ETHNICALLY CLEANSED SARAJEVO NOW ENTIRELY MUSLIM

As the useful tools of the media and the Muslims spin their silly tales, the Muslim takeover continues apace.

Bosnia: Muslims dominate capital, claims Croatian MP   Adnkronos

The Bosnian capital of Sarajevo, once a symbol of ethnic diversity, has become an entirely Muslim city, a Croat deputy in the Bosnian Parliament, Branko Zrno, said on Wednesday.

"Sarajevo definitely isn't a multi-ethnic city, but the city of one group, the Bosniacs (Muslims), " Zrno told local media. He pointed out that Serbs and Croats in Sarajevo have no institutional protection, and continue to leave the capital. Zrno echoed allegations from Bosnian Serb leaders, including Serb entity Prime Minister Milorad Dodik, that non-Muslims in Sarajevo suffered discrimination and were denied their rights.

[...]

Serbs claim that in the city of 400,000 only 7,000 Serbs have remained, compared to 160,000 before the 1992-1995 civil war.

Thanks Bill Clinton!

The Serb claims have been supported by the Muslim President of the Bosnian Helsinki committee for human rights, Srdjan Dizdarevic, who said in a recent interview that Sarajevo had become a "monoethnic" city.

"Over 90 percent of Sarajevo inhabitants belong to only one group, the Bosniacs," Dizdarevic told weekly Fokus.

"Ethnic cleansing in this city has, unfortunately, been successfully completed. If the will exists to reconstruct Bosnia on multiethnic principles, one should start with Sarajevo," he concluded.

But as ethnic tensions deepened, the Muslim chairman of a three-man rotating state presidency, Haris Silajdzic, on Wednesday launched a fresh attack on the Serb entity.

Silajdzic repeated earlier claims that the Serb entity is a "symbol of genocide" allegedly perpetrated by its first president, Radovan Karadzic.

The hoax.

Karadzic is currently in detention and the Hague-based war crimes tribunal last week charged him with genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

"Karadzic has been arrested, but his project continues to live," Silajdzic said.

So said the Muslim President  preceding over a city of Muslims, ethnic cleansing accomplished.

"The international community is obliged to remove consequences of the genocide," Silajdzic added, referring to the Serb entity.

So said the Muslim President  preceding over a city of Muslims, ethnic cleansing accomplished.

[...]

Bosnia's majority Muslim leaders have continued to call the Serb entity a "genocidal creature" that should be abolished - a move strongly opposed by Serbs.

Comments

[maryatexitzero]

Our state department bases many of its malign policies on the theory that the enemy of our enemy must be our friend.

People who use phrases like "Milosevic’s supposed oppression" also base their statements on the theory that the enemy (in this case, the Serbs) of our enemy (in this case some, all, lots of Muslims) must be our friend.

There are many reasons why this theory doesn't work. One reason: the aggressor in a conflict that involves ethnic cleansing usually sees himself as a member of a 'superior' and ethnically 'pure' group. As such, he believes that all people who are not members of his pure/superior group are - inferior. He is not just the enemy of one, he's the enemy of all. He is nobody's friend.

A self-proclaimed Balkan expert, extreme leftist, anti-American journalist John Pilger, writes this about Clinton and Blair's actions in the former Yugoslavia:

Muted by the evidence of the Anglo-American catastrophe in Iraq, the international "humanitarian" war party ought to be called to account for its largely forgotten crusade in Kosovo, the model for Tony Blair's "onward march of liberation." Just as Iraq is being torn apart by the forces of empire, so was Yugoslavia, the multi-ethnic state that uniquely rejected both sides in the cold war.

Lies as great as those of Bush and Blair were deployed by Clinton and Blair in their grooming of public opinion for an illegal, unprovoked attack on a European country. Like the buildup to the invasion of Iraq, the media coverage in the spring of 1999 was a series of fraudulent justifications, beginning with U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen's claim that "we've now seen about 100,000 military-aged [Albanian] men missing ... they may have been murdered." David Scheffer, the U.S. ambassador at large for war crimes, announced that as many as "225,000 ethnic Albanian men aged between 14 and 59" may have been killed. Blair invoked the Holocaust and "the spirit of the Second World War." The British press took its cue. "Flight from genocide," said the Daily Mail. "Echoes of the Holocaust," chorused the Sun and the Mirror.

John Pilger opposes the Iraq war, he opposed the war in Afghanistan and he believes Bush, Blair and Rumsfeld are war criminals. He has called Guantanamo a 'concentration camp'. He believes that the only terrorism is "state terrorism", and, like most of the leftists who defend Serb actions in the former Yugoslavia, he believes that America is a terrorist state. This journalist is well respected, and he can provide 'evidence' to back up his support of terrorism, leftism, and the Serbs. He also uses phrases like "Milosevic's supposed oppression"

So, is Pilger an enemy or a friend of Julia Gorin and Andrew Bostom?

This is another reason why the theory that 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' is invalid

[Pamela Geller]

It's not my theory.

