Atlas Shrugs

Australia: Muslim refuses to rise for Judge, Yells at Sargeant "You’re not a lady, you’re f…ing filth"

 

Millions of Muslims come to Western countries with a ready-made model of society and government (sharia) which they believe to be superior to what we have here, and they are working to institute it. A vicious Muslim who violently attacked police during a protest against free speech in Australia said his religious beliefs stopped him for rising for the court -- the standard practice whenever a judge or magistrate enters or leaves.

This is the sharia. My question is, why would anyone who regarded their system of governance (no matter how savage) superior to the country in which they are living -- be allowed to remain? It is treason. They should be thrown out. 

In this case, this Muslim was  jump-kicking at the (officers') shields and punching the shields. Of course, his defense was the Islamic default position, grievance mongering. Whine and whack, then whine some more.

A protester holds a home made sign during a rally in Sydney's central business district as anger over a film that insults the Prophet Mohammed spread to Australia on Saturday

"Accused rioter Mohammed Issai Issaka berated in court after refusing to stand for Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge" The Daily Telegreaph, May 20, 2013

A MAN accused of rioting during last year's violent Muslim protests has been berated for his "disrespect" after refusing to stand before a magistrate at his court hearing.

Mohammed Issai Issaka, who was charged with riot, assaulting police and resisting arrest over the September incident, this morning said his religious beliefs stopped him for rising for the court - the standard practice whenever a judge or magistrate enters or leaves.

Magistrate Jacqueline Milledge repeatedly demanded Issaka stand for her, telling him she didn’t accept his refusal.

"You can tell me where it is in his religion that it says he cannot stand," she said to Issaka's lawyer, Stephen Hopper.

"I was a magistrate at Bankstown Court for four years and I have never had to deal with such disrespect."

The hearing had to be postponed for nearly half an hour after the prosecution and defence consulted Ms Milledge, with the case eventually continuing after Issaka waited outside the courtroom as everyone stood for the magistrate.

Constable Allan Simon, who helped arrest Issaka during the CBD protests, told the court he first noticed the man take a "boxer stance" in front of a police line, where he was "jerking backwards and forwards" and "hissing" at the officers' dogs.

He said he next saw the accused rioter about 15 minutes later when he was violently lashing out at riot squad police.

"There was like a running jump-kick at the (officers') shields and he was punching the shields," he said.

Constable Simon said three officers brought Issaka to the ground but he continued resisting them and the man kicked him in the knee before he was bundled into a police van.

While in the truck he kept repeating "I have no respect for you guys", the court heard.

Issaka shook his head repeatedly during parts of the constable’s evidence.

Sgt Catherine Sadler said she saw Issaka dragged towards the police van and she heard him yell out: "You’re not a lady, you’re f…ing filth".

"I don’t recall anyone other female officers being there – I took the abuse as being towards me," she said.

Issaka, who pleaded not guilty to the charges, has claimed he only acted in self-defence to being violently restrained during the protests.

He produced a bloodied beanie during his last hearing date in February as proof of the injuries he allegedly suffered in the confrontations with police.

 

A protester hits a policeman with a pole in in Sydney

Protesters pray in front of a line of police officers in Sydney's Hyde Park today

Australian Party senate candidate charged for terrorism comments

Blowing up women and children, waging war on the streets of Western nations, subverting Western law with sharia -- this is not a problem according to the prevailing [anti-]wisdom. The problem is offending believers in the ideology that commands the blowing up of women and children, waging war on the streets of Western nations and more moderate Muslim nations, subverting Western law with sharia ....

"Yet the Australian Defence Force is sending a message that intelligence officers cannot discuss Islam in any way, shape or form, unless they pass judgment that it is a nice, peaceful religion.

"How the hell are you supposed to have an objective view of Islam if you are not allowed to examine links between Islamic beliefs and terrorist activity?"

Muslim immigration from jihad countries must end. Immediately. What politician will carry the ball? This Australian candidate tried, and look where it got him. This is sharia in the West.

Terrorism comments got me charged: Gaynor Brisbane Times (thanks to Sheik)

Former Katter Australian Party senate candidate Bernard Gaynor claims he has been charged by the Australian Defence Force over comments he made about Muslim immigration and terrorism.

Mr Gaynor, an Army Reserve Intelligence Officer, has posted a series of blogs arguing Islam immigration should be limited and in the wake of the Boston bombings re-aired his views.

He said he was charged on Monday by the ADF for bringing the organisation into disrepute and responded by saying it was proof political correctness was hampering the ADF's ability to fight against Islamic violence.

"It is outrageous that the Australian Defence Force is charging me for discussing Islam," he said in a statement.

