JEFFREY GOLDBERG: JEWICIDAL JIHADI BENDS OVER, SUBMITS DEMANDS ISRAEL DO SAME
The New York Times is the mother-ship for Jewicidals both foreign and domestic. Today, the Jew tool that Obama used to sell his taqiya on Israel, jihad Jeff, wrote this oped today in The New York slimes:
More like, Goldberg's self loathing problem
By JEFFREY GOLDBERG Washington
WHEN the prime minister of Israel, Ehud Olmert, arrived at a Jerusalem ballroom in February to address the grandees of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (a redundancy, since there are no minor American Jewish organizations),
There it is - kicking off with the protocols of the elders of Zion.
he was pugnacious, as is customary, but he was also surprisingly defensive, and not because of his relentlessly compounding legal worries. He knew that scattered about the audience were Jewish leaders who considered him hopelessly spongy — and very nearly traitorous — on an issue they believed to be of cosmological importance: the sanctity of a “united” Jerusalem, under the sole sovereignty of Israel.
"United" in quotes??? WTF? And the use of the word sanctity.Jerusalem is sacred, you asshat.
These Jewish leaders, who live in Chicago and New York and behind the gates of Boca Raton country clubs,
Ugh. Get that visual folks? Those rich Joooooos hiding behind the gates of Boca. Ugh.
loathe the idea that Mr. Olmert, or a prime minister yet elected, might one day cede the Arab neighborhoods of East Jerusalem to the latent state of Palestine. These are neighborhoods — places like Sur Baher, Beit Hanina and Abu Dis — that the Conference of Presidents could not find with a forked stick and Ari Ben Canaan as a guide.
How does he know that? Because he can't find them? Has he ever been on an AIPAC or JCPA mission to Israel?
And yet many Jewish leaders believe that an Israeli compromise on the boundaries of greater Jerusalem — or on nearly any other point of disagreement — is an axiomatic invitation to catastrophe.
It's jewicide.
[...]
When I spoke to Mr. Olmert a few days after his meeting with the Conference of Presidents, he made only brief mention of his Diaspora antagonists; he said that certain American Jews he would not name have been “investing a lot of money trying to overthrow the government of Israel.”
Seems more like they're investing in Olmurderer's wallet.
But he was expansive, and persuasive, on the Zionist need for a Palestinian state. Without a Palestine — a viable, territorially contiguous Palestine — Arabs under Israeli control will, in the not-distant future, outnumber the country’s Jews.
[...]
The unsentimental analysis of men like Mr. Olmert and Mr. Barak came to mind this week as I spoke to Barack Obama about his views on Israel. He spoke with seemingly genuine feeling about the post-Holocaust necessity of Israel; about his cultural affinity with Jews (he may be the first presidential candidate to confess that his sensibility was shaped in part by the novels of Philip Roth); and about his adamant opposition to the terrorist group Hamas. He offered some mild criticism of the settlement movement (“not helpful”) and promised to be unyielding in his commitment to Israeli security.
There are some Jews who would be made anxious by Mr. Obama even if he changed his first name to Baruch and had his bar mitzvah on Masada.
Baruch and a bar mitzvah? You're a liar and an asshat, jihad Jeffro.
But after speaking with him it struck me that, by the standards of rhetorical correctness maintained by such groups as the Conference of Presidents and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or Aipac, Mr. Obama is actually more pro-Israel than either Ehud Olmert or Ehud Barak. (To say nothing of John McCain and President George W. Bush, who spoke to the Knesset last week about external threats to Israel’s safety but made no mention of the country’s missteps.)
The country's misstep? Only in giving up Gaza. Here again is further proof of Goldberg's ignorance. AIPAC wil not play politics. They work with whatever administration that is in power. They are non-partisan (which I think is jewicidal) and I have taken issue with AIPAC on this blog for this very reason.
Obama is more pro-Israel than Hitler maybe ..........
This is an existentially unhealthy state of affairs. I am not wishing that the next president be hostile to Israel, God forbid. But what Israel needs is an American president who not only helps defend it against the existential threat posed by Iran and Islamic fundamentalism, but helps it to come to grips with the existential threat from within.
"Helps it to come to grips with the existential threat from within"? Jihad Jeff, that would be Jews like you.
A pro-Israel president today would be one who prods the Jewish state — publicly, continuously and vociferously — to create conditions on the West Bank that would allow for the birth of a moderate Palestinian state.
Read that again. Prods (as in pressures) Israel to surrender Jewish land to Islamic jihad. That's what this kapo is saying. And we know what Islamic jihad wants -- all of Israel -- "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free"
Most American Jewish leaders are opposed, not without reason, to negotiations with Hamas, but if the moderates aren’t strengthened, Hamas will be the only party left.
So what? The Nazis were too and they had to be destroyed. So will Hamas. But here Jihad Jeffro is toeing the pro-Hamas Obama platform.
And the best way to bring about the birth of a Palestinian state is to reverse — not merely halt, but reverse — the West Bank settlement project. The dismantling of settlements is the one step that would buttress the dwindling band of Palestinian moderates in their struggle against the fundamentalists of Hamas.
