Atlas Romney for President Music Vlog

What lengths we won't go through for our Presidential candidates! Romney is truly the outsider, the maverick. The well oiled machine is at work to destroy is candidacy  my friends.

I am with COULTER!

The great and inestimable Thomas Sowell, my favorite columnist btw, weighs in here:

MCCAIN'S CROOKED TALK

We have been hearing for years that Senator John McCain gives “straight talk” and his bus has been endlessly referred to as the “Straight Talk Express.” But endless repetition does not make something true.

The fact that McCain makes short, blunt statements does not make him a straight-talker.

There are short, blunt lies — and he told a big one on the eve of the Florida primary, when he claimed that Mitt Romney had advocated a timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

Even the Washington Post, which supports McCain, said that the senator “has distorted the meaning” of what Governor Romney said, that Romney “has never proposed setting ‘a date for withdrawal.’ ”

During Mitt Romney’s ABC News interview that Senator McCain twisted, Governor Romney was asked by the interviewer whether he agreed with President Bush’s veto of congressional legislation setting a timetable for withdrawal, and whether Romney as President would veto similar legislation.

“Of course,” was Romney’s reply. There was no ambiguity.

Confronted with his lie on Wednesday night’s debate, McCain blustered and filibustered in a manner reminiscent of Captain Queeg in The Caine Mutiny, when he was caught in a lie during a navy inquiry.

When confronted with any of his misdeeds, Senator McCain tends to fall back on his record as a war hero in Vietnam.

Let’s talk sense. Benedict Arnold was a war hero but that did not exempt him from condemnation for his later betrayal.

Being a war hero is not a lifetime get-out-of-jail-free card. And becoming president of the United States is not a matter of rewarding an individual for past services.

The presidency is a heavy responsibility for the future of the nation, including generations yet unborn. Character and integrity are major qualifications.

The passing years and a friendly media have allowed Senator McCain’s shortcomings in the character and integrity department to fade into the background.

McCain was one of “the Keating Five” — senators who used their influence to try to protect a failing savings & loan company, which also became the subject of a corruption investigation.

During the 2000 primaries, the Associated Press reported Senator McCain’s joking about people with Alzheimer’s.

This went beyond bad taste because (1) it was known at the time that Ronald Reagan was suffering from Alzheimer’s and (2) the media to whom McCain was pandering hated Ronald Reagan.

It is especially ironic now to see McCain wrapping himself in the mantle of President Reagan.

With the momentum of his Florida primary win behind him, going into the “Super Tuesday” primaries, John McCain has now been restored to the position of front runner that the media gave him at the outset.

Other Republicans are jumping on his bandwagon. This may have less to do with McCain’s own qualities than with the prospect of getting Cabinet posts or Supreme Court appointments as rewards for their political support.

It may all look like a done deal. But the McCain-Kennedy bill giving amnesty to illegal aliens looked like a done deal two years ago — until the public realized the truth behind the spin and brought that sell-out to a screeching halt.

Super Tuesday may be the voters’ last chance to bring the so-called “straight talk express” to a screeching halt.

It should be called the “sell-out express” because McCain has sold out not only with amnesty for illegal aliens but also sold out the First Amendment with the McCain-Feingold “campaign finance reform” bill that was supposed to take big money out of political campaigns, but blatantly has not.

McCain also sold out on judicial nominations by making his own side deal with the Democrats, undercutting Republican attempts to stop Democrats from filibustering judicial nominees instead of voting them up or down.

This is quite a record for someone running as a straight talker. 

The brilliant and in the know Dr Jack Wheeler has a devastating piece. Scathing.

HOW THE CLINTONS WILL DESTROY MCCAIN Dr Wheeler, To the Point News (SUBSCRIBE ALREADY! Wheeler will beat me senseless when he sees I've run this :)

The number of fellow Senators who think John McCain is psychologically unstable is large.  Some will admit it publicly, like Thad Cochran who says, "The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine."

Others relate times when McCain screamed four-letter obscenities right in their faces in the Senate cloak room, like Dick Shelby, Rick Santorum, or Jim Inhofe.  "The man is unhinged," one Senator told me.  "He is frighteningly unfit to be Commander-in-Chief."

That John McCain is clinically nuts is scary enough.  What worries a small group of GOP Senators and Congressmen even more is a deep and dark skeletal secret in McCain's glorified past to which they are privy, and which the Clintons will use to blackmail him.

[...]

In other words, the CIA has in its possession the notes and reports of John McCain's interrogators at the Hanoi Hilton, in both the original Vietnamese and translated Russian, showing collaboration with his Communist captors.

