More of the poisonous fruit of Obama's monstrous foreign policy, but no worries. The media will rewrite the narrative for the jihad stooge in the White House.
The Assassination of Tunisian Political Leader Chokri Belaid; Tunisian Media: Government Bears Political Responsibility For Assassination MEMRI
On February 6,
2013, Tunisians lost one of the leaders
of the Tunisian Jasmine Revolution,
when Tunisian secular and leftist
opposition leader Chokri Belaid was
gunned
down in front of his home in El Menzah
VI, a residential neighborhood in the
capital Tunis.
Belaid was coordinator of the left-wing
Tunisian
Democratic Patriots' Movement, a
political party that
was established in
1981 but legalized only in 2011
following the Tunisian Revolution. He
was a
prominent critic of the El-Nahda party,
which won a relative majority in the
Tunisian elections in 2011, and of the
rise of Salafist movements in the
country.
Belaid's was not the first political
murder. On October 18, 1012, Lotfi
Naguedh, coordinator of the secular
party
Nidaa Tounes, was killed after being
beaten by members of the League for the
Protection of the Revolution (LPR), a
group close to El-Nahda; he was
attacked in his office in Tataouine. [1]
Nidaa Tounes leader
Beji Caid Essebsi called Naguedh's death
a "political assassination."
At a February 1, 2013 El-Nahda Shoura
Council meeting, El-Nahda members
suggested that Naghuedh's killers should
be
freed.[2]
A few days later, and the day before he
was killed, Belaid said, during an
appearance on a TV show on the North
African channel Nessma TV, that by
making this
suggestion, El-Nahda had given a green
light for political killings in the
country.
Belaid, who lived in fear of
assassination, had been threatened by
the LPR,[3]
which the Tunisian opposition considers
to be El-Nahda's paramilitary armed
wing.[4]
It is thought by the opposition that the
LPR is behind Belaid's assassination;[5]
Belaid's widow, Besma Khalfaoui Belaid,
has
said that the she considers the El-Nahda
party directly responsible for his
death.[6]
On
February 8, the Tunisian media outlet
Kapitalis published a lengthy editorial,
penned by Tunisian journalist Rachid
Barnat, stating that stated that
political responsibility for
the assassination rests not only with
El-Nahda but also with the ruling troika
government comprising El-Nahda, the
Congress for
the Republic Party (CPR), and Ettakatol.
The editorial accuses the troika of
having
done nothing to stop the rise of
Islamism in the country, and states
further
that if the LPR is considered to be the
militia of El-Nahda, then CPR leader
and Tunisian President Moncef Marzouki
can be considered to have flirted with
the LPR – referring indirectly to a
visit by an LPR delegation to Marzouki
at
his presidential palace in Carthage,[7]
among other incidents.
The
editorial also argues that the
government has long since lost its
political and
moral legitimacy, since it was supposed
to be transitional, formed with the aim
of drawing up the Tunisian constitution
in the aftermath of the revolution. The
mandate of this government, he said,
expired on October 23, 2012, a year
after
the election, and its extension makes it
illegitimate.
Soon
after Belaid's killing, El-Nahda PM
Hamadi Jebali proposed the formation of
an apolitical
technocrat government. His party did not
welcome the proposal, and the issue
opened up a rift between Jebali and
El-Nahda leader Rached
Gannouchi.
Belaid's
killing united Tunisians; 1.4 million[8]
reportedly attended
his funeral.
The
following are excerpts from Barnat's
op-ed, translated from the original
French
as published by Kapitalis:
"Some People Can Oppose Ideas And
Freedom
Only With Violence"
"Tunisia is
mourning. It mourns a brave republican
who fought for his ideas using as
weapons
only his intelligence and his force of
conviction. He was shot in a cowardly
manner for representing the conscience
of this country, because some people can
oppose ideas and freedom only with
violence.
"Tunisia weeps.
There is weeping everywhere, in every
corner of the country and across the
world: in Paris, Marseille, Toulouse, in
Belgium, in Canada, and elsewhere.

Image circulated on Tunisian Facebook pages.

Scene of the attack on Chokri Belaid, near his home in Tunis[9]
"Tunisia grieves, and stands by Chokri Belaid's widow [Besma
Khalfaoui Belaid] and her two daughters [Nayrouz and Nada]. His young
innocent daughters, devastated by sorrow, do not yet understand what has
happened. Only later, much later, when the mourning is over, will they
and the entire country be proud of their father, who has entered the
pantheon of brave men who died for an ideal...

