That says it all folks. When Obama was asked on Pastor Rick Warren's Saddleback Political Forum, who Obama would not have nominated for Supreme Court Justice, Obama said "Clarence Thomas". He then goes on to denigrate Thomas's intellect ("not a strong enough legal thinker or intellect"). Wow. By G-d this man has hubris. Have you read Clarence Thomas's, "My Grandfather's Son"? And then have you read Obama's Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance (pulp white hating trash).
I find Obama's racism against Thomas (he calls everyone against him a racist so why can't I do the same?) appalling. The audience applauded (was that racist? I'm confused.) John Bolton, the intellectual's intellectual, has called Clarence Thomas "an outstanding Supreme Court Justice".
And Scalia? Only the greatest living justice on the bench. lol
So Obama applauds terrorists rights, eminent domain for private enterprise and leniency for child rapists. Good luck with that America.
When the Pastor asked about his no vote on John Roberts, Obama stood behind it. I kid you not.
When McCain was asked the same question, he said without hesitation Ginsberg, Souter, Beyer, and Stevens (bing, bang, boom)
He added the two appointments Alito and Roberts are his recent favorites.
Where these two men stand on the SCOTIS tells you everything about the direction of their presidency(s).
Obama was slick, slick smooth, all style.
McCain was all substance. Tough, hard hitting. No bullshit.
McCain wiped the floor with him.
When asked does evil exist and if so how would he handle it? Ignore it, negotiate with it, confront it or defeat it
Obama: verbose, wordy ..... he would confront it but also equivocated on what evil is. "We have to have some humility on the issue on the of confronting". Evil has been been committed in the pursuit of good. *sigh*
McCain: "DEFEAT IT" huge applause. McCain went on to describe Radical Islam as the greatest threat of the 21at century. He also promised most forcefully that he would capture and kill Osama Bin Laden. He said he would pursue bin Laden “to the gates of Hell,” Gotta love that.
Obama equivocated and talk around a lot of issues.
McCain's answers were straight, direct, and decisive.
Obama's most important advisers: Michelle (the "proud" wife, the grandmother "a typical white person", and then a bumch of politicians - Ted Kennedy, Nunn, Biden et al)
McCain's most important advisers: Gen. David Petreaus, head of US troops in Iraq; US Rep. and veteran civil rights leader John Lewis, D-Ga.; and former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, a top adviser to his campaign, “It’s one of these great economic success stories".
Question: Should better teachers get more pay?
Obama: There should be a set up
Let me put it this way for the grrrrrrls out there.
Obama is the guy you date. Smooth, suave, takes you for a ride. Full-of-shitnik.
McCain is the man you marry. Solid, plain talking, earnest, masculine, his word is his bond.
Can you dig it?











But the best thing was , HIS ADVISORSSSS ESTER and Grandmaw God this man is full of it. McCain absolutely kicked asss
Posted by: RISE_UP | Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 10:26 PM
One of the things he didnt like about Clarance thomas was his lack of experience. Isnt that the teapot calling the kettle black? Oh wait. Did I just play the race card?
Posted by: Yidwithlid | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 12:01 AM
Ohhhh, you are SOOOOO racist, YWL!! BOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
[I mean, HAAAAAAAAWWWWW!!! ROFPM!! ]
Posted by: JewishOdysseus | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 12:52 AM
atlas: excellent deconstruction of the differences between the two.
well stated, clear, and convincing.
you go girl!
Posted by: kobi | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 01:07 AM
Why is it whenever I watch Obama from Iowa onward and in congressional hearings on Cspan I get the feeling that I am watching somebody who is still saying to himself that he wants to be a politician when he grows up?
Posted by: SlimGuy | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 02:14 AM
Glad to see McCain doing his "Presidental" thing..this man is the bomb.
Just feel in love with him.
Thanks for the reporting Pamela, and the kind words about McCain
Posted by: Barbara | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 03:06 AM
In the Saddleback debates, once again Obama had to release a bit more about his true colors. The more he has to talk about his views the more damage he does to himself in the eyes of rational Americans.
When asked about evil, he seemed to be trying to equate evil with sin. People can sin, but evil is being Satan like. There is a big difference in the meaning, they are not the same. For a minute there I thought he was going to say, "Let him who is not evil cast the first stone!" Jesus said, "Let him who is without sin cast the first stone." Obama also said that there are evil people in America, which is true but it is also true everywhere else; and that America has done evil things, which is not true. So, is he suggesting that America is the great Satan? Sounds like Political Islam to me.
Obama has made other statements that make you wonder if he is in fact a Christian. Recently he made a public statement to the effect that he believes that there are many ways to God. I thought all Christians knew that there is only one way! To paraphrase Jesus, "You cannot come to the Father but by me." Yet Obama continues to hold that he is a Christian. At best Obama is not a good Christian and when you take all his comments into account in this area he does not seem to really understand the bible. At worst he may be a Muslim pretending to be a Christian.
