The Home Secretary has responded to our request to commence proceedings for a judicial review. I am posting all 38 pages, it is appalling.
It most awfully demonstrates the fraudulent, arbitrary and capricious nature of government use of power.
They have absolute authority to exclude those who words they think might "justify terrorist violence." That is state sanction of terrorism. Anyone who might displease savages can and will be banned. Further, judges are restricted from interfering in these exceptional national security matters. "Considerable weight" should be accorded the Some Secretary of State. "The court should not interfere with that assessment." In other words, the UK government can do what it wants in this area with but few limitations -- which are really fig leafs anyway -- such that there are no limitations other than political.
Their "research" reports prepared by the UK government on both Robert and me are both mendacious and outrageous in their bias and slant. This just confirms what we know, unfortunately. They use Hamas- CAIR as a legit source. I find the redactions to be quite revealing ..... when examined, they suggest a deep infiltration by the Islamic supremacists and their leftwing tools. That is confirmed also by the fact that they let in a Muslim Brotherhood leader just recently, despite the Brotherhood's persecution of Coptic Christians, and just before we were banned let in a Saudi imam, Muhammad al-Arifi, who has said: "There is no doubt that one’s devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah and one’s will to shed blood, smash skulls, and chop off body parts for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion constitute an honor for the believer."We are crafting our response as we speak.