I just watched Fox's Julie Banderas and Greg Jarrett embarrass themselves trying to talk a leading psychiatrist into a newfangled idea of "vicarious" post traumatic stress disorder. Being that Major Muslim Nidal Hasan never saw combat, he vicariously suffered its effects from his patients (while he was attempting to convert them).
If someone can post that video URL, please do. it was an outrage.
What could be the motive? I don't know, Greg, what could it be?
Worse was Neena Reenan interviewing Hasan's Palestinian family members, giving a platform for such lies and deception, I will not report them here (they said he loved America). That jihad pig is not the story. The victims are the story. The pregnant girl, the heroine who took that woman hating jihadi down, Kim Munley.
It is criminal, the twisting and gyrating the media is contorting to provide the taqiya for Islamic jihad. If the attack on the World Trade Center, The Pentagon, and the White House and or Capital building happened today, this is how the media would cover it.
Fort Hood was the military's 911.
Major Hasan's cousin said Hasan joined the Army "right after college" (assuming of course that his cousin wasn't lying). Hasan is 39, so assuming that he waited until he was 21 years old that would give him 17 - 18 years in the Army. I remember a commentator on Fox news said that Hasan's time in college would have been counted as time in service. You have a mandatory 8 years that you have to serve your country. By my calculations Major Hasan should have had more than enough time in service to have resigned his commission and gotten out of the Army without having had to resort to going Jihadi. So what's going on? Something is fishy. Raise the question on Atlas please. The media is buying into this BS that he wasn't being allowed to leave the Army and that will lend credibility to the argument that "he was under stress" and "it wasn't his fault".
FB Comment: "If he has told his commander that he was going to kill as many hero's as possible he could of got out of Iraq with consequences".











I saw the segment this afternoon while I was channel surfing. Fox's Julie Banderas and Greg Jarrett came off as imbeciles trying to work the conversation towards some sort of mental illness to explain what happened. The expert they interviewed still leaned to "radical idiology" by the end of the segment though. Fox's Julie Banderas and Greg Jarrett wound up looking really stupid. How much of a financial interest do the Saudi's have in Fox News anyway? Because it sure looks like they will do anything to make sure that Islam isn't mentioned as the cause of this terrorist attack.
Posted by: Deus_Vult! | Saturday, November 07, 2009 at 08:23 PM
Why didn't the major resign his commision? Good question. It is true that a commissioned officer has to serve 8 years active service but can then resign that commission. Or they can then join the reserves, if they wish to keep working towards their 20 year retirement. The point is is that he DID NOT have to stay in the army, especially if he didn't want to go overseas.
Why didn't the traitor resign his commission? Allah only knows.
Posted by: galtboy | Saturday, November 07, 2009 at 11:29 PM
Why does it have to be either mental illness OR radical ideology? I tend to think that much of what is considered "radical ideology," or "radical islam," is really a form of mental illness. That does not make it excusable. I believe these extremist mass ideologies are a form of collective mental dysfunction. As I said, that doesn't excuse it or make it less reprehensible.
Posted by: BethesdaDog | Sunday, November 08, 2009 at 03:04 AM
Why wouldn't this guy try to stick it out in the army? Can you see him trying to make it in private practice or some private hospital where he has less job protection? Unfortunately, the military, like much of the federal government, probably tolerates all sort of deviance and weirdness just because it is too difficult to eliminate it. In fact, as a veteran of federal civilian government service, it's often the most screwed up, least ethical and least responsible who end up thriving and moving up. Anyone with scruples, honesty or courage ends up getting screwed in the system. It's probably somewhat similar in the military and that doesn't take away from the many anonymous courageous individuals who serve and sacrifice for our national defense. You get ahead by playing the system.
Posted by: BethesdaDog | Sunday, November 08, 2009 at 03:08 AM
over at http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/05/national/main5539067.shtml
"missheidi" commented on November 7, 2009:
"The US Taxpayers paid over $500,000 to put this murderer thru Va. Tech, 4 yrs. of medical school, 2 yrs. residency then 2 yrs interning while he was getting a six figure salary. After we paid his tab, he wants to get out of the US Army."
I believe he did not want to get out of the army...he simply was building a case to make as amny Muslims look victimized as psosible, and hopefully to assure the army would blame itself for not letting him out. Good victimizers always make themselves look like the victims.
I tried googling it and it seems everything has been already scrubbed on Google about this.
Posted by: sweetness and light | Sunday, November 08, 2009 at 04:59 AM
According to Islamic literature...Jihad is obligatory to all Mahoundians. If they refuse the call, they die hypocrites...There are no hypocrites in Allah's paradise. For them, Allah has prepared a most grievous punishment...
Posted by: duh_swami | Sunday, November 08, 2009 at 07:34 AM
Why didn't Major Nidal Hasan resign from the army? Because he was an enemy infiltrator! He is little different from an enemy spy. Biding his time, looking for the perfect excuse to pull off his act of predatory war was his act of jihad, as pointed out elsewhere already, considered obligatory for all Muslims. The army needs to court martial him for treason, convict him, and then execute him by firing squad, remembering to apply the Black Jack Pershing treatment.
"Black" Jack Pershing, commander of U.S. forces in the Philippines during World War I, had 50 captured Muslim terrorists. They were all tied to stakes for execution by firing squad. Before executing them, though, he had his men bring in two pigs, and slaughtered the pigs in full view of all the Muslim terrorists. Pershing's men dipped their bullets in the pig blood, again in full view of the Muslim jihadis, then used those pig blood-soaked bullets to execute 49 of the 50 jihadis. His men then dug a ditch for the 49 corpses, covered the corpses with the carcasses, blood, and entrails of the pigs, and buried the bodies that way. He then let go the 50th Muslim, who had witnessed everything, to tell the tale. We didn't get any trouble from Islam for over 40 years after that.
The army needs to give Nidal Hasan the "Black" Jack Pershing treatment to make an example of him and signal to all other Muslim infiltrators that, like Nidal Hasan, they will not get into Islamic paradise due to contamination by pigs. It's high time the army remembers this superstition of the enemy and takes full advantage of it.
Posted by: Robert | Sunday, November 08, 2009 at 01:45 PM
Why didn't this guy resign his commission you ask? Because he "had a premeditated mission and that was to kill non-Muslims!
Posted by: Instant Rebates | Sunday, November 08, 2009 at 04:00 PM