"In the last week, ASIO has confirmed hundreds of Muslim Australians are joining violent Islamic groups in Syria and a radical Australian Islamic cleric has been linked to the Boston bombers.

"Yet the Australian Defence Force is sending a message that intelligence officers cannot discuss Islam in any way, shape or form, unless they pass judgment that it is a nice, peaceful religion.

"How the hell are you supposed to have an objective view of Islam if you are not allowed to examine links between Islamic beliefs and terrorist activity?"

The ADF have been approached for comment.

His latest blog about limiting Muslim immigration is titled "ASIO concern highlights need for immigration debate" and was posted in the wake of the Boston bombings.

"As I've written a number of times before, Australians urgently need to debate the pros and cons of continued Islamic immigration," he wrote in the post.

"News that ASIO is concerned that hundreds of Muslim Australians have gone to Syria to fight with radical Islamist groups highlights that this debate must be had.

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/terrorism-comments-got-me-charged-gaynor-20130422-2i9rg.html#ixzz2RDEDzTN3

 

Australian Government: Sharia Law Out, One Law for All

This has to be the first government in the world to say this.

Check out the article (below) in The Australian. In short, no room for Sharia law in a multicultural society. Muslims in Australia say they will defy the (secular) law and have multiple wives anyway. And I am sure those wives will apply for single mother benefits. (Thanks to Mike for screenshot.)

This is rampant in the US as well -- 70% of Muslims in America support multiple wives....

From The Australian

#MyJihad in Australia: Four Muslims found guilty of sharia law whipping

Sharia whipping in Australia. Yes, Australia.

Four men found guilty of sharia law whipping The Australian, February 28, 2013

FOUR men who took part in the whipping of a Muslim convert to punish him for drinking alcohol and taking drugs have been found guilty of assault.

The Sydney case is believed to be the first in an Australian court relating to such punishment being meted out under the pretext of sharia, or Islamic law.

Christian Martinez, 32, was whipped with an electric cord at his home in Silverwater in Sydney's west between July 16 and 17 in 2011.

His religious mentor, Wasim Fayed, was accused of carrying out the whipping as punishment under sharia, while the other three men held Mr Martinez down on his bed.

Fayed, 44, along with Zakaryah Raad, 21, Tolga Cifki, 21, and Gengiz Coskin, 22, pleaded not guilty to charges of assault occasioning bodily harm in company and stealing.

Fayed also faced two charges of intimidation.

In Burwood Local Court today, Magistrate Brian Maloney found the offences proved.

He noted that the prosecution had stated it was not a case about the Islamic faith but of the imposing of the offenders' views of sharia.

Fayed was the dominant player, having taken on the role of guiding Mr Martinez in his new faith.

Mufti Of Australia And Delegation Meet With Hamas Prime Minister Haniya And Officials In Gaza

Again and again, we see the true nature of the devout and the pious -- genocidal aspirations, ethnic cleansing, hatred and violence. There is a consistent thread that runs through all of this, no matter the country of origin (Austalia, France, UK, US, Germany, et al) -- the common thread is Islamic jihad. Country, language, border is of no import. "Islam is Islam" (to quote Turkish PM Erdogan).

Mufti Of Australia And Delegation Meet With Hamas Prime Minister Haniya And Officials In Gaza MEMRI

Following are excerpts from a report on a delegation of Australian Muslims to the Gaza Strip, which aired on Al-Aqsa TV on December 26, 2012:

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV.

Reporter: "Delegations of solidarity continue to arrive in Gaza. An Australian delegation of sheiks and scholars, headed by the Mufti of Australia, Dr. Ibrahim 'Abu Muhammad,' met the [Hamas] prime minister, and expressed their joy at arriving in Gaza."

Click here to read the full report.

 

MEMRI TV Clip No. 3689

Suha Arafat, Widow Of Yasser Arafat: The 2000 Intifada Was Premeditated, Planned By Arafat

Following are excerpts from an interview with Suha Arafat, widow of Yasser Arafat, which aired on Dubai TV on December 16, 2012:

Suha Arafat: "Yasser Arafat had made a decision to launch the Intifada. Immediately after the failure of the Camp David [negotiations], I met him in Paris upon his return, in July 2001 [sic]. Camp David has failed, and he said to me: 'You should remain in Paris.'"

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

Head Imam at Australia's biggest mosque declares fatwa against Christmas

Another pious Islamic cleric spreading the word of Islam....."[Ishmael’s] hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him" Genesis 16:12

"No merriness here: mosque puts fatwa on Christmas" Sidney Morning Herald December 22, 2012 (thanks to Assad Elepty)

 THE Lakemba Mosque has issued a fatwa against Christmas, warning followers it is a ''sin'' to even wish people a Merry Christmas.

