The Scandinavian media firestorm over our freedom march on the anniversary of the jihadist suicide bombing in Stockholm is in full flame. The media reports have been vicious. News reports are going so far as to call us "Breivik's foot soldiers." The blood libel is monstrous.
Read the comments on this thread to see just how much Sweden's media has been islamicized.
Kenan Habul, a reporter at Aftonbladet, a notoriously anti-Jewish newspaper and the biggest newspaper in Sweden and Scandinavia, wanted to interview me regarding the Freedom March and the “First Worldwide Counter-Jihad Action in Stockholm on August 4." The interview mirrors Eigil Söderin’s ugly, accusatory interview with me yesterday. This is a relentless campaign by the enemedia to marginalize and demonize those who are fighting for freedom.
Aftonbladet is not a stranger to blood libel. They traffic in it. What is the Swedish media trying to do? Gin up the haters and the destroyers to commit violence against freedom lovers?
I am running the interview in full, because I am under no allusion that Habul will be objective or honest:
Breivik has cited (your blog) Atlas Shrugs in his manifesto, and I am aware that you have said that Breivik was inspired by Islamic supremacists. Without suggesting that your writing (or your blog) is to be blamed for Breivik's actions, my question is:According to Breivik and court testimony, Breivik was inspired to act the way he did by Al Qaeda and Hamas. You will have to ask them. His frustration, he claims, was because the media was self-enforcing sharia and refusing to cover jihad accurately. Do you feel responsible?
1. Do you believe that you, and other prominent authors within counter-jihad movement, bear any responsibility for inspiring Breivik?
2. You claim that you are against violence, but do you see any risk that your writings about Islam and Muslims as a threat can inspire some people to commit violent acts against these groups?
Of course not. Pointing out oppression, subjugation and discrimination is a human rights activism. A response of violence is the act of savages.I am smeared, derided, libeled and defamed daily. I have never considered violence. Your premise is false and flawed. Do not reward violent intimidation with silence. Silence is sanction.
In your reply to a Swedish journalist Eigil Söderin you wrote that kids who attended Utöya-camp were taught anti-semitism and that "What these kids were being taught and instructed to do was a different kind of grotesque".
3. My question: What kind of grotesque do you think of and what exactly was anti-semitic about activities in the camp? Can you be specific with your examples.
According to The Anti-Mullah, "The main activity at the Utoya Island Meeting were mock 'Break the Israel blockade' games. One event was Palestinian aide boats would try to break the Israel blockage.The sign says 'defeat the blockade' (opphev blokkaden – Gaza)." The only actual boats that have tried to break the blockade were exemplified by the jihad flotilla Mavi Marmara, on which the passengers were chanting the jihad war cry, "Khaybar, Khaybar, O Jews, the army of Muhammad will return." In other words, death to the Jews.
The hatred of Israel is hatred of the Jewish people. Israel is the heart of the Jewish people. Teaching anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda is a form of murder, too, as we know only too well where it leads."Islamophobia" is a fictional construct. On page 74 of my book, Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance, I explain the origins of the thought-crushing device, "Islamophobia":Another false premise. It is intellectually dishonest. Islamic Jew-hatred is in the quran. We are speaking out against oppression, subjugation, genocide and humiliation. I speak out against no religion. My work is dedicated to individual rights, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience. I oppose the most radical and extreme ideology on the face of the earth.
4. What would be your response to those who are claim that Muslims today are the victims of the same kind of prejudice that the Jews were the victims of before -- i.e., that islamophobia is the new antisemitism?
Defamation. I am a lover not a hater. I do what I do because I love humanity. My work helps Muslims seeking to live a free life. Calling me "hatemonger" is merely the art of the smear.
5. What is your reply to people who call you "hatemonger"?
I am not. More smears. My work is fact-based, rooted in empirical evidence. There is conspiracy theory and there is conspiracy fact. The global jihad is a conspiracy fact.
6. What is your reply to those who call you conspiracy theorist?
7. What do you say to those who are saying that muslims today are being the victims of the same kind of prejudice that the jews were victims of before, i.a that islamophfobia is the new antisemitism?
"Islamophobia" is a Muslim Brotherhood exercise in victimology, designed to distract people from jihad and cast Muslims as victims. CAIR reports on hate crimes are full of faked hate crimes meant to advance the mythical Muslim victimhood narrative. Studies have shown that antisemitic hate crimes are far more common today than attacks on innocent Muslims. Antisemitism is at a worldwide high -- it's real. The advance of Islamic supremacism is at a worldwide high as well, in Egypt, Indonesia, Tunisia, et al, and non-Muslims are suffering unspeakably.
The very word “Islamophobia” is a fictional construct, as journalist Claire Berlinski explains, “The neologism ‘Islamophobia’ did not simply emerge ex nihilo. It was invented, deliberately, by a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, the International Institute for Islamic Thought, which is based in Northern Virginia….Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, a former member of the IIIT who has renounced the group in disgust, was an eyewitness to the creation of the word. ‘This loathsome term,’ he writes, ‘is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.’”85
8. What is the reason for your constant criticism of President Obama?
Obama is anti-freedom, anti-individual rights. His failures have mounted, one after another. He has apologized for America all over the world. The text of his apology to Karzai for an incident in which American troops burned copies of the Qur'an that jihad terrorists were using to pass messages to each other was apparently so abject that it has never been made public. He has drastically weakened America's standing in the world, and imperiled free people worldwide.
UPDATE: Habul did the same hit job on Robert Spencer, as well.