Flight 93 Islamic Crescent Memorial Points to Mecca: Allah FUbar

Flight 93 Memorial: A giant Islamic crescent pointing to Mecca.

Tom Burnett's 9/11 protests against the crescent memorial  Error Theory

I missed this last week. Mr. Burnett had an op-ed column in the Somerset Daily American on 9/11. He also did a second radio interview with Pittsburgh talker Fred Honsberger. These heartfelt appeals are well worth the time. If you want to feel the loving and heroic spirit of Tom Burnett Jr., just listen to his father.

It is heartening also to hear the caller with the Indian accent expressing his fury that America is allowing this desecration to go forward, but he makes a mis-statement about the 44 glass blocks that will be emplaced along the flight path. In addition to the 40 inscribed with the names of the murdered passengers and crew, there ARE to be four more, matching the number of terrorists, but they are NOT going to be inscribed with the names of the terrorists, as the caller seemed to think.

CAO's is getting behind the blogburst as well;

 

You can find the pdf version of the manuscript of Alec’s book at CrescentofBetrayal.com. Alec Rawls also blogs at Error Theory and exposes there not only the hypocrisy of the media on this issue, but leftist thought processes which seem to be totally divorced from rational thinking. Does one have to be a conservative to think that planting an Islamic flag on the crash site doesn’t honor the crew and passengers who fought the terrorists on that fateful day?

X Posted at TWA and STACLU

Flight 93 has once again been hijacked by the terrorists.

After deliberating on this for a while, I’ve decided to start a blogburst regarding the Flight 93 Memorial in order to keep the calculations that verified its orientation to Mecca from going down the memory hole.

In addition, I think bringing heightened awareness to the mosque features of the memorial and other facts are important because they’re moving to start construction of this monstrosity at the crash site.

If you want to join the blogroll/blogburst for the Crescent of Betrayal blogburst, email caoilfhionn1 at gmail dot com, with your blog’s url address. The blogburst will be sent out once a week to the participants, the plan is- we will all be posting simultaneously on this issue on Wednesdays.

Of course, I will fully expect that you will post on this if you join the blogburst. I’ll keep an email list, and if you don’t post on it, your url will come off the blogroll, and your email address will come off the list.

When was the last time you wanted to get back at the terrorists for 9/11? THIS IS YOUR CHANCE.

Let’s roll.

 

Comments

[Razdan]

Looking at the proposed crescent memorial that is depicted above gives me an idea. With just a slight change the crescent can be changed to resemble a bow and an arrow can be drawn from the center pointing towards the heart of Islam, i.e. Mecca. I think that symbol would be far better memorial to the brave people who died on Flight 93.

[jpm100]

When I moved here after growing up in the Great White North, I noticed a few subtle differences about Americans. This is one of those differences.

The evidence is there right in your face. The idea someone would try to get away with this would sound absurd to the Average American. And because of that, they're able to get away with it.

This brings me to one of those differences. "If you work in the absurd, no American will touch you." Americans are paralyzed or go into denial like a deer in the headlights when something which seems absurd is coming their way.

On 9/10, if I predicted terrorist would bring down the WTC with hijacked planes, I would have been laughed at by most people. On 9/12, the same people would call me an idiot if I said I didn't see it coming.

I don't know why Americans just bury their heads when someone is trying to pull something absurd on them. It could be arrogance in that "no one would dare try something like that on me deliberately." Or part of it is a fear to commit to making the leap to a conclusion that to someone else could make you sound foolish.

Whatever the reason, to get people to act against it, you have to overcome the "absurdity" factor that make people not want to accept it or address it.

[Always On Watch]

Alec Rawls is the scheduled interviewee on The Gathering Storm Radio Show on Friday, October 5, at the bottom of the hour. HERE is the home page for show, which airs/tapes at 3:00 PM EDT every Friday.

[Vince]

I find it funny a Canadian is going to single out Americans for being in denial and naive.

[Thomas Carney]

FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Whoever's putting the most $$$$ into this memorial is calling the shots with the architect(s).

[C Max]

Here's a suggestion from an attorney: every single person who donated to this thing has a cause of action in fraud and civil conspiracy against the assholes who planned it and the architect who designed it.

I live in Cleveland. I'd be happy to file the complaints pro bono on behalf of anyone who donated to this.

It is fraud, because whoever solicited the money said it was for a memorial, without saying it was a memorial for the TERRORISTS.

And it's conspiracy because the asshats who put this together obviously committed overt acts in furtherance of it.

Let's see how funny this architect thinks it is when he's being sued for millions of dollars and is forced to pay some lawyer half a million to defend the case.

No reasonable jury could conclude that this thing is anything other than a slap in the face to the victims and the people who donated to the memorial.

[Alec Rawls]

Got a riddle for you. A widely advertised feature of the crescent design is the "40 Memorial Groves." When controversy over the Crescent of Embrace name first arose, the entire memorial was even briefly retitled "40 Memorial Groves."

Why then does the design only include 38 Memorial Groves?

Hint: the crescent symbolizes the Islamic heavens. Not just anyone can be memorialized there. So who IS being memorialized, and how?

I'll post the answer on my Error Theory blog in next week's blogburst, but try to solve it first!

Another clue is here. Remember, architect Paul Murdoch is an evil genius. The answer is tricky!

[ZachTaylor]

Pamela,

Did you know there was a Hussein Obama campaign ad on you main page today? Maybe there's no way to control it, maybe it doesn't matter, or maybe it's good to take his money knowing he's not going to get any support here anyway. It just looked weird--a dhimmi element among all the sanity of your excellent site.

I love your blog. Thank you so much for all the hard work.

--Zach

[Cao]

Thanks, Pam, for the recognition and link.

Vinnie has a point - some of the money that's funding this thing is coming from the Heinz Foundation.

Regardless, though, just because some heavy hitters are influencing the decisions with their greenbacks doesn't mean the rest of us have to roll over and play dead!

We need to defend those who we're supposed to be memorializing in Pennsylvania, which is the bottom line here.

[reliapundit - the astute blogger]

the architects who designed this are postmodernist leftists/mutliculti's who dressed up this symbolic trojan horse in highbrow BS and the public is afraid to question their "authority."

it must be stopped.

this design is the equivalent of ahmadinejad laying a wreath at ground zero.