The religious ruling, which followed a similar lecture during Friday prayers at Australia's biggest mosque, was posted on its Facebook site on Saturday morning.

The head imam at Lakemba, Sheikh Yahya Safi, had told the congregation during prayers that they should not take part in anything to do with Christmas.

Samir Dandan, the president of the Lebanese Muslim Association, which oversees the mosque, could not be reached for comment on Saturday.

The fatwa, which has sparked widespread community debate and condemnation, warns that the "disbelievers are trying to draw Muslims away from the straight path"

It also says that Christmas Day and associated celebrations are among the "falsehoods that a Muslim should avoid ... and therefore, a Muslim is neither allowed to celebrate the Christmas Day nor is he allowed to congratulate them".

The posting of the fatwa has shocked many Muslim leaders. The Grand Mufti of Australia, Ibrahim Abu Mohammad, said the foundations of Islam were peace, co-operation, respect and holding others in esteem.

"Anyone who says otherwise is speaking irresponsibly," he said.

"There is difference between showing respect for someone's belief and sharing those beliefs," Dr Ibrahim said.

Dr Ibrahim said the views did not represent the majority of Muslims in Australia. "We are required to have good relations with all people, and to congratulate them on their joyous events is very important."

The fatwa quotes the teacher Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim as saying that congratulating disbelievers for their rituals is forbidden, and if a "Muslim who says this does not become a disbeliever himself, he at least commits a sin as this is the same as congratulating him for his belief in the trinity, which is a greater sin and much more disliked by Almighty Allaah than congratulating him for drinking alcohol or killing a soul or committing fornication or adultery”.

[...]

Rights Report: Christians Most Oppressed Group, Muslims Most Oppressive...

Australia: Muslim jailed after he held his sister-in-law over a railing at a high-rise Sydney after she took his wife to the beach

It's the sharia! Respect it, you filthy kuffar! Two and half years? Sounds like sharia to me.

"Man jailed after he held his sister-in-law over a railing at a high-rise Sydney" The Daily Telegraph

Jailed .... Ismail Belghar. Source: The Daily Telegraph

A MAN who held his sister-in-law over a railing at a high-rise Sydney car-park after she took his wife to the beach has been jailed for at least two-and-a-half years.

In the District Court in Sydney on Friday, Judge Peter Zahra sentenced Ismail Belghar, 37, to a maximum four-and-a-half years' imprisonment for assaulting Canan Kokden and detaining her without consent in December 2009.

The court heard Ms Kokden was "convinced she was going to die'' after Belghar slapped her, picked her up and held her over the car park railing from the chest upwards at Sydney's Broadway shopping centre, saying "I'm going to kill you, I'm going to femememing kill you''.

Belghar let Ms Kokden go after her brother came to her aid, the court heard.

Belghar, who pleaded guilty to the offences, detained Ms Kokden after she took his wife to a beach where they possibly wore bikinis - something he disapproved of.

Belghar said he was fearful that Ms Kokden was leading his wife "astray'' and undermining his relationship with her, saying she was "like a different person'' when she was with her sister.

Sharia in Australia: "Forty lashes for having a drink"

Sharia in the West:

"Forty lashes for having a drink" News.Au.com (hat tip Peggy)

Cristian Martinez leaves Burwood Court / pic: Danny Aarons Source: The Daily Telegraph

CRISTIAN Martinez was physically sick and begged "please no more" as four men held him down and whipped him 40 times with an electrical cord as punishment under sharia law for drinking alcohol.

But his attackers told him it was his body being "cleansed" by Allah, he told Burwood Local Court yesterday.

Mr Martinez said the "unbearable pain" was so bad he wanted to jump from his balcony rather than face more lashings.

Four men charged over the attack - Zakaryah Raad, 21, Tolga Cifci, 21, Wassim Fayad, 44 and Cengiz Coskun, 22 - faced court yesterday.

They all pleaded not guilty to assault occasioning actual bodily harm after the alleged attack at Mr Martinez's Silverwater home in July last year. They denied stealing CCTV footage from cameras at the home.

Mr Martinez told the court yesterday he had been drinking and taking cocaine at the Ivy nightclub and had contacted Fayad because he saw him as "his spiritual leader" after his recent conversion to Islam.

The court heard Fayad told him over the phone that: "I'm going to tie you up ... that's what you need."

Mr Martinez said he was "going to be punished for what I'd been doing with drugs and alcohol".

He said that during his conversion to the Islamic faith he had never been told about sharia law punishment.

Raad, a friend of Mr Martinez, allegedly went to his home before letting the other three men in, the court heard.

