BOLTON GETS SUDAN RESOLUTION PASSED! [CRICKETS CHIRPING]

The UN Security Council just passed Resolution 1706, with 12 votes in favor, and abstentions from China, Russia, Qatar (their silence speaks volumes.)

SAVE DARFUR RALLY SEPTEMBER 17TH NYC
(Events Outside NY)

Ambassador Bolton pushed for a UN Security Council vote as quickly as possible. The resolution to transition the African Union force in Darfur to a UN peacekeeping operation has been passed.  And he got it.

Why is no one talking about this? Why is the left talking Bolton  filibuster? Why isn't the left pushing to save lives in Darfur? Why is the left so full of shit? And where is Kofi? No wonder the people of Africa despise him.

Statement by Ambassador John R. Bolton, U.S. Representative to the United Nations, on the Resolution 1706 (Sudan), in the Security Council, August 31, 2006

Mr. President,

    We are pleased that the Security Council has taken this important step in passing Resolution 1706.  It is imperative that we move immediately to implement it fully to stop the tragic events unfolding in Darfur.  Every day we delay only adds to the suffering of the Sudanese people and extends the genocide. 

    The United States calls on the Government of Sudan to comply fully with Resolution 1706 and cooperate with the UN as we begin the work of implementation.  Paragraph 1 of the resolution invites the Government of Sudan to consent to deployment, though nothing in this language requires their consent.  We expect their full and unconditional cooperation and support with the new UN peacekeeping force.  Failure on the Government of Sudan's part to do so will significantly undermine the Darfur Peace Agreement and prolong the humanitarian crisis in Darfur.

Resolution 1706 sets the foundation for an effective, multi-dimensional international force.  With the expansion of the force up to 17,000 military personnel and over 3,000 civilian police, we can now expect that the AMIS rehatting will take place rapidly and smoothly, and that the follow-on UN force will be fully operational, with a substantial African element at its core. 

Significant planning and logistical work has already taken place.  Now with the passage of this Resolution, we can begin finalizing those details as we prepare to deploy the force.  The United States is prepared to assist immediately in that regard.  We cannot afford to delay.

    Mr. President, the Security Council upheld its responsibility and passed a strong resolution which offers the best hope to bolster the Darfur Peace Agreement and end the tragedy we are witnessing in Darfur.  We must devote all of our energies now to secure its immediate and full implementation.  Ambassador Bolton: Okay. Why don't we get started? We have concluded our consultations on the resolution, which will expand the mandate of the U.N. mission in Sudan to cover Darfur. There are a number of comments made, which we and the United Kingdom will be taking into account during the day. But as we said in the Council and repeated at the end of the consultations, it is our intention to put the resolution in blue today and to have a vote tomorrow. We're obviously hoping for unanimous support. We've tried in many respects to take account of the concerns the different Council members have made, but we think it is important to proceed with a vote, and that will be our intention.

Good on ya, Mr. Bolton.

What follows is a Q & A with Ambassador Bolton and reporters on the Sudan resolution (emphasis mine.)

Reporter: Ambassador, did anyone object to having this vote ?

Ambassador Bolton:  Well, some governments thought that we should put it off until September, but I think we've taken into account the concerns that have been raised. We're very worried about the humanitarian situation in Darfur, and obviously, each day that you delay adopting the resolution is a day that pushes out the planning and logistical work that has to take place to do two things: First, to bring su pport to the existing AMIS force, but second, to facilitate the ultimate transition to the U.N. force that we contemplate. So this is not simply a question of delay for the sake of additional diplomatic negotiations. This has profound operational consequences as well, which is one reason why we think it's important to proceed.

Reporter: (Inaudible) is it your view that by passing the resolution you'll be able to start on bolstering AMIS and going ahead with some of the logistical planning stuff, even though Sudan has not agreed to allow the rehatting of the force?

Ambassador Bolton: Well, the fact is that the resolution itself contemplates there will be lots of discussions with the government of Sudan, and nothing in this resolution cuts off those discussions. We've said from the outset that we didn't contemplate that the U.N. peacekeeping force was going to fight its way into Darfur. We need the assent at least of the government of Sudan for logistical reasons among others. But what we think is important is that the question of consent not hold up the operational steps that need to be taken to get this force deployed as rapidly as possible. Already it's not being deployed with the speed or at the time that we would have most preferred, and we think there comes a point where we just have to say, "We're going to a vote. We're going to proceed. We need to get moving."

