Lefty Israel Study-Why Jews Don't Rape: They have an agenda!

Here we have it. The defining moment in leftarded Jewicidal thinking. A leading Israeli university has conducted a study to determine why Jewish soldiers don't rape Pali Arab women, you know - spoils of war. As far as the left is concerned, Islamic barbarism has effectively become the norm so when decent, honorable (Jewish) men do not behave according to savage norms, there must be an ulterior motive. Seriously.

Hebrew University has jactually gave an award to student Tal Nitzan's essay  that alleges that Israeli soldiers were "racists for not raping Arab women."

Perhaps Jewish men don't rape the women because they are good, kind and decent moral men. Not possible?  For this they did a study? A study? This is why Israel is in such trouble. Leftarded Jews hold sway in their media, universities and government.

I think the leftarded Jews ought to convert to Islam and move to the Muslim countries whose outrageous crimes against humanity they sanction and where they inevitably belong.

Hebrew  University Paper Finds: IDF Has Political Motives for Not Raping Israel National News

Hebrew University committee prize-winning paper finds that the lack of IDF rapes of Palestinian women is designed to serve a political purpose.

(IsraelNN.com) A research paper that won a Hebrew University teachers' committee prize finds that the lack of IDF rapes of Palestinian women is designed to serve a political purpose.

The abstract of the paper, authored by doctoral candidate Tal Nitzan, notes that the paper shows that "the lack of organized military rape is an alternate way of realizing [particular] political goals." 

The next sentence delineates the particular goals that are realized in this manner: "In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it can be seen that the lack of military rape merely strengthens the ethnic boundaries and clarifies the inter-ethnic differences - just as organized military rape would have done."

The paper further theorizes that Arab women in Judea and Samaria are not raped by IDF soldiers because the women are de-humanized in the soldiers' eyes.

Leftist psychotic thinking continues. Over at "A Mother in Israel"

The Israeli Sociology Association awarded the report a mark of excellence.

Here's a quote from the study:

As Israelis/Jews, who view themselves as moral, the soldiers find it difficult to commit martial rapes. It seems that (in Bosnia) men identified themselves as Serbians through committing public group rapes of Bosnian women; Jews identify themselves as non-rapists, non-assimilationists, as a nation unique in the embrace of God. Rape and non-rape are two sides of the same coin, which in different situations the use of either one can lead to the same results. [emphasis and translation mine]

Nitzan notes that the Israeli army is the only one not to commit mass rapes when it occupies another country.

Check out:  Israel Satire Laboratory's take on it. Too sick to believe.

UPDATE: Phyllis Chesler's take on it here.

Nitzan writes that the “lack of IDF rapes of Palestinian women is designed to serve a political purpose.” Since Israel fears the Palestinians demographically, IDF soldiers have been trained not to rape the women in order to avoid creating new Palestinians and little intifaders. (Has Nitzan never heard about Palestinian honor killings in which pregnant-out-of-wedlock or adulterous women are murdered by their families who love them too much?) Nitzan alleges that the “lack of military rape merely strengthens the ethnic boundaries and clarifies the inter-ethnic differences—just as organized military rape would have done.”

Thus, Israeli racism, which “de-humanizes” Palestinian women, suppresses Jewish male lust—which proves that Israeli soldiers are racist oppressors. As the only army that does not, apparently, rape, Nitzan fails to grapple with other reasons for this, including the possibility that Israeli soldiers are acting in an ethical and civilized manner.

 

Comments

[Solaratov]

Nitzan might want to take a look at the US Military's record vis-a-vis mass rapes. It doesn't happen. And individual cases of rape are dealt with rather harshly.
On the other hand, I guess we can only offer condolences to the Pali non-rapees. Perhaps if they declared war on Nigeria, they'd have better luck. Or not. Who knows?

[Surak]

Let me see if I get this right. Israeli soldiers refuse to commit rape for one or more of these reasons: 1) it embarrasses those groups who do commit rape; 2) their potential victims are not worthy of rape. Such conclusions stipulate the axiom that soldiers ought to commit rape, or can't help committing rape, unless some hidden agenda tells them not to. Those sneaky Zionist neo-cons!