Mr Martinez said he was "grabbed and held down" on his bed and whipped 10 times with an electrical cord before he ran to the bathroom to vomit. "They stopped after about 10 lashes to give me a break," he said, adding he got back on the bed willingly for the next 10 lashes.

But after those, Mr Martinez said he was "vomiting, crying and begging 'please brother no more, no more'."

Fayad allegedly told him that the vomiting was "Allah taking impurity out of the body because you are being cleansed" and that if he didn't finish administering the punishment, he would be punished himself.

The court heard Mr Martinez was given a cold, wet towel for the welts on his back before the next 20 lashes.

"They said they were going to give me 40 lashes, that was the intention they came with," he told the court.

"After the 40 lashes, I couldn't bear the pain ... I even wanted to jump off the balcony, I was running to the front door.

"(Fayad) said to me: 'I'm only doing this because I love you ... the next time you want to drink or take drugs you're going to remember this pain'."

Mr Martinez said he was "angry and furious" after the lashings and called a sheik to ask about the punishment because he couldn't believe it was real.

"I knew I had done the wrong thing, but I couldn't believe I was getting these hits," he said.

Islamic child abuse: Muslim 8-year-old girl calls on Islamic youth to back jihad in Australia

This is what Muslim children are weaned on ..... blood. And this is Australia, not Gaza. So is yesterday's violent action by Muslims in Sydney so surprising?  Madrassas in the West must be monitored. This is not a controversial proposal; it is essential.

 "Girl, 8, calls on Islamic youth to back jihad" Jared Owens, The Australian, September 17, 2012 (thanks to David)

Eight-year-old Ruqaya speaks at the Khilafah Conference in Bankstown, Sydney. Picture: James Croucher Source: The Australian

AS Julia Gillard struggled to explain how Muslim children could be used to incite violence, eight-year-old Ruqaya yesterday fronted a congress of Islamic fundamendalists in Sydney to espouse her love for jihad. Addressing a 600-strong crowd at the Australian chapter of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Bankstown in the city's west, the young girl urged all Muslim youth to fight for the restoration of the Islamic caliphate, a single global government for all Muslims established under strict sharia law.

"My dear brothers and sisters in Islam, as the world gathers against the believers in Syria ... seeking to hijack our sincere and blessed uprisings, children in Sydney would like to send their message of hope and support to the Muslims of (Syria), especially to the children and mothers," she read from notes. "These uprisings have demonstrated that this umma (global Muslim community) is alive and well, her love is for jihad, she is unshackled herself from the fear which she held, and she yearns to once again live under the banner of (the Islamic state).

"Children as young as myself can be seen on the streets joining the uprisings, risking their lives to bring food, water and medicine to their wounded family members, some of them never returning to their mothers ... Nobody is too young," she said.

Ruqaya was the seventh of nine speakers at the "Muslims Rise" conference.

Organisers of the event invited the media to report on her address.

Julia Gillard yesterday expressed her horror at images showing Muslim children carrying inflammatory placards at a protest in Sydney on Saturday, including one that read "Behead all those who insult the Prophet".

Another sign at the protest read "Our dead are in paradise, your dead are in hell".

"I do not want to see in the hands of anyone, particularly children, offensive signs that call for the killing of others," the Prime Minister said.

"This is not the Australian way.

"We believe in freedom of religion and we believe that every religion should be treated with respect."

Hizb ut-Tahrir is an international political movement devoted to restoring a caliphate, the last of which collapsed in the 1920s.

The movement hopes Islamic fighters in Syria will replace the Assad regime with a caliph-led state that will eventually annex other Muslim countries and promote Islam in the West.

The caliphate would also threaten Western nations with jihad if they did not prevent their citizens from defaming the Prophet Mohammed or Islam.

It would be established under the same constitution imposed under Mohammed, which could not be reformed.

Ruqaya said: "We must work hard to achieve victory. It is enough that your generation and your parents' generation were raised in the absence of the khilafa (caliphate). Do not allow my generation to be added to that list."

Khaled Sukkarieh, the chairman of the Islamic Council of NSW, said images of children at the protest shocked many in his community. "Someone put that (banner) in the hand of a child.

"That is a poor, innocent child. It is abhorrent and a very sad way of using children," Mr Sukkarieh said.

VIDEO: Violent Muslims attacking Police in Sydney Australia

Time bomb in the West.  Muslim Anti Freedom riots spread to France, Belgium, London ...... Video hat tip Jane

Protesters clash with policemen on a street in Sydney's central business district, on September 15, 2012

'Let the step of kicking out the embassies be a step towards liberating Muslim countries from the American hegemony,' a statement posted on an Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) website on Saturday said.

In Australia, Ten Network television news showed a policeman knocked unconscious as the mostly male crowd hurled bottles and other missiles. Many of the protesters were wearing Muslim dress.