Allegations of this nature have been made over the years, many by Vietnam veterans.  There is an even an organization, Vietnam Veterans Against McCain.  But they are based on suspicions and circumstantial claims.  There has never been any hard direct evidence.   

What T says the CIA has is such evidence.  Its release would destroy McCain.  The threat of its release could force McCain to take a fall, blow the election and lose on purpose.  And just who do you suppose would know what the CIA has and work with them to release it?

Someone who has been a CIA asset since he was recruited by London station chief Cord Meyer while a student at Oxford in 1968?

(Back in the 90s years after he retired,  if Cord drank a little too much Scotch, he would laugh derisively at those conspiratorialists who accused Bill Clinton of being connected with the KGB.

"They all darkly point to Bill's participation in anti-war peace conferences in Stockholm and Oslo, and his trip to Leningrad, Moscow, and Prague while he was at Oxford. ‘Who could have paid for this?', they ask. ‘It had to be the KGB!' they claim." Cord would shake his head. "What rot - we paid for it. We recruited Bill the first week he was at Oxford. Bill's been an asset of The Three Bad Words ever since."  Cord passed on in 2001.)

The small group of Senators and Congressmen who have been briefed by T have been unable to confirm with the CIA any details of its document swap with the GRU beyond an admission that such a swap "may have happened."  They are very nervous about pursuing the matter any further.

The Clintons are not nervous.  They are utterly ruthless, and have buddies at Langley all too happy to help them.

It has been noted many times here in To The Point that while most folks think the CIA is a right-wing outfit, it is not. The CIA has been dominated by left-wing hyper-liberals for years.

The CIA is a left-wing, liberal outfit, and its main job for some time now is not attacking America's enemies but conservatives in general and George W. Bush in particular.  The story is best told by friend, Ken Timmerman in his new book Shadow Warriors.

When the time is right, the Clintons will see to the leaking of the GRU archives on McCain to the media.  Bet on it, just as you can bet they'll follow it up with media disclosures of the lady lobbyists in Washington having adulterous affairs with McCain.  (There are at least three of them; I know the name of one but I'm not going to put it in writing.)

Maybe McCain will try to fight back by confirming Hillary's well-known bisexuality and her lesbian affair with her beautiful assistant, Huma Abedin.  Google "Hillary" and "Huma Abedin" and you'll get almost 6,000 hits.  Turns out Huma is a Moslem who grew up in Saudi Arabia and is strongly suspected of working for Saudi intelligence.

Or maybe he'll capitulate to Clinton blackmail.  You never can tell what a psychologically unstable guy will do.

And that last point is why - be prepared for this, folks - I would not in any circumstances vote for John McCain, not if either Hillary or Obama were the alternative.  Evil is safer than crazy.  Leftie amateur inexperience is safer than crazy.  So I agree with Ann Coulter who says:

"I'd rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we'll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility."

How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase whack-job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses "profit" as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes "stopping global warming" is worth destroying the American economy, won't drill ANWR, won't appoint strict constructionist justices, won't protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times, and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage?

Rush is right.  A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party.  It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.

Go to To The Point, there is so much more.

"The (Non)Conservatives Against McCain"

and my man Hal points out,

I don't know if anyone else has noticed this but The Arnold has endorsed John McCain for president at a time when California is suing the US government because California wants stricter environmental laws on the books than what the Federal government has.  McCain is very "green" friendly (as long as it gets him elected, and ain't it peculiar that being "green" puts a lot of green in these putz's pockets???).  They managed to take their lips off each other's respective asses long enough to make a few statements to the press.  No doubt McCain will reward Schwarzenegger with a post on his cabinet if he wins, possibly head of the EPA??  Nice reward for someone who fucked up California's economy and created a $14 BILLION deficit.  Way to go Arnold!  If McCain wins, Arnold  might get a chance to screw the nation's economy like he has California's.  Maybe he should hire a script writer and have him save California's economy while giving the states entitlements away to illegal aliens (oh wait, the writers are on strike, scratch that).  3 links w/stories below, feel free to pick and choose.

Will Media Expose Global Warming Con Job?

CONTRIBUTE

UPDATE: Romney Picks Up Maine booya! (hat tip Larwyn!)

UPDATE 2/5: Refuting  the McCain prisoner of war allegations  here (hat tip Joe)

Both sides should be heard:

Recently, I have seen several allegations that condemn Senator John McCain for his behavior as a prisoner of war. I believe that these allegations are false. I am in a better position than the Senator’s accusers to know the truth since I was a prisoner with him, having been captured a little over a month before him. I have contacted hundreds of my comrades on our e-mail list and not one of them can confirm anything that has been alleged against McCain.

