How frightening is this plan by the corrupt looting swine over at the United Nations to steal our land? Why don't they expend the little collectivist brain power they have saving a few Haitians, or Ivory Coast victims, or feed a few of the dying in Darfur.
This is another ploy of the UN to steal what is ours to feed their corrupt, depraved, socialist, souless guts. Work? Them? Ha! They use the "environment" to cloak their sins, please read Michael Crichton's speech on the fallacy of the environmentalist argument.
It wasnt long ago the pigs at the UN were trying to hit us with that international tax, remember?
But this? This is an abomination.
United Nations agenda a threat to property owner's rights
The Ashland Daily Press Wed, 01 Jun 2005 8:21 AM PDT
Agenda 21 is the United Nations blueprint for global transformation. Casually perused, it seems innocuous enough, on its surface. After all, what could possibly be wrong with preserving natural resources for the next generation?
The UN currently administers five hundred treaties and protocols that directly influence the environmental and industrial policies of thousands of federal, state and local governments. This global contract binds governments around the world to the UN plan for changing the ways we live, eat, learn, and communicate — all under the noble banner of saving the earth.
"Land.. .cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and
subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land
ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of
wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may
become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development
schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and health conditions for the people
can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole.
Public control of land use is therefore indispensable..."
Throughout this UN document, a socialistic model for the elimination of private property rights, policies are proscribed which form the nexus for future United Nations encroachment on personal freedom. The publication of an eleven hundred-page document titled 1995 UN Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA) spelled out this idea. The GBA calls for property owners to "cede rights to decision-making regulatory authority because resources are non-exclusively theirs (the property owners) to use. Property Rights must be allocated to the environmental public good". If you're a socialist, I guess it's hard to quibble with such good stewardship of Planet Earth.
This socialistic philosophy is in direct contradiction with the very intent of the U.S. Constitution, which the Founding Fathers designed to protect private property rights from external control. The most dangerous and unpublicized intent of this treaty is its commitment to place 30-50 percent (you didn't misread that) of the United States into "wilderness preserves" and "interconnecting corridors" in order to protect the "ecosystems and biodiversity" of our lands. Its regulations would severely limit water use, electricity transmission and commercial transportation. It even purports to deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas. Here is an example of how UN meddling can abrogate U.S. citizen's property rights by influencing our governmental bodies.
Ellsworth Toohey Lives!
Now, do yourself a favor and read all of the information available on Agenda 21.
Michael Coffman Agenda 21 is a great Internet site. As an American citizen
and/or property owner, you may be in for an unpleasant surprise.