Pilger is not "my friend". I do not agree with his epistomolgy at all, whatever his conclusion.

[neverforget]

If I was a Serb, then I would get the hell out of there until all Muslims were dead or deported.

[shirtsbyeric]

Maybe they should award Clinton a retro Nobel prize that he did this for. And maybe a lifetime of awesomeness award for Obama so his ego isn't hurt.

[Firham]

Now, I think it's just odd that anybody would complain that there are are fewer Serbs and Croats in Sarajevo.

Well, there are fewer Muslims in Srebrenica, Fojnica and dozens of other towns across Serb-controlled Bosnia. Try complaining about that.

And of course, Serbs and Croats must complained of discriminations in Sarajevo - what do they expect from the people they tried to exterminate ?

[Sarajevan]

I came accross this site by accidnet and have had my blood boil by this article. I might be making a huge mistake by not reading more into stuff that is posted here, maybe my reaction would not be as strong then ...
But I decided not to. My name is Snjezana - which to those who know more about Bosnia tells clearly that my origin is Cristian. I intentionally refuse to tell here which of the dominant Chtistian groups I am.
I am a born Sarajevan, grew up in this town, did most of my schooling (all but the postgraduate), lived in 5 other countries but my own over the period of 14 years - all posts related to work (not a war refugee) and returned to Sarajevo in early 21st century. I give you all this information as background to support what I will say next.
Sarajevo has suffered changes because of the war. Part of that change is a change in percentages between the major ethnic groups.
Many people have left the city since the war has ended, but people of ALL nationalities. And that fact is partly what has contributed to the mantioned change in percentages. Many Bosniaks (or Muslims for some) have moved to Sarajevo becasue they could not live where they lived before the war, or because the war brought them to the city and tehy dod not want to go back to remote villages (!!! a weird reason that does not happen anywhere else...).

However, I refuse and with dispise look at your comment that Sarajevo has become a "Muslim city" because it IS NOT. If you have been in Sarajevo even for a day, not to mention more - you would realise that this is not true. I happily live here and work here. Have not ever encountered any problems bacuse of my name, religion or "ethnicity".

I am not saying that Sarajevo is without its problems, a "dreamland" city. But please stop declaring us into one or the other, or the third, or the fourth group. Stop putting labels on us without ever living this city.

I am sick and tired to see the world declaring us as A,B or C based on what a politician says - find me a politician in the world that does not look at the truth and reality through the prism of his own goals and aims. So next time you decide to form an opinion of Sarajevo (or any other place you have never been to) please DO NOT LISTEN TO THE POLITICIANS(especially the local ones) but rather travel the world and get to know the people, or at least research more on the poitician's view through following what other people (not more politicians) have to say about it - international artists, people who live or have lived there.

Back to the quotes you provided - like Milorad Dodik. The person who has based his success on the rhetorics of nationalistic hate. If he is so great that you should trust him - why do you think that the whole of international community that is working in Bosnia and Herzegovina is curretly "at war" with Mr. Dodik. Because his views and words are peaceful? - don't think so.

But not to go on - as I probably can on this issue , I have a favour to ask.

Please do not discuss and declare us as being A, B ,C, D or any other letter of any alphabet without really knowing us. I do not take the liberty to discuss such personal and intimate details as faith and treatment towards those who are different even for the countries I lived in - not to mention about the places I have never been to.
Sarajevo has its problems, as does Bosnia and Herzegovina as a whole. Non-Muslims being discriminated agains and forced to leave Sarajevo is NOT one of them.
If there is a problem linked to nationality - that is the inability - from the local politicians, and those in the world like yourself - for us not to be Serbs, Croats or Muslims (Bosniaks). For, it is the citizens of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, (and easily many other parts of the world) that refuse to be put in boxes and choose to be humans while keeping our religion and ethnicity where it belongs (in own, personal and private spheres) that are most endangeres from Dodik's, Zrno's and them alike local politicians and likes of yourself.

If I have been too harsh - I appologise. Please understand that this article for whatever reason has been "the last drop", and I just could not read and listen so similar stuff and not respond. If I have erred and offended, again my deepest appologies.

But, please before writing more on similar issues look deeper. Right now you have Mr. Zeljko Komsic travelling in US and meeting with the UN officials - member of the Bosnia's three member presidency, elected directly by the people (not as a polical party leader). A Croat by nationality who won the vote not through the nationality but thorugh "I will not represents the rights and interest of Croats, I will represent the rights and interest of the citizens of this country" - indicator strong enough of how many people here really prefer to be the citizens first, who are also Serbs, Croats, Bosniaks or any other group in their full right and for themselves, but with rights and lifes of citizens first.
And Zeljko is a born and bread Sarajevan, still living in this beautiful city. And he is not alone.

There are many more - who respect their nationality, and live and breath the soul of Sarajevo. World awarded film directors, musicians, sportsmen - they are all Sarajevans too. As are those who visit and meet us - and keep coming back. And many internationals, who decide to stay...
Therefore, come and meet this city yourself. Then we can talk about the problems Sarajevo has.