An editorial in the Harvard Crimson proves, yet again, how useless a liberal arts education has become in 21st century America. Cloaked in sanctimonious and self-righteous rhetoric, the Harvard Crimson supports the suppression of free speech and truth, and more importantly, the expression of ideas.
American universities have become incubators of leftist fascist and Islamic supremacism. The very institutions that should be on the forefront of the battle for freedom have become the fortress of its enemy.
If the future of our freedoms is best reflected in a nation's youth, it is safe to say that our unalienable rights are on life support.
The Harvard Crimson supports the MBTA suppression of free speech and the denial of our pro-Israel ad. The Crimson has no problem with the vicious blood libel ads against Israel run by the MBTA. That is .... intellectual discourse. But our ads, according to the Crimson:
"Reducing a decades-long conflict between Israel and Palestine to a Manichaean struggle between 'civilized men' and 'savages' is also ahistorical in its implicit attempt to absolve Israel of serious allegations of human rights abuses."
Funny how these leftists never miss an opportunity to advance their antisemitic propaganda. The fact is that the jihad against the Jews is savage. That is the right word. Any war on innocent civilians is savagery. And the war on the Jewish people is a war on innocent civilians. Whether it’s targeting schools with missiles from Gaza or the bloody wholesale slaughter of a Jewish family in the middle of the night, the Fogel family, it’s savagery. The bloody hacking to death of the Fogel family was savage. The blowing up of a bus of Jewish women and children in Bulgaria is savagery.
The relentless 60-year campaign of terror against the Jewish people is savage. The torture of hostage Gilad Shalit was savage. The Munich Olympic massacre was savage. The unspeakable torture of Ehud Goldwasser was savage. The tens of thousands of rockets fired from Gaza into southern Israel (into schools, homes, etc.) are savage. The vicious Jew-hatred behind this genocide is savage. The endless demonization of the Jewish people in the Palestinian and Arab media is savage. The refusal to recognize the state of Israel as a Jewish state is savage. 9/11 in New York was savage. 3/11 in Madrid was savage. 7/7 in London was savage, 11/26 in Mumbai was savage. 10/12 in Bali was savage. 6/30 at the Glasgow International Airport was savage. The Time Square attempted bombing was savage. Fort Hood was savage.
The Boston Marathon bombing, which took place in their backyard, is savage.
Our ad is not "ahistorical." The jihad against the Jews is consistent throughout her history. Even before the establishment of Israel, Palestinian Muslims conducted vicious and bloody pogroms against Palestinian Jews under the leadership of Amin al Husseini, President of the Supreme Moslem Council. He led the Muslim riots through the 1920s and 1930s that led to the deaths of hundreds of Jews, and then in league with Adolf Hitler, the murder of hundreds of thousands of Jews. Al Husseini's chief goal was the annihilation of the Jewish people. That is savage. (Source: The Arab Higher Committee, Its Origins, Personnel and Purposes, The Documentary Record submitted to The United nations, May 1947).
Maybe the students at Harvard ought to spend more time learning and less time bloviating about things they know nothing about. Bright young minds ought to work towards getting and exposing the truth, not making themselves the foolish tools of the enemies of freedom.
The Crimson deigns to say:
"The pro-Palestine ad may well be considered ahistorical too—though it does not sink to the level of the AFDI."
No, it's worse. It's a blood libel.
This has become a pattern at Harvard. In December 2011, Harvard fired Subramanian Swamy after an editorial he wrote concerning the jihad in India was deemed "offensive to Muslims." Did Harvard ever address the truth of Swamy's remarks, or the 80 million Hindus slaughtered in jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilations and enslavements?
Freedom of speech protects all speech, not just the ideas that we like. That's the point. Who decides what's good and what's forbidden? Harvard? The Islamic supremacists seeking to impose the sharia restriction on free speech?
Harvard has been bought and sold to the highest sharia bidder (in December 2005, Saudi Prince Al-Waleed donated $20 million each to Harvard University and Georgetown University to fund Islamic studies).
Someone ought to teach these self-righteous knuckleheads at Harvard that Islam is not a race and truth is not racist. A is A.
"No Racism on the T" By the Harvard Crimson
The MBTA was right to reject discriminatory ad