RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION OF PRESIDENT HUSSEIN: "A $550 Billion Electronic Run on the Banks"
This is un-frickin-believable. The financial crisis was deliberate, planned, staged. Who made the run? "Someone threw us in the middle of the Atlantic ocean without a life raft. We are
trying to determine which is the closest shore and whether there is any chance
in the world to swim that far. We don't know."
Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania
explains what former Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman
Bernanke told congress
during the September 2008 closed door session. During the first third of the
video an enraged caller is ranting to Rep. Kanjorski about how wasteful the
first $700 billion bailout was. The best part is 2 minutes and 15 seconds into
the tape where Rep. Kanjorski reveals what Paulson and Bernanke told congress
that shocked them into supporting the first $700 billion bailout.
On Thursday Sept 15, 2008 at roughly 11 AM The Federal
Reserve noticed a tremendous draw down of money market accounts in the USA to
the tune of $550 Billion dollars in a matter of an hour or two. Money was being
removed electronically.
The Treasury tried to help, opened their window
and pumped in $150 Billion but quickly realized they could not stem the tide. We
were having an electronic run on the banks. So they decided to closed down the
accounts.
Had they not closed down the accounts they estimated that by 2
PM that afternoon. Within 3 hours. $5.5 Trillion would have been withdrawn and
the entire economy of the United States would have collapsed, and within 24
hours the world economy would have collapsed.
Kanjorski also explains why Paulson
spent the bailout money differently than he originally proposed.
Some
other gems from the recording:
It would
have been the end of our economic and political system.
We would have had
to spend 3 to 4 Trillion dollars to buy up all the toxic assets. But we didn't
have that much we only had 700 Billion.
Without a banking system you
don't have an economy.
We are no better off now than we were three months
ago.
Someone threw us in the middle of the Atlantic ocean without a life
raft. We are trying to determine which is the closest shore and whether there is
any chance in the world to swim that far. We don't know.
More to think about. Somebody took a lot of money out of the banks. A lot.
So where did it go?
Who to?
And who got it? When? And where?
Somebody knows. Those transactions have been investigated, and
somebody knows. But they ain't talking, are they?
John Jay posits - there has to be a reason why:
--this hasn't been heretofore revealed
--why those who received the deposits haven't been identified
--why there is no explanation for their motives, and
--why this has just now been revealed.
The motive part is very interesting, isn't it? Now, a person does no
wrong, in and of itself, by taking his money from his accounts, perfectly legal,
and absolutely unpreventable by any means other than the government shutting down or
closing the market, as it did, to prevent/stop the run.
A run is a banker's term of art, and it is like a herd stampede, or panic,
or a psychosis of a lot of people.
They say 4 or 5 trillion dollars could have been emptied out of the bank by
the end of that business day. Presumably, it could not have gone all to one
entity, else that entity just could have gone back when the markets opened, and
continued to withdraw funds. So, if it were designed as action to induce a
panic, it had to have been done in a way that the new would spread quickly, go
"viral" as it were, to others holding funds or control over funds in similar
banking institutions/markets. So, the transaction had to be public, or at least
traceable, because they had to be noticeable, and they had to instill a panic so
that the run would continue, and people would be noticing what was happening and
would move to preserve and protect what money they could access.
So, it wasn't silent.
It wasn't stealth.
Just the opposite. It had to be noticed, to work, to induce the panic in
the number of people required to induce the panic.
So, the people who do such things, who monitor who and where the orders
come from, and who keep track of whose accounts the money is taken from, have to
have been able to figure that out, and who was responsible.
Yet, they do not tell us.
Why?
They should be able to.
There is one more context. People where really abuzz trying to stop this
latest round of Obama legislation, and considerable heat was being brought to
bear on this.
Obama & his minions choose this C-span broadcast/interview, complete with screaming put-upon lady, so that Rep. Kanjorsky (Democrat, Pennsylvania) can tell us all just how close we came to financial panic and collapse, no doubt to stir us to support for Obama.
Can there be any other reason for it. Seems to me, you'd kinda want to
keep a lid on it,just like everybody did.
