We've Got Certified Mail! Legal Jihad!
Shabbat, the "rabbi" goes legal jihad
The leftist Islamic alliance spend their limited energies on shutting down the truth tellers.
"rabbi" Feinberg has sent me a legal doc threatening litigation jihad. Specifically he takes issue with the word "crazy". I have attended many Pro Pali Arab rallys, CAIR rallys, KGIA press conferences, and the belligerent "rabbi" is always there. Fighting for the jihad, threatening, bullying, blustering, screaming in your face. My favorite personal moment is when he screams NAZI! in my face all because I attend. (The Nazi moment is in the video below)
Definition of crazy:
cra÷zy

[krey-zee] Pronunciation Key
| 1. | mentally deranged; demented; insane. |
| 2. | senseless; impractical; totally unsound: a crazy scheme. |
| 3. | Informal. intensely enthusiastic; passionately excited: crazy about baseball. |
| 4. | Informal. very enamored or infatuated (usually fol. by about): He was crazy about her. |
A Rabbi who supports Hamas? (Americans Against Hate video)
I stand behind my coverage as accurate. Feinberg wants to sue me? Good. I was at these events. He was physical, dangerous and abusive. I will not take the truth down or will I tell others that ran my reportage to take down their posts either. A real Jewish Rabbi does not hate Jews or Christians. A real Rabbi does not support Hamas who states plainly in their charter to destroy Israel. What's next? A lawsuit from Hamas for calling them savages?
Feinberg wants a fight. I am anxious for the discovery phase. Dying to know who he is connected to, who he works for and on whose payroll(s) he is on. We need to further investigate his ties to CAIR et al.
He is an avid supporter of the New York public Arabic school, Khalil Gibran International Academy, Click below to watch his press conference advocating the return of ex principal Dhabah Almontaser who was forced to resign for statements that condoned intifada.
Rabbis for Hamas ....over at Frontpage (thanx idf)
Brit Tzedek vâShalom (Covenant of Justice and Peace: hereafter BTvS), a Jewish âpeace and justice for Palestiniansâ group (www.btvshalom.org) published the names of 387 Rabbis who have signed a petition demanding that our government not withhold aid to the Hamas-controlled government of the Palestinian Authority. This petition is BTvSâs response to the Ros-Lehtinen/Lantos Bill, HR4681, which would denyU.S. funds to the PA unless Hamas relents on its commitment to the destruction of Israel and the extermination of the Jewish people
See My Brother's Keeper, Front Page Magazine. Complete list of signers (who is #91) Thanks eliza
Feinberg at an anti-war rally.
This was taken in Union Square...an anti-war vigil...
he was very angry at us
because we showed up and did a good counter-rally.
Pro-Islamist Rally Video: Watch the rabbi threaten great American Joe Kaufman (minute 3:25 ) Now, is that "crazy"? In the video, the "rabbi" is threatening to destroy daring truth teller Joe Kaufman And if you want to see previous temper tantrums that the "rabbi " threw, check out his tantrum at the CAIR fundraiser I happen to cover. He was CAIR's front man (video here). That's him right at the beginning of the film but I missed getting on film his attempt to grab my camera.
UPDATE: Proud to be in such company
UPDATE: Thank you for your support. Keep sending all those videos, pictures, testimony and audio. Send everything you've got - it is quite a case.
Atlas legal eagles and private investigators will be most welcomed.
UPDATE: Others blogging this:
Thanks Yid with lid!
My Pet Jawa
Dancing from Genesis
Mr Bagel
Dreams into Lightening
Muslims Against Sharia
More video below:













Freedom of speech! Freedom of the press! First Ammendment! The right of the people to criticize assholes shall not be prohibited or abriged! Bring it on ya muzzy lovin' bastard! Go get 'em, Pamela. Find out who owns this POSer and expose him to the world. By sueing you he will open himself and his associates up to minute scrutiny. Let's see if he can handle it.