In International Politics Obama's latest comment indicates his lack of experience as do all his other comments in this arena. He tries to put half the blame of the Russian invasion of Georgia, on Georgia. When you add in his platform on taxes, the military, energy, etc. it paints a very scary picture of what he will do as President. I am not sure America could survive his first term. Just considering experience, we cannot afford to put someone in the Whitehouse who requires comprehensive On-the-Job-Training!
Obama would not be good for the U.S., for Israel, or for the World.
Posted by: Spartan | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 05:09 AM
"McCain - ALL THE WAY - TO THE GATES OF HELL"
THERE's your soundbite America!
There's your campaign slogan!
Posted by: Timur | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 06:30 AM
See anti-Corsi pamphlet put out by desperate Obamites. I am no fan of Corsi, but he took the book to #1 on the bestseller lists, so we have to take notice. Obama's thin-skin nature fails the character test.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4773699/Obama-Nation-Unfit-for-Publication
I will understand if website operators don't want this material on this site. I respect your call. Regards!
Posted by: blocked | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 07:34 AM
If you pay close attention to Mr Hopenchange, "the world's greatest orator using a teleprompter", when asked if he would have nominated Clarence Thomas, he says "I would not have nominated him due to his lack of exper..intellect and legal ability" or something close to that. He ALMOST shot himself in the foot by saying Thomas lacked "experience", which is the same thing HE (Obama) lacks. Jeez. What a liberal empty suit. Mr. Freelunch would be a better name for him vs Mr Hopenchange.
Posted by: clyde | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 07:57 AM
Some flotsom that I picked up on free net. See McCain's 1974 essay on rules for POWs. Youthful work, but shows character. See bizarre remote psychological profile of Georgia's President, Saakashvili. Even if this is quackery, the US should distance the country from this jackass.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3395134/John-McCain-Essay-1974
http://www.scribd.com/doc/4795536/Mikhail-Saakashvili-A-Psychological-Study-of-the-Character
Posted by: blocked | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 08:14 AM
Fool me once, shame on me:
Fool me twice, shame on you:
And yes, I have read My Grandfather's Son -- GREAT!
Posted by: elvis | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 12:02 PM
There was certainly a clear distinction between both candidates however I'm not yet convinced Mccain's word is his bond; we'll find out when he speaks before an entirely different audience just how bonded is McCain to his words.
In this election both candidates are panderers, Obama is just better at pandering than is McCain. I have to wait to see if McCain really does believe in what he says or will he change is words to get people to beleive him.
Up in New Hampshire McCain campaigned as a big global-warming fraud, over in Saddleback Church in sunny California he campaigned like he was Reagan, in Texas no doubt he will campaign as a champion of the illegal slave trade industry; I have to wonder what he will be next.
Posted by: syn | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Certainly, Mac is a proven RINO, Closer to Hillary in belief than to conservatives. If he is elected the very few real small C conservatives will get the blame for what is now under the tip of the iceberg. It will be a one term presidency and Hussein Obama will follow. But it really doesn't matter since both are in the bag to the gov't/media/industrial complex. Hussein Obama wants the cry babies to think that he will be giving their and your money to them which is a one trillion dollar tax hike for "free" medical care, the Global Poverty Tax (Hussein's main claim of legislation which is on the table due to a pro voice vote so that the parliament of whores would not be on record for its passage), the Global Warming Tax (which Mac also wants, but may be pandering to the left), etc., ad infinitem. Mac is a lot more slippery, and know s people have short memories. He voted against Bush tax cuts on the premise that social programs should be cut in proportion. But this is big C conservative bull since social programs have a built-in yearly increase. So the tax cut only lowered the built-in raise only slightly, but never really lowered the base rate. It's all a big dog and pony show designed to fool everyone. Recall GHW Bush's obfuscation of the new global economic order using the red herring phrase, 'the vision thing' implying he didn't have one, but only understood short term issues. Jimmy "Pound Nails" Carter is just pissed off that he isn't running the show, the policies of which were earnestly put in place during his term by Zbig's CFR/Trilateral Commission influence. And this has been the MO ever since regardless of who or which party is in power. Does one prefer an outright antisemite as he or a Kapo such as Kissinger?
Decisions, decisions...
Posted by: elvis | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 02:08 PM
No matter what...no obama
Posted by: RISE_UP | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 04:15 PM
Clarence Thomas didn't have the mind or the intellect to be a judge, but Obama has the mind and intellect to be PUSA? Well, whatever. I strongly disagree. More importantly, McCain just stomped Obama. Even NBC's head political writer admitted that McCain won, despite (in his own assessment) McCain's "pandering" versus Obama's "thoughtful" and "authentic" responses.
Posted by: FancyLad | Sunday, August 17, 2008 at 07:06 PM