Now, the other question that comes to my mind, is just when the Republicans
went into the tank on the republic election. It is too bad we don't have the
collective memory to remember just when McCain officially threw in the towel,
and whether it had any connection to this. He most assuredly would have known. Palin most assuredly would not have, in all likelihood.
The Wall Street boys knew.
The regulators, the Federal Reserve knew, and nary a boo, peep or squeak out
of any of 'em, until now.
A Congress that can keep a secret? Pretty unheard of in this day and age.
but, up til now .... .
The FDIC has just announced that a
consortium of private equity and hedge fund firms would be buying IndyMac.
IndyMac was an independent "bridge bank" spun off of Countrywide Mortgage in the
late 90s. IndyMac acted as a "bridge bank" to Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac.
New York Democrat Charles Shumer
precipitated the fall of IndyMac in May of 2008 by
releasing "inside" information that the mortgage company was in dire financial
straits. This disclosure created the initial "bank run" that is credited by
many economists as the initial trigger that prompted the current mortgage
crisis. The FDIC took over the operations of IndyMac in late summer of 2008.
So much for history. George Soros
is in on the deal to buy IndyMac from the FDIC. Soros has a
long history of making loads of money by first creating a financial crisis and
then stepping in to grab up the bargains. Perhaps the most famous example of
this tactic is "Black Wednesday," when Soros nearly sunk the entire economy
of Great Britain through currency speculation.
George Soros has helped bankroll
the campaigns of the Democrats in Congress who created this mess. Now, it
appears, he is cashing in on his investment.
RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION OF PRESIDENT HUSSEIN: "A $550 Billion Electronic Run on the Banks"
This is un-frickin-believable. The financial crisis was deliberate, planned, staged. Who made the run? "Someone threw us in the middle of the Atlantic ocean without a life raft. We are
trying to determine which is the closest shore and whether there is any chance
in the world to swim that far. We don't know."
Rep. Paul Kanjorski of Pennsylvania
explains what former Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman
Bernanke told congress
during the September 2008 closed door session. During the first third of the
video an enraged caller is ranting to Rep. Kanjorski about how wasteful the
first $700 billion bailout was. The best part is 2 minutes and 15 seconds into
the tape where Rep. Kanjorski reveals what Paulson and Bernanke told congress
that shocked them into supporting the first $700 billion bailout.
On Thursday Sept 15, 2008 at roughly 11 AM The Federal
Reserve noticed a tremendous draw down of money market accounts in the USA to
the tune of $550 Billion dollars in a matter of an hour or two. Money was being
removed electronically.
The Treasury tried to help, opened their window
and pumped in $150 Billion but quickly realized they could not stem the tide. We
were having an electronic run on the banks. So they decided to closed down the
accounts.
Had they not closed down the accounts they estimated that by 2
PM that afternoon. Within 3 hours. $5.5 Trillion would have been withdrawn and
the entire economy of the United States would have collapsed, and within 24
hours the world economy would have collapsed.
Kanjorski also explains why Paulson
spent the bailout money differently than he originally proposed.
Some
other gems from the recording:
It would
have been the end of our economic and political system.
We would have had
to spend 3 to 4 Trillion dollars to buy up all the toxic assets. But we didn't
have that much we only had 700 Billion.
Without a banking system you
don't have an economy.
We are no better off now than we were three months
ago.
Someone threw us in the middle of the Atlantic ocean without a life
raft. We are trying to determine which is the closest shore and whether there is
any chance in the world to swim that far. We don't know.
More to think about. Somebody took a lot of money out of the banks. A lot.
So where did it go?
Who to?
And who got it? When? And where?
Somebody knows. Those transactions have been investigated, and
somebody knows. But they ain't talking, are they?
John Jay posits - there has to be a reason why:
--this hasn't been heretofore revealed
--why those who received the deposits haven't been identified
--why there is no explanation for their motives, and
--why this has just now been revealed.
