
 
DEMONSTRABLE PROOFS ON THE PREACHING OF HATRED: ROME: A hidden television camera catches the imam of the Turin mosques, Khohaila, preaching to his folllowers "not to mix with Westerners", to "stay far away from the infidels" and telling them "to hold women in submission." This is just one of many videos.

A courageous inquiry was carried out to discover that in our mosques the niqab, the integral veil, should be imposed byn the Divine authority and symbolizing the penetration of Sharia, the Koranic law, as part of the Islamization of Italy.

Counter_jihad_brussels_015

The Baron, Bat Yeor

Counter_jihad
 

The next speaker , whom I recorded, was Dr. Aryeh Eldad (see below.) Many of us are looking at Knesset member Arieh Eldad as a symbol of hope for the tortured Jewish state.In fact, the Israeli politician is heading a new national movement called Hatikvah, which means, literally, the hope.

Eldad is a world-renowned medical doctor. He was surgeon general of the medical corps and the head of plastic surgery at Hadassah hospital in Jerusalem when the second intifada broke out in 2000. There were about 3,000 casualties in two years, mostly burns, among other injuries, from suicide bombers,"I realized that preventive medicine is the most effective way to practice. Prevention is so much more efficient. In terror, preventive medicine doesn't lie within the hospital walls, but in the field of politics. We can prevent this terrible wave of terror."

And the only way is by preventing the creation of a Palestinian state west of the Jordan River the famous two-state solution that is actually a suicidal plan.Every piece of land given away is interpreted as just another stage towards the goal of elimination of the state of Israel, he continued. "We can see that from Gaza. ˜It will turn into Hamastan"

Dr Eldad, Israel's next Prime Minister (well I can hope can't I?)

Counter_jihad_brussels_016_4

NEW: Dr. Eldad VIDEO

 

The most compelling presentation was Patrick Sookhdeo. I am right now reading his book GLOBAL JIHAD, The Future in the Face of Militant Islam. His evaluation of Islam in the UK was depressing. That train has left the station and frankly there is little hope of stopping it. I have an audio interview with Mr Sookdheo which I will post later (don't haver the right connection here.)

Counter_jihad_brussels_018_2

We don't do our homework so we do not understand how the enemy operates. Sookhdeo laid out how Islam infiltrated and co-opted British society.

In Islamic theology, you must organize. If there are two Muslims they must get together  (and they do) and strategize. That is the genius of Islam.

LIVEBLOGGING PRESENTATION:
Organization and Imposition of Sharia
Radicals take over Muslim community and its infrastructure, shape it in their image.
Gain control pf local Muslim areas, turn them into no go areas for non Muslims.

From his book: GLOBAL JIHAD, The Future in the Face of Militant Islam:

"Radical Islam has declared war on the West. It is the manifestation of a theology that is rooted in classical Islam. Traditional Islam which, developing under colonial pressure, saw a break from violence, from the totality of shari's and from politcal activism, is now gradually being subsumed into classical Islam. The challenge for the West is .. to declare war on on the Islamic theology,  philosophy, and ideology that motivate and sanction fanaticism, extremism, violence, and terrorism. We live in depressing times, as leaders, both political and military, whether in the Islamic or the non-Islamic world, grapple with issues that seem insoluble."

For this to be done, the Muslim world - its clerics, theologians, political leaders and umam -- must rise up and engage in a radical reformation of Islam.

While liberal societies have long relegated religion to the outer reaches of society, leaving  it a primarily private matter, Islam has shot back in the opposite direction. Muslims are presently engaged in instituting Islam and Islamic law into every tenet of society. A DARK AGES AS IT WERE.  By using the classical tenets of Islam, they have undertaken a strategy to impose Isla, on Muslim and no Islamic states. The quranic view on war (according to the book) "The initiation of war is for the cause of God."

Pakistani General S.K. Malik in his military textbook:

"'Jehad' the Quranic concept of total strategy, demands the preparation and application of total national power and military instrument is one of its elements. As a component of the total strategy, the military strategy aims at striking terror into the hearts of the enemy from the prepatory stage of war while providing effective safeguards against being terror stricken by the enemy." Source Sookhdeo's GLOBAL JIHAD.

Counter_jihad_brussels_014

Nidra Poller .

Counter_jihad_brussels_005

Belien, Littman and .....

And into the evening................

Counter_jihad_brussels_025_2

Tossing back a few.

 

Counter_jihad_brussels_029_2  
The Czech Republic is well represented!

Counter_jihad_brussels_031

Filip De Winter, Dr. Eldad, running for Prime Minister of Israel on the Hatikvah ticket and David Littman who is very active in several NGOs on human rights  issues at the UN commission (check out my interview with him here.)

