OBAMA: REPARATIONS TO BLACKS FOR SLAVERY
UNITY! HARMONY! BRINGING THE FOLKS 2GETHUH. This guy is going to set off race riots. The irony is Obama's ancestors would have been the enslavers not the slaves. Obama's strategy is to make the whole race about race.
WATCH THIS VIDEO NOW: Muslim Black slavery - Islam slave history of Black Africa.
What about reparations for that?
OBAMA FAVORS REPARATIONS TO TODAY'S BLACKS FOR SLAVERY
NO ONE IN OBAMA'S AFRICAN FAMILY WAS EVER A SLAVE.
Worse, his family were the enslavers.
ONE WHITE ANCESTOR WAS A SLAVE-OWNER.
MAYBE THAT EXPLAINS WHY HE FAVORS REPARATIONS:
"I think the reparation we need right here in South Carolina is investment, for example in our schools. I did a town hall meeting in Florence, South Carolina, in an area called the corridor of shame. They've got buildings that students are trying to learn in that were built right after the Civil War. And we've got teachers who are not trained to teach the subjects they're teaching and high dropout rates. We've got to understand that there are corridors of shame all across the country. And if we make the investments and understand that those are our children, that's the kind of reparation that are really going to make a difference in America right now."
UPDATE: Does it mean anything that Black Americans have the highest standard of living in the world? Is his angry wife proud of that?
I guess the Jews have an real ax to grind with Egypt. 400 years!~
UPDATE: Obama is all about race. I believe America has no desire to go back in time 50 years:
Obama Accuses McCain of Race-baiting Weekly Standard hat tip Larwyn
ABC News has video of Barack Obama telling voters in Missouri today:
Nobody really thinks that, that, that Bush or McCain have a real answer for the challenges we face. So what they are going to try to do is make you scared of me. You know he--oh, he's not patriotic enough. He's got a funny name. You know, he doesn't look like all of those other presidents on those dollar bills.
I'm sure the Washington Post is hard at work on a front-page story debunking this scurrilous and unfounded accusation.









Between his 'Global Poverty Act' and reparations, the war he's likely to see is a tax revolt ala Boston Tea Party.
Posted by: kozanne | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Obama's run for the Presidency is definitely setting up America for the re-emergence of racial problems. If he does not get the Presidency, the Black people are going to be very upset. Blacks and Whites, in general, perceive the world differently and both views are usually contrary and opposing. If he becomes President, his race will be a continually sensitive issue whenever he is subjected to criticism. So let's see what is in store for us.
Posted by: norman | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 03:42 PM
Slavery was not confined to the African people. The Muslims had thriving slave markets for people from all over. All the areas that were conquered by the Muslims provided booty and slaves. So they included the Christians and Greek speaking people of the Levant, the Middle East, Persia, Hindu and Buddhist people, and North Africans. Inhabitants all along the Mediterranean Sea were constantly captured and sold into slavery. Europeans from almost all regions of Europe were a source for slaves to the Muslim world through raids and warfare. Even the Vikings captured and sold Europeans to the Arabs. The total number of all those slaves must have been enormous. One sad aspect to this is that almost all of these people were taken away without any trace of what happened to them. They were regarded as cheap fodder and were discarded when used up.
Posted by: norman | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 04:13 PM
Race riot? Try full-blown race war!! I personally will declare war against the Government of the United States if this is passed and the IRS attempts to collect.
We've already paid reparations many times over - how about the 300,000 Union soldiers that died in the "Civil War" (which actually wasn't a Civil War but that is a whole other sotry). How about the TRILLIONS in tax money spent in the so-called "War on Poverty" starting in the 1960s?
As Norman brought up, slavery was not just an American experience - it is a common thread throughout history (do the Jews in Egypt ring a bell?). It was western civilization that put an end to most of the slavery in the world (William Wilberforce in England is one really shining example). Other than in communist countries like North Korea where the government is the slavemaster is slavery most common? Answer - in MUSLIM countries, especially in Africa.
John Conners, the Congressman from Detroit, has been talking the reparations game since he was first elected to Congress 40 years ago. I actually lived in his district at one time and told him at a town hall meeting back in 1968 that if he really thought he'd get this passed that he must be smoking something that wasn't legal. As the years have gone on he has gotten even more looney that he was 40 years ago and I think he and the Black Caucas think they will get it passed - and of course if Barack Hussian Osama Obama is President you know he'll sign it. To amplify what I said above - "OK buddy, now try and collect it. You'll get it from my cold dead hands".
Posted by: BillBowen | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 04:44 PM
Don't worry about it. Even with the mortgage crisis, a weak economy and a fawning MSM, this lunatic, racist moron's going to alienate every white voter in the country before November.
My guess is he will beat Dukakis and McGovern and lose all 50 states. Mark my words, you heard it here first.