Posted by: Timur | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 07:34 PM
Interesting what you can find out when you Google his name:
Rabbi Michael Feinberg
Executive Director
Greater New York Labor-Religion Coalition
40 Fulton Street - 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10038
Labrelig @ aol.com
(212) 406- 2156 extension 4
Posted by: Timur | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 07:53 PM
Apparently the first listing with the extension number was incomplete or it has changed.
Coalition Director is Rabbi Michael Feinberg (212/ 406-2156. ext. 4637). Coalition offices are located at CSEA, 40 Fulton St., 22nd floor, New York, NY 10038.
Posted by: Timur | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 08:04 PM
Hey D*ncan, in order to contribute to his legal fund you would have to get out of your moms basement and get a job. Most lawyers don't take old Hustler magazines in exchange for services.
Posted by: lowandslow | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 08:12 PM
Atlas,
I'm a lawyer in Michigan. I can't represent you in NY, but if you need legal research or anything else, please let me know.
detroitjewandproud [at] yahoo.com
Posted by: MichLaw | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 08:30 PM
Pamela, I would suggest an immediate countersuit for his attempting to suppress your freedom of the press and limit your freedom of speech.
This ersatz rabbi wants a world "without borders" where there are "no illegals". Wonder how the Saudis feel about this? Why doesn't he try going to Mecca some day? If he had his way, America would be punished for being so rich and powerful. How dare we be successful when there are poor people in the world? It's all our fault! Bad Americans!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCJbvBrGItc
Herr Feinberg is just a socialist/communist tool and a "useful idiot" for the moslems. Pathetic what passes for an educated man these days. What a putz. It's peopel like him who are referred to as belonging to the "synogogue of Satan" in the bible.
Posted by: Timur | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 08:30 PM
Mich, Thanks .... looking forward to chatting with you offline :)
Posted by: Pamela Geller | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 08:36 PM
The one very good thing about 9-11-2001 is that it demanded, almost required, that individuals and nations, choose sides; all cards on the table please.
Posted by: Queued | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 09:31 PM
WWELD? (What would Ezra Levant do?)
WWRED? (What would Rachel Ehrenfeld do?)
heh, he doesn't know who he's messing with...
Posted by: oppressedbyislam | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 09:43 PM
Obviously this will come as no surprise to Atlas fans.........and Freedom lovers. Williams, Ehrenfeld, Kaufman and others were shunned by the neo-cons and armchair "conservatives" in their time of need. Pamela was the exception to this disgraceful display of cowardice, standing up for them all. We can do no less for our friend Ms.Geller.
Peace
Posted by: Miluimnik | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 10:36 PM
Well, well, Pamela, this is yet another sign of your success. That a death-cult loving miscreant would threaten to sue you is a sign that you hit a nerve. Keep poking at him. He won't like it.
All the best from your friend in NC!
Abu
Posted by: Abu Daboo Doo al Bedrocki | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 11:01 PM
Pamela:
You are an inspiration to us all.
Posted by: salt1907 | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 11:09 PM
Atlas, I think you need a team of lawyers here. You can contact me at jahpdq@aol.com and I would be happy to offer a defense pro bono.
Posted by: C Max | Friday, February 29, 2008 at 11:42 PM
Atlas - I love your moxie! You won't back down and you won't blink!
You are an inspiration and a leader.
I will be hitting the tip jar - I am only too happy to help make sure you keep blogging the TRUTH!
Special thanks to C Max and MichLaw for stepping forward to help you. You two are awesome!!
Posted by: eavesdropper | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 12:23 AM
And who is signing the hecks for the prestigious Counselor DeLonge?
Whattatool.
Posted by: JewishOdysseus | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 12:24 AM
"checks"
Posted by: JewishOdysseus | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 12:25 AM
Wow. Just wow.
Pamela, you are awesome. Good on you for sticking to your guns. You give these a**holes their day in court, and make them sorry they ever heard of you.