In America, while the professors are registered Democrat over Republican by about a 5:1 ratio, in sociology, anthropology and political science (and perhaps English) the ratio is closer to 20:1. Such people are so out of touch with reality that you'd have to feel sorry for them - if it weren't for the fact that the rest of the cognitive elite holds them in such respect. Contemptible.

[JewishOdysseus]

"Nitzan notes that the Israeli army is the only one not to commit mass rapes when it occupies another country."

Now that's not LEFtarded...That's just REtarded. How 'bout: USA, UK, for 2?

BTW, how is it POSSIBLE to parody this sh!t?
Will we see new feminist studies where women after dates will blast the guys for acting like gentlemen, since they "obviously had an agenda...If he'd groped me, it wd prove he really respected my independence!"

This story is the perfect time to break out the good stuff: Read it, and quickly hit this link:
http://faultgame.com/images/twilzone.wav

[Timur]

Maybe just it's the Jewish prohibition against having sex with animals... After all, that's what the moslems are proving themselves to be...

[The Passionate Conservative]

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. If they don't rape (as if it's some sort of military "right" to rape enemy females? HUH?) then they "have ulterior motives." If they gave in to some sort of evil urge, and committed a rape, then the leftists would scream what animals the IDF is. Can't win.

[Shy Guy]

The only raping that took place here is the raping of academia and intelligence.

[joeblough]

Clearly the answer is that the Israelis are civilized. Hence, no unbridled savagery. Simple.

Now that I've declared my position ...

The first thing that went through my mind when I read the first paragraph of the posting was the question -- do the Palisites mutilate their females' genitalia?

It's probably quite difficult to have even normal consensual sex with someone who's all scarred and distorted "down there".

I mean ... is that gross or what?

And then it occurred to me, that in all probability, all over the mohammedan cultures are men who regularly have sex with women who for sure are all scarred and distorted "down there".

And that just made my stomach roll over.

[joeblough]

BTW, the material in the "study" is not thought in any normal sense.

It is rationalization.

The authors start out with the premise that Jews should be detested, and then goof around arranging various ideas into reasons for hating Jews.

==========

Thought has to do with discovering and identifying something about the world "out there".

Verifiable fact and clean logic are required for this.

Thought is a very different activity from simply arranging words and ideas into desired patterns.

Just arranging words and ideas, can go on forever without any reference to fact, or any dependence on logic.

You simply keep messing about till you hit an arrangement that pleases you.

Relation to reality is only lightly required. You only have to use words that normally refer to something in the world -- and mix them in.

But your statement as a whole can be pure nonsense and still serve its purpose perfectly -- which is to boost up and communicate one's feelings, and to maintain an image of oneself as someone who "thinks", (in a rather poorly understood sense of that word).

It doesn't have to be provable, just defensible -- and the rules for defending your rationalization are just as loose as the rules for composing it in the first place. Most of the time, simply insulting the person who argues against you is considered sufficient.

[Mega]

Condemning Jews for not commiting rape...I, who normally write 100 words for every 2 or 3 words that should be written, can't think of a damn thing to say, it's just that ridiculous.

[EJO]

Dear Pamela;
You Jews are so damn sneaky. No wonder nobody trust you. You've always got something up your sleeve.

But seriously though folks; Southwest Asia, and North Africa truly is Bizarro World.
The men are allowed to beat their wives. They're allowed to have sex with little baby girls. And they're allowed to murder their sisters for wearing make-up, or reading a book. And then when a Pali-Arab female DOESN'T get raped by am Israeli soldier, she's like, "Hey"! "What am I"? "Chopped liver"?
This is insanity of the highest order.
Sincerely;
EJO

[x_dhimmi]

If the so-called-palestinians want rape, they can shoot rockets at U.N. peacekeepers. That should do it.

[jmaimarc]

Here's a little twist for you: look in the Bible, specifically Devarim 21:10-14 (Deuteronomy). We actually have laws regarding the taking of women during a military conquest. So even this "brutal" aspect of human nature is governed by the Higher Law. I wonder if this moron even bothered to cite this reference in his paper. I doubt very much that he served in the IDF; probably dodged like the rest of his leftard buddies.