PELOSI PERFIDY PLANNED US DEFEAT

Andy sent me this EXPLOSIVE story: The Speaker of the House, California Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, lead an entourage to hold talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad, with intentions of undermine our military operations inside Iraq, and members of that entourage met with members of the PKK (The Kurdistan Workers' Party), an affiliated terrorist organization, namely PJAK (An arm of the PKK who were tasked with handling the battle within Iraq.) leader Rahman Haji Ahmadi, and everybody in the know was too scared to go public with it.

Remember that trip last spring by Pelosi (in the hijab no less) and 7 members of congress to Syria?...and remember how after their trip the PKK started their incursions into Turkey and the Turks moved troops on the border and tensions between the PKK and the Turks suddenly seemed to escalate?...leading some on the right to imagine the speaker of the house trying to cut off the supply line to our troops in Iraq so that we will loose the war...there was much speculation about the Speaker having a hand in this?...and remember the "intense" diplomacy between Sec. Rice and the Turks? Eventually things got under control, but for a time it looked uncertain. This seemed like the perfect coup by the liberal democrats to sabotage the war effort by cutting off our supply lines running through Turkey. But there was nothing to verify any of this except mere speculation and a healthy dose cynicism. Until this morning. Well, sorta.

Andy (who sent me all this data)  was listening to talk radio when the host Jim Quinn of The Quinn & Rose Show mentioned for the second day in a row the aforementioned topic of the Pelosi trip. The reason he was talking about this a year removed was because the topic came up about how the democrats killed the free trade deal with Columbia, effectively siding with the narco terrorist group FARC, and Thug Hugo Chavez. Which made him revisit the Pelosi/Syria trip once again. That was yesterdays show.

Today he informed his listeners that someone in Washington was listening in to yesterdays show and heard him talking about the Pelosi trip, and that that DC listener had sent an email to someone he [Quinn] calls "son of deep throat" telling him that he was exactly right about someone from Pelosi's delegation meeting with members of the PKK. He said the letter went on to explain that it wasn't Pelosi who met with them. It was the late Tom Lantos, and Louise Slaughter (D) NY who met with the PKK members. This is a rough transcript.

Certain members of Pelosi's 7 representative delegation to Syria last spring met with officers of the PKK an affiliated terrorist organization...this is not an assumption...this is something that several republican congressmen know with 100% certainty, but they can't come  forward with it because they need to protect sources and methods...It was not Pelosi who originally had the meeting with the PKK, nor was it Henry Waxman or the original Muslim Congressman, Keith Ellison...It was Tom Lantos and Louise Slaughter democrat from New York who had the actual meeting with Haji Amadi, the leader of the PJAK, which is an arm of the PKK who were tasked with handling the battle within Iraq, and other PKK and KCK officers. He said that one PKK officer Marrett Kereillin(sp)  has even bragged on  this and other meetings in interviews in English and Arabic and Farci language publications. This is all the source could and likely will say...He feels if we continue to talk about it the story could break in the national media...the possibility of some Kurd or even a PKK member or a sister terrorist organization might be willing to discuss what they know or one of the intelligent sources, French, US, Israeli, Iraqi, who already are aware of the meeting will finally see the need to leak it...or even a democratic staffer will come forward with the facts... If this is true we have a bunch of people in the congress of the United States who have committed treason...they have actually consorted with the enemy to create a situation that cuts off the   supply line to an American military operation...Tom Lantos is dead Louise Slaughter is still alive...If this is true...this is enormous...it's so big the average American can't even get their head around the idea that the speaker of the house would lead an entourage to try to undermined a military operation and put our people in danger.

Anybody out there know more. Give it up - CONFIDENTIALITY GUARANTEED.

Remember my interview with Sandmonkey right after Pelosi left?

SANDMONKEY: Let me tell you something. I was in Turkey a couple of weeks ago and I met a couple of Syrian activists. They one thing they told me that was really funny about the Pelosi visit. After Pelosi came to Syria two things happened. People on Syrian TV were saying, "We forced the Americans to knock on the Damascus gate!" Sort of like an admission that we messed things up in Iraq so much that America had to come and beg for their help.

But the day after Pelosi's visits there were immediate arrests of Syrian activists. That was the fruit she yielded. "Oh the Americans came over and they said they have a different foreign policy  and they're more interested in placating Bashar's ego." And he went out and got [arrested] everyone he wanted because he knew he had an ally in Washington that wouldn't pressure him as much.

UPDATE: More on Pelosi aiding FARC at Fausta's hat tip Larwyn

A dark day in history: Nancy hands out 'the Chavez Rule'

UPDATED

Wednesday night I wrote an article for Pajamas Media explaining the consequences if Nancy Pelosi delayed a vote on the Colombia Free Trade Agreement.

Yesterday Pelosi, who I now consider an enemy of America, changed the voting timeline rule on trade pacts from 90 days to whenever.

This is the first time in history that Congress failed to approve a major trade pact.

Monica Showalter of Investor's Business Daily yesterday afternoon describes why this is an evil move (yes, I am choosing my words carefully - it is an evil thing Pelosi has done). I post the editorial in its entirety (emphasis added):

Pelosi's War
Congress: The cowardly start more wars than the courageous. Nancy Pelosi's craven altering of House rules to kill off Colombia's trade pact brings that danger to the Andes. If war breaks out, her name will be on it.

April 10 may end up as a date which will live in infamy. The Speaker of the House not only refused to step forward and be counted on approving the vital Colombia free-trade agreement, she ran away from letting anyone else vote on it.