The best way to bring peace is not to annihilate the jews, Jihad Jeffro, but to crush Islamic jihad. Then the world will live in peace.
So why won’t American leaders push Israel publicly? Or, more to the point, why do presidential candidates dance so delicately around this question? The answer is obvious: The leadership of the organized American Jewish community has allowed the partisans of settlement to conflate support for the colonization of the West Bank with support for Israel itself. John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, in their polemical work “The Israel Lobby,” have it wrong: They argue, unpersuasively, that American support for Israel hurts America. It doesn’t. But unthinking American support does hurt Israel.
Support for Israel, hurts Israel. Leftard logic.
The people of Aipac and the Conference of Presidents are well meaning, and their work in strengthening the overall relationship between America and Israel has ensured them a place in the world to come. But what’s needed now is a radical rethinking of what it means to be pro-Israel. Barack Obama and John McCain, the likely presidential nominees, are smart, analytical men who understand the manifold threats Israel faces 60 years after its founding. They should be able to talk, in blunt terms, about the full range of dangers faced by Israel, including the danger Israel has brought upon itself.
But this won’t happen until Aipac and the leadership of the American Jewish community allow it to happen.
Jihad Jeff Goldberg, from one Jew to another, go to hell. Cuz it's foe shizzle you are going to rot there.









I knew this moron had a problem when I read his article on Israel's 60th.
Then the Obama JOKE.
All these gavones have the same problem. They think if Israel will just give up the settlements, it will be like negotiating with the United Mine workers, and all will be fine.
They just don't get it.
Israel is a refuge for 3000 years of jew hating, surrounded by both ancient and modern jew hatred. The settlements (and Jerusalem) are a convenient reason for the genocidal to hide in the shade of the word 'occupation'. But they are meaningless in the real struggle.
There are no words which can convince the likes of this Goldberg.
Posted by: epaminondas | Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 05:34 PM
I got up early this Sunday morning, brewed myself some joe and sat down at my computer to read the morning news. I actually clicked on NYT ... big mistake .... saw the title to Jeffrey Goldberg's, rolled my eyes and promptly left the site. It just wasn't worth the aggravation.
Posted by: John D. Infidel | Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 09:10 PM
Mucking forons.
Posted by: Timur | Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 09:55 PM
What "Manifold Threat" there is only one "fold"... Islam brought to you by the child molester..Muhammad.
This is not "religion" ...the road for the 12th Iman ...why doesn't Jihad Jeff mention that.
And that Iman isn't too fond of jews..Jeffrey Jihad Traitor.
Posted by: Barbara | Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 10:08 PM
There is a hard to get movie called, "The Believer" that deals with a self-loather who was so warped in nihilism that he became a Nazi. Said movie became undistributable after the Wiesenthal Center attacked it. In fact, the producer felt some need to concoct an ersatz rational basis for Jewish nihilism, and did so by perverting the Isaac narrative. The producer - Jewish - has obvious extensive knowledge of Hebrew. I have my own concerns regarding the film-makers' portrayal of both Talmudic study and its students. One former student - portrayed as an Assistant District Attorney - informs the self-loather of police interest. That is cartoonish, however, the film was based on a true story:
http://www.nypress.com/16/8/news&columns/oldsmoke.cfm
If you ever see a copy of the 2001 film, you can spot several NYC actors who later had some renown in TV and theater. Ryan Gosling plays the Matzonazi.
Posted by: supercargo99 | Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 11:34 PM
There is no hell in Judaism.
It's telling that you don't actually argue against any of Goldberg's points. Highlighting a phrase in red bold does not constitute a rebuttal.
Posted by: Blake Emerson | Monday, May 19, 2008 at 10:43 AM
You are one sick lady. Judaism, who cares? Jewish thuggery, now that's the thing.
Posted by: The Other Alan | Monday, May 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM
There sure IS hell in Judaism. Stop spewing from the standpoint of ignorance, and learn something:
http://judaism.about.com/library/3_askrabbi_o/bl_simmons_heavenhell.htm
As for "Judaism, who cares"? Obviously YOU do, why else are you perusing Atlas Shrugs?
"Jewish thuggery, now that's the thing"... uh, what?
Let's see...
the Jooooz are:
1) wretched, ignorant, refuse
OR
2) brilliant, scheming, masterminds
3) inventors of the "holocaust" lie
OR
4) Hitler was great and should have finished
the job
OR
4A) the "Zionist" conspirators worked WITH the Nazis to get Jews killed
5) colonialist, imperialist, interloping aggressors who steal land from defenseless indigenous peoples
OR
6) should stay stuck in a strip of dirt about the size of New Jersey (the borders of which have SHRUNK over the last 60 years... the Sinai area was LARGER than the entire State of Israel)
7) are all-powerful, controlling everything including the Fed
OR
8) have to resort to "stealing" money from the hapless US taxpayers via loan guarantees (most of which then has to be used to by American products)
9) are geniuses who concocted complex plots to to attack the USA on 9/11/2001 and cover it up
OR
10) are bungling idiots who can only direct old men and ideologists to steal "secrets" that don't even harm US interests
11) We murdered christ
OR
12) we invented Christianity as the greatest mind-control scheme of all time
13) the Zionist entity terrorist force occupies stolen land
OR
13) the Zionist entity keeps the "indigenous" peoples locked in ghettos behind an "apartheid" wall
etc.
etc.
etc.