Police used pepper spray against the protesters, who chanted 'Obama, Obama, we love Osama' and waved placards saying 'Behead all those who insult the Prophet.'

Fury about the film swept across the Middle East after Friday prayers, with protesters attacking U.S. embassies and in protests that killed at least seven people and prompted Washington to send troops to bolster security at its missions.

A policeman, injured by protesters, is assisted by colleagues in central Sydney today after anger over an anti-Islam video spread to Australia

Violent Muslim Riots Hit Australia; Police attacked, hospitalized "Behead all those who insult the Prophet"

 

Police in Australia at Muslim anti-freedom riot in Sydney, here.

The anti-freedom riots come to the West -- one reader wrote me,

"Here in Sydney Australia we saw your interview on Fox and Friends.  Thank God you articulate what so many of us know to be true.

Earlier today my city of Sydney was overrun by psychotic, foaming-at-the-mouth muslims violently protesting against us infidels. The riot was an extension of the Middle East uprisings, supposedly avenging the 'offensive film'.  Police were beaten and bloodied, the Muslim rage was deafening and what I witnessed today was truly unsettling.  We've never seen anything like it here in Australia."

Tim Wimborne / Reuters An injured protester is detained by a policeman in Sydney's Hyde Park, Saturday.

NBC News: Some of the chanting protesters carried placards reading "Behead all those who insult the Prophet."

Several streets, usually thronging with weekend shoppers, were blocked off by police as the protest grew. Police, many wearing anti-riot equipment and some on horseback, used dogs and chemical sprays as they tried to control the protest.

Violence erupts in Sydney over anti-Islam film Radio Australia 

Updated 15 September 2012, 18:45 AEST

Violence has erupted in central Sydney as hundreds of Muslims protest against a controversial film about the Prophet Mohammed. Follow the latest on our live blog.

It is the latest in a series of demonstrations that have killed at least six people in the Middle East. Protestors have also marched through London.

The wave of protests spread to Sydney's CBD this afternoon, beginning outside the United States Consulate and spreading through the city's streets to Hyde Park.

The ABC understands the protest was sparked by a mass text message saying: "We must defend the honour of our prophet, we must act now."

Follow our live blog for developments as they happen:

[...]In a press conference, Superintendent Mark Walton said eight people were arrested during the "unannounced protest".

Up to 150 police officers attended the incident throughout the day. Six officers were injured, including two who were taken to hospital for treatment.

Two police vehicles were also damaged.

Police have used tear gas on Sydney protesters who swept through the CBD as world-wide demonstrations triggered by a US first amendment.

UPFATE: More from the Herald Sun:

Also being brandished by heavies in the crowd: the black flag of jihad, the green flag of the Hamas terrorist outfit and a sign “we love Osama”.

The Daily Telegraph reports:

Photos posted on social networking site Twitter show police, possibly from the Public Order and Riot Squad injured and assaulted.

In multicultural London, another voice of protest:

RACHAEL BROWN: Do you also object to the killings of the ambassador and three other people in Libya?

SAIFUL ISLAM: See, the thing with these killings and what is happening, obviously this was going to be expected. Obviously when you do something like this it’s going to ignite and it’s going to cause violence.

RACHAEL BROWN: So you’re not surprised there were deaths?

SAIFUL ISLAM: I’m not surprised at all, I’m expecting obviously more carnage and more violence, and it’s going to escalate.

I don’t think multiculturalism is working out as promised. I’m not sure admitting many more Muslims to Australia is smart until we are sure we’ve assimilated those already here.  UPDATE

What religion inspires protesters to do this:

UPDATE: Check out the video (thanks to Jane. ) it's Russia Today, which is just as bad as Al Jazzeera but the footage reveals the rioters:

Islamization of Nations: Muslim man "first" in Australia granted judge-only trial because of his Islamic beliefs

Here again we see, anywhere Islamic law and Western law conflict, it is always Western law that has to give way. We see this time and time again, imposing Islam on the public square, the secular marketplace, the courts of law, the school, the workplace. Stop the islamization of nations.

• Muslim man "first" in Australia granted judge-only trial
• A jury may be biased because of his religious beliefs
• Pleads guilty to detaining and assaulting his sister-in-law

The man beats up his sister's wife for taking her to the beach without his permission (under the sharia, women must wear a cloth coffin), and he gets special accommodation. Got that?

Are Aussies too biased to try this Muslim man? News.com.au (Hat tip David)

ISMAIL Belghar is believed to be the first Muslim in Australia to be granted a judge-only trial on the grounds that a jury may be biased because of his religious beliefs.