UPDATED; Henry Holzer wants answers. Me too. Holzers important piece raises more questions then Warner over t Front Page answered;

Soon after being shot down on October 26, 1967 in the middle of Hanoi, McCain asked for medical attention and promptly received it at a North Vietnamese military hospital. Was it because he quickly told his captors who his father was, as his detractors claim? Was it because he was so badly injured, as his supporters contend? Or for some other reason(s)?

 

Even though no returning POW reported that he had been interrogated by non-Vietnamese communist intelligence or security agents who identified themselves as such, there is considerable circumstantial evidence, and at least three pieces of direct evidence, that some had been. Indeed, McCain himself has admitted that he was interviewed by at least one “French” reporter, that he had a discussion with “ a famous North Vietnamese writer” about Ernest Hemingway, that unspecified “others came to find out about life in the United States” that one of them “was Gen. Vo Nguyen Giap, the hero [!] of Dienbienphu,” and that indeed, “[m]any [unspecified] visitors came to talk to me”

 

During those interviews, literary discussions, cultural conversations, and military dialogues, did McCain disclose information that he should not have, as his detractors claim? Or did he not, as his supporters contend? (For the record, neither McCain nor any other POW should be criticized for whatever information, however sensitive, they may have given up under torture.)

 

As a United States Senator, McCain joined with colleague John Kerry to choke off an official inquiry into the fate of American MIAs. Was it because McCain had something personal to hide and/or like Kerry was trying to facilitate restoration of normal relations with the communists, as his detractors claim? Or because he honestly believed the Vietnamese had not withheld any American servicemen, as his supporters contend? Or for some other reason(s)?

 

McCain was instrumental in having Congress seal the debriefings of all returned prisoners of war. Was it because of legitimate privacy concerns? Or did his and others’ debriefings inculpate him because of his conduct in captivity.

 

One can speculate about how many people know the answer to such questions.

 

But one thing is certain.

 

John McCain knows the answers.

 

Comments

[terrence]

Great music Vlog, Pamela.

Have you seen "Jackie Mason '08 Vlog 9 John McCain is a Phony!"?
It is about seven minutes long.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=DkrHn9TOqCo

[turn]

"Well, Paula, How would you rate her performance?"

"Simon, I just love her animation. She has great moves and an infectious smile."

"Randy?"

"She was a little pitchy at first, but she ends up really nailing it."

"OK, that settles it. Pamela, you get the golden ticket to go on to...

.

.

.

.
visit turn while he's recuperating at home from yet another (#8) skin cancer surgery. Stay out of the sun, kids."
___________________

If half of the above is true it needs to be exposed now.

[Francis W. Porretto]

McCain in the Oval Office would be a terrible disaster for conservatism, freedom, and American national security. Perhaps Clinton or Obama would be as bad on the issues, but I can't see how they could be worse -- and they wouldn't tarnish the luster or general reputation of conservatism as McCain in power would do.

Far better, if we're to be governed by a liberal statist, to have him be an avowed liberal statist, rather than a pseudo-conservative whose disasters will persuade the gullible that "freedom has been tried and failed."

[Razdan]

OK! OK!, Pamela, aside from the problems you list about McCain what's there to not like about him.... Just kidding!

[dbl action]

Romney/Geller '08; I sure would love to vote for that ticket. Anyway, there's really no choice other than Mitt Romney and he has a lot going for him as a leader and as a man of traditional values; no second rate guy here!

What has happened to all those people who we all thought had a clue? Islame-ooos are getting their way while our children are being indoctrinated with 'perversion is ok', America's founding principals are bad, we're all lucky mud from the primordial swamp and don't forget to bow down at the 'climate change' alter as you leave the classroom. And now, they want us to believe that treacherous Johnny is just what we need? Absurd, I WILL NOT VOTE FOR THAT PATHETIC MAN.

How 'bout Geller/Coulter '08? Yes, that's it, I can see it now... 'President Geller the Palestinians want all the citizens in Israel to quit breathing immediately; what should we do?' Well Ann, what do you think, ready to kick some sand in the Pally gearbox?...

[Timur]

McCain is the Manchurian candidate. McCain- Kennedy. McCain-Feingold. McCain-Lieberman. This guy is NO CONSERVATIVE! He was thinking about running as John Kerry's vice presidential candidate. WAKE UP PEOPLE! The media is pimping him right now because they know that he can be easily beaten by Clinton or Obama, especially if Huckabee runs as an indie candidate and plays Rosss Perot by taking votes away from Romney. The media wants the Democraps to win.

[Guy S.]