Chokri Belaïd and his two daughters.[10]

The Belaids' wedding.[11]

Belaid's widow, following the assassination.[12]

Belaid's daughter Nayrouz, on the day of her father's funeral. Her shirt reads, "Who killed my father?"[13]
"Chokri Belaid was assassinated by the same people he had defended
against [former Tunisian dictator Zine Abidine] Ben Ali, and who, thanks
to his struggle, were released from jail or allowed to return from
exile and given the right of free speech... [But] they chose to deprive
him of that same right – silencing him forever with their criminal and
abominable act.
"We are still emotional, and that is normal. Emotion felt by an
entire nation unites that nation. [El-Nahda leader Rached] Ghannouchi,
with his Machiavellian strategy, has intentionally divided the Tunisians
and pitted them against one another! Since this murder, they are united
behind Chokri Belaid, more than ever before. They will all say: 'We are
Chokri Belaid!'"

Image circulated on Tunisian Facebook pages: "One dies, one thousand awake"
"The Troika Is Responsible For This Crime!"
"But we must overcome this justifiable emotion and ask ourselves two
very important questions: Who is responsible for this murder, and what
must we do?
"When we talk of responsibility, we are not talking about those who
actually carried out [the murder], the despicable people who opened
fire. Those are just pathetic individuals – fanatics used by others,
wretched mercenaries. The real culprits are those who gave the orders
and created the toxic climate that made this happen!
"Please, refrain from talk about a [government] investigation […]. Let's
spare the Tunisians the deception of a commission of inquiry – like the
one established after the assassination of Lotfi Naguedh, or other
inquiries into violent incidents, […] which have not been concluded to
this day!
"We are talking of those politically responsible for this crime, and
it is obvious who they are. The political responsibility falls upon
those now in power – the Islamists who are ruling, starting with their
leader Ghannouchi and his associates, including in the troika:
[President Moncef] Marzouki and [Constituent Assembly President
Mustapha] Ben Jaafar. The troika is responsible for this crime! [The
troika] is accountable to the Tunisian people [for these crimes].

"He did not die under the Ben Ali dictatorship.... He was assassinated under the Troika 'democracy'"[14]

Belaid's funeral[15]

Image circulated on Tunisian Facebook pages: "Today, we counted 1.4 million at Djellaz [cemetery], attending Chokri Belaid's funeral"
"Let us analyze the [issue of political] responsibility [for this
crime]. The first cause of this crime is the policy of the Islamists,
who mixed religion into politics and forced on the Tunisians a way of
practicing Islam that has been obsolete for many centuries – thereby
injecting the population with the poison of division. They branded as
'good Muslims' [only] those who let themselves be colonized by
obscurantists from Saudi Arabia and Qatar and by Bedouins from the Gulf,
and as 'bad Muslims' all those who rejected this new politico-religious
colonialism! The poison of mixing religion into politics is worse than
any other cause of division, because the politicians who use it evoke
God in their speeches and cause people to believe that they are speaking
in the name of Allah.
"The second element of responsibility is that [the government] paved
the way for the most backward, violent and regressive brand of Islam,
namely Wahhabism – which the Tunisians had already rejected in the early
19th century – and also received with full honors preachers of hatred,
and allowed them to distill their poison aimed at fostering dissent
among the people. Isn't that true, Mr. Marzouki? Isn't this a major
[reflection of your] responsibility?

Tunisian Salafis in the city of Sfax[16]