The decision in the New South Wales District Court can be revealed after Belghar, 36, yesterday pleaded guilty to detaining and assaulting his sister-in-law after she "dared" to take his wife to the beach without his permission.

The court heard, because of his religious beliefs and because he thought he had absolute authority over her, Belghar felt it "abhorrent" that his wife, Hanife Kokden, had been to the beach where she "displayed her body"....

VIDEO: Muslim Gets Violent Over Burka-Clad Men

Muslim loses it with protesters wearing burqas.

Ugly scenes erupted between a group of burqa-clad protesters and a Muslim man outside NSW State Parliament in Sydney today 9News (hat tip Cynthia)

A group of men dressed in the veiled female garb as a publicity stunt to try and get the outfit banned. Members of the group Faceless ventured into a Sydney CBD courthouse, pub and bank without drawing much reaction, but faced a stronger backlash later outside parliament.

"It's got no place in Australia — it's a front to a civilised country like Australia," Faceless member Nicholas Folkes said of the burqa.

Nine News filmed a man outraged by the protesters, shouting in their faces and pulling off their veils.

"That's what I think of you," the man said after spitting on the ground.

The argument became more heated when a man connected to Faceless referred to the prophet Mohammed as "a rat".

No one will be charged

Muslim Lies Come Back to Bite: Burqa wearers need face-to-face witness

That wretched woman who perjured herself in accusing a policeman of racism after she broke the law and then got off becuase she claimed it wasn't her has been avenged in Australia. Following the public outcry over the case of Carnita Matthews, lawyers will have to ask women wearing burqas to show their faces before witnessing their signatures under tough new state laws.

The case compelled me to write this for The American Thinker: Ban the Burqa. Also, I blogged about it here: Burqa'ed Muslima Accused of Lying about Police Trying to Tear her Burqa off Avoids Jail -- Because Her Identity Could Not Be Proven

Back in November 2010, I reported on a burqa’ed Muslima in Australia, Carnita Matthews, who was charged with making a false complaint that used the Muslim victimhood card in her defense. “All cops are racist,” she charged -- what race? Covered from head to toe in a burqa, with just a slit through which to see, the Muslima claimed that a police officer had tried to tear off her burqa.

It didn’t happen. Matthews was charged with making a false complaint to police. And the judge, Magistrate Robert Rabbidge, saw through her claim right away, describing her lie as “deliberate, malicious and ruthless.” Rabbidge added: “There is not a shadow of doubt in my mind, beyond a reasonable doubt, that she knew that the complaint she was making was false.”

Matthews, predictably, played the race card, saying: “You look at me and see me wearing this and you couldn’t handle it. All cops are racist.”

Her lawyer claimed that Matthews had been a victim of mistaken identity. Because who really knows who was under that burqa? Only Allah can say for sure. But Rabbidge would have none of it. Matthews is the one who lodged the complaint against an officer, and signed a statement to that effect. Police prosecutor sergeant Lisa McEvoy said: “Her signature on that affidavit coupled with the signature on her driver’s licence is exactly the same.”

Matthews was found guilty, and was sentenced to six months in prison. Yet despite the indisputable evidence against her, the burqa’ed civilizational jihadist appealed -- and won, all the while remaining inside her cloth coffin. A new judge, Clive Jeffreys, bought her claim of mistaken identity, and said that because she was wearing a burqa, there was no certainty that Carnita Matthews was the same woman who falsely accused the police officer. Jeffreys contradicted Rabbidge, saying: “I am not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that she made the complaint. Even if I was satisfied that she made the complaint, I am not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that it was knowingly false.”

The Muslims expressed their gratitude for this in their usual way: it was an ugly scene. Australia’s News.com.au reported: “More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting ‘Allah Akbar’ as they stormed out of Downing Centre Court with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them. Tempers rose and they began jostling with police after several members of the group attacked cameramen.” Matthews’ dhimmi lawyer Stephen Hopper explained: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them.”

Attacking cameramen: “culturally appropriate” for Muslims.

Now her crime and her lies against the infidel have been avenged:

Burqa wearers need face-to-face witness Telegraph, March 5, 2012 (hat tip David W)

LAWYERS and JPs will have to ask women wearing burqas to show their faces before witnessing their signatures under tough new state laws.

The move to "burqa-proof" identity checks follows a public outcry following last year's controversial Carnita Matthews case.

Ms Matthews, a Muslim, had her conviction overturned for knowingly making a false statement accusing a police officer of racism because the prosecution could not prove that she had signed the statement.

The 23-year-old JP who witnessed the signature of a woman wearing a full black niqab had assumed it was Ms Matthews but had not asked her to show her face.

Attorney-General Greg Smith said the case highlighted the need for change and the new laws, to begin on April 30, would minimise the risk of fraud.

