China Confidential broke the story. The Washington Post is now confirming that North Korea has captured two American journalists and is holding them as hostages ...... I am sure O-bambi will refrain from using the word hostage. He wouldn't want to insult Kim Jong-Il.
Click here for the story.
The Obama administration and accommodating media outlets are likely to avoid using the hostage term, even though the definition of a hostage is a person held against his or her will--a prisoner--by one party in order to ensure that another party meets specified demands or behaves in a certain manner.
EDITOR'S NOTE: American advocates of appeasing nuclear-armed North Korea and its nuclear-arming ally, Iran, have begun a blame-the-victim whispering campaign in Washington, DC and New York that recalls a knee-jerk liberal response to urban crime during the 1960s and '70s. What was she doing walking in that neighborhood? was commonly heard on Manhattan's Upper West Side and in other liberal bastions following an all-too commonplace report of a rape, mugging, or beating. It is only a matter of time--days, maybe--before North Korea's apologists will mobilize to downplay both the hostage-taking by the regime and its menacing missile launch.




It's ironic that the journalists detained by North Korea are two reporters working for Al Gore's CurrentTV and presumably sympathetic to NK's despotic regime.
Just another proof that the totalitarians will kill off the useful idiots as well as everyone else.
chsw
Posted by: chsw | Wednesday, March 25, 2009 at 01:20 PM
the u.s. gov will probably use a term like:
temporarily detained
and explain it as 'just a formality'...
riiiiight.
i remember how israel used to respond to just one hostage...they'd tear them up to get that person back.
Posted by: kobi | Monday, March 30, 2009 at 02:07 AM