It's a dark day, America, when a leading pundit on the FOX network, even a clownish one, admits that the risk of the threat of Muslim violence outweighs the benefits of free speech. Does O'Reilly understand what he has said and done?
I am not a big O'Reilly fan. He is weak and equivocal, so I don't expect much from him, but this is so profound a capitulation to Islam and a relinquishing of our most basic American freedom, it must be met with outrage and indignation. Surrender to this century's nazis out of fear is a giant step back into the dark ages. The last thing we should do in response to jihad is silence ourselves. That is sharia law. O'Reilly is advocating adherence to Islamic law on national television.
Starts at minute 4:00 ....
"This risk is higher than the reward." The risk of free speech is higher than the reward ...... so then what, Bill? What comes after that?
Pictures of Hirsi Ali, Geert Wilders, Westergaard and others and a voice over in video (Anwar Al Awlaki) talking about assassinations of those who have defamed the prophet Mohammed – “Harming allah and his messenger is a reason to encourage Muslims to kill whoever does that.” And: “there is nothing more between you and me as the sword, there will be no dialogue, there will be no forgiveness, no building bridges, no attempts of reconciliation, there will only be the sword between you and me."