Martial arts display at a meeting of Salafis in the city of Kairouan. [17]
"But let's continue. This government has tolerated many calls for
murder, especially by fanatic imams who still retain their positions
unharassed. Is anything more detrimental to public order than a call for
murder? [But] instead [of arresting these clerics, Interior Minister]
Ali Larayedh preferred to arrest and charge artists, journalists, trade
unionists, and teachers... for disrupting public order – when their only
crime was to ask for reforms and for more freedom!
"Mr. Marzouki, isn't it true that this government has tolerated the
League for the Protection of the Revolution (LPR), which is nothing but a
fascist militia, which under the rule of law cannot be tolerated?
"This government has tolerated attacks on political gatherings,
physical aggression against political figures, and destruction of
mausoleums, and has taken no effective measures against these...
"How is it possible to not see [in all this] laxity – or worse, connivance that encourages crimes?
"How is possible, in such a climate, to avoid having some fanatics shoot a brave man?
"Yes, Ghannouchi and his double talk... Marzouki, Ben Jaafar and [PM
Hamadi] Jebali: You are bear direct political responsibility for this
crime, and History will attribute it to you.
"Let us remember what Ghannouchi used to say about 'Salafis' and
about their activities: They're only kids, they're not from Mars, we
need to be tolerant towards them because they are the bearers of culture
and values! [But] attempts at murder and political assassination
illustrate his considerations about Salafis, whose often-violent
activism evokes his emotions and remind him of what he was like at their
age!"
"If The Clearly Identifiable Culprits Had A Shred Of Dignity, They Would Resign"
"The shocking attitude of the interior minister, on February 6, in
the [events that transpired during the] transport of the remains of the
late lamented Chokri Belaid, at the height of Bourguiba Avenue, shows
that he is totally unworthy of his position The cortege, followed by
thousands of Tunisians crying their anger aloud, was harassed by
Islamists – and, worst of all, the police of this state used tear gas
against simple grieving bystanders, and against the ambulance that was
being used as a hearse. Shame on them!
"Do you think that a government which has such a behavior should remain in power?

A
man in a Tunisian flag suit in Tunis on February 6, the day of the
assassination. Tunisians demonstrated against the assassination amid tear gas used by police.[18]

A
Tunisian protester jumps to avoid tear gas fired by police to break up a
rally outside the Interior Ministry following the assassination.[19]
"If the clearly identifiable culprits had a shred of dignity, they
would resign, because they have failed. The most amazing thing is to
hear the ministers of the Ghannouchi government telling us that they
will take responsibility – thinking that with this word, they clear
their consciences...
"[These events] should have led to the resignation of all the
relevant ministers, if not [to the resignation of] the entire
government, as happens in the democratic countries! And this should have
happened long ago, because after every crisis that follows violent
acts, there must be [some] resignations... But these gentlemen remain,
chattering about responsibilities and legitimacy!...
"However, Tunisians do not believe in the dignity of these depressing
figures. They must chase them out by themselves, because it is would be
intolerable for the culprits in this crime to continue, in any way, to
rule Tunisia. They are no longer worthy [of the posts they hold]."
The Government Has Lost Its Political and Moral Legitimacy
"All the keen forces in this country – civil society, and,
first and foremost, the UGTT [the Tunisian General Labor Union] – must
clearly say that it is no longer possible to continue with this rule,
which as of October 23 2012 [when its mandate expired] has lost all
juridical and political legitimacy, and has now lost its moral
legitimacy.
"By the way, we can reproach the opposition and the UGTT for its
failure to be adamant, on October 23, in demanding the recognition of
the illegitimacy of the Constituent [Assembly] and of the powers
deriving from it... Had they shown more resolve in demanding the end of
the mandate, or had they at least firmly demanded respect for the
conditions they proposed to the troika against an extension of their
legitimacy... Chokri Belaid might still be alive today.
"Republicans of all stripes must join with civil society, in the
framework of a dialogue yet to be defined, in order to create a
government of National Unity – after first acknowledging the
illegitimacy of the current rule, which has exceeded the time set for it
the moment it was elected, which has missed its mission, and which,
with this second crime against a political leader, has shown quite
clearly its moral defeat.
"With regard to [PM] Jebali's decision to appoint a government of
technocrats – this is simply surreal from a legal point of view. Who has
the power to form a government, and who has the legitimacy to appoint a
new government? There are still some lessons in law to be learned.

Tunisians dedicated Chokri Belaid Square.[20]
"It is only the Assembly that could still have the power to appoint a
new prime minister and a government –but since October 23, this
assembly has no juridical, political, or moral legitimacy. And we will
repeat it endlessly: This assembly is no longer legitimacy. It was
elected for the period of one year […] and had a specific task: to write
the Constitution. We must acknowledge that this period has expired, and
that [the assembly] has not fulfilled its mission. From where does it
draw its legitimacy today?
"Furthermore, has this government succeeded in anything that might
justify its legitimacy? Has it ensured political stability for this
country? Has it managed to create stable institutions, which are the
only guarantee of economic and social development? Has it ensured the
security to property and to the people? To all these questions the
answer is undoubtedly: NO!