SUCH A LIAR: OBAMA'S FAKE BIRTH CERTIFICATE
O-liar will merely say he had nothing to do with KOS releasing the fake doc but we know what a BOLD FACE LIE that is because KOS would rather chew off his arm than do anything to hurt the hate
America candidate. My question is this ...... does it matter? Even if he's mom is American born, "Research has since uncovered the law, in force at the time of
Obama's birth, that were he to have been born in another country, his
young American mother's youth extended time abroad would not suffice to
make him a "natural born citizen." Even if he were naturalized later --
and there is no evidence that he was -- he would not be eligible to run
for the office of president ."
If he is hiding the doc, what is he hiding? C'mon..... give it up Obamendacity. I can't people the Clintonostra did not uncover such a bombshell.
FAKED BIRTH CERTIFICATE SUGGESTS OBAMA MAY NOT BE 'NATURAL BORN' CITIZEN Reuven Koret, Israel Insider hat tip KGS
It is now a certainty that the "birth certificate" claimed by the Barack Obama campaign as authentic is a photoshopped fake.
The image, purporting to come from the Hawaii Department of Health, has been the subject of intense skepticism in the blogosphere in the past two weeks. But now the senior spokesman of that Department has confirmed to Israel Insider what are the required features of a certified birth document -- features that Obama's purported "birth certificate" clearly lack.
The image became increasingly suspect with Israel Insider's revelation that variations of the certificate image were posted on the Photobucket image aggregation website -- including one listing the location of Obama's birth as Antarctica, one with the certificate supposedly issued by the government of North Korea, and another including a purported photo of baby Barack -- one of which has a "photo taken" time-stamp just two minutes before the article and accompanying image was posted on the left-wing Daily Kos blog.
That strongly suggests that Daily Kos obtained the image from Photobucket, not the State of Hawaii, the Obama family, or the Obama campaign. Photobucket is not generally known as a credible supplier of official vital records for any of the fifty states, and the liberties that other Photoshoppers took with the certificates confirms this.
Some of these oddities surfaced in Israel Insider's previous article on the subject, but new comparative documentary evidence presented below, and official verification obtained by Israel Insider from a senior Hawaiian official, provides the strongest confirmation yet.
An authentic Hawaiian birth certificate for another Hawaiian individual has since surfaced which, using the same official form as the presumptive Obama certificate, includes an embossed official seal and an authoritative signature, coming through from the back. Obama's alleged certificate lacks those features, and the certificate number referencing the birth year has been blacked out, making it untraceable.
Janice Okubo, Director of Communications of the State of Hawaii Department of Health, told Israel Insider: "At this time there are no circumstances in which the State of Hawaii Department of Health would issue a birth certification or certification of live birth only electronically." And, she added, "In the State of Hawaii all certified copies of certificates of live birth have the embossed seal and registrar signature on the back of the document."
Compare the top image presented by his campaign as evidence of Obama's 1961 birth and the other certifying the birth of one Patricia Decosta.
![]()
Click for higher resolution image.
Click for higher resolution image.
So if he were registered as being born in Hawaii, Barack Obama -- because only he or another member of his immediate family could by law request a "Certification of Live Birth" -- must have a certified paper copy, with embossed stamp and seal, or he could request one. But what his campaign has put forward as genuine, according to the senior spokesman in the relevant department of the State of Hawaii, is not in fact a certified copy. It is not valid.
Whereas the uncertified Obama document provides the date "filed by registrar", the certified DeCosta document provides the date "accepted by the registrar." The difference between filing an application for a Certification of Live Birth and having it accepted may be key here.
The Obama campaign, however, continues to flaunt the unstamped, unsealed, uncertified document -- notably in very low resolution -- on its "Fight the Smears" website, with campaign officials vowing that it's authentic, sending the image around as "proof" to reporters, and inviting supporters to refer to it as they battle against supposed distortions and calumnies against their candidate. However, the campaign refuses to produce an authentic original birth certificate from the year of Obama's birth, or even a paper version with seal and signature of the "Certification of Live Birth." Nor has it even published an electronic copy with the requisite embossed seal and signature.
The failure of the Obama campaign to do so, and its willingness instead to put up an invalid, uncertified image -- what now appears to be a crude forgery -- raises the dramatic question of why the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate might have to hide.
Until now, it has been thought that there might be some embarrassing information on the real certificate: was the candidate's name something other than Barack Hussein Obama II, as it is claimed? Was no father listed because of the uncertainty over Obama's paternity? Was his father's race listed as Arab, or Muslim, rather than African? These revelations might be embarrassing, and further undermine his credibility, but he could disavow and downplay their significance. Would revealing such embarrassment outweigh the far greater risks involved in perpetuating a palpable forgery, or passing off an uncertified official document as being certified?
There is one possibility, however, which alone might justify the risk that Obama and his campaign seems to be taking in putting forward the uncertified document image: Obama was not in fact born in Hawaii and may not be an American citizen at all, or at least not a "natural born citizen" as the Constitution defines the requirement for the nation's chief executive. Real original birth certificates, circa 1961, have all kinds of verifiable information that would confirm Obama's origins, or throw them into doubt should they be lacking.