The motive part is very interesting, isn't it? Now, a person does no
wrong, in and of itself, by taking his money from his accounts, perfectly legal,
and absolutely unpreventable by any means other than the government shutting down or
closing the market, as it did, to prevent/stop the run.
A run is a banker's term of art, and it is like a herd stampede, or panic,
or a psychosis of a lot of people.
They say 4 or 5 trillion dollars could have been emptied out of the bank by
the end of that business day. Presumably, it could not have gone all to one
entity, else that entity just could have gone back when the markets opened, and
continued to withdraw funds. So, if it were designed as action to induce a
panic, it had to have been done in a way that the new would spread quickly, go
"viral" as it were, to others holding funds or control over funds in similar
banking institutions/markets. So, the transaction had to be public, or at least
traceable, because they had to be noticeable, and they had to instill a panic so
that the run would continue, and people would be noticing what was happening and
would move to preserve and protect what money they could access.
So, it wasn't silent.
It wasn't stealth.
Just the opposite. It had to be noticed, to work, to induce the panic in
the number of people required to induce the panic.
So, the people who do such things, who monitor who and where the orders
come from, and who keep track of whose accounts the money is taken from, have to
have been able to figure that out, and who was responsible.
Yet, they do not tell us.
Why?
They should be able to.
There is one more context. People where really abuzz trying to stop this
latest round of Obama legislation, and considerable heat was being brought to
bear on this.
Obama & his minions choose this C-span broadcast/interview, complete with screaming put-upon lady, so that Rep. Kanjorsky (Democrat, Pennsylvania) can tell us all just how close we came to financial panic and collapse, no doubt to stir us to support for Obama.
Can there be any other reason for it. Seems to me, you'd kinda want to
keep a lid on it,just like everybody did.
Now, the other question that comes to my mind, is just when the Republicans
went into the tank on the republic election. It is too bad we don't have the
collective memory to remember just when McCain officially threw in the towel,
and whether it had any connection to this. He most assuredly would have known. Palin most assuredly would not have, in all likelihood.
The Wall Street boys knew.
The regulators, the Federal Reserve knew, and nary a boo, peep or squeak out
of any of 'em, until now.
A Congress that can keep a secret? Pretty unheard of in this day and age.
but, up til now .... .
The FDIC has just announced that a
consortium of private equity and hedge fund firms would be buying IndyMac.
IndyMac was an independent "bridge bank" spun off of Countrywide Mortgage in the
late 90s. IndyMac acted as a "bridge bank" to Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac.
New York Democrat Charles Shumer
precipitated the fall of IndyMac in May of 2008 by
releasing "inside" information that the mortgage company was in dire financial
straits. This disclosure created the initial "bank run" that is credited by
many economists as the initial trigger that prompted the current mortgage
crisis. The FDIC took over the operations of IndyMac in late summer of 2008.
So much for history. George Soros
is in on the deal to buy IndyMac from the FDIC. Soros has a
long history of making loads of money by first creating a financial crisis and
then stepping in to grab up the bargains. Perhaps the most famous example of
this tactic is "Black Wednesday," when Soros nearly sunk the entire economy
of Great Britain through currency speculation.
George Soros has helped bankroll
the campaigns of the Democrats in Congress who created this mess. Now, it
appears, he is cashing in on his investment.
"You are a wonderful fighter for liberty" -- Bat Ye'or
"Well, I read Atlas Shrugs, Power Line, National Review blogs" ........ "Atlas Shrugs breaks more news than dozens of liberal blogs combined." ...... ... Ambassador John Bolton
"I'm a fan!" - Mark Steyn
"Fearless, intelligent, beautiful --- Pamela Geller wears her Supergirl
costume well."
"Pamela Geller is a dynamo of energy and
a paragon of courage and fearlessness.