I (have and continue to) feel much the same about the renegade Senator from Az. He is a dangerous man. I will not denigrate his past military service, but have commented on my own bit of fluff on the net about the possible by products of his stay at the Hanoi Hilton. We do not need a broken (or possibly mentally unbalanced)man in the white house with his (shaking) hand on the *football*. And though I will concede anything is possible vis a vie the former philander in chief having been in the employ of an alphabet agency, I wonder about that. Far more likely they (the Clintons) have folks in the department of State who either have or can get much the same info on McNutcase. Bottom line, keep him out of there! Needless to say, my vote will be for Romney.

[Armoured Passionfruit]

"Yeah baby she's got it"

[lilbean]

and then theres this,released before mccain has the nomination?

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-say-mccain-nearly-abandoned-gop-2007-03-28.html

get ready folks, the next 5 years are gonna be rough.
bean

[Steve Harkonnen]

I was going to comment on how people can suddenly change their minds on a candidate if their favorite drops out, but that would be like the mouse calling the rat a rodent.

If Ron Paul drops out, obviously I will end up supporting Mitt Romney as I feel exactly the same way about McCain. I cannot have a liberal president in the White House.

Don't know if I am right or not - but didn't Ann Coulter declare she's voting for Hillary if McCain is the Republican Candidate? Can anyone elaborate on that?

[balzar]

I like Ron Paul. He has been out raising both McCain AND Romney lately.

[Harcourt Fenton]

Interesting slip of the tongue that Pamela first says "Pull it out for McCain" before correcting herself on Romney. Let's see if she holds to voting for Hillary if/when McCain gets nominated.

Calling out McCain on the "Gang of 14" is a Stalinist propaganda move - the single thing that the "Gang" accomplished was a cloture vote on the Alito nomination - preventing a Democratic fillibuster - and allowing Alito to sit on the Supreme Court. What, Pamela, is your issue with Alito?? Would you rather have had months and months and months of a different nominating process??

If that is your line in the sand, how do you support Romney, who led the Taxachusetts implementation of health insurance legislation that requires you to provide health insurance for your nannies and gardeners - in Romney's case, his illegal immigrant gardeners. If that is your hard line, how did you support Rudy?? You think he didn't meet with the Sharpton's of the world to reach compromise and prevent shutdowns of the NYC government?

The only one that's going to "pull it out" for Romney is Larry Craig.

[salt1907]

Rick Santorum has endorsed Romney on the Laura Ingraham show.

[lowandslow]

Not to be a stick in the mud but why do people think Romney will be any better on any policy, domestic or foreign, then McCain? The guy isn't what you would call a rock of consistency. Romney's political desire to please everyone will no doubt led to more bad policy.
Vote for Romney if you feel McCain doesn't have the disposition to lead or because you just plain hate him but leave the policy rhetoric out of it. Romney is no conservative, his actions in regard to the 2nd amendment alone should disqualify him from using that label.

[lowandslow]

Let me also add, come next Tuesday, this thing is over anyways. Romney just ain't going to win, just as there was no way he could win the general. Vote for him if your primary is still up if you want (what a crappy choice) but be prepared to vote McCain in November.
What we should be doing is working with your local GOP on getting decent representation in the House, that's where we have to take control of the party back and really any control this year.

[lowandslow]

One more thing, to people considering hitting the CONTRIBUTE to Romney paypal thing. Remember, he still has over 200 million dollars in personal wealth to spend on his campaign.

[WildPointer]

I am with you. Of the few still standing the only one I like is Romney. I will vote for Romney but not McCain. I can't beleive anyone would seriously think I could vote for McCain.
Dr. Tom Coburn is my representative but I am also proud of James Inhofe.
But idiots out there expect me to hold my nose and vote for McCain.
They better not ask me to make that choice because I will disappoint them.
Everyone needs to contribute to Romney. Please hit that link and give a dollar or five. It all helps.

[RISE_UP]

OMG PAMELA!! your video knocked me out. Im with you. I also said before Ann coulter did, that I will vote for Hillary before I vote for McCain. What the hell has he done and that bs about getting bin laden is crap. He has been in Washington too long. I appreciate his service..But he's too old, too long in Washington. Too much a buddy of Ted Kennedy. And I believe Romney would be an excellent president.

[Underzog]

McInsane should not be President. Since he likes to spew excrement on his fellow Republicans (Gang of 14; etc.), Republicans should not vote for him.

And you can't have such a mentally unstable man in the government!

[eavesdropper]

McCain sucks - he's bitter since 2000 when he lost to W, and he's beaten W ever since.

He's gotten a free ride.

Atlas is right on the money, McCain is a disaster.

The Fifth Column is scared of Romney.

[Kaitian]

Welcome back lowandslow. Pitching in for your primary candidate McCain/Huckabee here by trying to undercut Romney? Yes of course.

[lowandslow]

Vote for Romney if you want Kaltian, WTF do I care. Just don't blow smoke up my ass that Romney's some conservative savior.