Reporter: So what can happen once the resolution is passed, even though Sudan doesn't - 

Ambassador Bolton: Well, I think there's a chicken-and-an-egg situation here. I think once the resolution is passed, the consent may be forthcoming more rapidly than people think.

Reporter: Well, Ambassador, a follow-up from that question, because there are, as you know, some governments, especially China, who say that you should wait on this until we have the discussion and everything, and then go with the resolution. What do you say to that?

Ambassador Bolton: Well, we have already delayed a good deal. In fact, there's a substantial argument that we've waited longer than we should have in an effort to accommodate these concerns. As I said in the Council this morning, you know, in America there's a saying that for many politicians voting is like standing out in the rain, and I said into every life some rain must fall.

Reporter: I'll ask the same question I asked this morning. Will the blue take the brackets off the numbers or -

Ambassador Bolton: Yeah, the numbers -

Reporter: Are they the same ones now that are in brackets?

Ambassador Bolton: Yes, it'd be the same in the text that was circulated last night. That represents an upper limit to the force. A number of governments, including the United States, obviously have concerns about the budget implications, and we'll be discussing that further as the preparations continue.

Reporter: But you're going to take the brackets out of those numbers for the time being -

Ambassador Bolton: Right, because we have to circulate a text as what it will be in final.

Reporter: (Inaudible) adopt a resolution tomorrow, and then waiting for the consent of the Sudanese government, time-wise what are you - what do you envision before you actually are able to if you get the consent and if you don't?

Ambassador Bolton: I don't think I could give you a projection on the impact on timing. I think a whole chain of events will begin once the resolution is adopted. And I think that's one of the compelling reasons to go forward with it. And then we'll see whether the government of Sudan is prepared to step up to its responsibilities, as they have agreed, as was contemplated in the Darfur Peace Agreement, and as the African Union has already previously agreed.

Reporter: For the general public, which doesn't know its UNMIS from its AMIS, on Sudan, first of all, what has this resolution really accomplished? They've seen years of violence, destruction, calls of genocide. What does it do? Removing all the jargon. And number two, on Iran, just - we may not have access to you. There's reports of uranium enrichment. There's the IAEA report, whether you've seen previews or not of that. Will there be a serious action here, since weeks ago you were saying we're prepared to come in with sanctions? For the general public, which is very curious and has a very busy life and can' t keep up with everything?

  Ambassador Bolton: On the question of Sudan, the central purpose of this resolution is to extend the mandate of U.N. peacekeepers to cover Darfur, to pick up the responsibilities that are currently being handled by the African Union and to help implement the Darfur Peace Agreement. We think this critical to mitigating the humanitarian disaster that's occurring in Darfur and we need to do it as soon as possible.  In terms of Iran, we've said repeatedly that we expect that no later than August the 31st, pursuant to Security Council Resolution 1696, that the Iranians will suspend all uranium enrichment-related activity. Now, if they haven't done that by August the 31st, we've also said repeatedly, and the foreign ministers of the five permanent members of the Security Council in Germany have agreed, that we will come to the Security Council to seek sanctions. That has been our intention for some months; it remains our intention; it will be our intention on September the 1st if the Iranians don't comply with the resolution.

Reporter: Just quickly back on Sudan. One of my colleagues asked another ambassador here this question. What if - Sudan, who's given no indication of consenting all the way through to this U.N. force, even your own staff on the ground in Darfur were told about jihad if U.N. peacekeepers arrived. So what's next? What about the responsibility to protect?

Ambassador Bolton: I think that the resolution entrusts the secretariat with a number of responsibilities - a lot of tasks, planning, logistical tasks that have to go forward - and I think those will begin as soon as the resolution is adopted. And at that point we'll see what the rhetoric is and what the real response is from the government of Sudan. And I expect that as they objected to the deployment of U.N. peacekeepers in the southern part of Sudan right up until the deployment, there may be a pattern here. But that's the whole point of not waiting until there's final consent from them on the deployment, why we need to pass this resolution and then the operational steps will unfold and further discussions will take place.

