More Good Can Come from the Dubai Port Deal: END ISRAEL BOYCOTT, DEAL BREAKER

I stand behind my original call of the Post deal with Dubai here and here and here.
It is not a security detail, good economic deals make good friends and the more Arab friends we have in the war on terror the better.
Vital Perspective points out that Dubai Ports World Participates in Arab Boycott of Israel

Dubai Ports World, the company involved in the UAE port deal, participates in the Arab boycott against Israel.

"Yes, of course the boycott is still in place and is still enforced," Muhammad Rashid a-Din, a staff member of the Dubai Customs Department's Office for the Boycott of Israel, told the The Jerusalem Post in a telephone interview. U.S. law bars firms from complying with such requests or cooperating with attempts by Arab governments to boycott Israel. The U.S. Department of Commerce lists the UAE anti-Israel boycott requirement as a "prohibited boycott condition in an invitation to bid" under examples of boycott requests from the UAE that has been reported to the Office of Antiboycott Compliance. The "prohibited boycott condition" reads:

"Documents to accompany tenders [include] the declaration and Israel boycott certificate. It states the tenderer must accompany his offer with the following, written signed declaration. "We declare that we are a company which is not owned by any companies that have violated the approved rules of the boycott and that we do not own or participate in companies that are in violation of the approved rules of the boycott. Further, we do not have, nor does any of the companies that are considered to be a parent company or a branch of ours, any dealings with any Israeli party, whether directly or indirectly." Furthermore, a certificate issued by the Israel boycott office in UAE confirming that neither the supplier nor the manufacturer are blacklisted, should also be accompanied."

In one instance, according to a Department of Commerce press release, a New York-based exporter paid a $13,500 fine for violating the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The antiboycott provisions of the EAR prohibit U.S. persons from complying with certain requirements of unsanctioned foreign boycotts, including furnishing information about business relationships with or in Israel. In addition, the EAR requires that U.S. persons report their receipt of certain boycott requests to the Department of Commerce.

Importers to the UAE, however, need to comply with the terms of the boycott. In the Frequently Asked Questions area of the Jebel Ali Free Zone Area website, six documents are listed that are required in order to clear an item through the Dubai Customs Department. One of them, called a Certificate of Origin, " is used by customs to confirm the country of origin and needs to be seen by the office which ensures any trade boycotts are enforced ."

Clearly their boycott of Israel would have to end. That's a deal breaker. No fines, no violations, no bullshit. NO BOYCOTT. And that would be a good thing. Changing the way they do business would be a good thing. And yes, we would have to enforce it.

Israel is a great nation. This decades long boycott must be broken. This is how we do it.

UPDATE:But now Little Green Footballs  has even more info to suggest that DP is not de facto much of a boycotter  --hat tip Kahn;

Here’s a report at Globes Online that appears to contradict the Jerusalem Post story we noted earlier today: Dubai Ports World uses Zim connection in US deal.

Dubai Ports World, the company involved in the UAE port deal, participates in the Arab boycott against Israel.

"Yes, of course the boycott is still in place and is still enforced," Muhammad Rashid a-Din, a staff member of the Dubai Customs Department's Office for the Boycott of Israel, told the The Jerusalem Post in a telephone interview. U.S. law bars firms from complying with such requests or cooperating with attempts by Arab governments to boycott Israel. The U.S. Department of Commerce lists the UAE anti-Israel boycott requirement as a "prohibited boycott condition in an invitation to bid" under examples of boycott requests from the UAE that has been reported to the Office of Antiboycott Compliance. The "prohibited boycott condition" reads:

"Documents to accompany tenders [include] the declaration and Israel boycott certificate. It states the tenderer must accompany his offer with the following, written signed declaration. "We declare that we are a company which is not owned by any companies that have violated the approved rules of the boycott and that we do not own or participate in companies that are in violation of the approved rules of the boycott. Further, we do not have, nor does any of the companies that are considered to be a parent company or a branch of ours, any dealings with any Israeli party, whether directly or indirectly." Furthermore, a certificate issued by the Israel boycott office in UAE confirming that neither the supplier nor the manufacturer are blacklisted, should also be accompanied."

In one instance, according to a Department of Commerce press release, a New York-based exporter paid a $13,500 fine for violating the antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The antiboycott provisions of the EAR prohibit U.S. persons from complying with certain requirements of unsanctioned foreign boycotts, including furnishing information about business relationships with or in Israel. In addition, the EAR requires that U.S. persons report their receipt of certain boycott requests to the Department of Commerce.

Importers to the UAE, however, need to comply with the terms of the boycott. In the Frequently Asked Questions area of the Jebel Ali Free Zone Area website, six documents are listed that are required in order to clear an item through the Dubai Customs Department. One of them, called a Certificate of Origin, " is used by customs to confirm the country of origin and needs to be seen by the office which ensures any trade boycotts are enforced ."

Clearly their boycott of Israel would have to end. That's a deal breaker. No fines, no violations, no bullshit. NO BOYCOTT. And that would be a good thing. Changing the way they do business would be a good thing. And yes, we would have to enforce it.

Israel is a great nation. This decades long boycott must be broken. This is how we do it.

UPDATE:But now Little Green Footballs  has even more info to suggest that DP is not de facto much of a boycotter  --hat tip Kahn;

Here’s a report at Globes Online that appears to contradict the Jerusalem Post story we noted earlier today: Dubai Ports World uses Zim connection in US deal.

Comments

[penxv]

I agree that the deal might be smart business seeing as it probably doesn't take an intellectual juggernaut to sneak shit past the union workers anyway.

But the only legitimate charge for the United States Government is to defend her citizens. That's it.

It just doesn't make any sense from the outside looking in. I'm sure an American Union worker can get bribed just as easily as a worker from the U.A.E. but the U.S. Government usually likes to pretend that they control everything that goes on.

Power percieved is power achieved.

[wyguy]

Amen to that, it's either no boycott or no deal!

[Iceman]

Thank you for bringing this to a large audience. When I have mentioned to people that UAE participates in a boycott of Israel and support the view that Israel needs to be eliminated they are surprised. A complete deal breaker. No ifs, ands, or buts...

[Laura]

Obviously shilling for bush takes precedence above even support for Israel for you and LGF. Disgusting! And you have the nerve to call Dems fifth columnists while you defend this adminisration's treasonous actions. For bush, business and free trade trump national security.

[Laura]

I don't care what Globes online claims, in the JPost article the company itself admits it's involved in the boycott.