--Robert Spencer, JihadWatch in his book Stealth Jihad
"You do great work. You are a hero". -- Geert Wilders, Dutch MP
"You are my hero!" -- Wafa Sultan, Former Muslim, Author human rights activist
"Hot female host with a good sense of humor based in NYC? I nominate Pamela."-- Michelle Malkin
"An American and Jewish national treasure." -- Steven Goldberg, National Vice Chair, ZOA
"A nationally recognized authority on the threat of radical Islam" -- Rep. Steven King (R-IA)
Pamela is one of the nation's most vigorous opponents of bigoted violence.- John Hinderaker, Powerline
" "A beautiful and articulate speaker and writer who has risen to prominence in the US for her steadfast commitment to exposing the deadly pathologies of Jew hatred, misogyny and other prejudices inherent to jihadist ideology." -- Caroline Glick" -- Caroline Glick
"I honestly think that one day historians will write about the defense of Western values and virtues in the 21st Century and speak of heroes. And one will be Pamela Geller." Michael Coren, TV host, Sun TV
"I'm cheering you on!" -- Amanda Carpenter
"Great site," Dick Morris
"A brash New Yorker and an irrepressible firebrand" -- Robert Tracinski, The Freedom Fighter's Journal and The Intellectual Activist
"Indeed, some of Israel's best friends and most articulate defenders can be found in the blogosphere .... Atlas Shrugs, [et al] all provide a refreshing alternative to the moral relativism and politically correct anti-Israel blather of the media. Michael Freund, Jerusalem Post
"She does more in one week than most of us do in a frickin' lifetime -- Pamela Geller!" -- Jaz McKay, Talk Radio KNZR
"Influential online fanatic" --- Max Blumenthal, Writer, Al Jazeera and The Nation
"I never go to MSM for news. Atlas is where I go. I am amazed at all that is happening, that only Atlas readers know about"". --- JCL, Atlas reader
"The heroine of the right wing blogosphere. 'We’re all Pamela Geller now!'” -- Charles Johnson, mental patient
“Geller had joined Stop the Madrassa and blogged often about the matter on her website, Atlas Shrugs. Blessed with sultry Hollywood sex appeal and a sassy, scythe-like wit — a personable Ann Coulter and articulate Sarah Palin rolled into one — Geller would ride the Park51 project protest to superstardom.”
- Southern Poverty Law Center
"Pamela Geller is one of the most polarizing women in the country."
Village Voice
"Pamela Geller's writings, rallies and television appearances have both offended and inspired, transforming Ms. Geller from an Internet obscurity, who once videotaped herself in a bikini as she denounced “Islamofascism,” into a media commodity who has been profiled on “60 Minutes” and whose phraseology has been adopted by Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin." The New York Times
"Geller and Spencer are probably the most important propagandizing Islamophobes in the world, these people's voices speak very loudly — not just here in the United States but overseas." Heidi Beirich, director of the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project
"I would give the greatest sunset in the world for one sight of New York's skyline. Particularly when one can't see the details. Just the shapes. The shapes and the thought that made them. The sky over New York and the will of man made visible. What other religion do we need? And then people tell me about pilgrimages to some dank pesthole in a jungle where they go to do homage to a crumbling temple, to a leering stone monster with a pot belly, created by some leprous savage. Is it beauty and genius they want to see? Do they seek a sense of the sublime? Let them come to New York, stand on the shore of the Hudson, look and kneel. When I see the city from my window - no, I don't feel how small I am - but I feel that if a war came to threaten this, I would throw myself into space, over the city, and protect these buildings with my body." Ayn Rand
Disclaimer: All comments are welcome on this website but the views expressed and any links provided in the comment sections are the personal views of individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect my views.
Thank you for visiting.
If you are a legal copyright holder or a designated agent for such and you believe a post on this website falls outside the boundaries of “Fair Use” and legitimately infringes on yours or your clients copyright I may be contacted concerning copyright matters at:
If you require a courier address please send an email and I will provide you with the required information.
If notice is given of an alleged copyright violation I will act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the material(s) in question. It is my strict policy to disable access to accounts of repeat copyright violators. I will also ban the IP address of repeat offenders from future posting on this website with or without a registered account.
All 3rd party material posted on this website is copyright the respective owners / authors. AtlasShrugs.com makes no claim of copyright on such material.
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
—–
DON’T BREAK THE LAW!
—–
Other than that you can do / say whatever you want on this forum.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.