O's "Stimulus" Suicide Bomb: Vanishing Point

Nancy Coppack explains President O's Alinsky strategy to bring America to its knees. There will be no turning back. Understand what you are dealing with.

Here are the GOP turncoats. Call now. Call back if it's busy.
Collins (202) 224-2523
 Snowe (202) 224-5344
Voinovich (202) 224-3353
Specter (202) 224-4254

THE CLOWARD/PRIVEN STRATEGY OF ECONOMIC RECOVERY The American Thinker

Using borrowed money for a band-aid bailout of the economy should seem backwards to most people. However, it likely is a planned strategy to promote radical change. Those naively believing that President Obama is simply rewarding his far-left base, and will then move to the political center, must wise up.

The assumption that Obama will need the nation to prosper in order to protect the 2010 mid-term election incorrectly assumes that he esteems free market capitalism. He does not. Rather than win through superior ideas and policies, the Democrat plan for success in the mid-term elections is to win by destroying political opposition.

Obama adheres to the Saul Alinksy Rules for Radicals method of politics, which teaches the dark art of destroying political adversaries. However, that text reveals only one front in the radical left's war against America. The Cloward/Piven Strategy is another method employed by the radical Left to create and manage crisis. This strategy explains Rahm Emanuel's ominous statement, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."

The Cloward/Piven Strategy is named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Their goal is to overthrow capitalism by overwhelming the government bureaucracy with entitlement demands. The created crisis provides the impetus to bring about radical political change.

According to Discover the Networks.org:

Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation... [Emphasis added.]

Making an already weak economy even worse is the intent of the Cloward/Piven Strategy. It is imperative that we view the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan's spending on items like food stamps, jobless benefits, and health care through this end goal. This strategy explains why the Democrat plan to "stimulate" the economy involves massive deficit spending projects. It includes billions for ACORN and its subgroups such as SHOP and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. Expanding the S-Chip Program through deficit spending in a supposed effort to "save the children" only makes a faltering economy worse. 

If Congress were to allow a robust economy, parents would be able to provide for their children themselves by earning and keeping more of their own money. Democrats, quick to not waste a crisis, would consider that a lost opportunity.

The Cato Institute reports that the plan will harm a faltering economy, intentionally causing increased job losses leading to increased demands for the aforementioned programs. Even the jobs to be created are set apart to render social justice, not economic revival. Robert Reich believes new infrastructure jobs should not go to white construction workers. Meanwhile, workers at Microsoft, IBM, Texas Instruments, and the retail market find themselves experiencing the life of the welfare poor.

If highly educated and trained workers continue to lose jobs and business falters as a whole, where will these jobless workers go? Could this be construed as revolutionary social reorganization that puts the underachiever above the achiever? Where is the future economic strength when jobless professionals collect welfare and unemployment while dreaming of a minimum wage job? For whites, there's not even the hope of a good paying construction job.

Please read it all.

UPDATE:The senators we need to target  Cassy Fiano hat tip Larwyn

We need to be calling all of our senators, folks. But some might need more attention than others. That said, I just finished calling every Republican in the Senate, plus Joe Lieberman. I kept a tally of who gave a firm no, and who seemed to be a little more on the squishy side. The ones who gave a firm no should still get phone calls, mind you, to make sure they don't change their position. But it's the squishy ones who really need our attention. Here's the tally:

FIRMLY OPPOSES:
I only put someone down in the "no" column if the response I got from the office was a firm no. Any wavering or talk of compromise and bipartisanship got them in the "squish" column. So, here are the senators currently planning on voting no:

Jeff Sessions

Kit Bond

Jon Kyl

John McCain

Mike Johann

John Ensign

Richard Burr

Tom Coburn

James Inhofe

Mike Crapo

James Risch

Jim DeMint

Lindsay Graham

Sam Brownback

Pat Roberts

John Thune

Jim Bunning

Mitch McConnell

Bob Corker

David Vitter

Robert Bennett

John Barrasso

Now, just because they're saying they oppose it right now doesn't mean that decision is carved in stone, so don't hesitate to continue contacting them. Let them know you support their decision and tell them that they're doing the right thing. Encourage them. Be nice.

Now, for the rest of the group.

THE SQUISHES:
These are the people whose votes are liable to change, along with any notes I wrote down about my conversations with them.

Richard Shelby — I got busy signals on both lines, so I just put him in the squish column.

Lisa Murkowski — definite squish; plus, her staffer was a huge asshat on the phone.

Thad Cochran

Judd Gregg — said he was abstaining from voting.

Joe Lieberman

Mel Martinez

Saxby Chambliss — said he currently opposed it, but was "open to compromise"

George Voinovich — voted no in appropriations but is still open to voting for the bill

Johnny Isakson

Arlen Specter — both of his lines were busy, I never actually got through

Richard Lugar

Chuck Grassley

Roger Wicker

Lamar Alexander — likely a "no" vote, but still possibly squishy

John Cornyn — no answer on either line

Kay Bailey Hutchison — busy on both lines

Susan Collins

Olympia Snowe

Michael Enzi — "leaning towards no"

So folks, that's where we stand right now on the positions of the Republican senators. Let's light up those phones now. You can get their phone numbers here.