Obama shakes hands with his Chinese counterpart Hu Jintao.
Another trip, another spectacular Obama failure. He is consistent in his impotence, is he not? And he will use any excuse to back away from his failures. When it comes to failing America, Obama never disappoints.
I find Axelrod's plea for taking "the long view" really rich, like we did for President Bush, right? The Bush doctrine needed the long view. The long view on fighting jihad perhaps but for sucking up and standing down on American hegemony. I think not.
And still Obama pimps for "climate change" hoax, which has bee exposed as the largest fraud ever committed in human history.
President
Obama has spent a week in Asia, with high level meetings across four
countries. But critics argue all that time and jet fuel has not been
well-spent. The President leaves South Korea today with arguably little
show for it.
After Obama's joint press conference with
President Lee Myung-Bak, White House senior advisor David Axelrod
defended the visit to reporters in the hall of the Blue House.
"This
not an immediate gratification business. I understand that Washington's
in the immediate gratification business," Axelrod said, "We made solid
progress on climate change that's been reported. We've helped him
clarify understanding on security issues and obviously on economics.
But nobody came expecting that all of these things would be resolved on
this trip, this is part of laying the foundation."
But the list of disappointments is long:
- official
news from the Danish Prime Minister that the upcoming climate change
summit in Copenhagen will not yield a binding international agreement.
- Chinese
President Hu Jin Tao made no commitments on balancing the yuan, and his
government refused to broadcast live Obama's town hall on state
television.
- Despite a personal appeal from President Obama, President Hu also continued to oppose economic sanctions on Iran.
- A
key meeting in Singapore with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev yielded
official confirmation that US/Russian disarmament negotiators will not
reach a new agreement before the START treaty expires on December 5th.
Ambassador John Bolton nailed him on this trip here:
President Obama Didn't Impress Asia
China and others know exactly how to take advantage of a 'post-American' President.
Barack Obama's first visit to Asia since his inauguration was one of
the most disappointing trips by any U.S. president to the region in
decades, especially given media-generated expectations that
"Obamamania" would make it yet another triumphal progression. It was a
journey of startlingly few concrete accomplishments, demonstrable proof
that neither personal popularity nor media deference really means much
in the hard world of international affairs.
The contrast between Asia's reception for Obama and Europe's is
significant. Although considered a global phenomenon, Obamamania's real
center is Europe. There, Mr. Obama reigns as a "post-American"
president, a multilateralist carbon copy of a European social democrat.
Asians operate under no such illusions, notwithstanding the "Oba-Mao" T
shirts briefly on sale in China. Whatever Mr. Obama's allure in Europe,
Asian leaders want to know what he means for peace and security in
their region. On that score, opinion poll ratings mean little.
What the president lacked in popular adulation, however, he more
than made up for in self-adulation. In Asia, he labeled himself
"America's first Pacific president," ignoring over a century of
contrary evidence. The Pacific has been important to America since the
Empress of China became the first trading ship from the newly
independent country to reach the Far East in 1784. Theodore Roosevelt
created a new Pacific country (Panama) and started construction on the
Panama Canal to ensure that America's navy could move rapidly from its
traditional Atlantic bases to meet Pacific challenges. William Howard
Taft did not merely live on Pacific islands as a boy, like Obama, but
actually governed several thousand of them as Governor-General of the
Philippines in 1901-1903. Dwight Eisenhower served in Manila from 1935
to 1939, and five other presidents wore their country's uniform in the
Pacific theater during World War II—two of whom, John F. Kennedy and
George H.W. Bush, very nearly perished in the effort.
But it was on matters of substance where Mr. Obama's trip truly was
a disappointment. On economics, the president displayed the Democratic
Party's ambivalence toward free trade, even in an economic downtown,
motivated by fear of labor-union opposition. On environmental and
climate change issues, China, entirely predictably, reaffirmed its
refusal to agree to carbon-emission limitations, and Mr. Obama had to
concede in Singapore that the entire effort to craft a binding,
post-Kyoto international agreement in Copenhagen had come to a complete
halt.
On U.S. national security, Mr. Obama
came away from Beijing empty-handed in his efforts to constrain both
the Iranian and North Korean nuclear weapons programs, meaning that
instability in the Middle East and East Asia will surely grow. In
Japan, Mr. Obama discussed contentious issues like U.S. forces based on
Okinawa, but did not seem in his public comments to understand what he
and the new Japanese government had agreed to. Ironically, his warmest
reception, despite his free-trade ambivalence, was in South Korea,
where President Lee Myung-bak has reversed a decade-long pattern by
taking a harder line on North Korea than Washington.
Overall, President Obama surely suffered his worst setbacks in
Beijing, on trade and economics, on climate change, and on security
issues. CNN analyst David Gergen, no conservative himself, compared Mr.
Obama's China meetings to Kennedy's disastrous 1961 encounter with
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev in Vienna, a clear indicator of how
poorly the Obama visit was seen at home. The perception that Mr. Obama
is weak has already begun to emerge even in Europe, for example with
French President Nicholas Sarkozy, and if it emerges in Asia as well,
Obama and the U.S. will suffer gravely.
Go. Read the whole thing.