NY TIMES HIGH TREASON: LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFO AGAIN

It is increasingly clear the left would throw their mother in front of an oncoming train if it meant our defeat in the war on the jihad. The left feverishly works for our defeat in Iraq, in Iran, in Afghanistan, at home ....

Bush may be angry at the latest NY Times act of treason but he has only himself to blame. Bush and his Justice department never pursued the  obvious leaker (s)at the Pentagon and/or CIA. They dropped the ball on Sandy Berger.On the FISA leak and the wiretapping leak.  This is but the latest outrageous leak in a long list of classified info dumped in the lap of the willing whore of our enemies, The Times. Bush never went after the lawbreakers Why? We are at war.  These leaks jeopardize American lives. They should have been persecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Drudge is reporting:

SOURCES: BUSH ANGER AT COMING NEW YORK TIMES STORY DETAILING HUNT FOR BIN LADEN... The newspaper is planning to expose a 'highly classified Pentagon order' authorizing Special Operations forces to hunt al-Qaida leader in mountains of Pakistan... DEVELOPING.

It's high time for another protest, me thinks.

UPDATE: 1:13 am Drudge updates: 'Operation Cannonball'... (IHT)

The new plan, outlined in a highly classified Pentagon order, was designed to eliminate some of those battles. And it was meant to pave an easier path into the tribal areas for American commandos, who for years have bristled at what they see as Washington's risk-averse attitude toward Special Operations missions inside Pakistan. They also argue that catching Bin Laden will come only by capturing some of his senior lieutenants alive.

But more than six months later, the Special Operations forces are still waiting for the green light. The plan has been held up in Washington by the very disagreements it was meant to eliminate. A senior Defense Department official said there was "mounting frustration" in the Pentagon at the continued delay.

After the Sept. 11 attacks, President George W. Bush committed the nation to a "war on terrorism" and made the destruction of Bin Laden's network the top priority of his presidency. But it is increasingly clear that the Bush administration will leave office with Al Qaeda having successfully relocated its base from Afghanistan to Pakistan's tribal areas, where it has rebuilt much of its ability to attack from the region and broadcast its messages to militants across the world.

Read all six pages here. It's Bush bashing at its finest. Lord knows how the Democrats are going to handle these barbarians.

UPDATE:  New York Times again exposes "highly classified Pentagon order"

 Judi McLeod

Comments

[EJO]

Dear Pamela;
Who effing cares! What does Georgie Pordgie plan to do about it? Nothing!! N-O-T-H-I-N-G!! G. Bush is the kind of schoolyard sissy that schoolyard bullies love to find in their presents.
All the leakers in the Pentagon; the Dept. of Justice, and State. All the leakers through out his administration. These treasonous, bastards have nothing to worry about. The editors, and assorted journalist at the N.Y. Times are as sneaky, and underhanded, and anti-American as you can get. And not one bad thing will happen to them.
Bush goes on his "Please don't hate me" tour of Europe to let everyone know how sorry he is for being a "cowboy", or for being manly for standing up to Saddam Hussein. He takes North Korea off the "Axis of Evil" list. What's next? Raunchy sex with Ahmadinejad?
I believe it was you who said that the last two years of his time in office have been horrible.
If this is the case, then I agree with you.
Sincerely;
EJO

[scrapiron]

The bad times for America happen to start when someone decided to put the democrats in charge of congress. Eighteen months ago, not two years. I seem to remember a booming economy, including the housing market. Now it's a disaster, but the democrat promised in 2006 to so something about fuel prices and the economy. I'll wager not many who voted for them thought they meant doing something was to destroy it. Gas prices went up 11 cents per gallon, 'per year' for the six years with a republican controlled congress. The price has now exceeded 12 cents per gallon, "per month" with the democrats in charge. I'm 67 years old and have never seen a worse collection of traitors and criminals in congress. I'll wager on congress as the leaker of this information also. Someone on the order of 'Leaky' Leahy (D).

As for the Justice department. Do we still have one that goes after anyone higher than a pickpocket? Too many left over democrats there for anyone to do anything. As Bush found out you can't fire the worthless P'sOS.

[Miluimnik]

There is nothing in that article that astute Atlas readers do not already know, if there is, then they have been watching too much American Idol. The protesters are ditto-heads with no capacity for reason or original thought. In the early 20th century these creatures were [correctly] designated "morons".

If criticism of the most anti-American of all presidents (Hero to the Saudism patron saint of the Communist Chinese) is "bashing", then so be it. "Bashers" are welcome at the table of America's founders, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, et. al. "Ditto-heads" are merely poorly cloned copies of Chairman Mao's Communist devotees.

As America faces the threat of nuclear Islam with millions of non-vetted 5th columnists in our cities and towns, we should be asking some very serious questions of those who opened the floodgates, not defending those who have chosen to disregard the highest law in the land.

As tiny Israel finds herself a breath away from destruction, friends should enquire as to why her barbaric neighbours have been armed to the teeth by this administration. Does Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE etc. require such massive military aid and [US] training for anything other than carrying out attacks against the Jewish State? The answer is an obvious "no". Our silence have made every citizen culpable for the planned "Final Solution to the Arab Israeli Conflict".

Those carrying placards in front of the NYTimes building have a right to protest...guaranteed by the US Constitution. It would be a wonderful gesture for someone, anyone, to read the rest of the document to the Ditto-Heads.....and the rest of America's residents.

Peace.

[Adam Stanhope]

I thought that Bush said that bin Laden "wasn't important" - and the conservative blogosphere supported this approach by Bush.

Hmmm - I wonder if we could have captured or killed bin Laden if the resources we've consumed losing a war/destroying a country in Iraq were to have been directed towards Afghanistan instead?

It's only been SEVEN YEARS since 9/11... SEVEN LONG YEARS for Bush to capture bin Laden. bin Laden is still on the run...

Do you truly believe that in Summer, 2008 there is anything the New York Times can say that jeopardizes the effort to capture/kill bin Laden?

Why aren't you angry at Bush for dropping the ball on this one?

Talk about a smokescreen!

[Miluimnik]

Mr. Stanhope;

There are currently only twelve [non-communist] "Conservatives" living in the United States. Bolton is one. Atlas is another, and the remaining ten are a secret.

Don't blame "Conservatives" when there are no Conservatives.

[Thomas Carney]

There's certainly NO CONSERVATIVES anywhere in the George W. Bush Administration. The last one in the administration was John Ashcroft and he quit!!!

It galls me to no end that Sandy Berger stole classified info and got away with it. If Berger was an ordinary civilian he'd be in prison for a loooong time.

George W. Bush has no balls. Neither does his father. Barbara Bush has more cajones than her husband and all her children put together!!!

[Miluimnik]

Bush shouldn't be viewed as an "American"...that is the perceptual problem we have. If we would consider GW to be a Saudi Islamist...he'd begin to shine. "The New Saladin" will be feted by the Ummah, when Americans no longer speak his name.