Research has since uncovered the law, in force at the time of Obama's birth, that were he to have been born in another country, his young American mother's youth extended time abroad would not suffice to make him a "natural born citizen." Even if he were naturalized later -- and there is no evidence that he was -- he would not be eligible to run for the office of president and -- if forgery or misrepresentation were involved -- he and his staffers might find themselves facing stiff federal and state charges.
But if, at this late date, Obama has no proof of being a US citizen by law, natural born or otherwise, then he or his advisers may be tempted to try to "tough out" the allegations about his "birth certificate" or the lack thereof. He and his campaign have gotten through other embarrassments: maybe this one will go away, too.
Because the consequences were he to admit, or should it come out, that he was not born in Hawaii would be so grave as to make it tempting to take the gamble and hope that no one dares call his most audacious bluff by demanding proof. Talk about the audacity of hope.
But now the State of Hawaii has dashed those hopes by clarifying that a certified birth certificate must have an embossed seal and signature, features his claimed birth certificate image lack.
The longer Obama waits, the graver grow the consequences of waiting.
Israel Isnider really did their homework. Read it all.










Don't one have to have birth certificate in order to get a driver's license,passport? I believe you have to have both to get a passport. So what the ell is going on? Maybe that's the reason someone was snooping into Obama's passport.But I don't think anyone cares. I think he could slice up a baby and no one would mention it.
Posted by: RISE_UP | Thursday, June 26, 2008 at 03:06 PM
Look, National Review makes it pretty clear that the certificate is authentic:
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTIzMDE2OTJiOTkwNmE3MTQwOWZiODYyZTBiMzdhMmI=
and Cannonfire - no lover of Obama makes it clear that Obama would qualify under the law as a natural born citizen even if not born in Hawaii:
http://cannonfire.blogspot.com/2008/06/once-again-can-barack-obama-legally-run.html
"However: The new law, 8 U.S.C. 1401, Sec. 301 (g) (here) has a better understanding of biological reality:
...a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years...
Obama's mama qualifies under that law.
Wait a minute! (I hear you shouting.) That's the post-1986 rule! It wasn't in place when Obama was born! It doesn't count!
Yes it does. Here's the part of 301(g) that the conservative bloggers always leave out:
This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date."
So there, you're wrong.
Posted by: gary | Thursday, June 26, 2008 at 04:43 PM
You can't "wish" a forgery into existence. Sometimes a banana is just a banana.
Note, too, that John McCain was born in Panama. Nobody is trying to accuse him of not being a citizen.
Posted by: Adam Stanhope | Sunday, June 29, 2008 at 10:51 AM
China's Head of State Speaks Out On US Election
http://www.topix.net/forum/news/2008-presidential-election/TAMJT6PBJ4DSN21PL
I am China's current succession emperor and head of state in exile. My family came here to the US in 1871, when my grandfather was 10 years old. My father was born here as was I. We have been loyal US citizens and working for the US Navy at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard in Honolulu, Hawaii.
I am a US citizen today and hoping to go back to China to bridge the gap between the US and China and to make the world a better place in which to live.
If America had a choice of seeing World War III come about with China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Iraq versus seeing that all nations are not at war and everyone knew their proper place in this world...
WHAT WOULD MOST AMERICANS CHOOSE?
With me back in China as China's next president, during Obama's first term in office or McCain's first term, you will have a loyal ally as president. A man whose family holds a true love for America and a true love for the Christian God.
My comments about Governor Palin is as follows:
I have every reason to vote for Barack Obama. In 1990, I negotiated Saddam's withdrawal from Kuwait and ended the Iraq war forever! Somehow this story was never published by the press and our nation went to war.
As to my views on Governor Palin, I read that she is the type of person to bring about change and that she has in the past fought the "establishment" or established order in politics.
I suspect that Hillary is not morally upright. I know of Barack Obama's sexual propensity and I know that past allegations are true.
What people DO NOT know is that Joe Biden was one of the Senators who opposed my publication of Saddam's agreement to withdraw. Why would Senator Biden, a long time member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations oppose the publication of the truth!???
Senator Biden's son is also using unetnical and unlawful means to shut Larry Sinclair up and from telling the truth about his relation with Barack Obama. Doing so is unethical and wrong!
I wrote 25 letters to Senator Obama about the particulars of the Iraq War. My being the chief negotiator and he has REFUSED to come to terms with the truth of this war and devise a correct and suitable plan for ending the war. His 16 month plan is wrong and inconsistent with what our military commanders in Iraq want, desire, and feel is correct.
I hope that people will consider all of the above information and will give a reformed and now more liberal John McCain and Governor Palin a chanve to be heard. This is all I am asking...for fainess and an unbiased hearing for Governor Palin and Senator JOhn McCain.
Thank you very much,
HIM Yao Sui,
officially by China's history
Emperor and head of state of China,
loyal US citizen whose family worked
for the US Navy for the past three
generations.
We politely asked Obama to sign our
guestbook and he immediately refused.
Obama said that he is willing to
speak with America's worst enemies
unconditionally, but when it comes to
speaking to an ally (China's royal family),
he REFUSES!
We asked Bill Clinton, President George
W. Bush, Mitt Romney, John McCain, and
Hillary Clinton to sign our guestbook...
can you guess who signed?
http://himyaosui.wordpress.com
http://www.myspace.com/himyaosui
http://chinatownhawaii.com/mission.html
Posted by: himyaosui | Saturday, August 30, 2008 at 06:49 PM