You go, girl!
Posted by: Asher Abrams | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 12:55 AM
May the Good Lord Bless you for never backing down Pamela! And may He grant you victory over your accusers.
Posted by: Mongol | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 02:25 AM
Pamela,
We are with you!
Posted by: Muslims Against Sharia | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 02:27 AM
(Pamela: I submitted a long comment with lots of info about this lawyer and how to push back against his attack on free speech, but it was caught by the spam filter because it includes a lot of links that I spent an hour gathering. If you're so inclined, please rescue it. Thanks.)
Posted by: Daryl Herbert | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 02:31 AM
Let's hope truth is still an insuperable defense to a charge of libel.
Posted by: Francis W. Porretto | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 05:15 AM
Well well welfare must not be enough. Pamela.This so called lawyer must not be aware of all of the evidence you have against this menace to america. For one, you could have and should have had him arrested and you have far more evidence of things he has done toward YOU that are grounds for assault. There are many levels and he has indeed struck one of those levels. And another thing he does not know is how many people who value our freedom of speech here in america and it is not just for Islam. And a HUGE lot of people behind you. I am behind you. And if you need a body guard or a lot of body guards just say the word. And I shall be hitting the tip jar as well on Monday. Bless you for all you do.And be safe.You have an Atlas Army concerned for you and remember..you spoke the truth. These sobs cannot stand the light of discovery. Love you
Posted by: RISE_UP | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 07:42 AM
Men of God are always flipping women the finger. Seen the Pope do it a thousand times....
Seriously, if the definition of "crazy" isn't a Jewish rabbi supporting Hamas, an organization whose stated goals are to kill all Jews and drive them out of Israel and into the sea, then what is? Maybe he isn't crazy, maybe he's just meshugana. He probably feels that Hitler got a bum deal too. I hope Judge Judy gets this case, I would love to see her rip him a new one.
Posted by: Timur | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 07:58 AM
Flipping the ol' bird, huh? Yeah, now there's a man of God.
These mental deficients just hate being exposed.
He has absolutely NO idea who he is trying to silence.
Posted by: kaps | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 08:23 AM
Men of God don't give people the bird. Idiots do. Guess which one this guy is? Kick ass and take names Pamela.
Posted by: clyde | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 08:37 AM
Friends....All hell has broken loose in our sovereign homeland. Nothing on Alwaleed Bin Talal's CNN or FOX ans we can expect nothing more than slander and dis-information from the MSM and unfortunately, the Arabist administration. These are very dangerous times and very few peasants have either the intellect or the guts to serve the truth.
Pamela does.
Posted by: Miluimnik | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 02:13 PM
I'm an attorney from Illinois. Our code of civil procedure contains a provision where a litigant can bring a motion for attorneys fees costs and expenses against an opposing litigant who brings a frivolous action where there are untrue statements in a pleading or the action is brought for an improper purpose or to be harrasing or vexatious. It is loosely based on the federal Rule 11. Most states have these provisions. They are under used. My experience is that good judges will grant sanctions in a bullshit case. And the good "rabbi" doesen't have much to stand on. The prospect of having to pay his own fees(nobody in his right mind would take his case on a contigent basis) and Pamela's fees should prove too risky. My suggestion is to have a NY lawyer write a letter back to his lawyer and threaten sanctions. Our provision lets us go after the lawyer, too. I have gotten sanctions against my opponents twice. They usually have the deeper pockets and the more they fought me the more I made off them.