After President Bush submitted the pact to a vote under fast-track rules, she changed them to ensure it wouldn't go anywhere anytime soon. By a 224-195 House vote, the voting timeline rule on trade pacts was changed from 90 days to whenever. Pelosi now can hold up Colombia's treaty however long her caprice dictates.

"The message Democrats sent today," a bitter Bush warned after Thursday's vote, "is that no matter how steadfastly you stand with us, we will turn our backs on you when it is politically convenient."

Pelosi's move leaves Colombia, an ally, in limbo and uncertainty. She may think her clever maneuver was done in a vacuum, but it wasn't. In Venezuela's capital of Caracas, where Hugo Chavezfla-bank-meeting-to-focus-on-biofuels Apr-3-2008 holds forth, and in the jungles of Colombia, where drug terrorists hide out, Pelosi's move was watched closely.

Indeed, within hours of the vote, Latin American media already were calling Pelosi's maneuver the "Chavez Rule."

The Venezuelan dictator is no doubt fascinated at how Pelosi could do this to America's best ally in Latin America, punishing a vibrant democracy by isolating it from all the other nations that have sought and won free trade.

Unlike, say, military aid, this deal costs the U.S. nothing, is too small to have much impact on the U.S. economy and is mainly about ending tariffs on U.S. goods sold in Colombia, matching the no-tariff trade that Colombian firms already get here.

Free trade was what Chavez's enemy, Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, considered his best weapon. And Pelosi knocked it right out of his hand, just to placate her party's union supporters .

Only a month ago, Chavez sent 10 tank divisions to the Colombian border after Colombia's army blew away a FARC terrorist kingpin. He warned he would bring war inside Colombia.

Encircled by tanks not only in the East by Venezuela but also in the South by Chavez's cat's paw, Ecuador, Colombia asked the U.S. for just one thing: to pass the free-trade agreement. No tanks. No jets. Just free trade.

Now without it, Chavez might be emboldened to strike. After all, he'll hear from congressional sources that Pelosi probably won't bring up a vote on the trade pact for at least several months. He'll use that time to pick fights with its now-forsaken neighbor. The fact that Colombia can't get even a trade pact tells him all he needs to know about American commitment.

So even though the pact was not rejected outright, its absence will be inherently destabilizing. There's nothing Chavez or his FARC allies dread more than Colombia armed with trade rights that will boost its economy beyond the allure of Chavista populist promises.

At Argentina's 2005 Summit of the Americas in Mar del Plata, Chavez made his enmity toward free trade known by hurling insults at the president of Mexico and vowing to "bury" free trade.

Now, thanks to Pelosi's bid to shunt Colombia off to trade limbo, the potential for war in a tinderbox Andean region â€" over any border incident or FARC terrorist attack â€" has been heightened.

The world and its dictators don't sleep. The cowardly number that Pelosi did on Colombia likely will prevent the soft power of free trade from working, instead opening the gates to the hard power of war â€" and pulling in the U.S. whether Pelosi likes it or not. If so, we'll have the her to thank.

Nancy Pelosi has covered herself in a cloak of shame and infamy. Unfortunately for us, everybody in the hemisphere will have to pay the consequences.

The message Pelosi has sent the world is that in America, the only superpower in the world, political squabbles take precedence over security interests.

I expect she'll be paying Hugo a visit soon.

UPDATE
Drop Dead, Colombia
Democratic Speaker Nancy Pelosi blocks a trade deal with America's closest South American ally

UPDATE: The Freeps are on it.

<

Comments

[John D. Infidel]

This, I am afraid, is just a preview of what an Obama administration will be like.

[allat]

Does this surprise you? The governments of the world, the U.S. government wealthy will NEVER be effected- but will be very happy to be subsumed by the Borg islamics. Look at the example of the Shah of Iran - he was a moslem, but lived high off the hog - the way the Enablers here, will be.

Every time "Congoleessa Lice" or Pelosi goes over there, the islamics roll on the floor laughing. Wait till they get hold of these women or their daughters - the firt thing they will do is geld them - EXACTLY the same way, the arab raiders get hold of farm women in the Sudan - be they maidens or mothers - this has been documented - a woman survivor that lived to tell about it - and return - tells that the 1st thing that is done to women captured is to circumscize them - THEN - raped them.

And, Why shouldn't Pelosi and Rice, suffer that is in store for the rest of us - IF they conquer us!!!!

[EJ]

This is why I LOVE Quinn & Rose! They always have such good intel. Listen to them on XM channel 158 or listen online at wpgb.com if you can't get them locally.

[Armoured Passionfruit]

Any tie to Obama's foreign advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski and what he was doing in Syria in Feb 2008?

[pythagoras]

Nancy Pelosi by visiting and meeting with official enemies of the US on what is legally recognized as enemy soil violated the Bridges Act which has been in effect since the early days of the American Republic. By doing this, Ms. Pelosi can legally be classified as a criminal along with the demos who put her up to it. It is a violation of US law for any polician to meddle in US foreign policy on foreign soil with an official enemy state (which Syria is). Don't tell us she didn't know. She had to have.

ms. Pelosi is liable to be prosecuted and (we hope) incarcerated for her conduct. Evidently this woman believes she is above US law--and unless someone finally stops her she will be right in making such an assumption.

Bush blew iton this. Of course he COULD have had the lady prosecuted (and should have). By not addressing this, Bush's neglect has cost the USA a major ally in an area of the world where its alliance was worth its weight in gold. The Democrats are just breaking the water with this unless they are stopped.

Ms. Pelosi can probably STILL be prosecuted for violating the Birdges Act. Does anyone out there care enough to proceed with legal action against her (before she commits MORE political crimes against the US Republic)? Let us hope so.