Click below for Sudan Draft Resolution

erusalThe Security Council,

Recalling its previous resolutions concerning the situation in the Sudan, in particular resolutions 1679 (2006) of 16 May 2006, 1665 (2006) of 29 March 2006, 1663 (2006) of 24 March 2006, 1593 (2005) of 31 March 2005, 1591 (2005) of 29 March 2005, 1590 (2005) of 24 March 2005, 1574 (2004) of 19 November 2004, 1564 (2004) of 18 September 2004 and 1556 (2004) of 30 July 2004 and the statements of its President concerning the Sudan,

Recalling also its previous resolutions 1325 (2000) on women, peace and security, 1502 (2003) on the protection of humanitarian and United Nations personnel, 1612 (2005) on children and armed conflict, and 1674 (2006) on the protection of civilians in armed conflict, which reaffirms inter alia the provisions of paragraphs 138 and 139 of the 2005 United Nations World Summit outcome document, as well as the report of its Mission to the Sudan and Chad from 4th to 10th June 2006,

Reaffirming its strong commitment to the sovereignty, unity, independence, and territorial integrity of the Sudan, which would be unaffected by transition to a United Nations operation in Darfur, and to the cause of peace, expressing its determination to work with the Government of National Unity, in full respect of its sovereignty, to assist in tackling the various problems confronting the Sudan and that a United Nations operation in Darfur shall have, to the extent possible, a strong African participation and character,

Welcoming the efforts of the African Union to find a solution to the crisis in Darfur, including through the success of the African Union-led Inter-Sudanese Peace Talks on the Conflict in Darfur in Abuja, Nigeria, in particular the framework agreed between the parties for a resolution of the conflict in Darfur (the Darfur Peace Agreement), commending the efforts of the signatories to the Darfur Peace Agreement, expressing its belief that the Agreement provides a basis for sustained security in Darfur, reiterating its welcome of the statement of 9 May 2006 by the representative of the Sudan at the United Nations Security Council Special Session on Darfur of the Government of National Unity’s full commitment to implementing the Agreement, stressing the importance of launching, with the African Union, the Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and Consultation as soon as possible, and recognising that international support for implementation of the Agreement is critically important to its success,

Commending the efforts of the African Union for the successful deployment of the African Union Mission in the Sudan (AMIS), as well as the efforts of Member States and regional and international organisations that have assisted it in its deployment, and AMIS’ role in reducing large-scale organised violence in Darfur, recalling the decision of the African Union Peace and Security Council of 10 March 2006, and its decision of 27 June 2006 as outlined in paragraph 10 of its Communiqué that the African Union is ready to review the mandate of AMIS in the event that the ongoing consultations between the Government of National Unity and the United Nations conclude on an agreement for a transition to a United Nations peacekeeping operation, stressing the need for AMIS to assist implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement until transition to the United Nations force in Darfur is completed, welcoming the decision of the African Union Peace and Security Council of 27 June 2006 on strengthening AMIS’ mandate and tasks, including on the protection of civilians, and considering that AMIS needs urgent reinforcing,

Reaffirming its concern that the ongoing violence in Darfur might further negatively affect the rest of the Sudan as well as the region, in particular Chad and the Central African Republic, and stressing that regional security aspects must be addressed to achieve long lasting peace in Darfur,

Remaining deeply concerned over the recent deterioration of relations between the Sudan and Chad, calling on the governments of the two countries to abide by their obligations under the Tripoli Agreement of 8 February 2006 and the agreement between the Sudan and Chad signed in N’djamena on 26 July 2006 and to begin implementing the confidence building measures which they have voluntarily agreed upon, welcoming the recent re-establishment of diplomatic relations between the Sudan and Chad, and calling upon all States in the region to co-operate in ensuring regional stability,

Re-iterating its strong condemnation of all violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in Darfur, and calling upon the Government of National Unity to take urgent action to tackle gender based violence in Darfur including action towards implementing its Action Plan to Combat Violence Against Women in Darfur with particular focus on the rescission of Form 8 and access to legal redress,

Expressing its deep concern for the security of humanitarian aid workers and their access to populations in need, including refugees, internally displaced persons and other war-affected populations, and calling upon all parties, in particular the Government of National Unity, to ensure, in accordance with relevant provisions of international law, the full, safe and unhindered access of relief personnel to all those in need in Darfur as well as the delivery of humanitarian assistance, in particular to internally displaced persons and refugees;

Taking note of the communiqués of 12 January, 10 March, 15 May and 27 June 2006 of the Peace and Security Council of the African Union regarding transition of AMIS to a United Nations operation,

Taking note of the report of the Secretary-General on Darfur dated 28 July 2006 (S/2006/591),

Determining that the situation in the Sudan continues to constitute a threat to international peace and security,

Decides, without prejudice to its existing mandate and operations as provided for in Resolution 1590 (2005) and in order to support the early and effective implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement, that UNMIS’ mandate shall be expanded as specified in paragraphs 8, 9 and 12 below, that it shall deploy to Darfur, and therefore invites the consent of the Government of National Unity for this deployment, and urges member states to provide the capability for an expeditious deployment;