Posted by: C Max | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 04:52 PM
Total lie about Islam and slavery. Not only was it officially abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1962, the Saudis actually paid reparations, £1000 per slave, which was three times the going price. Of course they paid it to the owners. I would be very careful about offending Obama, he is, as you all know a Luo (a tribe which originated in the Sudan) and there are some powerful ones, such as Joseph Koni, leader of the Lords resistance army in Uganda. That alone should prove that Obama is not a muzzie.
Posted by: seeteufel | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 05:12 PM
Reparations to those entitled was established and given after the Civil War by an act of Congress on March 3, 1865 under the name Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands. The Freedmen’s Bureau provided support to 4,000,000 newly freed blacks during their transition from slavery to freedom. The Bureau built hospitals and gave medical assistance to blacks, more than 1,000 black schools were built, over $400,000 was spent to set up teacher-training institutions, churches were established and the Bureau acted as a clearinghouse of information to aide blacks in finding lost relatives. All major black colleges were either founded by, or received aid from, the bureau. The first federal welfare agency was established back in 1865 for those reparations.
Posted by: WRpeach | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 06:22 PM
Just when I thought that Obama could not get any more stupid, there's this.
Posted by: Natalie | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 07:30 PM
I've always found it interesting how historians and race mongers like to gloss over the original American destinations of the early slave ships: Boston and New York.
The human cargoes were later diverted south due to the fact slaves froze to death in northern winters, being from hot African climes. If the northern part of the country had better weather year round, who knows what would have happened? Especially since many of the early northern banks and insurance companies invested in cargoes of this nature. Sort of an early derivative, as it were. Of the human kind.
Posted by: clyde | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 07:47 PM
actually before the jews left egypt they were instructed to ask the egyptians for their wealth. it was given to them and that was the reparation they left with.
i think the argument for some form of reparations to black americans is valid. the japanese who were interred got some. actually, i feel that native americans deserve quite a bit.
however, how it is applied, to whom etc is a complex question with the issue of fairness looming large.
the sarcastic joke in the black community is about the promise of '40 acres and a mule'.
all that being said, you can now always count on obama to stir the emotional pot to get attention. he is the opposite of what he claims to stand for! he is not a uniter, he is not creating hope, he is not bringing people together. he is, simply, a racial marxist exploiting the emotions of the people with inflated rhetoric.
one could ask how does he compare to america's great black leaders: king, douglass etc. i would love it if, during the debates, mccain turns to obama and says: senator, i remember dr. king, and you are no dr. king!!
Posted by: kobi | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 08:28 PM
Natalie, Boston was only used after the British took the country from the Dutch. The very first slaves were landed by the Dutch in New York. After the civil war, British and US forces set up a squadron in West Africa to stop slave ships, they only caught Americans, guess what, none of them were Southeners.
Posted by: seeteufel | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 08:32 PM
i'd like to see some of the detailed history about post-civil war activity that was mentioned above. also, i really liked the idea of moslem reparations. the video is true: the islamic responsibility for slavery is huge. they have the money now, so they should pay it back.
certainly, if any reparations were to be made it should not be at the expense of regular american taxpayers. there are large wealthy corporations who's initial foundations were built from slave-trade related commerce.
but, as i said, the whole question is quite complex and not worthy of such demagoguery.
Posted by: kobi | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 08:36 PM
kobi: you point out the Japanese who were interred got some. And that is true, detainees who were alive at the time each received some money ,,, again "who were alive at the time." That’s not what is being sought today. And your question: "how it is applied, to whom etc..." Exactly ,,, what about the blacks whose ancestors owned slaves, or Americans whose ancestors hadn’t immigrated before/during that time, what about mixed race couples or people who have adopted black children???? Fairness, don't anyone hold their breath. There is the claim that all of humanity came from Africa making everyone African-(fill in the blank) ,,, making everyone eligible - so why bother, it's a wash.
Posted by: WRpeach | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 09:48 PM
And..he's such a flim flam man of the moment...divider not uniter!! As a Chgoland native and resident...obama-lama is just part of the Chicago combine-a cog in the wheel...I agree with billbowen...johnny mac in November. Get busy JM!!
PS -
Thanks atlas for getting this story out...nevah evah!!
Posted by: siddah | Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 10:07 PM
wrpeach: right. it's a complex question. that video about the islamic factor needs to be much more widely known. ah, the religion of peace strikes again. [although i know individual moslems who are nice people etc...still, where are the protests by the 'peaceful majority????"]
what irks me most is the gist of our great atas' piece: the divisive factor in all of obama's campaigning. this stuff about citizen of the world is disgusting. israelis know all too painfully well the fruits of leftist appeasement and self hatred. i consider oybombas "citizen of the world" crap a 'self-hating american' malaise.
i balance that against the moving heroism of our young people fighting in iraq. who come from all backgrounds!
this guy is the ultimate orwellian conundrum. by trying to bring peace, there'll be worse war; by trying to "unite" he is dividing....that dollar bill comment shows his ugliness and deception.
we say in hebrew: ribbono shel olam!!! master of the universe!!! helpu us!!!!
Posted by: kobi | Thursday, July 31, 2008 at 01:19 AM