Posted by: faboutlaws | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Hi Pamela,
I am an attorney in San Diego, California and have litigated many defamation cases. If this goes any further, I’m sure you will have a swarm of competent attorneys thrilled to represent you in the case. The availability of several complete defenses to a defamation lawsuit filed by Feinberg is obvious from even a cursory review of your coverage of this vile critter’s conduct: truth; opinion; fair comment; etc. If Feinberg isn’t bluffing and he really plans to sue, then he’s well beyond “crazy,” because he would be pursuing a case in which he has no chance of proving liability, while simultaneously walking into a propeller of discovery demands that you (as the defendant) could legitimately pursue. (Courageous and undaunted as always, it’s no surprise that you are looking forward to the discovery phase, in which you would have carte blanche to reveal the extent of Feinberg’s dastardly connections.) I hope it doesn’t come to that and that Feinberg and his attorney weasel away with their tails between their legs, but if there is a lawsuit filed, I have every confidence that you will clean that bastard’s clock.
There is a more specific point I wanted to raise beyond mentioning the standard defenses that are available to you. It pertains to the specific language in the letter itself and what it reveals about a strategy used by plaintiffs’ lawyers in defamation cases. I’m sure you noted that the letter makes absolutely no reference to Feinberg’s rabid activism and it is NOT because he is unaware of it. He makes no reference to it because he is carefully avoiding making any admissions that you could later use to argue the application of the “public figure” standard to his client.
Attorneys who are inexperienced in defamation law often fall into the trap of making too many statements in their cease and desist letters and pleadings designed to trump up their clients’ damages. If they spend three pages of the complaint listing how “well-respected” and “well-known” their client is “in the community,” and what a “sterling, noble reputation” they enjoy for their activism or public service, only to then allege HUGE damages to their reputation as a result of the defendant’s statements, they are walking into a trap that they have conceded the plaintiff’s “public figure” status. A finding that the public figure standard applies is CYANIDE to a plaintiff’s defamation case. It saddles the plaintiff with a virtually insurmountable burden of proof before liability will be imposed. When a judge rules that the “public figure” standard applies, it’s OVER. Interestingly, the seminal case on the “public figure” standard is New York Times v. Sullivan—this was the case where Ariel Sharon sued Time Magazine, alleging that their coverage of his conduct related to the massacres at the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps was defamatory. Although the jury concluded that the Time story included false allegations, they found that Time had not acted with “actual malice” and did not award any damages. (“Actual malice” is required if the plaintiff is a public figure.)
With that in mind, it is interesting to read the letter again. Notice that there is only the most vague reference to Feinberg’s “principles and causes,” and absolutely no assertions about Feinberg’s “standing” or “involvement” in the “community.” Most telling of all is the attorney’s reference to Feinberg as a “professional person,” clearly calculated to steer the claims away from the application of the public figure standard. In fact, the letter makes it sound like you launched a vicious attack against some random, anonymous vicar, living in a one-room shack in a remote countryside, ministering to a congregation of 20. The words in this letter were chosen very carefully; so carefully in fact that it reveals his lawyer’s knowledge of the greatest weakness of their case—that Feinberg’s “activism” (read: unapologetic allegiance to the enemy) has made him a voluntary and highly-visible participant in a debate about matters of public interest. Feinberg’s lawyer knows that a finding that Feinberg is a public figure (or even a “limited public figure” in a “narrow area of public interest”) will sink the case.
I just wanted to bring this to your attention because I am repulsed by Feinberg’s collaboration with the anti-semitic jihadists who will, in time, devour him. Furthermore, I hope Feinberg and/or his lawyer read this comment and understand that if they are foolish enough to try to silence you, your ardent supporters will be watching the discovery phase with big bowls of popcorn.
So, if you’re out there, Feinberg, BRING IT! Ms. Geller is not afraid.
Keep giving ‘em hell, Pamela! You are a magnificent example of a true American!
Sean Arther
Posted by: Sean Arther | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Pamela, please fight the ship and ask for us to join your fleet! We love you!! You're one of us and when you need our help, just ask.
In other news, I support a campaign. It's called DRAFT Pamela Geller for Vice President... DRAFT Courage, Conviction and Charisma... DRAFT what the haters of freedom HATE!
Posted by: Josef K | Saturday, March 01, 2008 at 09:34 PM