Requests the Secretary-General to arrange the rapid deployment of additional capabilities for UNMIS, in order that it may deploy in Darfur, in accordance with the recommendation contained in his report dated 28 July 2006;

Decides that UNMIS shall be strengthened by up to 17,300 military personnel and by an appropriate civilian component including up to 3,300 civilian police personnel and up to 16 Formed Police Units, and expresses its determination to keep UNMIS’ strength and structure under regular review, taking into account the evolution of the situation on the ground and without prejudice to its current operations and mandate as provided for in Resolution 1590 (2005);

Expresses its intention to consider authorising possible additional temporary reinforcements of the military component of UNMIS, at the request of the Secretary General, within the limits of the troop levels recommended in paragraph 87 of his report dated 28 July 2006;

Requests the Secretary-General to consult jointly with the African Union, in close and continuing consultation with the parties to the Darfur Peace Agreement, including the Government of National Unity, on a plan and timetable for transition from AMIS to a United Nations operation in Darfur; decides that those elements outlined in paragraphs 40 to 58 of the Secretary General's report of 28 July 2006 shall begin to be deployed no later than 1 October 2006, that thereafter as part of the process of transition to a United Nations operation additional capabilities shall be deployed as soon as feasible and that UNMIS shall take over from AMIS responsibility for supporting the implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement upon the expiration of AMIS’ mandate but in any event no later than 31 December 2006;

Notes that the Status of Forces Agreement for UNMIS with the Sudan, as outlined in Resolution 1590 (2005), shall apply to UNMIS’ operations throughout the Sudan, including in Darfur.

Requests the Secretary-General to take the necessary steps to strengthen AMIS through the use of existing and additional United Nations resources with a view to transition to a United Nations operation in Darfur; and authorizes the Secretary-General during this transition to implement the longer-term support to AMIS outlined in the report of the Secretary-General of 28 July 2006, including provision of air assets, ground mobility package, training, engineering and logistics, mobile communications capacity and broad public information assistance;

Decides that the mandate of UNMIS in Darfur shall be to support implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement of 5 May 2006 and the N’djamena Agreement on Humanitarian Cease-fire on the Conflict in Darfur ("the Agreements"), including by performing the following tasks:

To monitor and verify the implementation by the parties of Chapter 3 (“Comprehensive Cease-fire and Final Security Arrangements”) of the Darfur Peace Agreement and the N’djamena Agreement on Humanitarian Cease-fire on the Conflict in Darfur;

To observe and monitor movement of armed groups and redeployment of forces in areas of UNMIS deployment by ground and aerial means in accordance with the Agreements;

To investigate violations of the Agreements and to report violations to the Cease-fire Commission; as well as to co-operate and co-ordinate, together with other International Actors, with the Cease-fire Commission, the Joint Commission, and the Joint Humanitarian Facilitation and Monitoring Unit established pursuant to the Agreements including through provision of technical assistance and logistical support;

To maintain, in particular, a presence in key areas, such as buffer zones established pursuant to the Darfur Peace Agreement, areas inside internally displaced persons camps and demilitarised zones around and inside internally displaced persons camps, in order to promote the re-establishment of confidence, to discourage violence, in particular by deterring use of force;

To monitor trans-border activities of armed groups along the Sudanese borders with Chad and the Central African Republic in particular through regular ground and aerial reconnaissance activities;

To assist with development and implementation of a comprehensive and sustainable programme for disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration of former combatants and women and children associated with combatants, as called for in the Darfur Peace Agreement and in accordance with Resolutions 1556 (2004) and 1564 (2004);

To assist the parties, in co-operation with other international actors in the preparations for and conduct of referenda provided for in the Darfur Peace Agreement;

To assist the parties to the Agreements in promoting understanding of the peace accord and of the role of UNMIS, including by means of an effective public information campaign, targeted at all sectors of society, in co-ordination with the African Union;

To co-operate closely with the Chairperson of the Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and Consultation (DDDC), provide support and technical assistance to him, and co-ordinate other United Nations agencies’ activities to this effect, as well as to assist the parties to the DDDC in addressing the need for an all-inclusive approach, including the role of women, towards reconciliation and peace-building;

To assist the parties to the Darfur Peace Agreement, in co-ordination with bilateral and multilateral assistance programmes, in restructuring the police service in the Sudan, consistent with democratic policing, to develop a police training and evaluation programme, and to otherwise assist in the training of civilian police;

To assist the parties to the Darfur Peace Agreement in promoting the rule of law, including an independent judiciary, and the protection of human rights of all people of the Sudan through a comprehensive and co-ordinated strategy with the aim of combating impunity and contributing to long-term peace and stability and to assist the parties to the Darfur Peace Agreement to develop and consolidate the national legal framework;

To ensure an adequate human rights and gender presence, capacity and expertise within UNMIS to carry out human rights promotion, civilian protection and monitoring activities that include particular attention to the needs of women and children.

