Mayor Bloomberg continues to confound and betray the very constituency that elected this increasingly dangerous apologist and tool of the global jihad. It is ironic (/sarc) that Bloomberg was elected because of the catastrophe of the war declared on 911.
Bloomberg is a Democrat who stole the mayoral election by switching parties so that he could get into the race and get elected. Giuliani, the great hero of 911, could not run again because of term limits. It was Giuliani (who is opposed to the mosque) who anointed Bloomberg as his successor. Yes, the field of candidates was that pathetic. And Bloomberg won, because of Giuliani and the jihadi attack on NY on September the 11th.
As soon as the Ayatollah Bloomberg got in, he routed term limits. That's why we are still stuck with another elected official selling us out to our executioners.
Chris Logan reports:
Yesterday true American leader Rep Peter King stated that he will hold hearings on “radical Islam”, and today we see the absolute traitor to America that Mayor Bloomberg has become. Hey mayor, thanks for showing us that your Sharia investment with your so called Muslim friends, is more important than the lives of your families future generations. You are clearly on the side of the enemy.
NYC mayor: King’s radical Islam hearings not right
NEW YORK — New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg says a New York congressman’s planned hearings on radical Islam are not appropriate.
Rep. Peter King said in an opinion piece in Sunday’s Newsday that he intends to “break down the wall of political correctness” in the debate about what he calls Islamic radicalization.
Bloomberg was asked Monday about King’s plans.
The mayor said he does not agree with King and said the hearings are not appropriate.
The mayor was among the first and strongest defenders of the right for Muslims to build a mosque in lower Manhattan, near ground zero.
King is a Republican from Long Island. Bloomberg is a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-independent.
On a previous Atlas thread, "Previews," I report on the deeply disturbing realities manifest in the belief system of "moderate" Muslims in the West. Not a step too far from radicalization.
Nearly one-third of Muslim college students in Britain support killing in the name of religion, while 40 percent want to live under Islamic law, according to a secret cable from the U.S. Embassy in London that reviewed public polling data and government population predictions.
The embassy cable, released by the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks, said the same survey revealed that 54 percent of Muslim students want to be represented by an Islamic-based political party.
The poll also showed that 40 percent of Muslim students endorse Islamic, or Shariah, law, which can impose the death penalty for religious heresy and adultery, often by stoning, or the amputation of hands for theft. Since 2008, Britain has allowed Muslims to follow Shariah law in civil cases, but not in criminal trials.
Add to that: Majority of Muslims Worldwide Want Islam in Politics, Poll Says. And in Moorthy Muthuswamy's book, page 159:
"An April 2001 survey by the Council on American-Islamic Relations found 69 percent of Muslims in America saying it is “absolutely fundamental” or “very important” to have Salafi (similar to Wahhabi) teachings at their mosques (67 percent of respondents also expressed agreement with the statement “America is an immoral, corrupt society”).12 There was another poll conducted in Detroit area mosques in 2003. In this poll, 81 percent of the respondents endorsed the application of the medieval sharia in Muslim-majority lands."13
As JJ most astutely observed:
It seems to me that we should not ignore the one great point established here.--
This is from a communique from the American embassy.
The State department, of the United States government.
This communique establishes without doubt that our "keepers" are very much aware of the threat to the domestic security and tranquility of democratic societies, presented by muslim populations who wish the imposition of sharia upon the pre-existing domestic law of such societies.
In short, the state department and the united states government are well aware that muslim populations intend to conquer and rule wherever they are.
yet, in public they downplay this or feign ignorance of what is occurring.
This memo establishes that they do this, simply to placate us, or to decrease our opposition to such matters as muslim immigration and playing favor with muslim political & social groups.
In short, this memo from a diplomatic mission establishes beyond peradventure, that we cannot trust our government to either be straight with us, or to protect us from this muslim thirst to conquer.
When it comes to islam and the protection of this society from islam, we are strictly on our own. we cannot expect tools like bloomberg & obama to do what is right, we must continue to wrest our freedom, liberty and privilege from those who would take it, and we must continue to do it on our own.
You lead us.-- (a statement of fact, a request, an imprecation, and a prophesy.)
We must all, each of us individually, be prepared to do in the future those things necessary, and proper, to defend our freedom, and to resist and defeat islam.