The LA Times is refusing to release a video of the Jew hating event Obama hosted with pal and infamous Jew hater Rashid Khalidi, I am asking everyone at Atlas to contact the LA Times and implore them (nicely) to release the tape in keeping with their role as public servant (/sarc tag off)
LA TIMES CONTACT: here.
They know not what they do. What is fascinating to me is the important, Jewish powerhouses in Hollywood are not stepping up to the plate and demanding that the LA Times release the video or they will pull their entertainment advertising.
I am talking about men like Steven Spielberg who spent a large part of his fortune and career recording every witness to the Shoah. Fetishizing dead Jews. Someone ought to tell Spielberg (and Geffen, =Katzenberg, all of them) that his efforts are worthless if he has a hand in ushering in a President lethal for Israel and the Jews.
It was one thing for these guys to come out for Obama back in January 2007 when he was unknown. He is no longer unknown. Wright, Zbigniew, Farrakhan, Mansour, Powers, Rice, Ayers, et al. His allegiances are dangerous and fatal. You can avoid reality but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Movie moguls Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg (along with Soros of course) chose the Barack Hussein Obama, imposed him on the American people. The messed up. Big time.
These powerful and influential men should demand this video.
Allies of Palestinians see a friend in Barack Obama
LA Times (hat tip Randall)
CHICAGO -- It was a celebration of Palestinian culture -- a night of music,
dancing and a dash of politics. Local Arab Americans were bidding farewell to
Rashid Khalidi, an internationally known scholar, critic of Israel and advocate
for Palestinian rights, who was leaving town for a job in New York.
A
special tribute came from Khalidi's friend and frequent dinner companion, the
young state Sen. Barack Obama. Speaking to the crowd, Obama reminisced about
meals prepared by Khalidi's wife, Mona, and conversations that had challenged
his thinking.
His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been "consistent reminders to
me of my own blind spots and my own biases. . . . It's for that reason that I'm
hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation -- a
conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid's dinner table,"
but around "this entire world."
[...]
And yet the warm embrace
Obama gave to Khalidi, and words like those at the professor's going-away party,
have left some Palestinian American leaders believing that Obama is more
receptive to their viewpoint than he is willing to say.
Their belief is
not drawn from Obama's speeches or campaign literature, but from comments that
some say Obama made in private and from his association with the Palestinian
American community in his hometown of Chicago, including his presence at events
where anger at Israeli and U.S. Middle East policy was freely
expressed.
At Khalidi's 2003 farewell party, for example, a young
Palestinian American recited a poem accusing the Israeli government of terrorism
in its treatment of Palestinians and sharply criticizing U.S. support of Israel.
If Palestinians cannot secure their own land, she said, "then you will never see
a day of peace."
One speaker likened "Zionist settlers on the West Bank"
to Osama bin Laden, saying both had been "blinded by ideology."
Obama
adopted a different tone in his comments and called for finding common ground.
But his presence at such events, as he worked to build a political base in
Chicago, has led some Palestinian leaders to believe that he might deal
differently with the Middle East than either of his opponents for the White
House.
"I am confident that Barack Obama is more sympathetic to the
position of ending the occupation than either of the other candidates," said
Hussein Ibish, a senior fellow for the American Task Force on Palestine,
referring to the Israeli presence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip that began
after the 1967 war. More than his rivals for the White House, Ibish said, Obama
sees a "moral imperative" in resolving the conflict and is most likely to apply
pressure to both sides to make concessions.
"That's my personal opinion,"
Ibish said, "and I think it for a very large number of circumstantial reasons,
and what he's said."
[...]
Obama also calls for the U.S. to talk to such declared enemies as
Iran, Syria and Cuba. But he argues that the Palestinian militant organization
Hamas, which governs the Gaza Strip, is an exception, calling it a terrorist
group that should renounce violence and recognize Israel's right to exist before
dialogue begins. That viewpoint, which also matches current U.S. policy, clashes
with that of many Palestinian advocates who urge the United States and Israel to
treat Hamas as a partner in negotiations.
Hamas endorsed Obama.
"Barack's belief is that it's
important to understand other points of view, even if you can't agree with
them," said his longtime political strategist, David Axelrod.
I wonder if he would be so "understanding" if something terrible happened directly to him, his family, his people.
Obama "can
disagree without shunning or demonizing those with other views," he said.
"That's far different than the suggestion that he somehow tailors his
view."
Looking for clues
[...]
Last year, for example, Obama was quoted saying that
"nobody's suffering more than the Palestinian people."
Jewish leaders were
satisfied with Obama's explanation, but some Palestinian leaders, including
Ibish, took the original quotation as a sign of the candidate's empathy for
their plight.
Obama's willingness to befriend Palestinian Americans and
to hear their views also impressed, and even excited, a community that says it
does not often have the ear of the political establishment.
Among other
community events, Obama in 1998 attended a speech by Edward Said, the late
Columbia University professor and a leading intellectual in the Palestinian
movement. According to a news account of the speech, Said called that day for a
nonviolent campaign "against settlements, against Israeli apartheid."
The
use of such language to describe Israel's policies has drawn vehement objection
from Israel's defenders in the United States. A photo on the pro-Palestinian
website the Electronic Intifada shows Obama and his wife, Michelle, engaged in
conversation at the dinner table with Said, and later listening to Said's
keynote address. Obama had taken an English class from Said as an undergraduate
at Columbia University.
Ali Abunimah, a Palestinian rights activist in Chicago who helps run
Electronic Intifada, said that he met Obama several times at
Palestinian and Arab American community events. At one, a 2000
fundraiser at a private home, Obama called for the U.S. to take an
"even-handed" approach toward Israel, Abunimah wrote in an article on
the website last year. He did not cite Obama's specific criticisms.
Abunimah, in a Times interview and on his website, said Obama seemed
sympathetic to the Palestinian cause but more circumspect as he ran for
the U.S. Senate in 2004. At a dinner gathering that year, Abunimah
said, Obama greeted him warmly and said privately that he needed to
speak cautiously about the Middle East.
Abunimah quoted Obama as saying that he was sorry he wasn't talking
more about the Palestinian cause, but that his primary campaign had
constrained what he could say.
[...]
In Chicago, one of Obama's friends was Khalidi, a highly visible figure in the Arab American community.
In the 1970s, when Khalidi taught at a university in Beirut, he often
spoke to reporters on behalf of Yasser Arafat's Palestine Liberation
Organization
. In the early 1990s, he advised the Palestinian delegation
during peace negotiations. Khalidi now occupies a prestigious
professorship of Arab studies at Columbia.
[...]
While teaching at the University of Chicago, Khalidi and his wife lived
in the Hyde Park neighborhood near the Obamas. The families became
friends and dinner companions.
In 2000, the Khalidis held a fundraiser for Obama's unsuccessful
congressional bid. The next year, a social service group whose board
was headed by Mona Khalidi received a $40,000 grant from a local
charity, the Woods Fund of Chicago, when Obama served on the fund's
board of directors.
At Khalidi's going-away party in 2003, the scholar lavished praise on
Obama, telling the mostly Palestinian American crowd that the state
senator deserved their help in winning a U.S. Senate seat. "You will
not have a better senator under any circumstances," Khalidi said.
The event was videotaped, and a copy of the tape was obtained by The Times.
Though Khalidi has seen little of Sen. Obama in recent years, Michelle
Obama attended a party several months ago celebrating the marriage of
the Khalidis' daughter.
[...]
"He has family literally all over the world," Khalidi said. "I feel a kindred spirit from that."
Give up that tape.