Decides further that the mandate of UNMIS in Darfur shall also include the following:

To facilitate and co-ordinate in close co-operation with relevant United Nations agencies, within its capabilities and in its areas of deployment, the voluntary return of refugees and internally displaced persons, and humanitarian assistance inter alia by helping to establish the necessary security conditions in Darfur;

To contribute towards international efforts to protect, promote and monitor human rights in Darfur, as well as to co-ordinate international efforts towards the protection of civilians with particular attention to vulnerable groups including internally displaced persons, returning refugees, and women and children;

To assist the parties to the Agreements, in co-operation with other international partners in the mine action sector, by providing humanitarian de-mining assistance, technical advice, and co-ordination, as well as mine awareness programmes targeted at all sectors of society;

To assist in addressing regional security issues in close liaison with international efforts to improve the security situation in the neighbouring regions along the borders between the Sudan and Chad and between the Sudan and the Central African Republic, including through the establishment of a multi-dimensional presence consisting of political, humanitarian, military and civilian police liaison officers in key locations in Chad, including in internally displaced persons and refugee camps, and if necessary, in the Central African Republic, and to contribute to the implementation of the Agreement between the Sudan and Chad signed on 26 July 2006.

Calls upon all Member States to ensure the free, unhindered and expeditious movement to the Sudan of all personnel, as well as equipment, provisions, supplies and other goods, including vehicles and spare parts, which are for the exclusive and official use of UNMIS in Darfur;

Requests the Secretary-General to keep the Council regularly informed of the progress in implementing the Darfur Peace Agreement, respect for the cease-fire, and the implementation of the mandate of UNMIS in Darfur, and to report to the Council, as appropriate, on the steps taken to implement this resolution and any failure to comply with its demands;

Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

decides that UNMIS is authorised to use all necessary means, in the areas of deployment of its forces and as it deems within its capabilities:

to protect United Nations personnel, facilities, installations and equipment, to ensure the security and freedom of movement of United Nations personnel, humanitarian workers, assessment and evaluation commission personnel, to prevent disruption of the implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement by armed groups, without prejudice to the responsibility of the Government of the Sudan, to protect civilians under threat of physical violence,
in order to support early and effective implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement, to prevent attacks and threats against civilians,
to seize or collect, as appropriate, arms or related material whose presence in Darfur is in violation of the Agreements and the measures imposed by paragraphs 7 and 8 of Resolution 1556, and to dispose of such arms and related material as appropriate;

Requests that the Secretary-General and the Governments of Chad and the Central African Republic conclude status-of-forces agreements as soon as possible, taking into consideration General Assembly resolution 58/82 on the scope of legal protection under the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associate Personnel, and decides that pending the conclusion of such an agreement with either country, the model status-of-forces agreement dated 9 October 1990 (A/45/594) shall apply provisionally with respect to UNMIS forces operating in that country;

Requests the Secretary General to report to the Council on the protection of civilians in refugee and internally displaced persons camps in Chad and on how to improve the security situation on the Chadian side of the border with Sudan;

Calls upon the parties to the Darfur Peace Agreement to respect their commitments and implement the agreement without delay, urges those parties that have not signed the Agreement to do so without delay and not to act in any way that would impede implementation of the Agreement, and reiterates its intention to take, including in response to a request by the African Union, strong and effective measures, such as an asset freeze or travel ban, against any individual or group that violates or attempts to block the implementation of the Agreement or commits human rights violations;

Decides to remain seized of the matter.

Comments

[Kamakazi]

Atlas,

I am a little drunk but I read this whole post and I can only believe this is a parody? That cannot be the text from the U.N. I am no fan of the U.N. but that resolution goes even beyond perody. If that is the stuff that Bolton must deal with we should demolish the U.N. building using the same techniques we used to topple the world trade centers to make it look like radical Jihadis actually did it. Or, I could be drunker than I thought and am simply not recognising how obvious this parody is to sober fellas.

Cheers,

Jody Green