"They will require authorised witnesses, such as JPs and lawyers, to see a person's face and confirm their identity before signing their statutory declaration or affidavit," Mr Smith said.

The new laws cover the witnessing of legally binding documents including statutory declarations and affidavits and include all face coverings including motorcycle helmets, masks, veils, scarves, niqabs and balaclavas.

The JP or lawyer will also have to certify in writing on the documents that they have seen the person's face and have confirmed their identity through documents including a driver's licence. They face a fine of $220 for lying. "If a person is wearing a face covering, an authorised witness should politely and respectfully ask them to show their face," Mr Smith said.

"The person would only be required to show their face for as long as it is necessary to establish identity and in some cases this will not require the full removal of a head covering."

If the person refuses to show their face without a legitimate medical reason, the JP or lawyer must refuse to witness their signature.

[....]

It is the latest fallout from the case involving Ms Matthews. It has already led to changes to traffic laws, under which a driver who refuses to show their face can be jailed for up to a year or fined $5500.

After Ms Matthews, 48, was pulled over last year, a complaint purportedly signed by her was handed in to Campbelltown Police Station accusing the traffic officer of racism and of trying to rip away her full-face niqab, similar to a burqa.

The officer on duty had not asked to see the person's face and the JP who had witnessed the signature "C. Matthews" on the complaint had "assumed" it was Ms Matthews.

When charged with knowingly making a false complaint, Ms Matthews pleaded not guilty. She said it wasn't her signature on the document. She was convicted in the local court but that conviction was later quashed.

Australia: Islamic Blasphemy Laws Succeed for Muslim Shooter of Cop

On page 75 of my book, Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance, I explain the sinister orgins of the thought-crushing device, "Islamophobia":

The very word “Islamophobia” is a fictional construct, as journalist Claire Berlinski explains, “The neologism ‘Islamophobia’ did not simply emerge ex nihilo. It was invented, deliberately, by a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, the International Institute for Islamic Thought, which is based in Northern Virginia….Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, a former member of the IIIT who has renounced the group in disgust, was an eyewitness to the creation of the word. ‘This loathsome term,’ he writes, ‘is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’”⁸⁵

Discover the Networks reports, "Although the term was coined in the early 1990s, 'Islamophobia' did not become the focus of an active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11."

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” Adolf Hitler said that. Der fuhrer would be impressed.

Islamophobia' Defense Succeeds for Shooter of Aussie Cop Islamist watch

An Australian Muslim was acquitted of attempting to kill or grievously injure a police officer, based in part on the judge's decision that a vague and unsubstantiated "anti-Muslim feeling in the community" had helped make the perpetrator skittish enough to open fire out of fear. The verdict in the non-jury trial came in June, but a suppression order kept it hidden until last month.

On November 8, 2005, four policemen were dispatched to arrest a man identified in publicly
available records only as BUSB. Upon being approached in a Sydney suburb, BUSB spun around, pulled out a gun, and fired, hitting a sergeant in the hand. Another officer then shot and wounded BUSB, who was taken into custody.

"The man maintained he did not fire at police but at the horizon in what was intended to be a warning shot so he could flee," the Daily Telegraph reports. He "testified he was sick at the time and jumpy about surveillance and possible police questions." Laughable? Yes. But Judge Leonie Flannery accepted the argument, agreeing that BUSB may have fired a "warning shot in panic." More disturbing is her malformed sentence explaining the purported cause of BUSB's anxiety:

I am not satisfied that he put the Browning [pistol] in his pants because he was planning to shoot his arresting officers, rather he did so because he was concerned for his safety, and the state he was in brought about his illness, his concern that he was going to be arrested, and the climate of anti-Muslim feeling in the community at the time, he believed that he might be harmed by the police.

The context makes her decision even more alarming: the officers had been sent to arrest BUSB on terrorism charges. Judge Flannery's ruling acknowledges that BUSB "had with him … two loaded guns in connection with the preparation for a terrorist act." Found to possess jihadist propaganda, weapons, acids, and instructions for explosives, BUSB pleaded guilty to terrorism counts in 2008 and is serving at least 14 years — facts presumably known to Judge Flannery.

That BUSB did not get off scot-free does not excuse the judge for ratifying the defense's assertion that the shooting was mitigated by "an environment of anti-Muslim feeling, which engendered in the Muslim community a high sense of paranoia." Islamists often claim that bias against Muslims motivates investigations and prosecutions, but this may be the first criminal case in which "Islamophobia" was successfully employed to defend a Muslim's violent deeds.

