Danish Cartoons set Radical Islamic World on Fire

11:55 AM BREAKING STORY: ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST SHOT DURING RIOTING! CHURCHES BURNING ACROSS THE MIDDLE EAST. RIOTING RAMPAGING.

HAMAS SAYS "ANYONE THAT PUBLISHES THE CARTOONS SHOULD BE KILLED"

IN IRAQ; :"KILL DANES AND CUT THEM UP INTO PIECES"

"The publication of cartoons that incite religious or ethnic hatreds is unacceptable."

--U.S. Department of State (I am deeply ashamed of the State Department)

The DoS  ought to take lessons from Queen Margrethe II of Denmark, “We must show our opposition to Islam.”

Global look at the Muslim Call to war;

SOGGY DANISH BACKDOWN (click on illustration to enlarge)
Jyllands-Posten apologized last month for the insult to many Muslims but said yesterday it "would not apologize to the powers who have abused the whole situation to further their own agendas." 

And what exactly is "their own agendas" - world domination. Remember this always
More here on how Great Wars begnin.

More hypocrisy here. The Beautiful one speaks eloquently on the not so eloquent here .. The Eurabian take on Syrian rampage here.

While here in America the spineless dickless dhimmis at CNN refuse to run the cartoons, Mary does a vivisection here. But CUANAS on the battle of the sacred joke here, read it

but these cartoons are fine and run daily in all Arabic papers *SPIT*

l

More here . Please bear in mind that these Danish  cartoons that sparked this worldwide violence  ran back in September which is when I first reported on them. Why the outrage and insanity now? Isn't it reminiscent of events leading up to the outbreak of World War I? More here

Go over to CUANAS here for the Islam's war on women. Pastorius has written a sagacious essay here. I have long believed this war of civilizations is really about women. It's always been about women. Women as chattel,property vs women as individuals, full members of society, equal under the law.

And where is the left - the freedom of speech, freedom of anything goes, the feminaziparty on this? Tigerhawk investigates here  and unveils the hypocrites for what they are. I understand the silence of the left for what it really is, lover of all things and all people that hate America.

Bah dah bing ,Bah dah boom

But this is ok? The Cover of the Rolling Stone, Kanye West

Comments

[TheNewNormal]

"These cartoons are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims," State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said.

"We all fully recognise and respect freedom of the press and expression, but it must be coupled with press responsibility.

"Inciting religious or ethnic hatreds in this manner is not acceptable."

From: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=85255

[lowandslow]

Bush's largest failure in foreign policy is failure to clean house in the state dept. Any bureacrat with an appeasement (LLL) agenda should have been told to get on board, if they couldn't do that, show them the door.
Bureacrats; spit; the enemy within.

[JasonP]

It's not just the State Department but also our cowardly Dhimmi-whipped press. How many have printed the cartoons? The New York Sun printed one--but they are the exception! How can you have a story about a picture and (if it is not X-rate) fail to printed the picture?

I've been arguing that the press is worse than cowardly ... here.

Of course, that’s why we need the blogosphere … and Pamela … way to go!

[MarcH]

Lowandslow is (once again) right on target.
It would be interesting to read a history book from fifty years in the future (assuming that writing such a thing as history will be permitted) on the topic of the inside story of the response by DoS to 9-11. Such a work might try to determine how it was that DoS,
1. tried to maintain the Saudi Visa Express program;
2. succeded in geting the US to back the "Road Map toPeace" in 12/2002 after President Bush had endorsed a much tougher position on the Palestinian terrorists in 06/2002;
3. delayed the invasion of Iraq due to numerous futile international consultations;
4. opposed, in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, the attempt to create a "free-Iraqi" opposition (see Michael Rubin);
5. hamstrung US forces in Iraq (see first Fallujah);
6. arranged for President Bush to have the hand-holding photo-op with that two-faced, fat and oily terrorist supporter, Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah;
7. pressured Israel to make lethal compromises to her security in Gaza and the West Bank;
8. effectively turned a blind eye to Iranian and Saudi support of the terrorist insurgents in Iraq;
9. Allowed the Iranians years to advance their WMD programs; and,
10. And, worst of all, constantly watered-down and covered up accurate descriptions of the belief system of our enemy (latest from SoSo Rice: 'Palestinians have "long been known for their tolerance."').

The strength to refute the advocates of points #1-9 would come from a clear understanding of the nature of the enemy (point #10). It is tragic that it is only parts of the blogosphere, some talk radio, and a minority of MSM (NY Sun, Philadelphia Evening Bulletin, WSJ, Washington Times, etc.) that fight the good fight on point #10 while the DoS and MSM are AWOL.

[MarcH]

In point #10 above I mistakenly referred to Secretary of State (SoS) Rice, as SoSo Rice.

That was a mistake, not a "cute" insult.

#10 should read,
10. And, worst of all, constantly watered-down and covered up descriptions of the belief system of our enemy (latest from SoS Rice: 'Palestinians have "long been known for their tolerance."').

[MarcH]

Somewhat OT, but a very important developmen that I missed while paying attention to cartoonifada, from DEBKA via ISRAPUNDIT (http://www.israpundit.com/archives/2006/02/israels_nuclear.php#more):

'While Washington and the European Union are congratulating themselves on getting 27 of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s 35 members to refer the Iranian nuclear program to the UN Security Council, there is a very serious implication for Israel that is being virtually ignored by the international media. The diplomatic achievement was achieved at a price, one that was paid for by the collapse of a fundamental Israeli policy platform just two weeks after the interim Olmert government was rocked back by the Islamic Hamas terror group’s attainment of enough parliamentary seats to form the next Palestinian government.

Saturday, Feb. 4, Jerusalem stood back and watched the United States buckle under European pressure and accept Egypt’s demand to incorporate the following phrase in the resolution on Iran: The resolution recognized

“that a solution to the Iranian issue would contribute to global nonproliferation efforts and - the objective of a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction, including their means of delivery.”
What is this really saying?

Linking Iran’s violations of its commitments under international treaty and Israeli nuclear deterrent has long been demanded by the Arab states and opposed by Washington. Its acceptance now opens the way for the integration of the same linkage in the Security Council debate on Iran. It provides a pretext for a whole new set of maneuvers and dilatory tactics by Tehran.'

Removal of of the threat of Israel's potential nuclear deterent would have a profoundly de-stabilizing efect on the entire region, as Arab/Muslim states would feel free to wage a conventional war to destroy Israel without having to face an existential threat. of course it is also likely that, under such an arrangement, Israel would eliminate any nuclear weapons it has while the Arab/Muslim states would retain hidden nuclear waepons.

[Thomas Carney]

I am totally stunned at our government's GUTLESS response to this. Laura Ingraham put it right: "This is what you get in a FREE SOCIETY."

We now have proof that Secretary of State Rice has gone native. The Bush Administration is now kowtowing to Muslims, which I find disgusting when it should be that if Bush and crew were TRUE Republicans, they would be standing up for free speech....

Reagan must be turning over in his grave now.

OK, some people are offended by these cartoons. Well, when non-Christians put up cartoons insulting Jesus Christ or some other holy person in Christianity, Christians do speak out, but Christians don't go rioting or burning buildings.