Counter_jihad_brussels_013_2

Law Professor, Arnaud Dotézac Lawyer - Islamic law. What was most interesting in our conversation was  his description of structure pf various laws. Wherein in other religious and secular law morality comes first and then the law. Just the opposite was true with Islamic law. Law comes before morality.

Counter_jihad_brussels_027

The Baron from Gates of Vienna and Lars Hedegaard who made a powerful presentation on behalf of Denmark, a searing indictment on European capitulation. Hedegaard is a historian, author, journalist.  I lauded his countrymen for extending the offer of security to Hirsi Ali while putting the Dutch to shame.

UPDATE:I have Eldad video, Spencer video, and an important Sookhdeo  interview. Check back later.

UPDATE: Here is the interview I conducted with Patrick Sookhdeo. Riveting. Just wild. Get his book. It will be on Amazon next month. And he will be appearing on my show as well. Click this link to listen:

Download Sookhdeo.mp3

UPDATE: Robert Spencer was the keynote speaker. Powerful speech. We must EDUCATE ourselves and all Americans to the infiltration and ultimate take over. EDUCATE!

Dr. Andrew Bostom gave the closing speech on Islamic antisemitism and the Islamic Nazi conspiracy. Shocking revelations all tied to the Quran.

It was a tough day. But we did all converge on the bar late into the night. Spencer, Bostom, Brian of London, Steen, Arno, Poller - a bunch of us -- and laughed our asses until the wee hours. Hey - la chaim!

Bryssel18oktober2007384

Atlas. Arnaud, the Baron, Spencer, Bostom -- whooop.

Palin 2012!

SUBSCRIBE TO ATLAS
DAILY UPDATES!

ADVERTISE!

ADVERTISE HERE!

Advertise on Atlas


  • Contact Atlas: Email Me

    blog advertising is good for you

    blog advertising is good for you

    HELP YOUR FAVORITE BLOGRESS! BUY YOUR AMAZON STUFF HERE!


  • Facing_jihad_3

Atlas Shops!


  • Atlas shops

WEBLOG AWARDS

GRANDE CONSERVATIVE BLOGRESS DIVA

Sitemeter


Atlas Speaks At Your Next Event

Search me





  • Add to Technorati Favorites
  • BANNED ON GOOGLE: FORBIDDEN
    Google

    SEARCH HERE

FITNA

Counter Jihad

Follow me on FACEBOOK & TWITTER

  • FOLLOW ME

SUPPORT ATLAS!



  • Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Politics
My Photo

Categories

My Photo

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Quotables from Notables


  • Well, I read Atlas Shrugs, Power Line, National Review blogs ...... ... Ambassador John Bolton

    I'm a fan! - Mark Steyn

    Fearless, intelligent, beautiful -- Pamela Geller wears her Supergirl costume well. Pamela Geller is a dynamo of energy and a paragon of courage and fearlessness. -- Robert Spencer, JihadWatch in his book Stealth Jihad

    You do great work with your blog. -- Geert Wilders

    "Courageous insights from a pulchritudinous pundit!!" Dr. Andrew Bostom, Leading Scholar on Islam

    "Great site," Dick Morris

    "Indeed, some of Israel's best friends and most articulate defenders can be found in the blogosphere .... Atlas Shrugs, [et al] all provide a refreshing alternative to the moral relativism and politically correct anti-Israel blather of the media. Michael Freund, Jerusalem Post

    "The best there is," Beryl Wajsman, President Institute of Public Affairs

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Atlas on TV!

Ayn Rand at 100: "Yours is the Glory"

  • Aynrandstamp_1

  • Speaking to the unnamed, unchampioned, beating heart of her new land, Ayn was to say: 'Yours is the glory.'"
    A man whose ability and independence leads others to reject him, but who perseveres nevertheless to achieve his values. Man as an individual, as a creator. What's the most depraved type of human being? Not a sadist or a murderer or a sex maniac or a dictator; "The man without a purpose." Yet most people seem to go through their lives without a clearly defined purpose.


Barter


  • Life has Loveliness to sell,
    All beautiful and splendid things,
    Blue waves whitened on a cliff,
    Soaring fires that sways and swing,
    And children's faces looking up,
    Holding wonder like a cup

    Life has Loveliness to sell,
    Music like a curve of Gold,
    Scent of pinetrees in the rain,
    Eyes that love you, arms that hold,
    And for your spirit's still delight,
    Holy stars that star the night.

    Spend all you have for loveliness,
    Buy it and never count the cost;
    For one white singing hour of Peace
    Count many a year of strife well lost
    And for a breath of ecstasy
    Give all you have been, or could be.
  • Loyalist Party

BBBlogging

Fauxtography