Columnist Gerard Henderson ponders, "Would a Jew be entitled to cite a climate of anti-Semitism in the community as affecting the intention of an act which he/she had committed with respect to police? What about a Hindu?" To ask these questions is to answer them. Jews, Hindus, and others are treated like adults; Muslims frequently are viewed as children lacking self-control.

"Islamophobia" is no longer just a tool to silence critics of Islamism. In at least one jurisdiction, it has morphed into a legal defense for terrorists who shoot cops. If there is any remaining doubt regarding the pernicious trajectory of the "Islamophobia" meme, the above case should dispel it.

The Islamization of Australia: Man Bans

Marching back to the stone age, Australia willingly submits. Man bans take effect in Australia because, in Islam it is "culturally inappropriate for young women to participate in recreational activity with males present".

America, take heed.

Men banned as Muslim women win council backing Herald Sun

MAN bans are spreading as two more council functions are declared off-limits because it is "not appropriate" for men to mix with Muslim women.

And in a surprise twist, VCAT backed the latest bans, declaring there was no discrimination and councils no longer needed to apply for exemptions.

The Darebin City Council ban will be in force for a music concert to be held in December, while another female-only event to mark the end of Ramadan was cancelled last week.

The council sought the bans because it was "culturally inappropriate for young women to participate in recreational activity with males present".

But Ratepayers Victoria president Jack Davis said the bans were "another case of segregation".

"I think it is totally wrong. I think it's ridiculous and I do think it is discrimination, and it goes against what the average ratepayer wants," Mr Davis said.

"We are seeing more and more of this kind of stuff."

Moreland council recently banned men from a dance event while Monash council put up curtains at a public pool so Muslim women could have privacy during a female-only exercise classes.

Darebin Mayor Diana Asmar said the latest bans involved events promoted to young women who, "due to their cultural and religious backgrounds, cannot attend events where men and women both attend".

"The December event is a 10-week workshop series that teaches young women DJ-ing skills. The program culminates in a social event that the young women plan and run themselves," she said.

"Darebin's approach is to always identify barriers to community participation and address them."

Darebin council, with the support of the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, originally asked VCAT for an exemption under the Equal Opportunities act so it could have women-only events.

VCAT ruled the events would not discriminate against anybody and special exemption was not needed.

An Equal Opportunity spokeswoman said the decision meant "organisations do not have to go through a formal VCAT hearing to put in place practices to assist groups to achieve substantive equality".

A spokesman for the Islamic Council of Victoria, Nazeem Hussain, said the Darebin decision was not "controversial or surprising in the slightest".

Muslim threatens to ''kill all Christians and Jews'' and bomb Sydney on Facebook

All's quiet in the media. New York Times, LA Times, ABC, NBC seem completely uninterested in motive. Hmmmmmmm

Man accused of Facebook bomb threat Anne Tarasov July 31, 2011 hat tip Assad Elepty

New way to scare ... a bomb threat was posted on Facebook. Photo: Reuters

A CLEANING business owner used Facebook to threaten to ''kill all Christians and Jews'' and bomb Sydney, police allege.

Khaled Zakaria, 30, faced Parramatta Bail Court yesterday charged with one count of using a mobile phone to menace or harass and two counts of making hoax threats using a mobile phone.

In documents tendered to the court, police said Mr Zakaria, of Greenacre, threatened to bomb intelligence agency ASIO, stab officers at Goulburn's super-max jail and ''get'' officers at Bankstown police station under the Facebook profiles Kay Zee, Khaled Ibn-Al Walid and Khaled Ibn-Alwalie.

Police alleged Mr Zakaria posted threatening comments on the Ban the Burka and Sharia for Australia Facebook pages, including: ''There's going to be a big bang in the City of Sydney on 30th of July, 2011. Watch out. Bang Bang.''

Following Mr Zakaria's arrest on Friday by officers from the joint counter-terrorism team and the Middle Eastern Organised Crime Squad, police searched his house and car and seized two mobile phones and other related items.

Read the rest.

Australia: Muslims break into house of convert to Islam and give him 40 lashes for drinking

Hey, respect it!

Australia: Muslims break into house of convert to Islam and give him 40 lashes for drinking Jihadwatch

Note that Ahmed Kilami doesn't deny that this is the Sharia punishment for those who drink alcohol. He just objects to the attackers' taking the law into their own hands. The law is clear: once Muhammad flogged a man forty times for drinking alcohol. "Intruders whip Silverwater man, 31, for drinking," from AAP, July 18 (thanks to all who sent this in):

A Sydney man who was held down on his bed and whipped up to 40 times by strangers had recently converted to Islam and was reportedly being punished for drinking.

The 31-year-old was asleep in his apartment in Silverwater, in Sydney's west, when he woke to find four bearded men in his bedroom about 1am (AEST) yesterday.