You want it all, and then claim we Jews do!
Y'all really need to get together and get your stories straight.
Then come back and blame "Jewish thuggery" for all of your miserable worthlessness....
stop consuming pasteurized products (Pasteur was a Jew)
Stop using cellphones (invented by Jews)
Stop using computers (various CPU's designed by Jews)
And thousands of other things that make your lives better and easier... of course, yes, we know-- you would have invented them had those damn interloping Jews not stolen the ideas...
BTW-- just cause someone was born of a Jewish mother doesn't really make the crimes they may individually commit "Jewish thuggery"... or are all white men really serial killing, high school shooting, child molesting, human eating freaks like Gacy, Dahmer, Bundy, et al?
Stop wasting your life with hate.
Posted by: Doda McCheesle | Monday, May 19, 2008 at 11:40 AM
"But what’s needed now is a radical rethinking of what it means to be pro-Israel."
Modern liberal evildoers don't even have the guts to hold a knife to your throat and smile as they cut it. No, they sit there w/their little "compassionate" faces, and drone on relentlessly about how warped and subliminally corrupt and unintentionally cruel all the normal folks on earth are (Boy Scouts, cowboys, religious non-Muslims, Americans, Israelis) until the poor targets get so confused and demoralized that THEY SURE ENOUGH SLIT THEIR OWN THROATS.
Give me a jihadi screaming allahuakhbar while waving his AK47 anytime, it's much easier to demonstrate that he doesn't really love me. These liberals are really like mutant cancer cells in our body politic, they will kill us unless we can burn them out w/special chemo...
Posted by: JewishOdysseus | Monday, May 19, 2008 at 11:54 PM
Oh, forgot my 1st point:
"But what’s needed now is a radical rethinking of what it means to be pro-Israel."
New lib definition of pro-Israel:"anti-Israel."
Posted by: JewishOdysseus | Monday, May 19, 2008 at 11:56 PM
A wonderful post Doda McCheesle in every respect. Well said.
Is Duncan lurking around again under the name The Other Alan - or has another anti-Semite joined us?
Posted by: Jane | Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 12:59 AM
A wonderful post Doda McCheesle in every respect. Well said.
Is D****n lurking about again - or has another anti-Semite joined us?
Posted by: Jane | Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 01:01 AM
Thanks Jane! I too thought that perhaps our old friend D****n was lurking with a new ID...
I long ago realized a few things:
There are essentially 2 types of [Jew] haters:
1) the ignorant, who don't know anything about real Judaism. There is occasionally hope for these kinds, as they sometimes stumble across the truth and change their ways (ala S.H.A.R.P.- Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice).
2) those who are truly evil, hating for the sake of hating. Anything said or done to prove their arguments wrong is ignored, or declared a "plot". These are the kinds of freaks who will stand in the middle of a field and state "the grass I'm on is Purple", and when told the grass is green, they just have to look down to see it with their own eyes, will refuse to look down, saying "If I do look down, and it IS green, it is obviously because Zionist conspirators got here before me and painted it green". You cannot argue, debate, or discuss anything with this type of being. The only solution is if they attempt to attack us, we must destroy them first. No debate, no discussions. No treaties. Especially with those who perpetrate the their "god" demands that they kill us for being born.
I am not a rich, powerful Jew. I have been waiting 40 years for the "conspiracy" to invite me in, and so far they haven't (those evil BASTIDS!). My father was not rich and powerful (although he did teach me the ancient Jewish maxim that "the rich man is the man who is happy with what he has"- a lesson that really needs to be learned by many). My grandfather was a taxi driver and laborer. My great-grandfather was a painter. No doctors, lawyers, bankers, or accountants (or media moguls) anywhere in my family line (and it was my great grandparents who came to the USA in the late 1800's... no slaveowners in our tree either. While Africans were being kidnapped, wrapped in chains, and stuffed in ships and forced to be slaves [by their black and often muslim "brothers, but that's another topic-- look up the arabic word used to describe Africans- Abd], my ancestors were running for their lives across Europe and Asia simply because they were born Jews)... I had "Klan" type neighbors when I lived in Florida who told me that I was obviously an impostor, and should stop pretending to be a Jew and join them to build a compound...
Anyway, the point being that: a) it is essentially pointless to debate some of these ass-tards (especially via comment on some web site!)...it won't change jack.
b) those of us with religious faith know that the bad guys will ultimately get theirs...
c) I do take time to post some things occasionally in the hopes that maybe one person will see and learn...ya never know, but ya always gotta have faith.
Posted by: Doda McCheesle | Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 08:53 AM
Just for knowing .... this post was linked by a couple of leftard blogs so expect nonsensical, Jew hating (disguised as higher thinking) comments.
TROLL ALERT.
What is so galling is the new anti-semitism is being positioned as "pro-Israel". Even Orwell couldn't make this shiz up.
Posted by: Pamela Geller | Tuesday, May 20, 2008 at 09:41 AM