"America is Now Disappearing From the Hearts Within America Itself... Whereas Islam is Growing Even Within America"

Congratulate the left, they are doing a fine job of burying this great nation.

"America is Now Disappearing From the Hearts Within America Itself... Whereas Islam is Growing Even Within America"; "Whoever is Familiar With the Sunna and Hadith Knows That a Battle Against the Enemies of Allah Awaits on the Horizon, in Which the Muslims Will Be Victorious"  Saudi Cleric Nasser bin Suleiman Al-'Omar:More here

View MEMRI Clip here

On April 19, 2006, Saudi Islamist cleric Sheikh Dr. Nasser Al-'Omar appeared on Al-Jazeera delivering a lecture on jihad. In it, he said, "The Islamic nation now faces a great phase of jihad," and added "There are places where jihad is proper - Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq, Chechnya, Kashmir, and the Philippines." He also told his audience that the U.S. was "disappearing" - echoing his statement on Al-Majd TV on June 13, 2004 that "America is collapsing," and that Muslims "must be patient." 

In November 2004, Dr. Al-'Omar made headlines as one of the 26 signatories of a fatwa supporting the Iraqi resistance. On December 17, 2004, he explained, in an interview for the PBS program Frontline, why he was opposed to eliminating anti-Western and antisemitic teachings from Saudi schoolbooks. (1)

According to a March 13, 2006 Reuters report, Al-'Omar hosted a reception for a Hamas delegation, led by Khaled Mash'al, in Riyadh on March 12, 2006. The report also stated that according to Al-'Omar's website ( www.almoslim.net , hosted in Canada(2)) the reception was also attended by prominent clerics and Islamists - some of whom had served prison terms for their suspected support of Al-Qaeda or for criticizing the Saudi government.(3)

The following is the transcript of excerpts from the lecture by Sheikh Dr. Nasser bin Suleiman Al-'Omar, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on April 19, 2006.

"[A] U.S. Congressman... Said: 'The 21st Century is the Century of Islam, Which Will Offer an Opportunity for Peace in the World'"

Dr. Nasser bin Suleiman Al-'Omar: "Listen to this report, which was submitted by the American intelligence to the American officials, regarding the religion of Islam, which some think is defeated or weak today. According to the report, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. Muslims will soon become one-third of the world's population. Conversion to Islam increased significantly following 9/11.

"In addition, U.S. Congressman John Morlan [sic] said: 'The 21st century is the century of Islam, which will offer an opportunity for peace in the world.' There is no doubt that it is Islam that will bring peace, and not the U.N., America, Russia, or anyone else."

[...]

Comments

[Laptop_Ron]

Okay, this isn't exactly on topic, but considering the threats we are under as a nation... I miss Ronald Reagan!
Yes, I like, and voted for, President Bush, but he just isn't the "rally the troops" kind of guy. He's done a good job in a bad time, but doesn't have the charisma to get the blood moving. Yes, you could say that I shouldn't need that, but I would like the feeling that Reagan produced in so many people. The man oozed patriotism and it was infectious. The infectious part is important.

I was in the service when Reagan was president, and I remember how he amplified the pride I felt at being there and being an American.

I miss Ronnie!!!

There, I'm done.

[Thomas Carney]

Islam's conditions of peace:

1. All dhimmis i.e., protected peoples pay the jizya, the poll tax.

2. We can steal your women and forcibly marry them to Muslims.

3. You will not maintain your churches or synagogues. We Muslims will choose your religious leaders for you.

[NOTE: To this very day, the Synod of Bishops of Constantinople DO NOT have the final say in who becomes Patriarch of Constantinople (the highest bishop of honor in the Orthodox Church)... no, fifteen (yes, 15) names are sent to Ankara and the Turkish government chooses the patriarch.

To this very day, the governments of Jordan, Israel and the Palestinian Authority confirm the Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem.

To this very day, no bishop can ascend his throne in a Muslim country unless confirmed by the government.]

4. We will use you non-Muslim protected peoples for cheap labor, for chattel, for cannon fodder.

5. We will rape your young women and you cannot convict a Muslim man of rape unless there are FOUR MUSLIM MALE WITNESSES.

[THIS IS A COMMON OCCURENCE IN PAKISTAN, SAUDI ARABIA, AND OTHER MUSLIM COUNTRIES.]

Islam defines peace as "we control you, forcibly humiliate you and keep you down, because we want full control of non-Muslims in our midst."

[Thomas Carney]

Laptop_Ron: I miss President Reagan too. He was a fellow midwesterner who grew up 12 miles from my home town in Illinois, and he DID NOT let himself get converted to Californiaism. He kept his values.

I'll never forget him.

[Thomas Carney]

Laptop_Ron: I miss President Reagan too. He was a fellow midwesterner who grew up 12 miles from my home town in Illinois, and he DID NOT let himself get converted to Californiaism. He kept his values.

I'll never forget him.

[wabbit]

From an article by Ben MacIntyre in the London Times on how Churchill would have answered the Islamist threat:

In a passage that presages his staunch resistance to Nazism 40 years later, he[Churchill] wrote: “I hope that if evil days should come upon our own country, and the last army which a collapsing Empire could interpose between London and the invader were dissolving in rout and ruin, that there would be some . . . who would not care to accustom themselves to a new order of things and tamely survive the disaster.”

For in the end, Churchill saw the Sudan campaign as a conflict between barbarity and civilisation. Of the battle of Omdurman he wrote: “Civilisation — elsewhere sympathetic, merciful, tolerant, ready to discuss or argue, eager to avoid violence, to submit to law, to effect compromise — here advanced with an expression of inexorable sternness.”

That, undoubtedly, would have been Churchill’s response to the suicide bombings in London: these are not disasters to be “tamely survived” but an immoral assault on civilised values, to be fought with “inexorable sternness”.

[wabbit]

From an article by Ben MacIntyre in the London Times on how Churchill would have answered the Islamist threat:

In a passage that presages his staunch resistance to Nazism 40 years later, he[Churchill] wrote: “I hope that if evil days should come upon our own country, and the last army which a collapsing Empire could interpose between London and the invader were dissolving in rout and ruin, that there would be some . . . who would not care to accustom themselves to a new order of things and tamely survive the disaster.”

For in the end, Churchill saw the Sudan campaign as a conflict between barbarity and civilisation. Of the battle of Omdurman he wrote: “Civilisation — elsewhere sympathetic, merciful, tolerant, ready to discuss or argue, eager to avoid violence, to submit to law, to effect compromise — here advanced with an expression of inexorable sternness.”

That, undoubtedly, would have been Churchill’s response to the suicide bombings in London: these are not disasters to be “tamely survived” but an immoral assault on civilised values, to be fought with “inexorable sternness”.